Driving liberals, dhimmis and illegal alien apologists absolutely insane since 2005...

Pandak Gets Smoked

By Greg L | 28 September 2006 | Prince William County | 1 Comment

Craig Vitter attended last night’s debate of the candidates for PWC BOCS Chairman, and describes in detail how thoroughly awful Pandak’s performance was. I’ve gotten a few emails from other attendees that entirely confirm his account.

When obvious partisans say one side creamed the other at a debate, you can reasonably take such statements with a bit of skepticism. When Craig, who isn’t aligned with either side says this, it’s worth taking note of.

Did Pandak really try to write on an easel during the debate? That’s just goofy. Or bobble-headed.

Yes, it’s a bizarre photoshop, but I didn’t do it.

The opinions expressed here are solely the views of the author, and not representative of the position of any organization, political party, doughnut shop, knitting guild, or waste recycling facility, but may be correctly attributed to the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy. If anything in the above article has offended you, please click here to receive an immediate apology.

BVBL is not a charity and your support is not tax-deductible.

You can follow the discussion through the Comments feed.

1 Comment

  1. charles said on 28 Sep 2006 at 11:57 pm:
    Flag comment

    Greg, I still think you shouldn’t use it. They took it down, why not just use the picture they have of her.

    It’s your site, but my opinion is it detracts from your sound message in this case.

    The Potomac News didn’t take sides on who won the debate, which made me think Corey did well. The answers they provided looked better for Corey then for Sharon.

    And we didn’t learn anything about what Sharon said until after the jump, which is probably unfair to Sharon except I think with the message she had it probably helps her that people won’t flip the page.

    Oh, and Robert Mueller attacked Corey in a letter to the editor a couple of days ago, which should also help Corey a lot. (sorry Robert)

Comments are closed.

Views: 2258