<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Designed For Abuse: Manassas&#8217; Legal Entanglements</title>
	<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/01/25/designed-for-abuse-manassas-legal-entanglements/</link>
	<description>Blog-Fu for Prince William, Manassas and Manassas Park politics.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 08:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/01/25/designed-for-abuse-manassas-legal-entanglements/#comment-6215</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/01/25/designed-for-abuse-manassas-legal-entanglements/#comment-6215</guid>
		<description>Interesting to note, at this moment, there are 43 postings
  under "Zapatistas and the QMCB" - primarily blog
  blathering that "things are terrible and someone should
  do something" and only two postings under "Manassas'
  Legal Entanglements" - a candid look at what happens
  when local government does try to do something.  
  For clarity:
      1) It is the role of the FEDERAL government to
  control our national borders -- they simply aren't doing it
  and it has created a huge problem across America.
  But even worst than Katrina, where they also did 
  precious little, they have a gun with a hair trigger 
  aimed at any group that tries, by default, to do something -
  to  control illegal immigration and/or overcrowding. 
     2) So vent all you want, but there are thousands 
  of local governments around the country - and who 
  has tried to do more than  Manassas and had lasting
  success ? I'm not interested in proposals in every
  Podunk, but what has been enacted and, more
  important has it held up in court?  Google away -
  I haven't found anything - maybe you can - let
  us know. 
    3) And  one more time - ICE top officials have 
 stated again and again the Section 234(g) program
 is for illegal immigrant FELONS - they don't want
 us local folks wasting their time with simple illegals. 
 You don't  like it - I don't like it - but that is the deal. 
  4) I wish Delegate Miller well - maybe, just maybe,
 the state will throw us a life line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to note, at this moment, there are 43 postings<br />
  under &#8220;Zapatistas and the QMCB&#8221; - primarily blog<br />
  blathering that &#8220;things are terrible and someone should<br />
  do something&#8221; and only two postings under &#8220;Manassas&#8217;<br />
  Legal Entanglements&#8221; - a candid look at what happens<br />
  when local government does try to do something.<br />
  For clarity:<br />
      1) It is the role of the FEDERAL government to<br />
  control our national borders &#8212; they simply aren&#8217;t doing it<br />
  and it has created a huge problem across America.<br />
  But even worst than Katrina, where they also did<br />
  precious little, they have a gun with a hair trigger<br />
  aimed at any group that tries, by default, to do something -<br />
  to  control illegal immigration and/or overcrowding.<br />
     2) So vent all you want, but there are thousands<br />
  of local governments around the country - and who<br />
  has tried to do more than  Manassas and had lasting<br />
  success ? I&#8217;m not interested in proposals in every<br />
  Podunk, but what has been enacted and, more<br />
  important has it held up in court?  Google away -<br />
  I haven&#8217;t found anything - maybe you can - let<br />
  us know.<br />
    3) And  one more time - ICE top officials have<br />
 stated again and again the Section 234(g) program<br />
 is for illegal immigrant FELONS - they don&#8217;t want<br />
 us local folks wasting their time with simple illegals.<br />
 You don&#8217;t  like it - I don&#8217;t like it - but that is the deal.<br />
  4) I wish Delegate Miller well - maybe, just maybe,<br />
 the state will throw us a life line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revokin</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/01/25/designed-for-abuse-manassas-legal-entanglements/#comment-6189</link>
		<dc:creator>Revokin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/01/25/designed-for-abuse-manassas-legal-entanglements/#comment-6189</guid>
		<description>You want your blood to boil?  Meander over to HUD's website and see how many "Private Enforcement Grants" they hand out - our tax dollars being handed out like so many M&#38;M's.  The last round was good for $18 Million.  Here's a list of the winners:  http://www.hud.gov/offices/fheo/partners/FHIP/FY2006FHIP.pdf


btw, did HUD EVER submit a final report on Manassas?  Wasn't it supposed to show up within a month or so?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You want your blood to boil?  Meander over to HUD&#8217;s website and see how many &#8220;Private Enforcement Grants&#8221; they hand out - our tax dollars being handed out like so many M&amp;M&#8217;s.  The last round was good for $18 Million.  Here&#8217;s a list of the winners:  <a href="http://www.hud.gov/offices/fheo/partners/FHIP/FY2006FHIP.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.hud.gov/offices/fheo/partners/FHIP/FY2006FHIP.pdf</a></p>
<p>btw, did HUD EVER submit a final report on Manassas?  Wasn&#8217;t it supposed to show up within a month or so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/01/25/designed-for-abuse-manassas-legal-entanglements/#comment-6180</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/01/25/designed-for-abuse-manassas-legal-entanglements/#comment-6180</guid>
		<description>Greg,
         Thank your  for this posting. 
         You have hit the nail on the head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg,<br />
         Thank your  for this posting.<br />
         You have hit the nail on the head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

