If the above is an ad for Jody Wagner, readers should know she stinks
BVBL Tearing Down The Mexican Economy?
By Greg L | 10 August 2007 | Illegal Aliens | 47 Comments
Lately some folks seem to be under the impression that I personally have been reshaping the political landscape on the immigration issue. That is false. Were it not for the more than seven hundred members of Help Save Manassas, I would be nothing more than one voice in the great cacophony that is the immigration debate in Prince William County and Virginia. This evening, The Virginian Federalist is claiming that I am actually affecting the economic prosperity of Mexico, something that I never thought I’d hear. Good Lord, are people going to start saying that I’m supposedly responsible for some measurable difference in “global warming” because people are reading this blog?
If only.
It’s a pretty funny post, though.
The opinions expressed here are solely the views of the author, and not representative of the position of any organization, political party, doughnut shop, knitting guild, or waste recycling facility, but may be correctly attributed to the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy. If anything in the above article has offended you, please click here to receive an immediate apology.
You can follow the discussion through the Comments feed.
47 Comments
Views: 963
Loading ...
The last I have seen from economic indicators, the Mexican economy is chugging along aw always. The Mexican economy never relied on the people that are here illegally, although their remittances are helpful to the relatives at home.
This is obviosly another way of trying to make us look like the bad guys
Greg is responsible for all manor of cough syrup, scotch tape and very peculiar clouds shaped like very peculiar ham sandwiches.
Greg L: at the end of the Virginian Federalist long post he/she takes it all back by saying “Sorry BVBL, perhaps you are not destroying the Mexican economy single handed after all.” That should make you feel better.
The prosperity of Mexico is only impacted by corrupt government officials there — mostly at the local and state level now. There has been some progress made in cleaning up some of the corruption (at least at the federal level) since PAN won the presidency over PRI.
Liz,
I have to respectfully disagree. I have seen data which indicates that money sent home to Mexico, by Mexican citizens residing either legally, or illegally (the report did not make the distinction) in the US is the largest source of revenue into the Mexican economy, behind oil production and sales. While I am sure that the total $ value of these tranfers has declined due to a slow down in new home construction, and the weakness of the dollar in foregin markets, the shear scope of the transfers keeps this category at a strong #2. The Mexican economy has improved, slightly, due to rising oil prices.
Oh, let us not forget that money which comes from the illegal drug trade. The same report listed this as 4th or 5th.
Batson
Do you really believe that little Manassas Park and Greg’s site is affecting the Mexican economy? What cloud are you on? First of all our blog has done nothing to stop the money that goes back to Mexico and second the sources of the Mexican strength have nothing to do with our remittances. These monies are just the icing on the cake. On the other hand, who said we have to bloody support the Mexican economy? and to do that we are undercutting our own labor, giving away jobs to illegals and generally turning our country into a third world country.
Whose bloody side are you on?
‘Batson’ is entirely correct. I can only hope that BVBL puts a huge dent in it. Any government that purposefully enables theft from its neighbors — like Mexico does from the U.S., in part by having consulates that produce identification that is supposed to resemble U.S. states’ drivers licenses for Mexican nationals illegally in the States — is no friend of mine. Strong words? Sure, but I don’t plan on having kind things to say about countries who steal from ours.
Fed Up,
I believe that I am on the side of those who oppose illegal immigration, and want government at all levels to fulfill its obligation to protect the US and its citizens. I disagreed with Liz’s assertion that the Mexican economy isn’t dependent on the money that their citizens living in the US send home. I believe that the only obligation that the US has to Mexico, is to work with Mexico to improve its economy, to provide jobs and opportunites to its citizens, so they will STAY IN MEXICO, and to crack down on US employers that exploit illegals for cheap labor, which only serves to hurt AMERICAN WORKERS. The sooner that we realize that the US Federal Government, certain sectors of the US economy, the Governments of most Latin American Countries, Red China, and several West African Countries have a single motivation in keeping the flow of illegals unchecked, the more effective OUR efforts to stop it will be. That single motivation is GREED.
The fact is that the money sent home by Mexican citizens residing in the US is so significant to the Mexican economy that there is deliberate and direct action by the Mexican government to not only ensure that it continues, but to increase it if possible. This is why the Mexican Government formally protests any efforts by tyhe US to secure its borders. This is why the Mexican Government is expected to endorse Mexicanos Sin Fronteras efforts to protest the PWC resolution. This is why Mexican Consular personel held a recent event at NVCC to issue official Mexican documents to illegals residing in PWC.
Do I believe that the Mexican governement is thinking “Damn that HSM and BVBL”? No. Do I believe that the Mexcian government is concerned that individual localities across America are trying to execute the will of the people, by using what tools they have to combat illegal immigration?
You better believe it. They see that citizen pressure derailed the Amnesty Bill. They see that for every New Haven Conn., that is issuing City ID’s to illegals, there are 4-5 Hazelton PAs or PWC VAs. They see the wave coming, and they don’t like it. When the illegals return home, either voluntarily or otherwise, the money stops. These people become the Government of Mexico’s problem again.
Lou Dobbs did a show recently stating that Mexico has plenty of money. I only caught the tail end of it but the conclusion was that Mexico has plenty of money. The only problem they said was distributing their wealth in areas that would give poorer areas opportinity. I imagine since NAFTA our country is pooring billions of dollars into that country every year. I think the reason illegals come here is because it is like a gold strike for them. Where else can you go that you can sneak across the border with impunity keep about every dollar you make because you don’t pay taxes, get free health care, free schooling, help with housing and food and use your money to buy cases of Corona beer, cell phones, fancy trucks and big screen televisions? Obviously they spend money on the things they can take back with them instead of fixing up their homes. If they need more money they just go to the local BOA and ask for it without needing social security numbers or credit history. Let’s not forget the ones who may be here legally that are profiting from them. They obviously do not want to let go of their cash cows. This is all currently sanctioned by our government at all levels. I wonder when Bush will throw up his hands and say it is impratical to go after drug dealers and then ask Congress to pass a bill to make drug dealers licensed pharmacists.
Patty
You are absolutely right. On the other hand, people have to stop seeing Mexico as a poor country. The people in it are poor, but Mexico has never been a country without resources.
On the other hand, Mexico has done nothing to help us. There is constant rethoric against us, and they would love none other than to see us go down.
They want to get rid of their unemployment problems by sending us the people that they themselves don’t want or want to take care of.
We have poured billions in South and Central America and all we get is gringo this and gringo that.
Let us NOT forget whose side Mexico was on during WWII!!!
Which side John?
As far as I know they have the famous flying aztecs fighting with us.
TH - if you remember, the Zimmerman Telegram of 1917 started the ball rolling with Mexico and support for Germany. At the beginning of WWII, Mexico was in full support of the Axis powers, hoping that if they do win, Mexico could hopefully (in their minds) take back that terrority in the U.S. which was rightfully theirs. It was not until 1941, when the Germans invaded Russia, that they, Mexico, switches alliances to the Allies.
So, while they ENDED on the right side, their initial support was CLEARLY against our best interestes. Also, Mexico served as a launching point throughout the war for Nazi spys into the border states.
Greg - you know that Che “Revolution” shirt that is so popular (http://www.thoseshirts.com/anticheshirts.html)? You should make one with “Viva la BVBL Revolucion” on it - lol
- Google “Carlos Slim” — si, the world’s richest man is Mexican.
BVBL must be doing something right. Keep up the good work. Question, why can’t the US simply tax the remittances to Mexico, etc.? Wouldn’t that send the illegals home, pronto?
Patty, I am not sure I would take Lou Dobbs authority on anything. Perhaps his “plenty” of money resembles his “plenty” of leprosy statistics and is equally accurate. But I would agree it is clear that the money that the Mexican government has is not helping the country’s poor.
Batson, did you not find it interesting to be attacked for just pointing out the importance of remittances to the Mexican economy? That made you quickly though briefly (one hopes) a traitor to the cause.
You and others here frequently say illegal aliens should stay home to help build their countries, but the reality is that the remittances (second only to oil in the Mexican economy) are building the country at the most direct and efficient local level. We may not agree with how that money is earned or more to the point, *where* it is earned, but there are forests of books and reports documenting the essential importance of remittances in Mexico, El Salvador, and a host of other countries.
John Light, interesting historical stuff. When you say “Mexico was in full support of the Axis powers,” could you be a bit more specific. I know there were influential groups in Mexican society in support of the Axis, but since you said “full support” by Mexico, are you saying that the government of Manuel Avila Camacho or Cardenas before him was not neutral? Also could you indicate some source on the role that you say Germany’s invasion of Russia played in Mexico’s shift from Axis to Allies. I am seeing a different explanation in my WWII reference books.
Would you also say that Britain’s status as an ally in WWII is tarnished the same way Mexico’s is since Chamberlain allowed Hitler free rein for a while. And what about the Soviet Union, which sacrificed more in World War II than the other allies put together. Would you say they also only “ended up” on the right side since Stalin initially signed a pact with Germany. Finally, how would you view the United States’ allowing Europe to be blitzed, raped, and pillaged for two years before it joined the fight, not to mention how xenophobes prevailed in the United States to turn away Jewish refugees and send them back to certain death. I guess my point is that Mexico is hardly alone in not immediately doing what was right against Axis aggression.
Leila,
These remittances do little to improve the long-term economic health and welfare of the recipients. I see them more as a Mexican non-governmental welfare program. Take them away, and the economy suffers. Sort of the “give a man a fish” argument. Wealth is concentrated in about 2% of the Mexican population. Their middle-class is tiny, relative to the size of their population. I heard a statistic during the last Mexican election cycle, when Vincete Fox was campaigning to MExican voters in…CALIFORNIA, that there are just as many Mexican citizens living legally and illegally in the United States, as there are living in Mexico. Think about that. Half of their population is living here, a great many illegally, to subsidize the other half, living in Mexico. Throw in the illegals from other countries, living in the US, and you get an idea of the scope of the problem.
Ross Perot, a head case but still a smart fellow in the ways of money
and biz, was right about NAFTA - good jobs rushing out of the USA.
What he didn’t predict, and it is germane to today, is the negative
impact of NAFTA on Mexican small farmers — many weren’t able
to compete with the cheaper food suddenly showing up from
el norte - and decided to immigrate here - often illegally.
Mexico is a country rich in natural resources and, yes, a smart people use
to hard work - the problem has always been lousy
government. (Pemex - the state oil monopoly - is a bloated
inept disaster).
Those interested in nation building - should focus on next door.
A prosperous, truly democratic Mexico would be a dream come true
for its citizens AND the USA.
Batson
Well said.
I found a Western Union wire to Mexico City from Manassas, for $2,000.00 (US-not pesos). This was on the sidewalk in front of my house with other litter left behind. I still have it. I was amazed that anyone would be this careless with a such an important receipts. I wonder if they are that careless with their cash.
Leila, while this blog is not history.com, I won’t take the space to answer each one, but let me remind you that by the actions taken by Mexico in regards to Germany at that time in history, it shows their support for the Nazis. As far as Manuel Avila Camacho is concerned, it took German U-Boats, as you know, to knock out two of Mexico’s ships carrying oil for Mexico to side with the U.S. To THAT, and his providing 15,000 troops to fight along side of us, the US owes Manuel Avila Camacho a debt of thanks.
Chamberlain, like the vast majority of Liberals here in the US, believed in appeasement and I lay the blame of the fall of Eastern Europe on his feet. Fortunately, Winston Churchill, who had been dercying Hitler for YEARS was there to lead the English to victory. The difference between England and Mexico is so vast that to even equate the two is foolhardy, especially when it comes to their alliances with the US.
And as far as the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics??? Obviously by your remarks you are a fan of Stalin “And what about the Soviet Union, which sacrificed more in World War II than the other allies put together.” Stalin KILLED more Jews than Hitler could dream of doing and he also prolonged the war by killing his own men - retreat was not an option under Stalin. Slash and burn was given new meaning in those dark years under “Uncle Joe.”
Big dog
How do you propose to give democracy to Mexico? And nation building? Puhleaze!!!
This is the same argument that we are using in building democracy in the middle east. We can all see how well that is going. the truth is that our style of democracy is not applicable until the people are willing to give up corruption, the narco cartels, their supremacy racial or perceived and other problems they have.
Nation building does not imply that people in those nations come here illegally and trash our country,
It is in our long term national interest to help, where possible,
Mexico become a strong and free country - both economically
and politically - where its citizens will see a good future THERE.
Simply to chase twelve million people back across the border
and cut off the money they send back -might be good for us,
but what will the result be in Mexico?
The last thing we want is for a Castro/Chavez like “presidente”to
come to power on our southern border.
We need to start thinking ahead - stop illegal immigration
AND ALSO help, where we can, to improve the life of the
average Mexican in their own country.
(And yes, not all Hispanics are Mexican, but they are the largest
group here and the only ones who share an 800 hundred mile border
with the USA).
Big Dog- It’s also in our long term national interest to create everlasting world peace and abolish hatred and evil from the face of the earth. I think maybe we should start and fix our problems at home before thinking we can cure the world of all its ailments.
Big Dog,
Yes, they are the largest group in the United States. No argument here. But they are not the largest Hispanic nationality in the Manassas area.
You make some interesting points. I also do not see how we could cut off money going back across the border to Mexico and Central American countries.
Last time I checked, Mexico was a democracy. Perhaps not a democracy like the United States of America, but a democracy, none the less. Mexico is less egalitarian than the United States. Their social stratas are not as flexible as ours and the education system is non-existent for many Mexican residents. Consequently, there is a great underbelly of poverty with little hope of remedy. The rest of the story is obvious…
dolph
If I remember correctly Mexico is a Republic. This means that they may have the basic tenets and legislation to be considered a democracy, but in truth that country is not because they do not respect their own laws. Corruption and nepotism cancel out the positive in the ‘res publica’. The point of democracy that I believe we all would like to see implimented in mexico would that of equal wealth sharing. Making that argument could make you a socialist. But that actually is a majority in the Mexican parliament.
The problem in Mexico is the lack of education, health care and, notwithstanding their socialist tendencies, the lack of labor laws and labor protection.
We cannot change Mexico by offering a remittance to the parents of expats in the US. That will only help to lift them out of their povery a little. It does, however, nothing to improve their education and does not place them in a position where they can find good employment or be competitive abroad. Another huge problem is that there is no availability of credit for Mexicans that would enable them to start their own businesses. That is where you see discrimination. The poor are kept in poverty deliberately. The power base remains the same decade after decade.
What the US needs to do is to streamline the immigration process so that people can come here legally and enforce existing law and keep illegal immigrants from using resources that should be dedicated to legal immigrants.
I think that an hispanic is a person from Spain or a direct descendant of Spaniards. A person from central america or south america is a latino.
Not that it matters any in the illegal argument but I am tired of hearing people calling latinos “brown” and latino “hispanic.”
The terms Latino and Hispanic can be used interchangeably. (at this point in time)
If we taxed the money going into Mexico and other foreign counties, we might be able to recoup some of the loses of the American taxpayer. Also when it is not profitable for illegal’s to be here they will go home.
Spaniards and Aztecs have nothing in common. The Hispanics don’t even speak proper Spanish.
I have to wonder if anyone is FOLLOWING THE MONEY?? We have McMansions being bought and rented to illegals (remember the Wheaton, MD story?), strip malls being bought out (or rented out?) to latinos exclusively (recall the recent FL story?), Sanctuary-City-Newark’s illegal Carranza, a/k/a LaChira linked to the 3 execution-style murders (he is said to have posted bail several times to the tune of 100’s of thousands of dollars). Besides latino mafia men living in the vicinity, is the Mexican government actually buying out property ala the Japanese in Hawaii a few decades ago?
It is good thing that you are “educated” and half “Spanish” fed up.
Have you evr heard the term Hispanoamerica? Hispano Parlante (speaking the language from Hispania:Potugal and Spain)?
I agree that they shouldn’t be called brown because a lot of the south americans are as White as their European acenstors
/my dear TH
this is the last time I indulge you. YOu seem to think you know everything. Well why don’t you go to Spain and ask them who they think Hispanics are? Or maybe you think they want to be called Iberian?
Remember to brush up on your English too. It seems lacking.
People living in the United States from Mexico, Central America, South America, Puerto Rico, and other islands where Spanish is spoken refer to themselves as Hispanic or Latino. ‘Latino’ actually only refers to people from the Americas. Most people I have known from Spain say they are Spanish. Perhaps it is snobbery to distinquish themselves from Spanish speaking people of the ‘New World.’ Some Latinos will say they are Spanish. My friends who know far more on this subject than I do tell me that this is incorrect.
Now I must ask….why on earth does it matter?
Someone on this blog stated that there are instructions in Spanish in the Prince William Government Center (presumably on Ashton Ave) that tell people how to apply for county/state benefits. I believe the implication was that illegal aliens were receiving state and county benefits there. Does anyone know if they advise people that, according to Virginia Code Section 63.2-503.1, they must be legally present in the United States to receive such benefits? Does anyone have any information that the county is/is not complying with that requirement? Would anyone care to find out? The section is set out below:
63.2-503.1. Legal presence required for public assistance; exceptions; proof of legal presence.
A. In addition to meeting the existing eligibility requirements of the benefits applied for, no person who is not a United States Citizen or legally present in the United States shall receive state or local public assistance pursuant to this subtitle, except for state or local public assistance that is mandated by Federal Law pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1621.
B. In addition to providing proof of other eligibility requirements, at the time of application for any state or local public benefit, an applicant who is 19 years of age or older shall provide affirmative proof that he is a U.S. citizen or is legally present in the United States. Such affirmative proof shall consist of documentary evidence as required pursuant to § 46.2-328.1 or a social security number as verified by the Social Security Administration. An applicant who is under the age of 19 years shall not be required to provide such affirmative proof; however, such person upon reaching the age of 19 years shall comply with the provisions of this section.
An applicant who cannot provide proof that he is a citizen or legally present at the time of application shall sign an affidavit under oath attesting that he is a U.S. citizen or legally present in the United States in order to receive temporary benefits as provided in this section. The affidavit shall be on or consistent with forms prepared by the Commissioner, and shall be subject to and include an explanation of the provisions of § 63.2-502 relating to penalties for knowingly providing false information on a public document. The agency shall report in writing to the appropriate attorney for the Commonwealth those who are determined to have falsely attested to lawful presence.
Once an applicant has provided the sworn affidavit required by this subsection, he shall be eligible to receive temporary benefits for either:
1. Ninety days or until such time that it is determined that he is not legally present in the United States, whichever is earlier, or
2. Indefinitely if the applicant provides a copy of a completed application for a birth certificate that has been filed and is pending and being actively pursued in accordance with § 32.1-259 or 32.1-260 or any substantially similar law of another state, the District of Columbia, or United States territory or commonwealth. Such extension shall terminate upon the applicant’s receipt of a birth certificate or a determination that a birth certificate does not exist because the applicant is not a United States citizen.
C. The provisions of subsection B shall not apply to persons applying for benefits exempted by subsection A of this section and subsection A of § 32.1-325.03.
(2005, cc. 867, 876.)
“Does anyone know if they advise people that, according to Virginia Code Section 63.2-503.1, they must be legally present in the United States to receive such benefits?”
What are the penalties for failure to comply with this, for both the illegal alien and the government agency?
John Light, sorry for the delay in replying. I was in transit. Not a fan of Stalin no. If I had to pick a Russian Communist to be a fan of, it would be Trotsky, but thankfully I don’t have to pick. No pun intended on pick. Sorry Leon. The Soviet people, I thought, died in greater numbers civilian and military than any other country in the conflict. Perhaps I am mistaken in that although I am looking at charts and other references that say just that. In any case, that is what I meant by sacrifice: loss of life.
Excellent question. Looks like it’s a Class 5 felony:
§ 63.2-502. False application or false swearing; penalty.
Any person who knowingly makes any false application for public assistance or who knowingly swears or affirms falsely to any matter or thing required by the provisions of this title or as to any information required by the Commissioner, incidental to the administration of the provisions of this title, to be sworn to or affirmed, shall be guilty of perjury and, upon conviction therefor, shall be punished in accordance with the provisions of § 18.2-434.
Is it possible to find out the number of people receiving county/state benefits? Is it possible to have a break down of this information by ethnicity?
Is there a way to find out what types of documentation are being asked for in order for a person to receive benefits?
I would prefer to work with facts and figures rather than what I assume to be true.
I am not very savvy when it comes to dealing with beaurocracies.
Dolph
It really doesn’t. But I think that the point is that we should realize that the underpriviliged, poor and desperate people who come here are not hispanic, they are indio or mestizo. Most of the people who are hispanic don’t need to move. They are the rich upper class which holds power in Mexico and other countries and sits in Mexico City sipping mojitos and complaining about all the peruvians and bolivians that are invading their country.
It is therefore important to distinguish not because it is inaccurate, although it is. It is important because it has become a generalization that does not reflect the need and cultural background of the immigrants that come here. The few ‘hispanics’ that do come here from Argentina and Venezuela, when they are not Italian, are usually here legally.
If we are talking about illegals, then they are not hispanic. Just because you speak Spanish, that does not make you an hispanic.
Fed up,
We will just have to agree to disagree because I am not going to debate. In this country, Hispanic and Latino are part of the vernacular and may be used interchangeably to describe people from Latin American countries.
Class distinctions and south of the border blood lines really have nothing to do with our issues here. Obviously if one is prosperous in one’s own country, one is less likely to immigrate elsewhere to find a better life.
Liz re: 8/19 2:22 post
I believe there are those out there who would say you just described the United States rather than Mexico.
We are not enforcing our own laws. Greed? Power? Corruption? It depends on who you talk to.
I am not going to get into some theoretical debate over republic vs democracy that belongs in some boring political science 101 class. Mexico is described as a democratic republic. So what.
I think we can agree however, that Mexico has a huge underclass and rather than trying to improve this situation with better education, medical services, and infastructure in the poverty areas, they have encouraged people without resources to come tap into ours.
Dolph:
In response to your 1:24 AM (don’t you guys ever sleep?) post, I believe we can get answers to those questions from the County. The main question I’m interested in is whether the County actually enforces that law and inquires about legal residency. I’ll start inquiring this week.
Advocator,
I would be very interested in knowing what you find out.
Any facts and figures you can get from them would be appreciated.
thanks,
Dolph
If the USA did this to Mexico they would take action, but we are so PC & Corrupt we let Mexico use a bunch of illiterate Peons with a average 6 grade education take this Nation & make the tax payers pay them for turning this country into another Third World Cesspool!
1. Did the United States violate the sovereignty and borders of Mexico by encouraging, aiding, & assisting 20 million of their most undesirable illiterate American peasants to cross the border illegally?
2. Did American send 128 Billions worth of drugs each year across the Mexican Borders to Destroy Millions of Mexican lives?
3. Did illegal American Citizens in Mexico, kill nearly 10 thousands Mexicans each year & Rob, Rape & Assault 10,s of thousands more?
4. Did American illegal aliens engage in wholesale forgery of vital public documents and commit identity theft in order to secure employment, education, credit, and access to public services?
5. Did American illegal aliens feed at the public trough for health care, education, food, housing and other vital services to which they were not entitled, and which cost Mexican taxpayers hundreds of billions of pesos each year?
6. Did the impact of serving American illegal aliens force scores of medical facilities into bankruptcy, resulting in the loss of vital medical services for Mexican citizens?
7. Did American illegal aliens who refused to pay for medical services manage to send $30 billion a year back to the United States?
8. Did American illegal aliens refuse to learn Spanish, and demand that Mexico provide services in English at considerable cost to Mexican citizens & to their Culture?
9. Did the children of American illegal aliens slow down and otherwise impede the education of Mexican children because of language and cultural issues & add Billions to the Education cost & Dummy down the Mexicans Children Education?
10. Did American illegal aliens demand driver’s licenses despite being in Mexico illegally? Did they demand that driver instruction and testing materials be in English?
11. Did American illegal aliens demand the same reduced tuition rates offered to Mexican students there legally?
12. Did American illegal aliens vote in Mexican elections and alter election results?
13. Did American illegal aliens overwhelm Mexico’s penal system, making it impossible to deal with the citizen inmate population?
14. Did the largest state in Mexico contract with another Mexican state for the housing and care of 15,000 inmates because of the impact of American illegal aliens?
15. Did American illegal aliens overwhelm Mexican hospitals, medical clinics, and emergency rooms and refuse to pay for medical services received?
16. Did American illegal aliens in Mexico in 1986 receive amnesty in an attempt by the Mexican government to end illegal migrations once and for all?
17. Did the Mexican government refuse to enforce the provisions of the amnesty, thereby causing the American illegal alien problem to grow seven times greater in the span of 20 years?
18. Did millions of American illegal aliens take to the streets to protest pending legislation in the Mexican congress that would tighten border security and enforce the nation’s immigration laws?
19. Did American illegal aliens wave Old Glory and scream “Yes we can!” and “We are Mexico” & “everything for the “White race & nothing for the rest” in English as they marched to protest the rule of law in Mexico?
20. Did American illegal aliens cry “Racism” every time they were criticized for being in Mexico illegally or challenged to learn Spanish and assimilate into Mexican society?
21. Did Americans Politicians state Often & Openly they were going to take Mexico over? They way Mexican officials have in Mexico & La Raza the Mexican racist, hate Org in the USA has?
22. Did Mexico pay for over 300.000 American Anchor Babies born to Illegal Americans Citizens each year in Mexico & give the Babies Mexican Citizenship?
23. Did American drive millions of cars & trucks each day without driver Licenses or Insurance, clogging the roads, polluting the air & trashing the environment?
24. Did illegal Americans take Mexicans jobs & drive Mexico’s standard living down by 250 billions per year?
25. Did Americans Illegally in Mexico bred like Fruit Flies on a Viagra diet & make the Mexican Taxpayers paid for their medical bills & the 10,000.00 Average per year to send them to School at the expense of Mexican Children Education?
26. Did American Citizens Carry third diseases across the Border to Mexico and infect 10,s of thousands of Mexicans Citizens with disease resistance stains of TB & type A & B liver diseases from feces on food?
No American did not, Mexico did that & much more to American, and they dare to complain!
American is on the down hill race to Destruction! When you ignore the Constitution & Laws of the land to add Millions of Law Breaking, Fast breeding, Uneducated, Criminally Inclined, Welfare loving, Education hating citizens with hated of American & Loyally to a Foreign Nation then you are asking to be destroyed!
If Americans Politicians were not so Corrupt & Willing to sell this Nation & Americans Citizens out for Money & Votes the US Military would be on the Border with Guns Protecting this Nation from the Largest Invasion in History!
The real question is whether this is more a commentary on your readership, or upon the pathetic state of the Mexican economy.
Wow, now that’s a serious laundry list of infractions I would say. Nothing more needs to be said on this topic now. Game. Set. Match. Illegal alien supporters: I challenge any of you to come up with a comparable list of positive things that illegal aliens contribute which could even come close to offsetting that list above. Good luck. You’re gonna need it…