Driving liberals, dhimmis and illegal alien apologists absolutely insane since 2005...

« Record Traffic On BVBLGay groups say defeating Marshall key to “progress” »

NLS Attacks Ken Cuccinelli’s Manhood

By Greg L | 2 November 2007 | Fairfax County, Virginia Senate | 14 Comments

Tonight’s post at NLS: “CUCCINELLI’S BIG COCK PROBLEM”

I’m just stunned.



The opinions expressed here are solely the views of the author, and not representative of the position of any organization, political party, doughnut shop, knitting guild, or waste recycling facility, but may be correctly attributed to the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy. If anything in the above article has offended you, please click here to receive an immediate apology.

You can follow the discussion through the Comments feed.

14 Comments

  1. Rob Smalls said on 2 Nov 2007 at 7:47 am: Flag comment

    The NLS posting is a juvenile play on words that attempts to make Ken Cuccinelli’s vote a projection of his manhood. NLS posted Ken C’s explanation of the vote in his comments, and the explanation seems sound. This is just silliness, certainly predictable and far from stunning.

  2. es_la_ley said on 2 Nov 2007 at 8:07 am: Flag comment

    Rooster envy?

  3. Rob Smalls said on 2 Nov 2007 at 8:12 am: Flag comment

    LOL

  4. CR UVa said on 2 Nov 2007 at 8:22 am: Flag comment

    I’m not. Clearly, the only way Ben can get any attention these days is to shock people.

  5. TC said on 2 Nov 2007 at 8:54 am: Flag comment

    Greg, didn’t you post in the thread at NLS?

    “How is a big cock a problem, pray tell?

    Posted by: Greg L | November 02, 2007 at 02:24 AM ”

    Or, is that a different Greg L?

  6. Cuccinelli-Oleszek: Money Madness and Desperate Behavior « Renaissance Ruminations said on 2 Nov 2007 at 9:31 am: Flag comment

    […] Then there is the cock-fighting bill, leading to today’s most unusual post heading and retort. […]

  7. John Light said on 2 Nov 2007 at 10:47 am: Flag comment

    I think Ben needs to worry more about his big stomach than about Senator Ken and the Bill in question.

  8. siebenundsiebzig said on 2 Nov 2007 at 12:35 pm: Flag comment

    Better to have a big cock problem than a little cock problem.

  9. Riley said on 2 Nov 2007 at 1:13 pm: Flag comment

    No wonder many a spam filter and firewall now prohibits access to NLS given.

  10. Dolph said on 2 Nov 2007 at 2:42 pm: Flag comment

    Crime and cruelty are embedded in cockfighting. It also is alive and well in Prince William County. One of the prize ‘fighters’ escaped his cruel fate and was lounging around the Sudley Manor House lawn over on Gardner Drive about a year ago.

    Michael Vick should have bought himself a few prime roosters rather than pitbulls. Then perhaps he would not have the legal and finacial problems he has today.

  11. Anonymous said on 2 Nov 2007 at 3:04 pm: Flag comment

    es_la_ley said 2 Nov 2007 at 8:07 am:

    cock-a-doodle-do!

  12. es_la_ley said on 2 Nov 2007 at 8:43 pm: Flag comment

    77: “Better to have a big cock problem than a little cock problem.”

    A rather fowl statement. But birds of a feather do flock together! We’re all cooped up here together after all!
    But we shouldn’t count our eggs before they’re hatched.

    Good grief, I just laid an egg.

    [Yes, I’m done.]

  13. John Light said on 2 Nov 2007 at 11:37 pm: Flag comment

    What do you expect from a guy who supports Hillary…what an idiot.

  14. es_la_ley said on 3 Nov 2007 at 9:13 pm: Flag comment

    John Light:

    Hmmmm…. Turn that around to a question!

    Q: What do you expect from a guy who supports Hillary?

    A:

    :)

Comments are closed.


Views: 892