As for you, “NoVA Scout,” I seem to recall you challenging my credentials in that regard once or twice. Thank you for illustrating that you conceal your identity for good reason. Of course, you misrepresent my comment to join in the fun of attempting to belittle people who actually make a difference without sleazy tactics, and without having to hide their identity and their genuine irrelevance.

It’s truly bizarre that someone as sensible as Greg on most issues provides a forum for the likes of you.

I want to commend Jimmy for setting aside his differences with Congressman Davis, and doing the right thing for Tom and our party. It’s time to get back to the “Big Tent” and this is how it begins.

You’re absolutely correct, Jimmy…you’d have been in some REAL trouble in a game of wordsmanship when I was in my prime. Your bubble would have been pushed COMPLETELY off the center (more so than you displayed in your last response on the previous “Convention” thread…WOW!), were that the case. I concur with Rebecca B that we should all go to our rooms now (I need the rest anyway)…you’re just not up to it and it’s unfair to shoot down an unarmed man.

Colonel Ditch’s comment does add a little perspective to the whole sequence of events, at least for me.

This pair decided to import an independent liberal big city mayor to press gun control onto Virginia voters. Brilliant !!

And as for your assertion, [AWC], you prove your continually diminishing mental capacity by confusing “guts” with “occasion.” FYI, I twice led the opposition to the meals tax. Just because you’re too old to remember it (as I recall, it happened on one of those occasions when you had absented yourself from GOP activities) or too embittered and demented to admit it doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. Of course, nothing that you don’t do is ever good enough, I’m sure you’ll belittle that, too. But at least I conducted my duties with integrity, unlike your actions as Harry’s last campaign manager. Unlike you, I don’t go out to harm people I dislike with the sole goal to destroy them. That you do merely demonstrates the applicability of the appellation: [redacted].

And there you go again, “CONVA,” illustrating the folly of defending one’s self in this forum, because for you poor, irrelevant, embittered souls — hiding their identities so the reader does not say “Who?” or possibly, “Oh yeah, him” — will always attack, no matter what. I retorted to the [AWC]’s ridiculous comment. Doubtless she wishes she were as relevant as I.

And “Fredo,” I was tempted to suggest that the [AWC] needs a lobotomy, but realizing that one would be redundant, withheld such an observation. On the issue of whether the [AWC] “need[s] protection,” one only wishes that her father had used some.

[Ed note: comment edited.]

I don’t think AWC needs protection.

funny ha ha.

Besides, jimmy is probably too busy trying to come up with legal cases to take to the Supreme Court…and probably the World Court too, for that matter!!

After all, Greg feels the need to protect her every time I point out her sleazy tactics on behalf of Harry Parrish, dishonestly claiming that the campaign (which she ran) had nothing to do with the criminal investigation of Steve Chapman, except to take the charges to the Commonwealth’s Attorney’s office.

Which, of course, is “something” to do with it.

Yeah, you go with that.

Well how do you explain that every time you’ve tried to tangle with her politically she’s kicked your butt across the county?

Irrelevant, indeed. Your petty jealousies fairly drip from the page.

[Ed note: comment edited.]