<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stolle&#8217;s Aide Switches Sides</title>
	<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/</link>
	<description>Blog-Fu for Prince William, Manassas and Manassas Park politics.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-42506</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-42506</guid>
		<description>Greg - It appears to me that it is YOU that is the dimit, not Stolle and not Payne.  You yourself say:
The other utter dimwit here is quite obviously Senator Ken Stolle. ... given Stolle’s own behavior in the Senate over the past several sessions, that’s going to be an uphill battle. He wasn’t what you’d call a “team player”, by any stretch of the imagination.


You then go on throughout your article and berate Mr. Payne for leaving.  You questions Stolle's behavior, call him a dimwit and then allege with absolutely no evidence that this guy is stealing condifdential information from one campaign to bring to another - in this case he has left to work for a moderate Democrat who seems to be more Republican than most Republicans are nowadays. 

Maybe Payne is concerned with the good of the Commonwealth of Virginia or maybe he just wants to work for someone that he feels better about.  Seriously, it is so clear that attitudes like yours have lead to the Republican's loss of ontrol of the Congress. People like you need to wake up. Payne may have realized that the Republican Party was leaving people like him behind.  If you spend more time figuring out why he left and less time with your conspiricy theories, perhaps you could help improve your party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg - It appears to me that it is YOU that is the dimit, not Stolle and not Payne.  You yourself say:<br />
The other utter dimwit here is quite obviously Senator Ken Stolle. &#8230; given Stolle’s own behavior in the Senate over the past several sessions, that’s going to be an uphill battle. He wasn’t what you’d call a “team player”, by any stretch of the imagination.</p>
<p>You then go on throughout your article and berate Mr. Payne for leaving.  You questions Stolle&#8217;s behavior, call him a dimwit and then allege with absolutely no evidence that this guy is stealing condifdential information from one campaign to bring to another - in this case he has left to work for a moderate Democrat who seems to be more Republican than most Republicans are nowadays. </p>
<p>Maybe Payne is concerned with the good of the Commonwealth of Virginia or maybe he just wants to work for someone that he feels better about.  Seriously, it is so clear that attitudes like yours have lead to the Republican&#8217;s loss of ontrol of the Congress. People like you need to wake up. Payne may have realized that the Republican Party was leaving people like him behind.  If you spend more time figuring out why he left and less time with your conspiricy theories, perhaps you could help improve your party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dolph</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-40232</link>
		<dc:creator>Dolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 13:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-40232</guid>
		<description>Billyboy,

Care to speculate on why they keep letting him run?  If I were a Republican, I would be howling like a stuck pig if he were allowed to run again.  I just don't see this individual as a mainstream candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Billyboy,</p>
<p>Care to speculate on why they keep letting him run?  If I were a Republican, I would be howling like a stuck pig if he were allowed to run again.  I just don&#8217;t see this individual as a mainstream candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billyboy</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-40124</link>
		<dc:creator>Billyboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 13:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-40124</guid>
		<description>Bob FitzSimmonds is a four time loser and the Republican will let him run again in four years and again he will loose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob FitzSimmonds is a four time loser and the Republican will let him run again in four years and again he will loose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39870</link>
		<dc:creator>eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39870</guid>
		<description>Curious that there is no mention in the comments about Will's involvement with Chris Stolle's losing campaign...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious that there is no mention in the comments about Will&#8217;s involvement with Chris Stolle&#8217;s losing campaign&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39827</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39827</guid>
		<description>Greg L said on 14 Nov 2007 at 8:57 pm: 
Rob, in a word, no.
You don’t get ahead in the world of politics by abusing trust. You don’t leverage the confidential information you have in order to benefit the other side.


C'mon Greg, this is a stretch, even for you.  And as for you above comment, if you really want to split hairs then lets talk about some of the Republican candidates that you supported in this election cycle who abused the trust of their constituents...namely Corey Stewart and the two mailers that he sent out regarding the immigration resolution and the mailer about the proffers in which he lied about a BOCS vote that hadn't even taken place yet, and when it did take place the vote failed even though Stewart told everyone that it had already passed....yes, that's really trustworthy, Greg.  Unfortunately for PWC, Stewart did get ahead for abusing the trust of this County.

I agree with Rob; it is wrong to assume that Stolle's aide was feeding secrets to the "enemy."  perhaps he just wanted to further his own career.  and unlike you, Greg, there are a lot of people out there who are politically moderate and can work on both sides of the aisle.  And to say that his supposed feeding of secrets to the Democrats cost Fitzsimmonds and O'Brien their elections is absurd...I can't speak for O'Brien, as i don't live in his district, but as far as Fitzsimmonds, he lost because he was a bad candidate, not because stolle's aide may or may not have been feeding information to mark warner.  you cannot prove any of this and therefore you need to stop making such false accusations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg L said on 14 Nov 2007 at 8:57 pm:<br />
Rob, in a word, no.<br />
You don’t get ahead in the world of politics by abusing trust. You don’t leverage the confidential information you have in order to benefit the other side.</p>
<p>C&#8217;mon Greg, this is a stretch, even for you.  And as for you above comment, if you really want to split hairs then lets talk about some of the Republican candidates that you supported in this election cycle who abused the trust of their constituents&#8230;namely Corey Stewart and the two mailers that he sent out regarding the immigration resolution and the mailer about the proffers in which he lied about a BOCS vote that hadn&#8217;t even taken place yet, and when it did take place the vote failed even though Stewart told everyone that it had already passed&#8230;.yes, that&#8217;s really trustworthy, Greg.  Unfortunately for PWC, Stewart did get ahead for abusing the trust of this County.</p>
<p>I agree with Rob; it is wrong to assume that Stolle&#8217;s aide was feeding secrets to the &#8220;enemy.&#8221;  perhaps he just wanted to further his own career.  and unlike you, Greg, there are a lot of people out there who are politically moderate and can work on both sides of the aisle.  And to say that his supposed feeding of secrets to the Democrats cost Fitzsimmonds and O&#8217;Brien their elections is absurd&#8230;I can&#8217;t speak for O&#8217;Brien, as i don&#8217;t live in his district, but as far as Fitzsimmonds, he lost because he was a bad candidate, not because stolle&#8217;s aide may or may not have been feeding information to mark warner.  you cannot prove any of this and therefore you need to stop making such false accusations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39796</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39796</guid>
		<description>Clean it Up,

Different legislators rely on their legislative assistants to do different things.  Some may be the secretaries you describe, but other legislative assistants are involved in policy, are involved in campaigning, and are insiders even down to advising about tactics inside the caucus.  That's not to say that Will Payne was one or the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clean it Up,</p>
<p>Different legislators rely on their legislative assistants to do different things.  Some may be the secretaries you describe, but other legislative assistants are involved in policy, are involved in campaigning, and are insiders even down to advising about tactics inside the caucus.  That&#8217;s not to say that Will Payne was one or the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billyboy</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39747</link>
		<dc:creator>Billyboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39747</guid>
		<description>Advocator,

Thats funny, I don't care who you are..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advocator,</p>
<p>Thats funny, I don&#8217;t care who you are..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Advocator</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39690</link>
		<dc:creator>Advocator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39690</guid>
		<description>Maybe he'll reveal the secret State GOP coffee recipe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe he&#8217;ll reveal the secret State GOP coffee recipe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clean it up in '07</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39684</link>
		<dc:creator>Clean it up in '07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39684</guid>
		<description>Once again on this blog, much is being made out of these legislative assistant positions.  I laughed when Fittzsimmonds supporters were actually asserting that these are some knd of "insider" policy shaping jobs.  They aren't.  They are administrative posts that are VERY apolitical, and in some instances the positions are held by people of the opposite party  of their bosses.  There are some legislative assistants who have held their positions even as a different member of a different party was elected to the post.  Some General Assembly members view this position just for what it is:  a constituent affairs adminstrator.....and yes...they have to make coffee too.

They are people hardly in a position to be included in high level campaign and policy strategy sessions on the statewide level.  Heck, Stolle himself probably has a hard time getting in on those conference calls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again on this blog, much is being made out of these legislative assistant positions.  I laughed when Fittzsimmonds supporters were actually asserting that these are some knd of &#8220;insider&#8221; policy shaping jobs.  They aren&#8217;t.  They are administrative posts that are VERY apolitical, and in some instances the positions are held by people of the opposite party  of their bosses.  There are some legislative assistants who have held their positions even as a different member of a different party was elected to the post.  Some General Assembly members view this position just for what it is:  a constituent affairs adminstrator&#8230;..and yes&#8230;they have to make coffee too.</p>
<p>They are people hardly in a position to be included in high level campaign and policy strategy sessions on the statewide level.  Heck, Stolle himself probably has a hard time getting in on those conference calls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dolph</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39677</link>
		<dc:creator>Dolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39677</guid>
		<description>How is this any different than Gary Friedman?  Speaking of trust.....

At least this guy made a clean break rather than slinking around and carrying tales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this any different than Gary Friedman?  Speaking of trust&#8230;..</p>
<p>At least this guy made a clean break rather than slinking around and carrying tales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39666</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39666</guid>
		<description>Maybe the guy just wants to go wtih the better candidate and one that is going to win anyway.  Warner is going to beat Gilmore.  This is the same Senator Stolle who has made public statements that he does not support State Police and 287g training and only wants it handled in the jails.  He is also the one who helped kill a lot of immigration bills last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the guy just wants to go wtih the better candidate and one that is going to win anyway.  Warner is going to beat Gilmore.  This is the same Senator Stolle who has made public statements that he does not support State Police and 287g training and only wants it handled in the jails.  He is also the one who helped kill a lot of immigration bills last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Smalls - Patriot Temp</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39664</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Smalls - Patriot Temp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39664</guid>
		<description>Corr:  Independent forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corr:  Independent forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Smalls - Patriot Temp</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39663</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Smalls - Patriot Temp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39663</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Anonymous @10:54.  True, he switched sides with respect to party affiliation, but that's not to say he's abused the trust of Stolle or anyone else.  It's a specious claim to say he's leveraging confidential information for the benefit of the opposition, unless you have proof that he's done so.  That's like saying I could never work at AMD as an engineer because I'm working for Intel as an engineer.

And to Anonymous @ 11:26, so what if he takes his knowledge, skills and abilities elsewhere?  It's his prerogative to do so.  Is it undesirable because it costs the Republican party an able body, or because it gives one to the Democrats?  If you've determined by now he's untrustworthy, surely you're better off to be rid of him.

This is why I'll be an indepedent forever.  Partisan politics will override principle and common sense everywhere it's found.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Anonymous @10:54.  True, he switched sides with respect to party affiliation, but that&#8217;s not to say he&#8217;s abused the trust of Stolle or anyone else.  It&#8217;s a specious claim to say he&#8217;s leveraging confidential information for the benefit of the opposition, unless you have proof that he&#8217;s done so.  That&#8217;s like saying I could never work at AMD as an engineer because I&#8217;m working for Intel as an engineer.</p>
<p>And to Anonymous @ 11:26, so what if he takes his knowledge, skills and abilities elsewhere?  It&#8217;s his prerogative to do so.  Is it undesirable because it costs the Republican party an able body, or because it gives one to the Democrats?  If you&#8217;ve determined by now he&#8217;s untrustworthy, surely you&#8217;re better off to be rid of him.</p>
<p>This is why I&#8217;ll be an indepedent forever.  Partisan politics will override principle and common sense everywhere it&#8217;s found.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: park'd</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39653</link>
		<dc:creator>park'd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39653</guid>
		<description>Stolle is a RINO anyway. He is worthless. He is the main reason why this state languishes with over a million illegal aliens. To call that guy a republican is an assault on the name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stolle is a RINO anyway. He is worthless. He is the main reason why this state languishes with over a million illegal aliens. To call that guy a republican is an assault on the name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39644</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 04:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39644</guid>
		<description>But the guy takes knowledge, skills and abilities to the other side.

Why do republicans and GOP donors spend money on these guys only to have them turn around and work against us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the guy takes knowledge, skills and abilities to the other side.</p>
<p>Why do republicans and GOP donors spend money on these guys only to have them turn around and work against us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billyboy</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39643</link>
		<dc:creator>Billyboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 04:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39643</guid>
		<description>By the way Stolle funded more than 80% of FitzSimmonds Campaign through PAC's which he and his comrades control. 
A wasted investment, that money could have saved Jay O'Brien and control of the Senate. 

I don't think Stolle or Payne feed Warner any information 
which cost Republican seats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way Stolle funded more than 80% of FitzSimmonds Campaign through PAC&#8217;s which he and his comrades control.<br />
A wasted investment, that money could have saved Jay O&#8217;Brien and control of the Senate. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Stolle or Payne feed Warner any information<br />
which cost Republican seats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39642</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 03:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39642</guid>
		<description>Greg,

You're assuming that there was an abuse of trust or that Will disclosed confidential information while considering the post in the Warner campaign, but you have nothing on which to base that assumption other than your own worst expectations.  But on the other hand, as you yourself observe in your 8:57 comment, you don't get anywhere in politics by doing that.  If the Warner campaign expected Will to do that, and I doubt they did, Will wouldn't have done it anyway.  While the first statement is an assumption as baseless as yours, the second is based on years of knowing Will Payne.

You're taking an even bigger leap by attributing this to Ken Stolle.  Stolle doesn't like Jim Gilmore, but he's hardly alone in the Virginia GOP on that point.  But Stolle didn't tell Will to do this, and Stolle doesn't have control over his employee's actions any more than any other employer would.  So how is Stolle to blame, other than your eagerness to find fault with him?

On the other hand, someone like Stall's former campaign manager, Pat Murphy, directly abandoned the Stall campaign and went to work for the enemy.  Now if you're looking for someone who had access to confidential information and could have cost the Senate GOP a conservative caucus member and a majority-preserving vote, blame him.

What about John Hager, who joined the Warner Administration?  Like it or not, he's still chairman of RPV.

Simply put, you're making a mountain out of a molehill on this simply because you don't like it.  And while you're entitled not to like it, there are still going to be people who remain friends with Will because they know that he did not abuse their trust and they know that politics isn't the most important thing in life, and neither is the political party or candidate your friend supports.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re assuming that there was an abuse of trust or that Will disclosed confidential information while considering the post in the Warner campaign, but you have nothing on which to base that assumption other than your own worst expectations.  But on the other hand, as you yourself observe in your 8:57 comment, you don&#8217;t get anywhere in politics by doing that.  If the Warner campaign expected Will to do that, and I doubt they did, Will wouldn&#8217;t have done it anyway.  While the first statement is an assumption as baseless as yours, the second is based on years of knowing Will Payne.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re taking an even bigger leap by attributing this to Ken Stolle.  Stolle doesn&#8217;t like Jim Gilmore, but he&#8217;s hardly alone in the Virginia GOP on that point.  But Stolle didn&#8217;t tell Will to do this, and Stolle doesn&#8217;t have control over his employee&#8217;s actions any more than any other employer would.  So how is Stolle to blame, other than your eagerness to find fault with him?</p>
<p>On the other hand, someone like Stall&#8217;s former campaign manager, Pat Murphy, directly abandoned the Stall campaign and went to work for the enemy.  Now if you&#8217;re looking for someone who had access to confidential information and could have cost the Senate GOP a conservative caucus member and a majority-preserving vote, blame him.</p>
<p>What about John Hager, who joined the Warner Administration?  Like it or not, he&#8217;s still chairman of RPV.</p>
<p>Simply put, you&#8217;re making a mountain out of a molehill on this simply because you don&#8217;t like it.  And while you&#8217;re entitled not to like it, there are still going to be people who remain friends with Will because they know that he did not abuse their trust and they know that politics isn&#8217;t the most important thing in life, and neither is the political party or candidate your friend supports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billyboy</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39639</link>
		<dc:creator>Billyboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 03:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39639</guid>
		<description>Where Ed Rollins? He cannot even get on CNN anymore.
After Warner he is dead and I doubt Warner will keep him around long, how can he trust him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where Ed Rollins? He cannot even get on CNN anymore.<br />
After Warner he is dead and I doubt Warner will keep him around long, how can he trust him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PWConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39636</link>
		<dc:creator>PWConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 03:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39636</guid>
		<description>his contact info is right there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>his contact info is right there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39629</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 03:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2007/11/14/stolles-aide-switches-sides/#comment-39629</guid>
		<description>This is unbelievable.  The next questions are when did Stolle find out Payne was leaving the party, what did Warner know and when did he know it and which seats did Payne cost the Senate GOP?

I hope Stolle's colleagues in the Senate appreciate his boy helping them to the minority.

BTW, the :) explanation is very convincing.  Oh, the Dems have control of the Senate going into redistricting, but he put a smiley face on the email - it's OK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is unbelievable.  The next questions are when did Stolle find out Payne was leaving the party, what did Warner know and when did he know it and which seats did Payne cost the Senate GOP?</p>
<p>I hope Stolle&#8217;s colleagues in the Senate appreciate his boy helping them to the minority.</p>
<p>BTW, the <img src='http://www.bvbl.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> explanation is very convincing.  Oh, the Dems have control of the Senate going into redistricting, but he put a smiley face on the email - it&#8217;s OK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

