Driving liberals, dhimmis and illegal alien apologists absolutely insane since 2005...

New Solutions For Transportation

By Greg L | 26 September 2006 | Prince William County, 50th HOD District | 4 Comments

The Manassas Journal-Messenger reports today on the success local members of the House of Delegates are having in moving some transportation initiatives through the General Assembly. Instead of looking for new and improved ways to extract ever-increasing quantities of taxpayer dollars from the citizenry, they’re working to improve the way Virginia allocates funding and plans for projects. These delegates certainly heard the voters loud and clear when they overwhelmingly rejected tax increases in the past, and are instead working for better fiscal responsibility and accountability.

Delegate Scott Lingamfelter has moved his bill which will require that VDOT funds be prioritized to favor projects which relieve congestion and improve safety will move to the floor on Wednesday. This novel concept, that you spend money where it’s needed rather than where it’s not is a critical part of reforming the way transportation dollars are allocated and would make a huge difference to Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads. Hopefully the overwhelming sensibility of this proposal will ensure it’s passage and demonstrate to tax raising naysayers stuck on gloom-and-doom such as Democratic candidate Jeanette Rishell that solutions like this can be passed, and will measurably help relieve traffic congestion. It’s worth noting that Jackson Miller, her Republican opponent is strongly in favor of reforming VDOT’s spending priorities and is very supportive of this initiative. Passage of this measure would help prove that the solutions favored by Republican members of , and candidates for the House of Delegates are workable, achievable and will help improve gridlock in Northern Virginia.

Delegate Jeffrey Frederick’s proposal to allow more local control over road projects is temporarily stalled in the counties, cities and towns committee. This bill would allow impact fees charged to developers to be used in road construction on state projects, not only allowing for local decisionmaking by the folks who have to live with these projects, but increasing the amount of money available to fund them. Local decisionmaking usually produces superior results, although developer interests may not be very fond of this proposal since it moves the decisionmaking process from Richmond, where the lobbyists are, to the localities, where the citizens are. It’s a solid proposal, and with the strong support of Speaker Howell, it should make it out of committee.

Perhaps most interesting is Delegate Robert Marshall’s demand that the legislature provide some oversight regarding a scheme to transfer the Dulles Toll Road from VDOT to the Metropolitan Washington Airport Authority. This should be a no-brainer, particularly given MWAA’s history of believing it is an organization not accountable to the citizens which has the power to impose laws and regulations without consent by the Virginia legislature, such as restrictions on the posession of firearms in non-sterile areas of the Dulles airport such as the commuter parking lots, sections of Route 28, and the drop-off and pick-up areas. This unaccountable organization may perhaps do a good job of executing a transportation project (Dulles Airport is really easy to travel from, right?), but it will certainly want to impose it’s own rules for what is legal and not legal on MWAA controlled property regardless of the provisions of Virginia law. Delegate Marshall’s proposal ensures that any decision to transfer this property is reviewed by the legislature, which is the very minimum of oversight which citizens should be demanding of the state.

The complete set of solutions offered by Democrats, such as Jeanette Rishell is “raise taxes” and “create a dedicated funding source”. There’s a clear difference in approach here that voters should carefully consider, as the Prince William County delegation moves forward with strong proposals to make better use of the taxpayer dollars while the Democrats complain that we will be unable to improve our infrastructure and reduce gridlock unless we raise taxes once again.

Delegates Lingamfelter, Frederick, and Marhsall are to be commended.

UPDATE: Jeanette Rishell posted today her latest revision of her transportation policy, which includes (surprise) reform of VDOT spending priorities.  If we can keep this up, jeanette Rishell is going to eventually morph into a conservative Republican.



The opinions expressed here are solely the views of the author, and not representative of the position of any organization, political party, doughnut shop, knitting guild, or waste recycling facility, but may be correctly attributed to the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy. If anything in the above article has offended you, please click here to receive an immediate apology.

BVBL is not a charity and your support is not tax-deductible.

You can follow the discussion through the Comments feed.

4 Comments

  1. anonymous said on 26 Sep 2006 at 11:55 am:
    Flag comment

    Dulles airport is *NOT* easy to travel from at 4pm on a weekday when your destination is Manassas.

  2. Mik said on 26 Sep 2006 at 12:28 pm:
    Flag comment

    It should be noted that it was Ms. Rishell who first came out in support of reforming VDOT, performance based budgeting, scrapping the base budget in favor of budgeting by priority, and stronger oversight of VDOT first in this campaign. Jackson Miller is late to the party.

  3. Greg L said on 26 Sep 2006 at 12:36 pm:
    Flag comment

    The only specifics I’ve ever heard from her, and seen on her website is “dedicated funding” (tax increase) and that the surplus is insufficient to finance what she wants to do with VDOT. Matt Harrison even started talking about specific tax rate increases which the campaign feels are necessary.

    Of course she can’t oppose needed reform, but to date she hasn’t stated exactly what reform she wants and is talking in generalities. If there’s any substance to her positions, she hasn’t clearly stated what that substance is. Other than spending (likely) billions for dedicated lanes on 95 and 66 for Bus Rapid Transit, that is. She still hasn’t told us what she thinks that will cost the taxpayer.

    And if reform is such a hot topic for Democrats, where are the proposals from the Democratic members of the house for reforming VDOT? Are they proposing anything other than a tax hike?

  4. Manassas insider said on 26 Sep 2006 at 1:00 pm:
    Flag comment

    Haaaa MIk, nice try. Miller made mention of this at his campaign kickoff way back before the republican convention. I was there, I heard it.

    Typical Dem strategy. When your wrong on the issues, just lie.

    Miller has had that position on his website since the site went up. Rishell just put it up today as a new item, in fact you can still go to her issues tab and see what she has had from day 1 on transportation. No mention of VDOT reform.

    Better look quick bvbl readers, as usual her campaign will quickly change her website after reading about thier errors on bvbl. Greg I still love the one you pointed out when they had the non-existing precinct in the 50th. They had to scramble fast to get that one off thier website. What a joke of a campaign.

Comments are closed.


Views: 1669