<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Brief History Of Faisal Gill</title>
	<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/</link>
	<description>Blog-Fu for Prince William, Manassas and Manassas Park politics.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: John Light</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12450</link>
		<dc:creator>John Light</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 02:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12450</guid>
		<description>Jim, how is it you write about Julie "Yet there is no doubt whatsoever that Julie has previously associated herself"  yet, when we bring up Faisal's past, and current, associations with Terrorist or Terrorist supporting organizations, you write "Guilt by association" and dismiss it???

Please be consistent, ok?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, how is it you write about Julie &#8220;Yet there is no doubt whatsoever that Julie has previously associated herself&#8221;  yet, when we bring up Faisal&#8217;s past, and current, associations with Terrorist or Terrorist supporting organizations, you write &#8220;Guilt by association&#8221; and dismiss it???</p>
<p>Please be consistent, ok?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Young</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12258</link>
		<dc:creator>James Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 15:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12258</guid>
		<description>Thank you, "Watching," for that comment on what I and others "believe."  It's nice to see that you've gotten around that whole problem about "making windows into men's souls" that so bedeviled Elizabeth I.

Of course, it's abundantly clear that you have utterly no idea what you're talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, &#8220;Watching,&#8221; for that comment on what I and others &#8220;believe.&#8221;  It&#8217;s nice to see that you&#8217;ve gotten around that whole problem about &#8220;making windows into men&#8217;s souls&#8221; that so bedeviled Elizabeth I.</p>
<p>Of course, it&#8217;s abundantly clear that you have utterly no idea what you&#8217;re talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Light</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12191</link>
		<dc:creator>John Light</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 17:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12191</guid>
		<description>Just wondering...has ANYONE seen the movie "No Way Out"???  lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering&#8230;has ANYONE seen the movie &#8220;No Way Out&#8221;???  lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Light</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12190</link>
		<dc:creator>John Light</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 17:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12190</guid>
		<description>Mary Hill wrote:"And frankly, I just don’t have the stomach anymore for people who smear others for their personal gain."

Ok, then you must be DISGUSTED by the outright lie from the Faisal camp when they made the phone calls and said that Julie supports abortion.  NOTHING could be further from the truth!!!  Ms. Lucas is very much pro-life and pro 2nd Amendment.

Faisal also has recently said that she has attacked his lobbying firm because they support cancer research.  Again, lies.  She attacks the firm because of who they support (read, those with terrorist ties).

So, if you are to be consistent, while I may not agree with you as far as Ms. Lucas is concerned, then you should be even MORE disgusted by the lies from the Faisal camp.

Apology on the other topic accepted, thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary Hill wrote:&#8221;And frankly, I just don’t have the stomach anymore for people who smear others for their personal gain.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ok, then you must be DISGUSTED by the outright lie from the Faisal camp when they made the phone calls and said that Julie supports abortion.  NOTHING could be further from the truth!!!  Ms. Lucas is very much pro-life and pro 2nd Amendment.</p>
<p>Faisal also has recently said that she has attacked his lobbying firm because they support cancer research.  Again, lies.  She attacks the firm because of who they support (read, those with terrorist ties).</p>
<p>So, if you are to be consistent, while I may not agree with you as far as Ms. Lucas is concerned, then you should be even MORE disgusted by the lies from the Faisal camp.</p>
<p>Apology on the other topic accepted, thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12173</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 14:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12173</guid>
		<description>Faisal Gill was going to speak before national Muslim conferences and saying he works at the Department of Homeland Security. He also said his brother works for the FBI. How could Faisal Gill be a spy?

He would have certainly blown his cover at the Muslim conferences where many extremists go.


According to Gary Aldrich, former FBI agent and author of Unlimited Access: An FBI Agent Inside the Clinton White House, Gary was an undercover agent who infiltrated many groups.

Yet he is a public figure who life could have been "in danger" . He didn't  leave the agency until he was ready to retire. I am sure Mr. Aldrich had all sorts of enemies in the Clinton White House, yet he didn't run away. Instead Gary went on the offensive and exposed corruption at the highest levels. Gary Aldrich didn't join the Clinton cool aid drinkers.

Oliver North had real terrorists out to kill him because he actually captured terrorists.  

I find it hard to believe that Faisal would leave the protection of the DHS with all of the security guards for the safety of the campaign trail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faisal Gill was going to speak before national Muslim conferences and saying he works at the Department of Homeland Security. He also said his brother works for the FBI. How could Faisal Gill be a spy?</p>
<p>He would have certainly blown his cover at the Muslim conferences where many extremists go.</p>
<p>According to Gary Aldrich, former FBI agent and author of Unlimited Access: An FBI Agent Inside the Clinton White House, Gary was an undercover agent who infiltrated many groups.</p>
<p>Yet he is a public figure who life could have been &#8220;in danger&#8221; . He didn&#8217;t  leave the agency until he was ready to retire. I am sure Mr. Aldrich had all sorts of enemies in the Clinton White House, yet he didn&#8217;t run away. Instead Gary went on the offensive and exposed corruption at the highest levels. Gary Aldrich didn&#8217;t join the Clinton cool aid drinkers.</p>
<p>Oliver North had real terrorists out to kill him because he actually captured terrorists.  </p>
<p>I find it hard to believe that Faisal would leave the protection of the DHS with all of the security guards for the safety of the campaign trail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watching</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12172</link>
		<dc:creator>Watching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 14:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12172</guid>
		<description>Methinks Mary doth protest too much.

Don't be fooled. Mary was never a Lucas supporter. 

Mary is one of those who believe that this is a conspiracy against Gill, started just after 9-11. All of these respected authors, writers, commentators, and even the public record, are in this together to destroy Gill. James Young is another. Oldie believes this too. Charles is the worst of the bunch.

If Gill is nominated, the Dems have an excellent chance to take and hold this seat for a long, long time. Gill is the "perfect storm" of bad candidates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Methinks Mary doth protest too much.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be fooled. Mary was never a Lucas supporter. </p>
<p>Mary is one of those who believe that this is a conspiracy against Gill, started just after 9-11. All of these respected authors, writers, commentators, and even the public record, are in this together to destroy Gill. James Young is another. Oldie believes this too. Charles is the worst of the bunch.</p>
<p>If Gill is nominated, the Dems have an excellent chance to take and hold this seat for a long, long time. Gill is the &#8220;perfect storm&#8221; of bad candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12171</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 13:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12171</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, Faisal Gill a spy... who had to leave Homeland Security because his life was in danger...

Well,...

Either "someone" is living in Fantasyland

OR

she has put Faisal's life in jeopardy by revealing to the world that he spied on terrorist sympathizers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, Faisal Gill a spy&#8230; who had to leave Homeland Security because his life was in danger&#8230;</p>
<p>Well,&#8230;</p>
<p>Either &#8220;someone&#8221; is living in Fantasyland</p>
<p>OR</p>
<p>she has put Faisal&#8217;s life in jeopardy by revealing to the world that he spied on terrorist sympathizers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12168</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 11:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12168</guid>
		<description>"""I never said that Faisil was on an undercover mission to spy on his law and business partners. Don’t put words in my mouth. And I never said that he was spying on anyone, only that it was told to me that he was being used as an insider source"""

If, according to you, Faisal was being used as "an insider source" then he was spying. If Faisal was spying than he was being used as "an insider source."

The two statements "Faisal was a spy" and "Faisal was an insider source" are equivalent. 

"""and I said that I didn’t know if that was true. Who knows what groups he may have had access to with the full knowledge of the U. S. Govt. and what info he may have relayed."""

Again, the reference to "info he may have relayed" means that you are asserting that Faisal was a spy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8221;"I never said that Faisil was on an undercover mission to spy on his law and business partners. Don’t put words in my mouth. And I never said that he was spying on anyone, only that it was told to me that he was being used as an insider source&#8221;"&#8221;</p>
<p>If, according to you, Faisal was being used as &#8220;an insider source&#8221; then he was spying. If Faisal was spying than he was being used as &#8220;an insider source.&#8221;</p>
<p>The two statements &#8220;Faisal was a spy&#8221; and &#8220;Faisal was an insider source&#8221; are equivalent. </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;"and I said that I didn’t know if that was true. Who knows what groups he may have had access to with the full knowledge of the U. S. Govt. and what info he may have relayed.&#8221;"&#8221;</p>
<p>Again, the reference to &#8220;info he may have relayed&#8221; means that you are asserting that Faisal was a spy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg L</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12164</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 04:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12164</guid>
		<description>Mary,

Just what "charges" has Faisal Gill been cleared of four times?  That he did not wrongly disclose his association with the AMC on his security clearance form?  I've acknowledged that a statement was issued in 2004 by DHS investigators saying that Faisal Gill had not done anything wrong by stating that he was employed by AG Consulting rather than the AMC and the Islamic Institute, although the information appears to contradict his earlier ethics disclosures and the timing might be suspicious.  Still those statements have been issued, and no one to my knowledge has denied that they have been.

Has Faisal Gill not been employed by, or been a law partner of Asim Ghafoor since 2001, except during the time he was employed by DHS?  Did Faisal Gill not participate in a walkout from a White House meeting in protest of the Secret Service raising objections to the presence of Sami Al-Arian's son?  Was Faisal not lobbying on behalf of the AMC at the time Abdurahman Alamoudi was declaring himself a supporter of Hezbollah and Hamas in front of the white house?  Was Faisal Gill not engaged in coordinating AMC's policy when they told Muslims not to talk to the FBI?

What is it exactly about Alan Gura's article that you believe is false?  I'm missing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary,</p>
<p>Just what &#8220;charges&#8221; has Faisal Gill been cleared of four times?  That he did not wrongly disclose his association with the AMC on his security clearance form?  I&#8217;ve acknowledged that a statement was issued in 2004 by DHS investigators saying that Faisal Gill had not done anything wrong by stating that he was employed by AG Consulting rather than the AMC and the Islamic Institute, although the information appears to contradict his earlier ethics disclosures and the timing might be suspicious.  Still those statements have been issued, and no one to my knowledge has denied that they have been.</p>
<p>Has Faisal Gill not been employed by, or been a law partner of Asim Ghafoor since 2001, except during the time he was employed by DHS?  Did Faisal Gill not participate in a walkout from a White House meeting in protest of the Secret Service raising objections to the presence of Sami Al-Arian&#8217;s son?  Was Faisal not lobbying on behalf of the AMC at the time Abdurahman Alamoudi was declaring himself a supporter of Hezbollah and Hamas in front of the white house?  Was Faisal Gill not engaged in coordinating AMC&#8217;s policy when they told Muslims not to talk to the FBI?</p>
<p>What is it exactly about Alan Gura&#8217;s article that you believe is false?  I&#8217;m missing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary HIll</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12162</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary HIll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 03:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12162</guid>
		<description>For John LIght
Thank you for informing me of Julie's record on this piece of legislation.   I'm sure others lobbied hard as well, but I will accept that Julie led the charge.  And as I said, I always believed she had an excellent record on the school board.  However, it changes nothing for me.  Integrity counts first.  She said she would run a positive campaign.  She could have stuck to her accomplishments and I would have stayed silent.  But she didn't.  She reneged on that promise.  And frankly, I just don't have the stomach anymore for people who smear others for their personal gain.  She didn't need to do it and she pushed me into Faisil's corner.  It is wrong to refer people to read about false charges against Faisil of which he has been four times cleared.  Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.  If the devil appeared to me  announcing he was the devil, I would tell him to take a  hike.  If someone cloaks themselves in good deeds and has no integrity, it is easier to be taken in.  I'm not going to do it.  I am repulsed by her mailers.  But I defer to you and stand corrected on the legislation issue.  Thanks for your thoughtful response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For John LIght<br />
Thank you for informing me of Julie&#8217;s record on this piece of legislation.   I&#8217;m sure others lobbied hard as well, but I will accept that Julie led the charge.  And as I said, I always believed she had an excellent record on the school board.  However, it changes nothing for me.  Integrity counts first.  She said she would run a positive campaign.  She could have stuck to her accomplishments and I would have stayed silent.  But she didn&#8217;t.  She reneged on that promise.  And frankly, I just don&#8217;t have the stomach anymore for people who smear others for their personal gain.  She didn&#8217;t need to do it and she pushed me into Faisil&#8217;s corner.  It is wrong to refer people to read about false charges against Faisil of which he has been four times cleared.  Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.  If the devil appeared to me  announcing he was the devil, I would tell him to take a  hike.  If someone cloaks themselves in good deeds and has no integrity, it is easier to be taken in.  I&#8217;m not going to do it.  I am repulsed by her mailers.  But I defer to you and stand corrected on the legislation issue.  Thanks for your thoughtful response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary HIll</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12161</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary HIll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 03:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12161</guid>
		<description>I never said that Faisil was on an undercover mission to spy on his law and business partners.  Don't put words in my mouth.   And I never said that he was spying on anyone, only that it was told to me that he was being used as an insider source and I said that I didn't know if that was true.  Who knows what groups he may have had access to with the full knowledge of the U. S. Govt. and what info he may have relayed.  That would all be top secret stuff that Faisil and DHS could never publicly comment on. And also as I said, the issue was to get him out of DHS - I never said he had to go into some kind of hiding or stay out of public life  Stop twisting my words.  That is all you seem to know how to do.  Okay, you don't like Faisil.  Great for you.  But stop making false charges against him and stop twisting the truth.   He has been found guilty of nothing - and by the way - neither have I.  Of course that conclusion came too late for me.  I just don't want it to come too late for someone else.  But I see I'll have no success in stopping false allegations against Faisil.  Reason is dead in your heads.  Hey, this is vastly more catchy than calling me a scatterbrain - I'll just call you "dead heads".  Keep your prayers.  You need them more than I do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never said that Faisil was on an undercover mission to spy on his law and business partners.  Don&#8217;t put words in my mouth.   And I never said that he was spying on anyone, only that it was told to me that he was being used as an insider source and I said that I didn&#8217;t know if that was true.  Who knows what groups he may have had access to with the full knowledge of the U. S. Govt. and what info he may have relayed.  That would all be top secret stuff that Faisil and DHS could never publicly comment on. And also as I said, the issue was to get him out of DHS - I never said he had to go into some kind of hiding or stay out of public life  Stop twisting my words.  That is all you seem to know how to do.  Okay, you don&#8217;t like Faisil.  Great for you.  But stop making false charges against him and stop twisting the truth.   He has been found guilty of nothing - and by the way - neither have I.  Of course that conclusion came too late for me.  I just don&#8217;t want it to come too late for someone else.  But I see I&#8217;ll have no success in stopping false allegations against Faisil.  Reason is dead in your heads.  Hey, this is vastly more catchy than calling me a scatterbrain - I&#8217;ll just call you &#8220;dead heads&#8221;.  Keep your prayers.  You need them more than I do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12160</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 03:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12160</guid>
		<description>Faisal Gill could give his own response.  We have not heard from him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faisal Gill could give his own response.  We have not heard from him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Light</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12158</link>
		<dc:creator>John Light</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 03:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12158</guid>
		<description>Mary Hill wrote: "And Julie claiming ownership of a piece of legislation as if she wrote and passed it herself. Give me a break. Lots of people supported and lobbied for that bill."

Mary, I believe you need to get your facts straight.  Julie was the SOLE person behind House Bill 1294 (2001).  She led all of the meetings, discussions, testified, and "lobbied" the VA House and Senate on behalf of this bill.  She met with PWC Delegates and one ended up putting her bill forward, but it was Julie who led the charge to gain support of the bill and was completely succesful without a single "no" vote against it.  THAT is effectiveness, something the entire 51st District would benefit from.

And to quote from a Faisal Gill mailer (with MINOR editing but no word changing), "No Way!!!  Julie Lucas!!!!  Should She Be Our Delegate???"  Yes, Faisal "Al Gore 2000" Gill, she should!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary Hill wrote: &#8220;And Julie claiming ownership of a piece of legislation as if she wrote and passed it herself. Give me a break. Lots of people supported and lobbied for that bill.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mary, I believe you need to get your facts straight.  Julie was the SOLE person behind House Bill 1294 (2001).  She led all of the meetings, discussions, testified, and &#8220;lobbied&#8221; the VA House and Senate on behalf of this bill.  She met with PWC Delegates and one ended up putting her bill forward, but it was Julie who led the charge to gain support of the bill and was completely succesful without a single &#8220;no&#8221; vote against it.  THAT is effectiveness, something the entire 51st District would benefit from.</p>
<p>And to quote from a Faisal Gill mailer (with MINOR editing but no word changing), &#8220;No Way!!!  Julie Lucas!!!!  Should She Be Our Delegate???&#8221;  Yes, Faisal &#8220;Al Gore 2000&#8243; Gill, she should!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoVA Scout</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12156</link>
		<dc:creator>NoVA Scout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 02:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12156</guid>
		<description>If that's really Mary Hill who thinks Mr. Gill is on an undercover mission for the government to spy on his law and business partners, you have my condolences and prayers.  If it's someone using her name and trying to make the former supervisor from the Coles district look like an easy mark, I  say cut it out. It's not funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that&#8217;s really Mary Hill who thinks Mr. Gill is on an undercover mission for the government to spy on his law and business partners, you have my condolences and prayers.  If it&#8217;s someone using her name and trying to make the former supervisor from the Coles district look like an easy mark, I  say cut it out. It&#8217;s not funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the real Mary Hill, stated under oath</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12151</link>
		<dc:creator>the real Mary Hill, stated under oath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 01:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12151</guid>
		<description>It is ironic that the prominent member of the PWRC who passed the info to me regarding Faisil leaving his job is someone who does not support Faisil's candidacy but now feels that Faisil is being wrongly accused.  And as I said, I do not know if the info is true or not regarding his leaving DHS.  I just wouldn't be surprised to learn that in fact it was true.   And if it is not true, I won't be the first person to have floated something untrue about Faisil - only the first of such comments to be positive for Faisil.
 
As for the ludicrous charges that Faisil is spying on Democrats or in league with Democrats - Many Republicans work in fields or are principals in firms where they deal directly with governemts.   The success of those businesses depends on them being able to work with people of both parties and Independents.   A strategy for their success is to employ or have co-principals who are Democrats.  It is common for business partners to financially support the political endeavors of their partners if for no other reason than friendship and mutual trust.  So be realistic.   Most candidates I have ever known take money from wherever they can get it, except I know that I did not take developer money like Marty.  Democrat money, yeah.  I think I may have had some of that.  But not nearly a small fraction of that collected by people like Sean.  And please don't try to convince me that a school board member doesn't have support from liberal teacher organizations???  If Republicans never got contributions or votes from any liberals or Democrats, they'd never win.  The same goes with Republican voters support going to Democrats.  Do the math.

Some of you just had to get personal.  Guess it is just one of your character flaws and you can't help yourselves.  No, I am not out of touch or a scatter brain.  Another person to whom I have been posting but yet disagrees with my support of Faisil called me a critical thinker.  I gradualted magnum cum laude and have been in too many positions on the inside so believe that I know  a smear campaign when I see one.  It worked agianst me and apparently there are lots of you who believed that garbage.  Thanks NOVA Scout and Jonathan for your concern for my welfare but don't worry about me.   I am well and my family is well.  And not being a supervisor is heaven on earth!  You don't see my son in any trouble since I left office.  Yes, he made a remarkable, even miraculous transformation the second I lost the election.  Give me a break.   But you know what - he probably thinks you can all go fly a kite - he has a great job, great credit, bought his own home, and  he and Morgan will soon be parents to a beautiful baby boy.  Life is good.  God is good!  Nonetheless,  you never saw anything happen to those  people who broke the law in their successful efforts to oust me.  I'd like to know how you would feel if you were falsely accused by a cop of selling drugs.  Probably wouldn't bother you anymore than the year long investigation at your taxpaying expense to turn up 3 ounces of majijuana and 14 pills or anymore than letting the big drug dealer off to rat out his little guy purchaser.  All of this is apparently okay with some of you.  JUST WHO IS OUT OF TOUCH HERE??? Certainly, not me.  Okay, you got me off base there for a second or too by turning my remarks for Faisil into a personal commentary on me.  So not to appear scatterbrained - heaven forbid - back to Faisil.

Islamic Agenda - absolutely do believe there is such going on.  But I also believe that there are many patriotiic American Muslims.  Maybe we should put them all in interrment camps just to be sure they can't hurt us.  Oops - there goes America.  That would be convenient for the jihadists - just let us destroy ourselves from within.  It will save them from blowing themselves up.  Maybe I'm just imagining that that is your secret wish - you know - to lock them all up.  But no doubt in my mind that some of you definitely, based on your posts, will not support any Muslim for public office.  

Anti-Faisil agenda.  Same old muckraking tactics.  Create controversy around a candidate regardless of the truth about him personally.  If we keep doing that to good people, we'll have nobody worth voting for. 

Will the real Mary HIll please stand up?  Here I am standing tall.  Now that that is settled, can you all stop being such scatterbrains and stick to the business at hand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is ironic that the prominent member of the PWRC who passed the info to me regarding Faisil leaving his job is someone who does not support Faisil&#8217;s candidacy but now feels that Faisil is being wrongly accused.  And as I said, I do not know if the info is true or not regarding his leaving DHS.  I just wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to learn that in fact it was true.   And if it is not true, I won&#8217;t be the first person to have floated something untrue about Faisil - only the first of such comments to be positive for Faisil.</p>
<p>As for the ludicrous charges that Faisil is spying on Democrats or in league with Democrats - Many Republicans work in fields or are principals in firms where they deal directly with governemts.   The success of those businesses depends on them being able to work with people of both parties and Independents.   A strategy for their success is to employ or have co-principals who are Democrats.  It is common for business partners to financially support the political endeavors of their partners if for no other reason than friendship and mutual trust.  So be realistic.   Most candidates I have ever known take money from wherever they can get it, except I know that I did not take developer money like Marty.  Democrat money, yeah.  I think I may have had some of that.  But not nearly a small fraction of that collected by people like Sean.  And please don&#8217;t try to convince me that a school board member doesn&#8217;t have support from liberal teacher organizations???  If Republicans never got contributions or votes from any liberals or Democrats, they&#8217;d never win.  The same goes with Republican voters support going to Democrats.  Do the math.</p>
<p>Some of you just had to get personal.  Guess it is just one of your character flaws and you can&#8217;t help yourselves.  No, I am not out of touch or a scatter brain.  Another person to whom I have been posting but yet disagrees with my support of Faisil called me a critical thinker.  I gradualted magnum cum laude and have been in too many positions on the inside so believe that I know  a smear campaign when I see one.  It worked agianst me and apparently there are lots of you who believed that garbage.  Thanks NOVA Scout and Jonathan for your concern for my welfare but don&#8217;t worry about me.   I am well and my family is well.  And not being a supervisor is heaven on earth!  You don&#8217;t see my son in any trouble since I left office.  Yes, he made a remarkable, even miraculous transformation the second I lost the election.  Give me a break.   But you know what - he probably thinks you can all go fly a kite - he has a great job, great credit, bought his own home, and  he and Morgan will soon be parents to a beautiful baby boy.  Life is good.  God is good!  Nonetheless,  you never saw anything happen to those  people who broke the law in their successful efforts to oust me.  I&#8217;d like to know how you would feel if you were falsely accused by a cop of selling drugs.  Probably wouldn&#8217;t bother you anymore than the year long investigation at your taxpaying expense to turn up 3 ounces of majijuana and 14 pills or anymore than letting the big drug dealer off to rat out his little guy purchaser.  All of this is apparently okay with some of you.  JUST WHO IS OUT OF TOUCH HERE??? Certainly, not me.  Okay, you got me off base there for a second or too by turning my remarks for Faisil into a personal commentary on me.  So not to appear scatterbrained - heaven forbid - back to Faisil.</p>
<p>Islamic Agenda - absolutely do believe there is such going on.  But I also believe that there are many patriotiic American Muslims.  Maybe we should put them all in interrment camps just to be sure they can&#8217;t hurt us.  Oops - there goes America.  That would be convenient for the jihadists - just let us destroy ourselves from within.  It will save them from blowing themselves up.  Maybe I&#8217;m just imagining that that is your secret wish - you know - to lock them all up.  But no doubt in my mind that some of you definitely, based on your posts, will not support any Muslim for public office.  </p>
<p>Anti-Faisil agenda.  Same old muckraking tactics.  Create controversy around a candidate regardless of the truth about him personally.  If we keep doing that to good people, we&#8217;ll have nobody worth voting for. </p>
<p>Will the real Mary HIll please stand up?  Here I am standing tall.  Now that that is settled, can you all stop being such scatterbrains and stick to the business at hand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12128</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 17:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12128</guid>
		<description>Apologies to the real Mary Hill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies to the real Mary Hill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoVA Scout</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12125</link>
		<dc:creator>NoVA Scout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 16:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12125</guid>
		<description>This person pretending to be Mary Hill should cease and desist (there are probably a lot of "Mary Hills", but I'm assuming the intent of these comments is to appear to be the former PWC supervisor). The poor woman had enough troubles without someone gratuitously trying to make her out to look like a completely gullible, out-of-touch scatterbrain. She's out of the public eye now and deserves some respite from her past troubles.  This kind of brutal parody is pointless.  I have no problem with pseudonymous postings, in fact I think they encourage free debate.  But taking someone else's name and using it to put that person in a bad light is highly unethical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This person pretending to be Mary Hill should cease and desist (there are probably a lot of &#8220;Mary Hills&#8221;, but I&#8217;m assuming the intent of these comments is to appear to be the former PWC supervisor). The poor woman had enough troubles without someone gratuitously trying to make her out to look like a completely gullible, out-of-touch scatterbrain. She&#8217;s out of the public eye now and deserves some respite from her past troubles.  This kind of brutal parody is pointless.  I have no problem with pseudonymous postings, in fact I think they encourage free debate.  But taking someone else&#8217;s name and using it to put that person in a bad light is highly unethical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12123</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 16:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12123</guid>
		<description>Hey, I bet Faisal is trying to infiltrate the Democrat Party too.  That's why his law partner is a liberal dem.  And that's why a big chunk of his cash is from democrats.

Yeah that's it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I bet Faisal is trying to infiltrate the Democrat Party too.  That&#8217;s why his law partner is a liberal dem.  And that&#8217;s why a big chunk of his cash is from democrats.</p>
<p>Yeah that&#8217;s it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12101</link>
		<dc:creator>freedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 10:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12101</guid>
		<description>Ari, it's clearly already underway....but under the guise of "political correctness."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ari, it&#8217;s clearly already underway&#8230;.but under the guise of &#8220;political correctness.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryanna</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12089</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 02:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/05/25/a-brief-history-of-faisal-gill/#comment-12089</guid>
		<description>For Mary Hill.
This is an analysis of the Islamic invasion of America, the agenda of Islamists and visible methods to take over America by the year 2020! Will Americans continue to sleep through this invasion as they did when we were attacked on 9/11?  http://www.sullivan-county.com/immigration/rob_nothink.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Mary Hill.<br />
This is an analysis of the Islamic invasion of America, the agenda of Islamists and visible methods to take over America by the year 2020! Will Americans continue to sleep through this invasion as they did when we were attacked on 9/11?  <a href="http://www.sullivan-county.com/immigration/rob_nothink.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.sullivan-county.com/immigration/rob_nothink.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

