<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeff Frederick Leads John Hagar For RPV Chairman</title>
	<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/</link>
	<description>Blog-Fu for Prince William, Manassas and Manassas Park politics.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: BullElephant</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-59998</link>
		<dc:creator>BullElephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-59998</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure if anyone is still reading this thread, but as promised above, I now post my observations of the Fredericksburg Mass Meeting last night.

There were about 20 people in attendance, which is a pretty good number for Fredericksburg.  After normal business, candidates or their representatives were allowed to speak.  Jeff Frederick was there, and spoke to a very enthusiastic reception.  No one spoke on behalf of Chairman Hager.  While no straw poll was taken, my sense is that the vast majority of those in attendance intend to vote for Frederick.  I get this impression not just by judging the reactions to the talk he gave, but also from the buzz surrounding him after the meeting, when most of those attending took the time to let him know they were supporting him.  I couldn't tell if the Frederick campaign has any systematic way to track which delegates they think will support him.

I don't offer this example as necessarily representative of what is happening in every other unit, but it does illustrate what I've said before about the grass roots thirsting for energetic leadership where, in recent years, there has been little more than residual inertia and stagnation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if anyone is still reading this thread, but as promised above, I now post my observations of the Fredericksburg Mass Meeting last night.</p>
<p>There were about 20 people in attendance, which is a pretty good number for Fredericksburg.  After normal business, candidates or their representatives were allowed to speak.  Jeff Frederick was there, and spoke to a very enthusiastic reception.  No one spoke on behalf of Chairman Hager.  While no straw poll was taken, my sense is that the vast majority of those in attendance intend to vote for Frederick.  I get this impression not just by judging the reactions to the talk he gave, but also from the buzz surrounding him after the meeting, when most of those attending took the time to let him know they were supporting him.  I couldn&#8217;t tell if the Frederick campaign has any systematic way to track which delegates they think will support him.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t offer this example as necessarily representative of what is happening in every other unit, but it does illustrate what I&#8217;ve said before about the grass roots thirsting for energetic leadership where, in recent years, there has been little more than residual inertia and stagnation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BullElephant</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-59745</link>
		<dc:creator>BullElephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-59745</guid>
		<description>The Frederick campaign has sent around another email earlier today, this time claiming that by "our count" they expect 3,779 delegate votes, versus 3200 votes expected for Hager.  They've also listed 26 GA members from around the state who have publicly endorsed Frederick.  The email also references takeovers of local units and victory over Hager takeover attempts at others (though no details provided, this presumably means takeover of chairmanship by pro-Frederick people).

You can keep dismissing this all as "phoney" numbers or "bull," but if you do, I'm afraid you're missing the boat.  Denial is not going to change the fact that Frederick is catching a wave of grass roots discontent that some of you plainly do not see coming.

I will be in attendance at the Fredericksburg GOP mass meeting tonight and will report on what I see and hear.  Maybe I'm wrong, but I expect to find independent evidence that supports the proposition that Hager is getting overwhelmed by frustrated people like me.  And no, in response to the person who apparently styles himself as some sort of sophisticated Euro-type ("Ciao!"), I am not Jeff Frederick.  I'm a conservative lawyer who commutes every day into DC...I do not work in politics at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Frederick campaign has sent around another email earlier today, this time claiming that by &#8220;our count&#8221; they expect 3,779 delegate votes, versus 3200 votes expected for Hager.  They&#8217;ve also listed 26 GA members from around the state who have publicly endorsed Frederick.  The email also references takeovers of local units and victory over Hager takeover attempts at others (though no details provided, this presumably means takeover of chairmanship by pro-Frederick people).</p>
<p>You can keep dismissing this all as &#8220;phoney&#8221; numbers or &#8220;bull,&#8221; but if you do, I&#8217;m afraid you&#8217;re missing the boat.  Denial is not going to change the fact that Frederick is catching a wave of grass roots discontent that some of you plainly do not see coming.</p>
<p>I will be in attendance at the Fredericksburg GOP mass meeting tonight and will report on what I see and hear.  Maybe I&#8217;m wrong, but I expect to find independent evidence that supports the proposition that Hager is getting overwhelmed by frustrated people like me.  And no, in response to the person who apparently styles himself as some sort of sophisticated Euro-type (&#8221;Ciao!&#8221;), I am not Jeff Frederick.  I&#8217;m a conservative lawyer who commutes every day into DC&#8230;I do not work in politics at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58319</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58319</guid>
		<description>No doubt Frederick has a big ego, but I am not sure of any elected official that does not have a healthy ego. In defense of Frederick, thats not necessarily a bad thing.  A healthy ego becomes a problem for all politicians when it turns to arrogence and Frederick has straddled this line carefully for a while now. Its just something all politicians need to watch. 

Fredericks probably looking for the "next big thing" since he has almost certainly figured out its only a matter of time he will lose the seat. I cannot blame him for this and its mostly due to demographic changes rather than his record. One also has to wonder what will happen to his seat when re-districting happens? His "independent" streak is nice when it pertains to his own district but not so nice when trying to save your seat during re-districting. 

For the above reasons, I certainly cannot and will not fault him for running for RPV chair. We have heard rumors over the past months, Federick for Chair, Lt. Gov., Congress, what next?  His best bet on a permanent job might be to eventually move into Colgan's district and try to get that seat after retirement.  He could get a much higher profile in which to run for a big office one day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt Frederick has a big ego, but I am not sure of any elected official that does not have a healthy ego. In defense of Frederick, thats not necessarily a bad thing.  A healthy ego becomes a problem for all politicians when it turns to arrogence and Frederick has straddled this line carefully for a while now. Its just something all politicians need to watch. </p>
<p>Fredericks probably looking for the &#8220;next big thing&#8221; since he has almost certainly figured out its only a matter of time he will lose the seat. I cannot blame him for this and its mostly due to demographic changes rather than his record. One also has to wonder what will happen to his seat when re-districting happens? His &#8220;independent&#8221; streak is nice when it pertains to his own district but not so nice when trying to save your seat during re-districting. </p>
<p>For the above reasons, I certainly cannot and will not fault him for running for RPV chair. We have heard rumors over the past months, Federick for Chair, Lt. Gov., Congress, what next?  His best bet on a permanent job might be to eventually move into Colgan&#8217;s district and try to get that seat after retirement.  He could get a much higher profile in which to run for a big office one day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everyone's an Ann Coulter Fan Behind Closed Doors</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58313</link>
		<dc:creator>Everyone's an Ann Coulter Fan Behind Closed Doors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58313</guid>
		<description>In answer to the question yesterday-yes Jeff can hold his seat if he's the Chairman, there's nothing that says that you have to resign your current seat to be chairman.  But there in lies the problem for Frederick.  He has run as an "independent/moderate" candidate each year, telling his moderate-if not pretty liberal leaning constituents that he doesn't follow party line.

If you are the chairman of the REPUBLICAN party-don't you think a lot of the Dems in his district that tend to vote for him are going to be a little pissed off come 2009 when he starts blasting his "independent" mail and tv ads everywhere?

Frederick's in a very unique place and it will be interesting to see how it pans out...do his colleagues in the GA support him because they want to see him lose in 2009 which means that they can be rid of him, or do they support Hager so that Frederick will lose the chairman seat and then he'll hold onto his Delegate seat come 2009?

Or maybe Jeff doesn't care about his seat anymore because he's planning on running for statewide office and this all a ploy to get his name out there-win or lose.

I've said this before-Frederick's a "good" conservative most of the time and does tend to vote how he thinks his voters want him to, but he's got a big ego and he gets ahead of himself a lot and that might be his final downfall...pride will kill everyone if they let it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In answer to the question yesterday-yes Jeff can hold his seat if he&#8217;s the Chairman, there&#8217;s nothing that says that you have to resign your current seat to be chairman.  But there in lies the problem for Frederick.  He has run as an &#8220;independent/moderate&#8221; candidate each year, telling his moderate-if not pretty liberal leaning constituents that he doesn&#8217;t follow party line.</p>
<p>If you are the chairman of the REPUBLICAN party-don&#8217;t you think a lot of the Dems in his district that tend to vote for him are going to be a little pissed off come 2009 when he starts blasting his &#8220;independent&#8221; mail and tv ads everywhere?</p>
<p>Frederick&#8217;s in a very unique place and it will be interesting to see how it pans out&#8230;do his colleagues in the GA support him because they want to see him lose in 2009 which means that they can be rid of him, or do they support Hager so that Frederick will lose the chairman seat and then he&#8217;ll hold onto his Delegate seat come 2009?</p>
<p>Or maybe Jeff doesn&#8217;t care about his seat anymore because he&#8217;s planning on running for statewide office and this all a ploy to get his name out there-win or lose.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve said this before-Frederick&#8217;s a &#8220;good&#8221; conservative most of the time and does tend to vote how he thinks his voters want him to, but he&#8217;s got a big ego and he gets ahead of himself a lot and that might be his final downfall&#8230;pride will kill everyone if they let it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Russ Moulton</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58306</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Russ Moulton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58306</guid>
		<description>Answer to question about where numbers came from:  They came in a mass email from the Frederick campaign (which I received, though not a supporter of his -- nor Hager, for that matter).  The blog then posted them and this blog then covered that blog.

Clear?

Ciao</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Answer to question about where numbers came from:  They came in a mass email from the Frederick campaign (which I received, though not a supporter of his &#8212; nor Hager, for that matter).  The blog then posted them and this blog then covered that blog.</p>
<p>Clear?</p>
<p>Ciao</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Rum</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58285</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Rum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58285</guid>
		<description>Something doesn't smell right indeed...and it could be the possibility that the Dems could control every political decision in the coming years. Personally, I and many others I have talked to, feel that a change in direction is needed. Frederick is interesting for now, but we are still in the early stages. The real question is whether Hager will be around long enough, or even capable, to right the ship (capable question applies to Frederick as well).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something doesn&#8217;t smell right indeed&#8230;and it could be the possibility that the Dems could control every political decision in the coming years. Personally, I and many others I have talked to, feel that a change in direction is needed. Frederick is interesting for now, but we are still in the early stages. The real question is whether Hager will be around long enough, or even capable, to right the ship (capable question applies to Frederick as well).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CONVA</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58278</link>
		<dc:creator>CONVA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58278</guid>
		<description>Did Jeff come out with any numbers, or was it a blogger, Red Virginia, comes to mind?  Was this a ploy to make Jeff look ridiculous?  Some doesn't smell right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Jeff come out with any numbers, or was it a blogger, Red Virginia, comes to mind?  Was this a ploy to make Jeff look ridiculous?  Some doesn&#8217;t smell right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58238</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58238</guid>
		<description>Bull,

A phoney numbers are phoney numbers. Gilmore's people are pushing the same exact crap right now. They must take other GOP grassroots voters are real dopes.   I have to assume these are phoney because there are NO committed delegates.  I have to say I respectfully disagree about name ID.  With all due respect, Frederick is a noncommodity out in the Beach area, the valley, and central va. NO one outside of a few committee heads have even heard of the guy. That is why these numbers are essentially bunk.  If I polled committee people in  my district right now his name ID would be 10% tops. Hager as a former statewide office holder would be near 95%. 

I am NOT saying Frederick cannot win but he needs to quit with the deceptive politics and making up phoney supposed delegates. Losing campaigns and campaigns on the rope (see Gilmore) use these type of tactics because they are scared of losing control.   We certainly don't need a chair who uses these  tactics. Hager probably has plenty of "stuff" to go after Frederick but he probably has too much class for inter party warfare.  No one and I mean no one can actually believe Frederick actually has exact numbers at this point. In a convention, its all about showing up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bull,</p>
<p>A phoney numbers are phoney numbers. Gilmore&#8217;s people are pushing the same exact crap right now. They must take other GOP grassroots voters are real dopes.   I have to assume these are phoney because there are NO committed delegates.  I have to say I respectfully disagree about name ID.  With all due respect, Frederick is a noncommodity out in the Beach area, the valley, and central va. NO one outside of a few committee heads have even heard of the guy. That is why these numbers are essentially bunk.  If I polled committee people in  my district right now his name ID would be 10% tops. Hager as a former statewide office holder would be near 95%. </p>
<p>I am NOT saying Frederick cannot win but he needs to quit with the deceptive politics and making up phoney supposed delegates. Losing campaigns and campaigns on the rope (see Gilmore) use these type of tactics because they are scared of losing control.   We certainly don&#8217;t need a chair who uses these  tactics. Hager probably has plenty of &#8220;stuff&#8221; to go after Frederick but he probably has too much class for inter party warfare.  No one and I mean no one can actually believe Frederick actually has exact numbers at this point. In a convention, its all about showing up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Russ Moulton</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58237</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Russ Moulton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58237</guid>
		<description>Dear aptly named "bull",

When numbers that are impossible to know or even accurately estimate are proclaimed it is a lie.  And in campaigns, it is an old trick for the gullible.

You are either gullible ... or you are Jeff Frederick.

Ciao</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear aptly named &#8220;bull&#8221;,</p>
<p>When numbers that are impossible to know or even accurately estimate are proclaimed it is a lie.  And in campaigns, it is an old trick for the gullible.</p>
<p>You are either gullible &#8230; or you are Jeff Frederick.</p>
<p>Ciao</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BullElephant</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58233</link>
		<dc:creator>BullElephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58233</guid>
		<description>I agree that there is probably no 100% solid basis for these numbers, but "lies"?  "Phoney" numbers?  I think a candidate who has a full time staff, and has been at one function or another in nearly every unit in the state, probably has at least some good faith basis to estimate the relative vote counts, especially when they have been organizing a very large proportion of the people who have been showing up to these unit meetings.  It's one thing to point out that these numbers are soft and subject to change, and that there is no objective basis on which to adjudge their accuracy, but it's a different thing altogether to allege outright dishonesty.  For that I think you owe your fellow Republicans a bit more support.

In terms of name recognition outside PWC, it's true that average citizens haven't heard of him, but I don't think it's at all the case that the GOP activist base (the people who will actually attend the convention) are unfamiliar with him.  Anyone who saw him at the 1st District special nominating convention could tell that a whole lot of people outside his district knew who he was and what he stood for.

As far as Hager being some sort of establishment steamroller who will win by a large margin, I have two words in response:  Jack Rollison.  Rollison was another old bull of the state GOP, just like Hager.  Today, Rollison is chiefly known for having lost in spectacular fashion to the upstart Frederick in a Republican primary where, as here, the energetic and motivated grass roots turned out against the ossified and insular party establishment.  

So, I guess what I'm trying to say is, I believe it when Frederick says he's winning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that there is probably no 100% solid basis for these numbers, but &#8220;lies&#8221;?  &#8220;Phoney&#8221; numbers?  I think a candidate who has a full time staff, and has been at one function or another in nearly every unit in the state, probably has at least some good faith basis to estimate the relative vote counts, especially when they have been organizing a very large proportion of the people who have been showing up to these unit meetings.  It&#8217;s one thing to point out that these numbers are soft and subject to change, and that there is no objective basis on which to adjudge their accuracy, but it&#8217;s a different thing altogether to allege outright dishonesty.  For that I think you owe your fellow Republicans a bit more support.</p>
<p>In terms of name recognition outside PWC, it&#8217;s true that average citizens haven&#8217;t heard of him, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s at all the case that the GOP activist base (the people who will actually attend the convention) are unfamiliar with him.  Anyone who saw him at the 1st District special nominating convention could tell that a whole lot of people outside his district knew who he was and what he stood for.</p>
<p>As far as Hager being some sort of establishment steamroller who will win by a large margin, I have two words in response:  Jack Rollison.  Rollison was another old bull of the state GOP, just like Hager.  Today, Rollison is chiefly known for having lost in spectacular fashion to the upstart Frederick in a Republican primary where, as here, the energetic and motivated grass roots turned out against the ossified and insular party establishment.  </p>
<p>So, I guess what I&#8217;m trying to say is, I believe it when Frederick says he&#8217;s winning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58226</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58226</guid>
		<description>I agree. Marcus and friends has been pushing this stuff with Gilmore as well because Bob Marshall scares them to death. The key to remember in Virginia, is that NO DELEGATES are committed until they actually vote. This is NOT the RNC convention were all delegates are pledged. You do not pledge at your mass meeting to any binding candidate. You pledge to be a delegate of the party. 
I cannot state this MORE forcefully. 

  For all we know, Federick could be winning but to push a random number makes him look amateurish and desperate.  Fredericks name ID outside of PWC is next to zero. He has plenty of time to fix this but potentially pushing phoney numbers is not a good start.  Hager is the heavy favorite but I would not be suprised to see an alternate type candidate emerge either since Frederick has some problems that Hager could bring up if he wanted and some people don't like  Hager because he used to work with Mark Warner. I still think in the end, Hager will win by a large margin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. Marcus and friends has been pushing this stuff with Gilmore as well because Bob Marshall scares them to death. The key to remember in Virginia, is that NO DELEGATES are committed until they actually vote. This is NOT the RNC convention were all delegates are pledged. You do not pledge at your mass meeting to any binding candidate. You pledge to be a delegate of the party.<br />
I cannot state this MORE forcefully. </p>
<p>  For all we know, Federick could be winning but to push a random number makes him look amateurish and desperate.  Fredericks name ID outside of PWC is next to zero. He has plenty of time to fix this but potentially pushing phoney numbers is not a good start.  Hager is the heavy favorite but I would not be suprised to see an alternate type candidate emerge either since Frederick has some problems that Hager could bring up if he wanted and some people don&#8217;t like  Hager because he used to work with Mark Warner. I still think in the end, Hager will win by a large margin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Russ Moulton</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58214</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Russ Moulton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58214</guid>
		<description>Sir, this post is beneath you and your level of knowledge of the political process.

The blog you cite is merely parroting a Frederick for Chairman email sent yesterday morning.  The numbers are transparently made up ... most delegates never attended a meeting, never heard of Frederick and don't even know there's a Chairman's race -- much less have chosen a candidate.  To be blunt, Frederick's numbers are lies.

He may win or may not.  I am not supporting him, or Hager ... and in fact have reason to be pretty sure there will be an alternative, conservative pro-life candidate in the race long before the convention.

Time will tell, but crap numbers like this should be exploded everytime some hotshot politico uses them whether it is Boyd Marcus, Ray Allen or Jeff Frederick, IMO.

Ciao.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir, this post is beneath you and your level of knowledge of the political process.</p>
<p>The blog you cite is merely parroting a Frederick for Chairman email sent yesterday morning.  The numbers are transparently made up &#8230; most delegates never attended a meeting, never heard of Frederick and don&#8217;t even know there&#8217;s a Chairman&#8217;s race &#8212; much less have chosen a candidate.  To be blunt, Frederick&#8217;s numbers are lies.</p>
<p>He may win or may not.  I am not supporting him, or Hager &#8230; and in fact have reason to be pretty sure there will be an alternative, conservative pro-life candidate in the race long before the convention.</p>
<p>Time will tell, but crap numbers like this should be exploded everytime some hotshot politico uses them whether it is Boyd Marcus, Ray Allen or Jeff Frederick, IMO.</p>
<p>Ciao.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spank That Donkey</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58165</link>
		<dc:creator>Spank That Donkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 05:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58165</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpPdLb69-qk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpPdLb69-qk" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpPdLb69-qk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Young</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58147</link>
		<dc:creator>James Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58147</guid>
		<description>These numbers are somewhat misleading.  One person doesn't equal one vote at the State Convention; it's all about delegate voting strength in the individual units.  Thus, if Jeff is very strong in a unit with few votes and many delegates, those votes are divided among the delegates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These numbers are somewhat misleading.  One person doesn&#8217;t equal one vote at the State Convention; it&#8217;s all about delegate voting strength in the individual units.  Thus, if Jeff is very strong in a unit with few votes and many delegates, those votes are divided among the delegates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg L</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58140</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58140</guid>
		<description>No, nothing would prevent this.  Jeff doesn't run for positions he isn't qualified for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, nothing would prevent this.  Jeff doesn&#8217;t run for positions he isn&#8217;t qualified for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CONVA</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58138</link>
		<dc:creator>CONVA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58138</guid>
		<description>John Hager is a nice guy, but there is no demand for nice guys in this political season we are in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Hager is a nice guy, but there is no demand for nice guys in this political season we are in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58137</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58137</guid>
		<description>This may be a dumb question, but if Jeff Frederick does become RPV Chairman, can he still remain a Delegate?  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may be a dumb question, but if Jeff Frederick does become RPV Chairman, can he still remain a Delegate?  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58124</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58124</guid>
		<description>Richmond, only time will tell but I firmly believe thats alot of nonsense.  Fredericks people can start rumors but we will see.   As I said, we will see how much support he can actually get at the convention. My feeling is that he will lose by about 3:1, especially if Hager decides to actually campaign and reveal the truth.  I know plenty of Republicans that don't want this race to get nasty because Frederick does hold a marginal district and that is important but believe me the potential definitely exists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richmond, only time will tell but I firmly believe thats alot of nonsense.  Fredericks people can start rumors but we will see.   As I said, we will see how much support he can actually get at the convention. My feeling is that he will lose by about 3:1, especially if Hager decides to actually campaign and reveal the truth.  I know plenty of Republicans that don&#8217;t want this race to get nasty because Frederick does hold a marginal district and that is important but believe me the potential definitely exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richmond guy</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58121</link>
		<dc:creator>richmond guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58121</guid>
		<description>"I wonder how many of his colleagues in the GA are supporting him?"

About 25 so far, rumor is, including moderates and conservatives, and even the Majority Leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I wonder how many of his colleagues in the GA are supporting him?&#8221;</p>
<p>About 25 so far, rumor is, including moderates and conservatives, and even the Majority Leader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58118</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/03/19/jeff-frederick-leads-john-hagar-for-rpv-chairman/#comment-58118</guid>
		<description>Oh contraire, video or not its widely known by most in the GA that Frederick took a walk and then re-appeared.   I wonder how many of his colleagues in the GA are supporting him?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh contraire, video or not its widely known by most in the GA that Frederick took a walk and then re-appeared.   I wonder how many of his colleagues in the GA are supporting him?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

