http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/03/11/chichester-rumors-are-rampant/ Blog-Fu for Prince William, Manassas and Manassas Park politics. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:41:55 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/03/11/chichester-rumors-are-rampant/#comment-7951 BullElephant Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:39:41 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/03/11/chichester-rumors-are-rampant/#comment-7951 Who? Who?

]]> http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/03/11/chichester-rumors-are-rampant/#comment-7948 asmith Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:10:36 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/03/11/chichester-rumors-are-rampant/#comment-7948 Not if Al Pollard runs. Not if Al Pollard runs.

]]> http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/03/11/chichester-rumors-are-rampant/#comment-7927 Chris Sun, 11 Mar 2007 05:41:35 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/03/11/chichester-rumors-are-rampant/#comment-7927 Greg, the insiders I talked too at Marc Cadin's kickoff were almost 99% sure that Chichester is going to retire. They were equally sure that Dan Chichester would run. So look for Chichester vs. Van Hoy, either way. But your right, a bevy of Republicans will want this seat becasue, if we don't lose redistricting, this could be a seat for life. Greg, the insiders I talked too at Marc Cadin’s kickoff were almost 99% sure that Chichester is going to retire. They were equally sure that Dan Chichester would run. So look for Chichester vs. Van Hoy, either way. But your right, a bevy of Republicans will want this seat becasue, if we don’t lose redistricting, this could be a seat for life.

]]>