Good post!

>Hummmm – I wonder what Mark Warner’s position is on the presence of illegal aliens […]

Probably the same as Webb’s. And Webb’s vote today on S.2205 shows that he’s pro-amnesty.

Jet Li ?

Let’s just hope those candidates that value our citizenship, laws and quality of life will continue to pound their opposition on the illegal alien issues.

It has bee absolutely fascinating to watch the metamorphosis that conservative candidates have undergone. Prior to the U.S. Senate debacle on the “comprehensive immigration reform”, known by its true name “amnesty” the issues that everyone touted was transportation, education and taxes.

The democrat party even tried to create an issue on the abuser fees and the fact that the current law excused out-of-state-drivers. Imagine their surprise when the truth came out and it was the democrat governor Kaine that excused out-of-state drivers from the abuser bill.

I also recall some prominent conservatives, taking the position that illegal immigration was not an issue in their districts.

I know what changed after the amnesty bill failed – candidates began their door-to-door campaigns and “discovered” the vast majority of probable voters said illegal immigration was the number one issue and demanded to know what the candidate was going to do to stop Virginia from becoming a sanctuary state.

I even recall an incumbent Fairfax County Supervisor claiming there was no problems with illegal aliens in his district only to turn around weeks later and ask the County Executive what social services could be withheld from illegal aliens (thanks PWC). My conclusion… he began his door-to-door campaign.

The conservative candidates adapted their campaign strategies (after all we do live in a representative democracy) and took their constituent’s issue seriously. Our more liberal candidates wrote the voter’s comments off to xenophobia. What a surprise when more that 60% of probable voter’s align themselves with candidates that are strongly against illegal aliens.

I’ve even heard of a comment by one Northern Virginia democratic candidates that indicated he has all but thrown in the towel because he waffled and flopped while his Republican opposition took a firm stand against illegal aliens.

One could argue that the liberal, pro-illegal candidates ought to just give up and stop spending money – after all Mark Warner is going to need every dime he can get.

Hummmm – I wonder what Mark Warner’s position is on the presence of illegal aliens, providing services to illegal aliens, providing in-state tuition to illegal aliens and allowing sanctuary cities and counties in the Commonwealth. I’m sure the questions will be asked.

Going door-to-door in Fairfax County, I have talked to many voters concerned with illegal immigation; some have even pointed to illegal boarding houses next door or across the street. If Baise can make voters understand that Connelly is against Fairfax on this issue, he can very well win this.

Go Gary!

They’ll finally have proof that the crackdown in Prince William isn’t from a bunch of reactionary right-wingers, but anger and concern from people across the political spectrum who deal with this out-of-control problem in their daily lives.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/23/AR2007102302425.html?hpid=moreheadlines

If politicians would only pay attention to the voters. We’ve been shouting about this issue.

That’s how Fairfax got almost a thousand new students this year after NO growth for 5 years. Illegals, fleeing Prince William and Loudoun for Connelly’s safe haven. Thanks Gerry! The taxpayers really want to pay for more illegal students.

Too bad arrogant Connelly has missed his chance to pay attention to the voters. Hahahaha…………say goodbye Gerry. Nighty-night, don’t let the screen door hit you on the way out.