www.goodbyefaisal.com

Coming soon….coreyneedstogo-yo.com

If Michele expected to receive a net pickup from pro-Faisal bloc voters out there then Michele would list an endorsement from Faisal at the top of her endorsements page. But she doesn’t. She mentions inconsequential supporters like Jim Young, but not Faisal.

Michele supported Faisal early, last March, before the former AMC chief lobbyist had even been declared the winner of the HOD-51 overvoting contest.

But now Michele by her reticence to mention receiving Faisal’s support on her webpage shows that she does not believe that Faisal is a net gain for those who endorsed him. On the contrary, Michele shows by it that she believes her association with Faisal hurts her more than it helps her.

Hopefully it will all go down the tubes for McQuigg in November, and people will be able to point at her and laugh “Ha, Ha, we told you so. You sold out your honor for office, and now you have neither honor nor office!”

She’s another one of those who “asked Faisal questions about his past and believes what he says,” she apparently doesn’t think there’s anything wrong with violating Navy and DoD Directives if it’s “for the better good,” and must kinda like “super fast street-drivers.” Well, not necessarily, but votes are votes.

http://www.mcquigg4clerk.com/campaign/endorsements.htm

Should BVBL readers hold Jim Young’s endorsement against her?

(1) Michele already has one strike against her for speaking in praise of Faisal from the podium at Gill’s 3/31/07 campaign kickoff. By the way, Michele’s website does not show any endorsement from Faisal Gill, even though she has endorsed him. I suspect that Michele is now ashamed to be associated with Faisal, AS WELL SHE SHOULD BE!

(2) She has a second strike against her because as Credentials Committee co-chair at the HOD-51 Convention she FAILED TO PROTECT THE INTEGRITY OF VOTING BADGES, making it possible for unscrupulous Faisal Gill supporters to vote early and vote often.

(3) And now Michele has a third strike against her, James Young’s endorsement. James Young who defends the overvoted HOD-51 convention as proper. I wonder what sort of shenanigans Michele and Jim might have planned for the Court House if Michele wins? If overvotes are okay why not backdate some documents too? Why not throw out some existing documents and substitute new ones which show what really happens?

You know, I sometimes attend Potomac Nationals games in PWC, and one of the things I learned is that in baseball, it’s “three strikes and you’re out.”

Well, it ought to be that way in politics too. Michele has three strikes against her, so SHE’S OUT!

Wanna know a little secret, jimmy boy? You should not use YOUR name… I’m sure your family is very nice and believe me, they don’t deserve the grief that your conduct lays upon them — you’re the only one who doesn’t comprende…:(

I’ll give awcheney credit for a single thing: at least she signs her name to her smears, so that she can face the consequences — being persona non grata among respectable Republican circles — for her juvenile and despicable behavior. People like “Batson,” “Dolph,” and “freedom” aren’t worthy even of that minimal level of respect.

‘Course, it speaks volumes that awcheney finds so much in common with the likes of them.

Faisal Gill won like Bashir Assad was reelected with 99.7 percent of the vote in the last Syrian elections. The idea is supposed to be to export democracy to the Middle East, not to import the Middle East’s corrupt electoral practices.

“I’m still waiting for the substantive arguments as to why Kopko’s ruling was wrong.”

There was never doubt but that Tom Kopko’s (aka “the committee’s) ruling would be in favor of Gill — afterall, he was an employee of Gill; the only surprise was that it took him two months to create what failed as plausible defense of his position. We all know…even you, jimmy…that because of his position, Tom Kopko should never have accepted Gill’s money, it’s an issue of leadership integrity which in the end, seriously jeopardized his ability to make an objective, unbiased decision. He knows that, you know that, we all know it. Yet, a few refuse to admit it…of course, they CAN’T admit error.

Facts are:

1. Tom Kopko refused to correct a simple, but difficult to find mathematical error in tabulating qualified Civic Center delegates. While he claimed that this should have been detected and corrected DURING the convention, and that would have been nice, it simply wasn’t. If not to find and correct errors, why is there is such a thing as an appeal process? That IS the reason for an appeal process. Yet, Tom Kopko favors allowing the error to stand because it was not detected DURING the convention.

2. With two overvoted precincts (Penn and Lake Ridge) Tom Kopko presumes to know the number of illegitimate votes cast. Truth is, NO ONE knows the number of illegitimate votes cast…only the number of votes that exceeded the number of properly credentialed delegates. Because of that question, the result of those two precincts is tainted…and therefore, the result of the tainted precincts should have been discarded — to preserve integrity of the vote by the remaining precincts and the integrity of the convention itself. Tom Kopko refused to do this.

But afterall, what can a person expect? If he had done the right thing, his boss would have become an “also ran.”

Accept this jimmy? …of course not, you won’t accept anything outside the Kopko/Gill party line…at least, not until November. Why did I even bother? :)

Gill has been a sloppy, unreliable PWRC member. He literally, “recklessly” disregards traffic laws. He has bought the support of Kopko, Stewart, Cuccinelli, Limgamfelter and Bolling–pulled the wool over their eyes or are they just willing to look the other way?

Gill double speaks on cracking down on illegal immigration, while working as an immigration attorney to help his Muslim buddies gain entry into the USA.

He lied on his security clearance application.

And did I mention he was the chief lobbyist for a convicted terrorist?

So golly gee-I am just supposed so be a good little Republican and roll over for this dirtbag?

This man is not just another bad candidate–he is BAD NEWS.

I’m still waiting for the substantive arguments as to why Kopko’s ruling was wrong.

Tick, tick.

Instead, y’all enlighten us as to how Gill won’t win. He managed to win the convention fair and square. Get over it, and get behind the nominee, and maybe he WILL win. Maybe he’ll win notwithstanding your perfidy. Plenty of us who supported Gill for the nomination have had to accept a candidate for the nomination that we opposed. Mark Early comes immediately to mind, as does John Warner and Harry Parrish.

Or stop claiming to be Republicans.

Good riddance.