Comments on: Fireworks In The 28th http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/04/24/fireworks-in-the-28th/ Blog-Fu for Prince William, Manassas and Manassas Park politics. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:28:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3 By: Jim G. http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/04/24/fireworks-in-the-28th/#comment-10077 Jim G. Sun, 29 Apr 2007 04:52:41 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/04/24/fireworks-in-the-28th/#comment-10077 Having said that I support Myers as a vote, I also fully agree with Graziano's statement above if he really said all that. Bill Howell is a bum in my book now. I just disagreed with him before on a lot of things but now he's gone way too far. He's just a politician now and quit representing MY INTERESTS a long time ago JUST LIKE CHICHESTER did. PLEASE don't forget these two clowns when you vote on May the 19 and in November the 6. Having said that I support Myers as a vote, I also fully agree with Graziano’s statement above if he really said all that. Bill Howell is a bum in my book now. I just disagreed with him before on a lot of things but now he’s gone way too far. He’s just a politician now and quit representing MY INTERESTS a long time ago JUST LIKE CHICHESTER did. PLEASE don’t forget these two clowns when you vote on May the 19 and in November the 6.

]]> By: Jim G. http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/04/24/fireworks-in-the-28th/#comment-10075 Jim G. Sun, 29 Apr 2007 04:48:23 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/04/24/fireworks-in-the-28th/#comment-10075 Russ Moulton is the one who tried unsuccessfully to rig the primary election in the first place (to not be an election), so it's not surprise he would front a candidate. Had he been successful however, we would have no chance of having a turncoat lawyer in the mix who 'could' win, so in one way, he would have done us a favor- not a service to democracy or the American way- but a favor to the 28th no less by not having a secret POLLARD SUPPORTER on the ballot!! Vanhoy seems all right enough alone but being that he is a plant of a person who would take away my OPTION of choosing a candidate altogether-- Jon Myers is the one I'm voting for. He fought for democracy as a US Marine and I have full confidence in his ability to lead us in Richmond. Check out his website, which has been up for a long time now: http://www.votejonmyers.com . He is a true conservative and has no strings that I'm aware of being pulled by someone else. Russ Moulton is the one who tried unsuccessfully to rig the primary election in the first place (to not be an election), so it’s not surprise he would front a candidate. Had he been successful however, we would have no chance of having a turncoat lawyer in the mix who ‘could’ win, so in one way, he would have done us a favor- not a service to democracy or the American way- but a favor to the 28th no less by not having a secret POLLARD SUPPORTER on the ballot!! Vanhoy seems all right enough alone but being that he is a plant of a person who would take away my OPTION of choosing a candidate altogether– Jon Myers is the one I’m voting for. He fought for democracy as a US Marine and I have full confidence in his ability to lead us in Richmond. Check out his website, which has been up for a long time now: http://www.votejonmyers.com . He is a true conservative and has no strings that I’m aware of being pulled by someone else.

]]> By: Chris http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/04/24/fireworks-in-the-28th/#comment-9844 Chris Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:02:23 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/04/24/fireworks-in-the-28th/#comment-9844 John Van Hoy website is up: http://www.vanhoy4senate.com/ Incidently, is anyone going to throw a fit over Russ Moulton endorsing Van Hoy despite other GOP candidates in the field? John Van Hoy website is up:

http://www.vanhoy4senate.com/

Incidently, is anyone going to throw a fit over Russ Moulton endorsing Van Hoy despite other GOP candidates in the field?

]]> By: Dirk http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/04/24/fireworks-in-the-28th/#comment-9833 Dirk Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:54:17 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/04/24/fireworks-in-the-28th/#comment-9833 "I am not ultra, ultra conservative. I am pro-life, I support the Second Amendment, and taxes to me are a last resort. But I would never say never," Stuart said." ""No one person is going to have the support of all the members of our party," Chichester said yesterday. "He said he's backing Stuart because Stuart's fiscal philosophies are in line with his own, and because he's an independent thinker." Check it out: http://www.fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2007/042007/04252007/278753/index_html?page=1 “I am not ultra, ultra conservative. I am pro-life, I support the Second Amendment, and taxes to me are a last resort. But I would never say never,” Stuart said.”

“”No one person is going to have the support of all the members of our party,” Chichester said yesterday.

“He said he’s backing Stuart because Stuart’s fiscal philosophies are in line with his own, and because he’s an independent thinker.”

Check it out: http://www.fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2007/042007/04252007/278753/index_html?page=1

]]> By: Chris http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/04/24/fireworks-in-the-28th/#comment-9822 Chris Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:29:51 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/04/24/fireworks-in-the-28th/#comment-9822 To clarify, I mean to say "I can take a moderate that is a loyal REPUBLICAN" To clarify, I mean to say “I can take a moderate that is a loyal REPUBLICAN”

]]> By: Riley, Not O'Reilly http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/04/24/fireworks-in-the-28th/#comment-9821 Riley, Not O'Reilly Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:27:51 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/04/24/fireworks-in-the-28th/#comment-9821 Never mind Warner's inauguration. This guy gave to Pollard who is the Dem candidate for this seat! Never mind Warner’s inauguration. This guy gave to Pollard who is the Dem candidate for this seat!

]]> By: Chrisun http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/04/24/fireworks-in-the-28th/#comment-9807 Chrisun Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:53:55 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/04/24/fireworks-in-the-28th/#comment-9807 UNBELIEVABLE!!! I can take a moderate thats a loyal conservative. This guy also gave money to Warner's Inaguration! I wasn't trying to be flippant above, I really wanted to know. This is unreal. Graziano, Meyers, Van Hoy . . . I doesn't matter. ANYONE but this guy. UNBELIEVABLE!!! I can take a moderate thats a loyal conservative. This guy also gave money to Warner’s Inaguration!

I wasn’t trying to be flippant above, I really wanted to know. This is unreal.

Graziano, Meyers, Van Hoy . . . I doesn’t matter. ANYONE but this guy.

]]> By: Dirk http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/04/24/fireworks-in-the-28th/#comment-9806 Dirk Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:18:08 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/04/24/fireworks-in-the-28th/#comment-9806 Hmmmm.....I don't know....could it be that in all the contributions he has given, 60% has ended up in Democrat hands? Check it out on VPAP: http://vpap.org/donors/results_level2.cfm?key=INP000268856&Year=All&CandFilter=A Republican: $300 (40%) Democrat: $450 (60%) The real kicker here is that he gave money to Al Pollard! How is that for a ringing endorsement of your opponent! RINO alert! Hmmmm…..I don’t know….could it be that in all the contributions he has given, 60% has ended up in Democrat hands? Check it out on VPAP: http://vpap.org/donors/results_level2.cfm?key=INP000268856&Year=All&CandFilter=A

Republican: $300 (40%)
Democrat: $450 (60%)

The real kicker here is that he gave money to Al Pollard! How is that for a ringing endorsement of your opponent! RINO alert!

]]> By: Chris http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/04/24/fireworks-in-the-28th/#comment-9805 Chris Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:47:09 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/04/24/fireworks-in-the-28th/#comment-9805 What makes Stuart a RINO? What makes Stuart a RINO?

]]> By: Dirk http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/04/24/fireworks-in-the-28th/#comment-9804 Dirk Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:20:05 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/04/24/fireworks-in-the-28th/#comment-9804 What is the deal with Howell? I thought he declared he was neutral? Maybe Chichester leaned on him reminding him of a past debt? I don't know how Howell can endorse a RINO like Stuart. Does he want another moderate in the seat to screw things up in the Senate so he can look inept again? What is the deal with Howell? I thought he declared he was neutral? Maybe Chichester leaned on him reminding him of a past debt? I don’t know how Howell can endorse a RINO like Stuart. Does he want another moderate in the seat to screw things up in the Senate so he can look inept again?

]]>