Driving liberals, dhimmis and illegal alien apologists absolutely insane since 2005...

Who Exactly Is Deluded? - Part 2

By Greg L | 26 February 2007 | Rack & Roll Scandal | 2 Comments

Last Saturday’s Manassas Journal-Messenger article on the Rack & Roll scandal (see part 1) featured a number of key players in the Colonial Downs referendum dismissing the idea that Dave Ruttenberg’s troubles had anything to do with them or the proposed sattelite wagering facility that was planned in Manassas Park Shopping Center. I always find it amusing when folks say things to a reporter that aren’t consistent with information that I have.

Take for instance Mayor Frank Jones’ statement that he couldn’t possibly have anything to do with this, since he didn’t take office until July, 2004. Frank Jones was in office when the referendum was being pushed, and while in office appears to have been some kind of a business consultant for Colonial Downs at the same time he was telling voters that he was neutral on the referendum. According to Jonathan Slater, son of councilmember Noreen Slater and the local point man for Colonial Downs:

Slater: They never took my mother’s [Noreen Slater] advice, and I don’t think they took the mayor’s advice.

Ruttenberg: What was the mayor’s advice?

Slater: Ah, put more money into the effort. If you want Northern Virginia…

Ruttenberg: How do you know they mayor said that to ‘em?

Slater: I heard him talk to them about, ah, on more than one occasion and you know, talking to Randy [Gilliland], urging them to basically put real effort…

(listen to this clip here, and there’s more here)

Randy Gilliland was at the time working for Colonial Downs and heading up their referendum effort, and was Jonathan Slater’s direct supervisor. Now he’s Vice Mayor of the city of Hampton, Virginia, where he’s been such an upstanding guy that local residents actually filed a recall petition to have him removed from office in 2005.

Apparently Mayor Frank Jones was doing a little more than just advising Colonial Downs on how to get this referendum passed. Jonathan Slater seems to confirm that he was also doing everything he could to ensure that there’s be a lot of available space for the new Colonial Downs facility:

Ruttenberg: I never met Frank Jones, ever. You’d think that me as a business owner he’d come into the pool hall and introduce himself.

Slater: Well, maybe pool was not his thing, really. He’s a family man, I don’t know.

Ruttenberg: Instead he sent…

Slater: …had the time to go over and, you know, say hi to him?

Ruttenberg: No, but he drove circles … don’t you remember being at the pool hall and watching him and the Chief of Police riding around the pool hall every busy night, like twenty times?

Slater: Yeah. I mean…

Ruttenberg: Why didn’t he stop and get out? What was going on there?

Slater: I don’t know. You know, I mean… You know… I don’t know.

Ruttenberg: You don’t even have an idea, or a hint?

Slater: I have a thought. I have my thoughts.

Ruttenberg: What are your thoughts? C’mon man!

Slater: Well, you know. The police chief and the mayor are riding around together, they know each other, you know, they might even like each other.

Ruttenberg: That’s not your thoughts.

Slater: Well, they might, uh…

Ruttenberg: Why were they driving circles around the pool hall every night between June and November?

Slater: (unintelligible) …they might not want the pool hall to exist.

Ruttenberg: Thanks, man, for giving me that much. And why might they not want the pool hall to exist?

Slater: Well, then, if Colonial Downs wins, then Colonial Downs comes in.

Ruttenberg: Thanks, Jonathan.

(Listen to this clip here.)

This is just a little different than what Frank Jones told the Manassas Journal-Messenger when they felt somewhat under the microscope. I don’t know about you, but I think it might be worth it for voters to start demanding some answers here.

Is Dave Ruttenberg deluded, or did Colonial Downs’ referendum point man say to David Ruttenberg that Frank Jones was secretly working on behalf of Colonial Downs while he was in office, and that Frank Jones and the Chief of Police wanted David Ruttenberg out so they could use his leased space for a betting parlor that was significantly more substantial than what was told to the voters? If you believe Jonathan Slater in these recordings, as I do, you might be wondering what else has been going on with Mayor Frank Jones.

I sure am.

UPDATE: Radley Balko has his own take on this series by the MJM here, and it’s well worth a visit.



The opinions expressed here are solely the views of the author, and not representative of the position of any organization, political party, doughnut shop, knitting guild, or waste recycling facility, but may be correctly attributed to the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy. If anything in the above article has offended you, please click here to receive an immediate apology.

BVBL is not a charity and your support is not tax-deductible.

You can follow the discussion through the Comments feed.

2 Comments

  1. disgusted reader said on 27 Feb 2007 at 12:11 am:
    Flag comment

    I thought the paper was for the people…..

    The more and more I read…the more my heart just sinks.
    When the local paper leaves out important facts not to step on peoples toes, goverment officals lie, and cops can run around power playing innocent people….it’s a very sad day for me.

    Where is the justice?

    I don’t know who you people are that read this blog but for god sakes stand up for what is right.

    Don’t just read about it.

  2. n walker said on 28 Feb 2007 at 12:31 pm:
    Flag comment

    I read these 3 articles thinking that the lid was going to be
    blown off of this scandal once and for all. I came away
    disappointed in the way the reporter had been obviously
    muzzled to the point of not making a point at all.

    What was the story researched and written for? It came across
    as just that, a story. No hard core facts, just allegations
    and then denials of all allegations. Every denial from the
    City made the point previously made disappear. And to
    have the word “delusional” in the heading? Please! What
    stranger to this story would think that David Ruttenburg ISN’T
    delusional after reading all the garbled fluff in these articles?

    I’m sorry to say the reporter wrote this in a manner that wouldn’t make anyone want to read anymore about it. It was just a story, not a hard hitting exposure of crime and corruption in a small town.
    I was (half) expecting Alex Grenados to be the next Woodward
    and Bernstein with this one. He has the facts, the proof and
    all that goes with exposing a major wrongdoing. Too bad MJM
    edited this story to death (literally).

Comments are closed.


Views: 2829