He’s not, nor would I anticipate he would be able to use the “military picture” attack against her — but that wasn’t the point, the point was that I would defend her against any false attacks he might use against her.

I brought it up because Greg suggested I might be a paid volunteer for the Gill campaign, and I wanted it to be clear that my responses are not about Gill, but about the false attacks.

I don’t know if Faisal doesn’t meet the requirements for his position as a Navy Reservist. And if he didn’t, it wouldn’t be a violation — if he failed a weigh-in, he would simply be put on a 6-month plan to get back into proper weight. I don’t know if the Navy reserve is running a program like that right now — but it’s something handled in the chain of command, not by bloggers trying to trash a political candidate.

But again, if you think there’s a problem, write a letter to his commander and report him. Last time someone did that, he was cleared of all charges, but you still bring them up anyway.

Jeff Dion: consorts with men.
Faisal Gill: consorts with men who fund suicide bombings and are serving 23-year prison sentences for money-laundering.

Jeff Dion: partnering with VA Partisans, which is seeking full implementation of civil rights for homosexuals.
Faisal Gill: partnering with Asim Ghafoor, who is seeking full implementation of sharia law in the United States.

Jeff Dion: No longer able to fit into society’s expectations of what a man should be.
Faisal Gill: No longer able to fit into his uniform.

So you can see why, for about two-thirds of BVBL readers, Faisal’s relationships are even worse than Jeff’s.

And Charles is the most annoying, horrible, insipid spokesman/defender a candidate could have. No wonder his blog is terrible, and his editorial articles in the MJM noting more than irrelevant fish-wrap. Oh, he’s a grown man and he plays with toy trains. End of Story.

There is aslo some question whether in his current state Gill could even fit into a ship’s bunk. Since Gill chooses to make his reserve naval service the cornerstone of his campaign the rotund former terrorists’ lobbyist’s readiness to serve is relevant.

Saying Faisal Gill is fat is not unfair, by the way. It’s a pretty accurate observation, and is only relevant because he has a duty and obligation to maintain a degree of physical readiness as an officer in the Navy which he is failing to honor. It’s not only relevant and appropriate to look at how he meets his obligations when he’s running for office, but since he’s made being a current Naval officer such a central part of his campaign strategy, his record as an officer is absolutely fair territory. It’s utterly incomprehensible that you can believe that on one hand it’s acceptable for him to wear a naval uniform when he poses for campaign photos in defiance of NAVPERS regulations, but believe his record as a naval officer is somehow off-limits when it doesn’t reflect well on him. Your spin here in Faisal’s behalf is utterly ridiculous. And as for “slander”, it’s not slander if it’s the truth.

Greg, I am most certainly not paid by anybody here. I don’t even know who I am supporting for this race, and might not choose between the two candidates. They aren’t in my district, so I won’t be at the convention.

My sole reason for posting is because I see you using unfair attacks against a fellow republican. If you were calling Lucas a terrorist, or saying she broke the law, or was fat, I would be defending her against your slanders.

However, since you support Lucas and she isn’t part of the lawsuit against you, I don’t imagine you will be making ANY comments about her appearance, her military service, or any other negative thing about her.

And again, have you been employed by the Faisal Gill campaign to provide campaign services by posting comments on this website which defend him? This is the third time I’ve asked, and you keep ducking the question.

Does ignoring the evidence cover you against charges that you knew the truth when a lawsuit is filed? I don’t know.

Seriously, if you keep putting out this pathetic junk, you are going to make a laughingstock of yourself. The images you are creating for us first took their form in your well fertilized brain, and sooner or latter somebody beside me is going to notice.

Charles, there is a point where Greg may deserve our sympathy rather than our disgust. Perhaps he has already reached it. Do you suppose it is likely that Greg’s mental issues are more serious than any anxiety he is causing Dion’s children?

Unfortunately, there is not much we can do about it. Unless Greg suffers a serious breakdown, I am afraid he will remain free to continue with his farce. The irony is that he cannot admit to himself he is hurting himself more than anyone else. As you have said, Greg is not a bad fellow. It is a shame he seems unable to straighten himself out.

It would be important for Julie to defeat Dion because otherwise the Gill people would say that Gill should run next time.

I would campaign for Julie against Dion if she thought I was not too negative. She might conclude that she runs a positive campaign and negative people like me hurt her more than they help her.

I volunteered for Lisa Marie Cheney (R, VA-8) in 2004 and donated money to Lisa’s campaign as well. It is on record at the FEC, I believe. So a Julie vs. Dion campaign would not be the first recent Republican candidate I volunteered for.

So JM, who do you want for Delegate? Lucas, Gill or Dion? I know you don’t want Gill. You have made that clear, and I am with you. Now say it’s Dion and Lucas? Who will you campaing for?

And Charles, please don’t use “annals” and Dion in the same post, as someone might misread it and think you are referring to Dion’s playground. Also, I think Greg L. might have grounds for a suit against you. You said he is in bed with Jonathan Mark. You are implying that Greg is gay. Greg should sue you.

Ridiculous isn’t it? Sensitive little mamby-pamby Charles, who so often cries about libel and slander and lawsuits. You, Chapman and Gill are part of the reason we have turned into a nation of wimps. EWWWWW! I don’t like what you said. I will sue you.

Wimps!

And Dion WILL win the election if Gill gets the nomination. That is the bed that Gill supporters are laying in now.

The question is why Gill supporters want a known, practiciing homosexual like Dion to win. Because if Gill is nominated then Dion will win.

I have suggested that perhaps some (not most) Gill supporters are closeted homosexuals who would secretly be pleased if one of their number, Dion, wins. Like that preacher in Colorado, these Sodomites pretend to oppose homosexuality while they secretly practice it.

So in order to help their fellow homosexual Dion win these closet cases (who only represent a minority of Gill supporters but could be significant) want to nominate the unelectable lobbyist-for-a-terrorist Faisal Gill to run against Dion. That way the practicing homosexual Dion wins the general.

Charles, why do you want a practicing homosexual like Jeff Dion to win the election in November? Because that is what will happen if Gill gets the Republican nomination. Dion will win.

It’s more of a funny nickname for him that’s come into vogue rather than anything with descriptive meaning. You gotta admit you’ve heard this for quite some time now, and it is pretty funny.

You should know that trashing Jeff Dion must happen even if his kids are hurt. Greg could care less about them. Not only is calling Gill a terrorist off base, equating being a terrorist with being gay ought, even in the narrow minded universe you and BVBL live in. Terrorists go to jail and are executed. Is that what you want to do to gay people as well. Just asking. There is just not telling where the contorted logical that previals on this web site might lead someone.

And in the annals of things I might want to sue a blogger for, I think calling me a terrorist would be VERY HIGH on the list.

In fact, I think that you would be hard-pressed to find people to support your “freedom” to call people terrorists without penalty, without proof that they are actually terrorists.

Of course, not all people are honest or principled, so you might get some support.

In view of the fact that some (not all) persons who profess to oppose homosexuality are in fact gay themselves, I wonder if that is the goal of some (not all) of Gill’s supporters. Namely, to secure the victory in November of Dion, who is gay like themselves but is open about it.

Why else would Gill’s supporters insist on nominating someone with a terrorist-lobbying past who cannot win? Gill’s nomination will put another gay in the HOD, and that is what some (not all) of Gill’s supporters want.

Oh, and to some commenters, don’t think for a second that Lucas hasn’t already been labeled a RINO by some of the more reactionary members of the local party. And it’s the reactionary wing that controls the party.