Driving liberals, dhimmis and illegal alien apologists absolutely insane since 2005...
video production in Manassas and Prince William County

The Other Railroad In The Park

By Greg L | 20 November 2007 | Rack & Roll Scandal | 10 Comments

On June 2nd, 2004 about 90 officers with the Joint Narcotics Task Force raided The Rack & Roll Billiard Club in ski masks and with guns drawn under the guise of an ABC investigation, and left about an hour later with only two warm bottles of beer to show for their efforts. After the expenditure of hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxpayer funds this warrantless search still didn’t produce enough evidence to put Dave Ruttenberg out of business. It was then time to try something else. In order to get an ABC license revoked, generally two serious violations were needed. The drug sales orchestrated by the police at Rack & Roll was one. There was a a charge of female patrons bearing their breasts at Mardi Gras, but it wasn’t considered serious enough. The two warm bottles of beer that the beer distributor had not marked as samples didn’t get the job done either. The city needed another charge.

Enter Shannon Mullins, a 19 year old girl who the JNTF could get to say that she was served alcohol by Dave Ruttenberg. Ms. Mullins drove herself down to the ABC headquarters in Alexandria to turn herself in one day, and swore out an affidavit that she was served a Captain Morgan and Coke by Ruttenberg in May of 2004. Now it’s off to the races at an ABC hearing. Here’s the needed additional violation.

Mullins’ original statement to the police says that Ruttenberg served her the drink, and this story starts to quickly fall apart as eyewitnesses provide conflicting accounts of the story. Mullins then goes back and changes the statement to say that Wayne Houston, the chairman of the Manassas Park Board of Zoning Appeals gave her the alcohol. Funny thing about that – It was clear at the time that the BZA would be deciding the fate of Rack & Roll’s Conditional Use Permit and would likely overturn the revocation of the permit for Rack & Roll. Mullins, after being confronted with the inconsistencies in her account of what happened, can’t seem to remember who gave her the alcohol, whether it was Wayne Houston (version two of the story) or an employee names Mike Rose (version three). The eventual complaint before the ABC hearing is that Dave Ruttenberg didn’t provide Ms. Mullins with the alcohol as originally charged, but somehow witnessed her consuming it, wherever it supposedly came from. Here’s the witness changing the story before, and then again during the hearing, and instead of the charge being dismissed, it continues under this constantly evolving description of the supposed circumstances.

Of note the city subsequently sues its own zoning appeals board in order to overturn their decision and throws the reputation of Wayne Houston under the bus in the process, since he’s not following the approved script for this takedown. Play ball, or become an enemy is the clear message here.

At the hearing, suddenly the police officers who were previously solid on the facts can’t seem to remember the specifics of the complaint. No matter. The hearing officer blissfully continues on, ignoring that the story about this violation has entirely changed during the course of the hearing and no witnesses can corroborate Ms. Mullins account, even while three witnesses directly contradict her story. Ms. Mullins becomes so confused that she mistakes Wayne Houston as a Rack & Roll employee, when he’s not. She can’t remember whether folks were joking around about her supposedly getting alcohol, or whether it was about something else entirely. While Mullins can’t keep her story straight, the police officers testifying absolutely fail to keep up with the twists and turns the story takes as they attempt to evade criticism. Yet the hearing officer for some unknown reason gave full credibility to Shannon Mullins, and with that additional violation, ordered Ruttenberg’s ABC license revoked. Go figure.

This story is problematic for additional reasons. Her boyfriend at the time was a Fairfax County Sheriff’s Deputy by the name of Gary Evans, who is the nephew of Manassas Park Chief of Police John Evans. He has stated that Mullins has told him that she lied, which is entirely credible since her entire story about this incident changed multiple times, and that her fake ID had previously been seized by Rack & Roll’s staff. Perhaps most damning is the timing of this charge with the proposal of Colonial Downs to redevelop this property into an off-track betting location. The day after this charge is filed, Colonial Downs announced their plans to seek approval for the Manassas Park Shopping Center to house a “satellite wagering facility”, something which Rack & Roll could make difficult since it was the sole tenant at this location that couldn’t be summarily kicked out if the referendum that would permit this was decided in Colonial Downs’ favor.

David Ruttenberg had held an ABC license for eighteen years prior to this hearing. During that time ABC enforcement officers had conducted approximately ninety stings with underage buys, and never once had Ruttenberg or any of his employees provided underage buyers with alcohol. Ruttenberg had a perfect ABC record. This all ends when one girl whose story can’t stay consistent, which is not supported by any police or ABC agent corroboration, but yet it becomes that crucial final violation that revokes the permit and turns Rack & Roll from a profitable business to a dying one.

What a way to run a railroad.

List of exhibits for this post:

Hearing Officer decision (pdf)
Wayne Houston statement (pdf)
ABC Charge (pdf)
ABC Code (pdf)
Witness statement on charges (pdf)
Gary Evans recording (audio, 1.5MB WAV)
Mullins Statement (pdf)

The opinions expressed here are solely the views of the author, and not representative of the position of any organization, political party, doughnut shop, knitting guild, or waste recycling facility, but may be correctly attributed to the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy. If anything in the above article has offended you, please click here to receive an immediate apology.

BVBL is not a charity and your support is not tax-deductible.

You can follow the discussion through the Comments feed.


  1. Rob Smalls - Patriot Temp said on 20 Nov 2007 at 12:18 pm:
    Flag comment

    Dave - I’m sorry for what my town is putting you through.

  2. Krusty said on 20 Nov 2007 at 12:29 pm:
    Flag comment

    Sure glad that the female patrons were “bearing” their breasts rather than carrying them in a shopping bag!

  3. Gone Fishing said on 20 Nov 2007 at 12:37 pm:
    Flag comment

    Dave, you need to go on a talk show or better still, 60 minutes,
    to bring your case to the forefront.
    Krusty, why would female patrons carry their breasts in a
    shopping bag? I don’t get it.

  4. Brighter Future said on 20 Nov 2007 at 1:43 pm:
    Flag comment

    Some of us needs answers on this Chavez woman coming to town???

    The PN quotes her as saying there wasn’t alot of EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE????

    I say we give her and committee alot of evidence,with photos of area,statistics and all that goes with it.

    Someone has gotten her to come after P.W. and Corey and I bet we all can hit the nail on the Head.???

    We need to blow this Human Rights Commission out of the water and make it non existent here in PW.

    Remember Chavez wanted to head the Dept. of Labor a few years back>?

    Now she’s a sour Volunteer.

    WHAT CAN WE DO?????? Thanks

  5. Krusty said on 20 Nov 2007 at 3:02 pm:
    Flag comment

    Gone Fishing - Just punning “bearing” because while they were definitely “bearing” their breasts (on their chest), I believe Greg meant that they were “baring” their breasts. There’s a difference, you know.

  6. Gone Fishing said on 20 Nov 2007 at 5:47 pm:
    Flag comment

    Ahhhh, now I get it, Krusty. Forgive me, I’m a bit slow these

  7. Krusty said on 20 Nov 2007 at 11:10 pm:
    Flag comment

    Gone Fishing - The English language is a lot of fun, I think. There’s a law about “bear arms” but no law about “bare arms”. I love it. - What’s slowing you down, Fisherman? If you’re like me, the long, hyped-up preamble to Christmas makes me want to hide in a deepfreeze until New Years Eve, and I slow down when most others get frantic.

  8. Gone Fishing said on 21 Nov 2007 at 9:56 am:
    Flag comment

    What’s slowing me down, Krusty….well, it could be age, I
    suppose. Happens to the best of us, right?

  9. Krusty said on 21 Nov 2007 at 10:43 am:
    Flag comment

    Amen to that! I passed up my gym class this morning to sit here and do nothing useful. Shoudda gone.

  10. Anonymous said on 21 Nov 2007 at 9:32 pm:
    Flag comment

    Krusty said on 20 Nov 2007 at 12:29 pm:
    Sure glad that the female patrons were “bearing” their breasts rather than carrying them in a shopping bag!

    Is that like ball bearings?

Comments are closed.

Views: 3630