<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Blog</title>
	<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/</link>
	<description>Blog-Fu for Prince William, Manassas and Manassas Park politics.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 03:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-14040</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-14040</guid>
		<description>Any truth to the rumor that both Stewart and Tompko are/were on Gill's payroll?  Stewart, by Gill giving his law firm terrorist action money and Tompko hired as a "consultant" to Gill?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any truth to the rumor that both Stewart and Tompko are/were on Gill&#8217;s payroll?  Stewart, by Gill giving his law firm terrorist action money and Tompko hired as a &#8220;consultant&#8221; to Gill?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Young</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-13509</link>
		<dc:creator>James Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-13509</guid>
		<description>It's hardly surprising, given the hate-Faisal efforts here and elsewhere.

Formally-affiliated campaign blogs are now common.  Formally unaffiliated --- but paid for --- blogs (think Raising Dough ... er, "Raising Kaine") are equally common in Virginia.

Then there are those of us who are just officious intermeddlers like ... virtually everybody else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hardly surprising, given the hate-Faisal efforts here and elsewhere.</p>
<p>Formally-affiliated campaign blogs are now common.  Formally unaffiliated &#8212; but paid for &#8212; blogs (think Raising Dough &#8230; er, &#8220;Raising Kaine&#8221;) are equally common in Virginia.</p>
<p>Then there are those of us who are just officious intermeddlers like &#8230; virtually everybody else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12925</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 06:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12925</guid>
		<description>I am unaware of Faisal ever having discussed jihad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am unaware of Faisal ever having discussed jihad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12924</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 05:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12924</guid>
		<description>Faisal Gill has to discuss Jihad.  Where does he stand?

http://www.terrorismawareness.org/know-about-jihad/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faisal Gill has to discuss Jihad.  Where does he stand?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.terrorismawareness.org/know-about-jihad/" rel="nofollow">http://www.terrorismawareness.org/know-about-jihad/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Light</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12903</link>
		<dc:creator>John Light</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 23:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12903</guid>
		<description>Ok, back to topic.  Has ANYONE noticed on Charles' blog that Charles is to Faisal as Smithers is to Mr. Burns - lol

http://www.thesimpsons.com/bios/bios_townspeople_smithers.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, back to topic.  Has ANYONE noticed on Charles&#8217; blog that Charles is to Faisal as Smithers is to Mr. Burns - lol</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thesimpsons.com/bios/bios_townspeople_smithers.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.thesimpsons.com/bios/bios_townspeople_smithers.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12894</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12894</guid>
		<description>They left because there was a long delay in between and they didnt feel like waiting around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They left because there was a long delay in between and they didnt feel like waiting around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12890</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 19:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12890</guid>
		<description>The records show that the total number who voted was 38 less than the number of delegates who registered. 

But in three of the precincts the number of voters was a total of five ABOVE  the number of delegates who registered. 

That means that in the remaining 12 precincts the number of delegates  who registered but didn't vote was at least 38 + 5 = 43. 

Since that lower limit of 43 non-voting delegates is close to ten percent of the number of delegates who registered it is an inordinately high percentage. 

In fact it is hard to believe.

Don't count on Kopko and McQuigg, who incredibly wants to be a court clerk, to try and figure it all out. Instead we will hear "Let's put all this behind us and unite behind the nominee."

That means that next time those two geniuses set up a convention the same thing will happen. In fact, I read on BVBL that the last time the PWCRC tried to run a convention it ended up with 17 overvotes. 

A reasonable person would conclude that the clowns who run the PWCRC right now are not capable of organizing a convention that results in an internally consistent record of how many registered delegates voted for each candidate.

If a bank ran its operations in this sloppy way the feds would shut it down immediately. But since it's just votes instead of money why should Kopko and McQuigg care? What matters is that the person they wanted to win won, sort of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The records show that the total number who voted was 38 less than the number of delegates who registered. </p>
<p>But in three of the precincts the number of voters was a total of five ABOVE  the number of delegates who registered. </p>
<p>That means that in the remaining 12 precincts the number of delegates  who registered but didn&#8217;t vote was at least 38 + 5 = 43. </p>
<p>Since that lower limit of 43 non-voting delegates is close to ten percent of the number of delegates who registered it is an inordinately high percentage. </p>
<p>In fact it is hard to believe.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t count on Kopko and McQuigg, who incredibly wants to be a court clerk, to try and figure it all out. Instead we will hear &#8220;Let&#8217;s put all this behind us and unite behind the nominee.&#8221;</p>
<p>That means that next time those two geniuses set up a convention the same thing will happen. In fact, I read on BVBL that the last time the PWCRC tried to run a convention it ended up with 17 overvotes. </p>
<p>A reasonable person would conclude that the clowns who run the PWCRC right now are not capable of organizing a convention that results in an internally consistent record of how many registered delegates voted for each candidate.</p>
<p>If a bank ran its operations in this sloppy way the feds would shut it down immediately. But since it&#8217;s just votes instead of money why should Kopko and McQuigg care? What matters is that the person they wanted to win won, sort of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12886</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 19:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12886</guid>
		<description>why would voters show up to the convention and not vote? That is strange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why would voters show up to the convention and not vote? That is strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excelsior</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12882</link>
		<dc:creator>excelsior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12882</guid>
		<description>hope there's a word limit on charles's posts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hope there&#8217;s a word limit on charles&#8217;s posts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12870</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12870</guid>
		<description>It doesn't matter how much money Faisal raises. It matters how much Paul Nichols raises. He will have a compelling story to tell about Faisal Gill, and it won't be pretty.

Remember George Allen? I voted for him. But he was an object of scorn and ridicule. And Faisal, unlike George Allen, will deserve it.

A properly funded and run Paul Nichols campaign will get 95% of the Democratic vote and some Republicans. All it takes is money, and the Dems will help Paul Nichols get it.

Pictures of fat Faisal in his XXL non-regulation-sized reservists uniform won't save his sorry ass. 

The number of overvotes in last weekends' convention was at least five, and could be many more than five. If the number of certified voters who left without voting was larger in a precinct than the number of illegal voters then no overvotes would have been recorded.

And we know that there were at least 43 certified voters who left without voting, or whose votes were not recorded for some other reason.

That is why the five known overvotes in three precincts is only the tip of the illegal voting iceberg. Faisal Gill couldn't win among Republicans, many of whom will never vote for him. He won't do any better among Dems. 

If Moslem citizens want to donate to Gill, let them. It is usually legal for citizens to do so. There will be plenty of others who will give to Nichols.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter how much money Faisal raises. It matters how much Paul Nichols raises. He will have a compelling story to tell about Faisal Gill, and it won&#8217;t be pretty.</p>
<p>Remember George Allen? I voted for him. But he was an object of scorn and ridicule. And Faisal, unlike George Allen, will deserve it.</p>
<p>A properly funded and run Paul Nichols campaign will get 95% of the Democratic vote and some Republicans. All it takes is money, and the Dems will help Paul Nichols get it.</p>
<p>Pictures of fat Faisal in his XXL non-regulation-sized reservists uniform won&#8217;t save his sorry ass. </p>
<p>The number of overvotes in last weekends&#8217; convention was at least five, and could be many more than five. If the number of certified voters who left without voting was larger in a precinct than the number of illegal voters then no overvotes would have been recorded.</p>
<p>And we know that there were at least 43 certified voters who left without voting, or whose votes were not recorded for some other reason.</p>
<p>That is why the five known overvotes in three precincts is only the tip of the illegal voting iceberg. Faisal Gill couldn&#8217;t win among Republicans, many of whom will never vote for him. He won&#8217;t do any better among Dems. </p>
<p>If Moslem citizens want to donate to Gill, let them. It is usually legal for citizens to do so. There will be plenty of others who will give to Nichols.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Batson D. Belfrey</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12861</link>
		<dc:creator>Batson D. Belfrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12861</guid>
		<description>"Richmond will have no cash for Gill"

I hope so, but I don't think cash will be a problem. He has lots of cash pouring in from the Muslim PACs, business community, and individuals form all over the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Richmond will have no cash for Gill&#8221;</p>
<p>I hope so, but I don&#8217;t think cash will be a problem. He has lots of cash pouring in from the Muslim PACs, business community, and individuals form all over the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12856</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12856</guid>
		<description>Rest well young lambs...  Richmond will have no cash for Gill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rest well young lambs&#8230;  Richmond will have no cash for Gill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Light</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12850</link>
		<dc:creator>John Light</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12850</guid>
		<description>Batson...not that there's anything WRONG with that ;-)  lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Batson&#8230;not that there&#8217;s anything WRONG with that <img src='http://www.bvbl.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Batson D. Belfrey</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12840</link>
		<dc:creator>Batson D. Belfrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12840</guid>
		<description>I think Charles has a huge man-crush on Faisil Gill. He practically gushes over him. If you asked Charles, he'd tell you that Gill is the new Reagan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Charles has a huge man-crush on Faisil Gill. He practically gushes over him. If you asked Charles, he&#8217;d tell you that Gill is the new Reagan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12833</link>
		<dc:creator>freedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12833</guid>
		<description>I'm just waiting for the "Republicans for anyone but Gill" blog...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just waiting for the &#8220;Republicans for anyone but Gill&#8221; blog&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12832</link>
		<dc:creator>freedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12832</guid>
		<description>awwwwwwwww seeya, we're so sorry you won't be returning...please???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awwwwwwwww seeya, we&#8217;re so sorry you won&#8217;t be returning&#8230;please???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWCheney</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12830</link>
		<dc:creator>AWCheney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 05:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12830</guid>
		<description>One way to clean out the riff raff Greg.  You sure you didn't suggest it to Charles?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One way to clean out the riff raff Greg.  You sure you didn&#8217;t suggest it to Charles?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seeya</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12829</link>
		<dc:creator>seeya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 05:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/06/05/new-blog/#comment-12829</guid>
		<description>Your blog has become nothing but hate-filled and depressing.  You spend most of your time criticizing other Republicans and the Republican party.  I shall never return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your blog has become nothing but hate-filled and depressing.  You spend most of your time criticizing other Republicans and the Republican party.  I shall never return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

