Here’s what is on the IRS website:

“The promotion of social welfare does not include direct or indirect participation or intervention in political campaigns on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office. However, a section 501(c)(4) social welfare organization may engage in some political activities, so long as that is not its primary activity. However, any expenditure it makes for political activities may be subject to tax under section 527(f).”

A 501(c)(3) “charitable organization” cannot advocate for or against a candidate or a a specific piece of legislation, but donations to it are tax deductible.

I believe you are confusing these.

1/2 a page of just Lies. Why would you run for an office built on integrity when

you lie to the taxpayers. Just sad.

So, Fotis’s organization can’t legally endorse him; I wonder, however, if they can spend “company time” (and thus money) endorsing him.

AWCheney - “Perhaps he is paying him Lars, we know for sure that Fotis is Ted Deeds boss at the LEAA. Fotis is the General/Executive Director and Deeds is the Operations Director.” I believe the point, is, and should be that LEAA has been paying Mr. and Mrs. Deeds’ salaries as well as Mr. Fotis’ salary for them to campaign for Mr. Fotis. Who is to say what other funds from LEAA have been used for the campaign as well. All of those poor LEAA members who truly believed their hard-earned money was being used to support 2nd Amendment Rights as well as Victim Rights. Hopefully this will be an eye-opener for them as well.

I have also blocked the IP addresses that Mr. Ted Deeds has used to access this site at my server. His outrageous behavior will no longer be tolerated.

Ted Deeds is a fraud and a persistent liar. I am deeply disturbed that Jim Fotis would ever want to associate with someone so thoroughly reprehensible, and deeply concerned that this reprobate would be granted any position of authority within the LEAA. His behavior is outrageous.

Instead of taking time to rage against his despicable behavior, instead I am going to knock on doors for the rest of the afternoon and urge voters to vote for Glen Hill on June 12th.

I am sure Fairfax has a special form too for his kind - probably titled “Civil Mental Commitment”

Talking to yourself in the mirror this morning Ted? Careful you don’t fracture your brain trying to figure out what other lies you can put out there…I know you must be straining it since you’ve shown your capabilities to be limited to repeating the same things over, and over, and over…..

Despite the fact that the Sheriff lack a legal footing to create such a form

Despite the fact that the incumbent Sheriff, seeking re-election chose to include totally inapporopriate and irrelevant questions on his from.

Are all Hill supporters on here of one voice that the “ends justify the means”? The Sheriff can do whatever he wasnts, be as unfair and as hostile as he wants to any sub-group of gun onwers and its all ‘okay’ by you because it is part of Sheriff Hill just doin his job.

I think there are voters out there, who support the Second Amendment, who would disagree.