Mostly Harmless?
By Greg L | 1 April 2008 | Prince William County | 26 Comments
While the Mexican Consulate was busy working with Chief Deane to reassure illegal aliens that they wouldn’t likely be subjected to any enforcement actions for unlawfully residing in our community, a spokesman for the Mexican Consulate in San Diego was telling folks a different story: that California has been, and will be part of Mexico.
But really, they’re harmless. Chief Deane says so, and Maureen Caddigan says anyone who believes otherwise is “paranoid”. Despite documented evidence that officials of the Mexican Consulate may not have the best interests of the United States in mind, it’s perfectly reasonable to blindly cooperate with their agenda. Right?
The opinions expressed here are solely the views of the author, and not representative of the position of any organization, political party, doughnut shop, knitting guild, or waste recycling facility, but may be correctly attributed to the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy. If anything in the above article has offended you, please click here to receive an immediate apology.
You can follow the discussion through the Comments feed. You can also pingback or trackback from your own site.
26 Comments
Views: 798



In the end it all comes down to votes.
I remember playing cowboys and Indians, but never cowboys and Mexicans? Indigenous people they are NOT! This is their new cry here in PWC. After this fails I wonder what their next tactic will be?
Native Americans is what they are now calling themselves in PWC.
I wonder if there was a video camera rolling for our side at Chief Dean’s meetings with Foreign Governments?
just asking…
I wrote and email to that joker on the video and he did a mass mailing to everyone who emailed him with the usual name calling and race baiting responses. He said he was only talking about the land around the consulate being Mexico’s. He accused me of being a San Diego Minuteman…
Many, many Central and South Americans come from indigenous tribes or they have Native American blood. You know Native American blood is not just limited to those indigenous who lived in the US. I American extends from Canada to Chile. People born in the US do not have the corner on being Americans. Go to the American Indian museum and check out the indigenous tribes. Many from Mexico also belonged to indigenous tribes. As a matter of fact in the mountainous land in Mexico there are many tribes still living there and speaking their native language.
Let me say, Chief Deane did a wonderful job providing information to all who attended the meeting at the Hi Mart. He has come under some unnecessary negative fire for just trying to inform everyone. The comment in a former blog about the Mexican Consulate’s remarks not being translated into English is just not factual. I recall hearing him speak in English first and then translate in Spanish.
In addition, you all might want to look at the history of North America to see that the Mexican’s have been used when it was convenient for our government to use them from the building of the railroads, providing labor during WWI and WWII, to picking the food we eat. Our government has been using cheap Mexican labor for over a hundred years when it suited them.
A San Diego Minuteman–as if that’s a bad thing!
The Mexicans have been talking about Aztlan for years. It’s supposed to encompass CA, AZ, NM, NV, CO, and TX. I looks like they’ve added the East Coast to their land grab.
OT (slightly), but I read this AM that the US will be deporting thousands of Vietnamese who are here illegally. The article did not state how they got here. Anyone have info or a reference on how they get in? Mexico? Canada? Overstay their visitor’s visas?
Well, take a close look at a native American, and then look at a person from Mexico. They look much more native “this continent” than I do (my roots are that of the original pilgrims). The speak Spanish because they were conquored by Spain. We speak English because the conquorers of this country spoke English. It’s all history. There are still people in Mexico who speak their native dialect too, just like there are native Americans who hold onto their language heritage (though the white man tried to extinguish it).
Advocator said on 1 Apr 2008 at 10:06 am:
OT (slightly), but I read this AM that the US will be deporting thousands of Vietnamese who are here illegally. The article did not state how they got here. Anyone have info or a reference on how they get in? Mexico? Canada? Overstay their visitor’s visas?
The same way the asains have been smuggeling people in for years. The difference is they do take over a total area and they are not all legal by any means. It is a very big business to bring people into this country.
It was interesting to me that Greg somehow was so busy that he did not say anythign about the ” SPA ” that was raided in Woodbridge this past week and three asain women of no fiixed address were arrested for prostitution but put in jail as possible illegal imagrants. It was turned over to ICE. I guess Deane is a equal opportunity enforcer of the law but why would Greg or Stewart or Stirrup want that to be the way this county runs.
Home > News> Crime
Prostitution evidence found
Advertisement
This says it all
By Staff
Published: March 27, 2008
Members of the Prince William Police Department’s street crimes, special problems and criminal alien units executed a search warrant Tuesday at SKO Therapy at 13628 Jefferson Davis Highway, where they seized $1,987 and evidence of prostitution, said 1st Sgt. Kim Chinn, police spokeswoman.
Police arrested six men and three women as a result of the investigation, Chinn said.
Sabina Park, 49, of no fixed address, was charged with maintaining a bawdy place and is being held without bond. Mihwa Park, also known as Mihwa Bak, 39, of no fixed address was charged with prostitution and failure to obtain a massage license. She was held without bond and was placed on an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer. Young Kim, 44, of no fixed address, was charged with prostitution and failure to obtain a massage license and was held without bond and was placed on a ICE detainer, Chinn said.
The three women were scheduled to appear in court on May 6, Chinn said.
Osmin E. Zetino-Turcios, 27, of 14051 Grayson Road in Woodbridge; Gary Fetter, 47, of 1209 Bishop Road in Blacksburg; Carlos Alfredo Suarez, 34, of 13404 Spriggs Road in the Dale City area; Samuel Asante, 34, of 4507 31st South, Apt. 201; John Eric Shaw, 40, of 9039 Palmer Drive in Alexandria and Kenneth Williams, 35, of 3507 Pike Road in Alexandria were all charged with frequenting a bawdy place and released on summonses to appear in court, Chinn said.
Court dates were not given.
Bob, if you feel I am not giving adequate coverage to local news, and you see something that I missed, I invite you to write an article and submit it for a guest posting. The reason that didn’t get high enough on my radar screen was that no mention was made of the legal status of the suspects, it did not appear to have political ramifications (such as the case with an incident nearer to my home which I reported on that involved the former mayor of Dumfries who also employed asian women as prostitutes), and I was unfamiliar with the area in which it happened.
On a related note, when you pay me for the service I provide, at that time I will take seriously demands that I write an article on a particular subject. Demands that I perform a service absent a stipend of some sort to compensate me for providing it aren’t likely to be taken very seriously.
No one is native to this continent. Everyone migrated here. There are no indigenous Americans. I think that it’s racist assumption to judge someone by their looks. It’s also racist to assume that all Native Americans are unified and therefore homogenous. I think that the Navajo tribe might take issue with being lumped in as part of Mexico. They were fighting against Mexicans for centuries before their land was part of America.
It’s obvious from watching the video that this peon is trying to bait the protesters into a reaction. His body language is very provacative and aggressive. In a perfect world, he would be reprimanded or reassigned, but we all know that is not likely to happen.
Well of course officials in the Mexican consulate do “not have the best interests of the United States in mind.” I would expect them to have the best interests of Mexico in mind. Anyone who believes otherwise is a damn fool.
Thanks, Bob. I missed that article in the local fishwrap.
I’m not sure what you mean by, “why would Greg or Stewart or Stirrup want that to be the way this county runs.”
As far as my association has been with those three individuals, I understand that they all would like all illegal aliens out of the county, the commonwealth, and the country. Nothing I’ve seen or heard from any of them would imply they are not “equal opportunity” anti-illegal immigration.
Ouch! It’s too hot for me in this kitchen. I’m a little dog so I’ll just stay on the porch and watch from a distance. Sorry I even tried to take part…
All I can say is ‘Don’t forget the Trojan Horse!!’
Why don’t we keep San Diego and give Detroit and Erie PA to Mexico?
Not a sermon, just a thought…..
Che: I had a similar thought in ‘73: Give N. Vietnam NYC and the entire state of Mass in return for S. Vietnam. Didn’t work.
We could be like Jimmy Carter and just give parts of the US away for nothing.
I rarely miss a Tom Knott piece, but somehow I missed this gem:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20080327/METRO/212832466/1004/metro
This is the second best argument for limiting immigration (after the astounding costs of English as a Second Language education):
“It is an outrageous system that keeps wages artificially low in the service and working-class industries and hurts many Americans because of their unwillingness to be a restaurant dishwasher at $8 an hour.”.
There are pros and cons to liberalized immigration policy. I believe that the cons outweigh the pros. However, there are pros and cons. The more methodical and logical the argument, the more likely it is to sway opinion.
The point about liberalized immigration keeping “US born” poor people permanently impoverished is a very valid argument.
“The point about liberalized immigration keeping “US born” poor people permanently impoverished is a very valid argument.”
The thing is, even with liberalized immigration, the tide of illegal immigration will not stop. Those hiring the illegals do so out of economic profit moreso then due to limited labor pools. The $8/hour dishwasher costs a lot more when he’s legal even if he’s still only working for $8/hour.
If illegals played by the rules (ie. became legal), the demand for illegal labor would not change. However, the demand for social services would increase SUBSTANTIALLY.
Mando said on 1 Apr 2008 at 3:23 pm:
You are exactly right!!!
FHL,
Go take you bs somewhere else. Canadians are not called Americans. Everyone immigrated to what is now North America, Central America, and South America.
Would you want America going into a Foreign Country and declaring it belonged to America?
Of course Mexico and El Salvidor want to keep the cash flowing. What a deal! Money just magically flows in. Their governments don’t have to provide any services or do anything. Our money just washes over them. They want more of their citizens to come here so that they can drain off more of our money.
Illegals, get out, or get legal. The is the USA, not Mexico, Mexico get the hell out. Police Chief meeting officials from Mexico? Put him out too, he is becoming one of them.