I agree wholeheartedly, Chris, but this doesn’t bode well in the face of our government’s plan for a “North American Union,” does it?

To me, a person’s support/non-support for the concept and eventual evolution of a “North American Union” warrants being used as a litmus test for every presidential and congressional candidate…but it won’t. I feel that we as citizens are totally hamstrung and can do very little about it.

That Judge gets it. I believe what Oklahoma has done is great and more States should follow exactly as they have done(to avoid legal issues). If their new laws are upheld, there is no longer the excuse of legal action to not take steps to rid a City or State of illegals.

This is from the thread about today’s events at McCoart. The following is part of a ruling from a Judge in Oklahoma. Pertinent to your comments and postive news. We can only hope this thought process continues and expands.

Patriot posted the link. I am totally inept when it comes to copying links I can try if you want it.

“These illegal alien plaintiffs seek nothing more than to use this court as a vehicle for their continued unlawful presence in this country. To allow these plaintiffs to do so would make this court an abettor of iniquity and this court finds that simply unpalatable.”

“It really is sad that illegals are treated far better than the average American when it comes to the legal system”

I could not agree with you more and this I do believe is the feeling of most.

( I have been trying for the last few minutes to elaborate more to say but I am truly at a loss of words.)

I plan on going on the General Assembly next month and I will certainly raise this issue with Jackson and Chuck. It simply is not acceptable for the GA to not do everything possible to protect the safety and security of the Citizens of this Commonwealth.

Anybody who is not in favor of not providing bail for illegals is a supporter of criminals and should be personally held responsible for crimes committed by those illegals who commit further crimes after having come into contact with law enforcement.

We should do the same for the judges who allow illegals back out as well. If judges and law enforcement were to be held responsible and accountable for those out on bail, there would be a huge decrease in the number of people released.

Agreed.

At the tippy top they are so busy lining their pockets with spoils from Iraq, they forget they are American, I think that’s why they all wear flags to help jog their memories.. The camera lights reflect off them into their eyes and they remember.

LOL TMI!!!! I got my information on the subject from the Discovery Channel several years ago. It also talked about D2D (dolphin to dolphin), not D2P.

The author of that article probably needs to have a long long talk with his shrink. Leave it to the internet…..

~~splash~~~ ~~blush~~~

All 287(g) does is DELEGATE federal authority to local law enforcement to ask the status question. That’s it in a nutshell.

They sit in jail until the hearing.

I’ve suggested the following measures; due to overloading the system I was worn down to one measure today simply to continue breathing. Although a nice post from MEDIC regarding an IV and a judgement from OK have revived me some.

1) Deported
2) Issued a detainer and imprisioned
3) Issued a warrant to appear for a deportation hearing
4) Failure to appear under #3

While I agree with you in a sense, to capture the whole picture all four are necessary. My only concern here is that if the feds don’t cough it up, we need to know early and complain to our local and state reps often - better while the Gen’l Assembly is in session, don’t you think?

How the devil would green cards translate into voters? Green cards are only legal residency IDs for foreign nationals necessary (theoretically) to obtain employment in this country. Legal citizens (who should be the only ones voting) do not require green cards. Is this a presumption that they are planning upon committing voter fraud on a national basis? If this is true, we might just as well turn over the keys of the nation to the illegals!

http://www.ilovedolphins.org/

The devil made me reference that;).

Just being able to tell if a person is illegal is a benefit. For instance, you might have an illegal that has committed a misdemeanor, but you look at his record and find out he has two more let’s say, DUI’s. The ADC can then hold them for ICE. Before, there was an almost certain chance that this illegal would have been let loose. We now have the tools to be able to petition the Fed’s to get rid of this illegal.

You might be rather ….amused…to read what dolphins really do with tongue…..

Not to avoid your question….I posted my rather biased comments over under the circus thread. I was pretty disgusted with her. She definitely had her own agenda. She interrupted the anti-illegal folks with her own opinions….the pro illegal lawyer was invited to submit her additional evidence after doing the biggest pity party whine session I have ever heard….someone should have asked her if she got the offending cops’ badge numbers and names. She was full of it. Frith I think was the name.

Chavez also prefaced her remarks to the supervisors with a little prejudicial stage setting. They fought back. I was proud of them.

Was I surprised at the tone of the hearing? Not in the least.