<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Calls To Remove &#8220;Good Time Charlie&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/</link>
	<description>Blog-Fu for Prince William, Manassas and Manassas Park politics.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Ridge</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63808</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Ridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 22:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63808</guid>
		<description>Ha Ha Ha.  "Axis of Weasel!"  You win.  Funnier.  I bet Woodbridge is looking for a real "regime change" in the next Supervisor election!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha Ha Ha.  &#8220;Axis of Weasel!&#8221;  You win.  Funnier.  I bet Woodbridge is looking for a real &#8220;regime change&#8221; in the next Supervisor election!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63792</link>
		<dc:creator>freedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63792</guid>
		<description>Hey Bob Wills, go take a nap, ok?  :) :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bob Wills, go take a nap, ok?  <img src='http://www.bvbl.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Real Advocator</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63761</link>
		<dc:creator>The Real Advocator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 17:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63761</guid>
		<description>Dude, Hello, Homeowner:  Re your posts yesterday evening about a defeat.  Maybe it was, maybe it wasn't, but there are lots of ways to skin a cat.  We hardly had time to stretch this one out on the skinnin' board and the smart pollos had already flown the coop.  We've got more tricks up our sleeve for the rest of them.  

Abide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, Hello, Homeowner:  Re your posts yesterday evening about a defeat.  Maybe it was, maybe it wasn&#8217;t, but there are lots of ways to skin a cat.  We hardly had time to stretch this one out on the skinnin&#8217; board and the smart pollos had already flown the coop.  We&#8217;ve got more tricks up our sleeve for the rest of them.  </p>
<p>Abide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63759</link>
		<dc:creator>Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 17:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63759</guid>
		<description>Only those people who have not had to personally deal with trying to get Deane's police dept. to do their job without considerable prompting trust Deane.  I'm not even talking about the illegal alien issue.  I'm talking basic police functions.

Why didn't Deane seek cameras for police cars years ago?  Why does he maintain that the reason why cameras are needed now is to protect the county from lawsuits when cameras can help provide evidence to prosecutors as well as help secure officers' personal safety and security during traffic stops?

Deane has created a cushy loft for himself in this post and only cares about good PR.  If you want to get him to actually act, nothing will get him to do it faster than the threat of bad PR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only those people who have not had to personally deal with trying to get Deane&#8217;s police dept. to do their job without considerable prompting trust Deane.  I&#8217;m not even talking about the illegal alien issue.  I&#8217;m talking basic police functions.</p>
<p>Why didn&#8217;t Deane seek cameras for police cars years ago?  Why does he maintain that the reason why cameras are needed now is to protect the county from lawsuits when cameras can help provide evidence to prosecutors as well as help secure officers&#8217; personal safety and security during traffic stops?</p>
<p>Deane has created a cushy loft for himself in this post and only cares about good PR.  If you want to get him to actually act, nothing will get him to do it faster than the threat of bad PR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63733</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 15:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63733</guid>
		<description>Deane is trying to protect the county from law suit which will surely come.
Stewart and Stirrup are not smart enough to think about the fall out of their actions. 

I would strongly encourage Stewart and Stirrup to keep trying to get rid of Deane. I'd like to see a new chairman and Gainesville district supervisor. 

Oh by the way it has nothing to do with King Charlie. People trust him more than Sewart or Stirrup...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deane is trying to protect the county from law suit which will surely come.<br />
Stewart and Stirrup are not smart enough to think about the fall out of their actions. </p>
<p>I would strongly encourage Stewart and Stirrup to keep trying to get rid of Deane. I&#8217;d like to see a new chairman and Gainesville district supervisor. </p>
<p>Oh by the way it has nothing to do with King Charlie. People trust him more than Sewart or Stirrup&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dolph</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63726</link>
		<dc:creator>Dolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 14:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63726</guid>
		<description>JM,

How do you know whether Chief Deane has attempted to find grant money for cameras or not?  

Had Chief Deane come to the BOCS and asked for camera money (and that is not just cameras but the software, hardware, and personnel to handle the data) what do you suppose he would have been told?  My guess would be that they cost too much money.  Sort of the same song and dance the fire and rescue folks have been told.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JM,</p>
<p>How do you know whether Chief Deane has attempted to find grant money for cameras or not?  </p>
<p>Had Chief Deane come to the BOCS and asked for camera money (and that is not just cameras but the software, hardware, and personnel to handle the data) what do you suppose he would have been told?  My guess would be that they cost too much money.  Sort of the same song and dance the fire and rescue folks have been told.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63716</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 13:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63716</guid>
		<description>It's not just Deane and Principi who "want illegal aliens to continue to live in PWC and commit their crimes without impediment."

Marty Nohe and Mike May do, too. (And of course Jenkins, but that's to be expected which is why I am not the least bit outraged at him.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not just Deane and Principi who &#8220;want illegal aliens to continue to live in PWC and commit their crimes without impediment.&#8221;</p>
<p>Marty Nohe and Mike May do, too. (And of course Jenkins, but that&#8217;s to be expected which is why I am not the least bit outraged at him.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JM</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63712</link>
		<dc:creator>JM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 13:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63712</guid>
		<description>Riley siad:

"The four supervisors who voted to fund the cameras were Stewart, Stirrup, Caddigan and Covington. That tells you who was the most serious about the strictest enforcement."

With all due respect, the vote to fund cameras had nothing to do with strict enforcement.

As I have stated before in another thread, Chief Deane's request for cameras was just a red herring.  He never wanted them, and he is not worried about protection from discrimination or harrasment suits.  Otherwise he would have been asking for cameras for years to protect white officers who stop blacks or male officers who stop women--also situations that make officers vulnerable to driscimination and arrassment suits. If Deane wanted cameras, he would have looked to Homeland Security for funds once the BOCS voted not to fund them.  He has never done any of those things.

Deane only asked for cameras in order to double the cost of the resolution, in hopes of making it expensive enough to be defeated.

Stewart, Stirrup, Caddingan and Covington voted for the cameras this time around to force Deane and Principi's hand, and show the taxpayers that these clowns do not want law enforcement cameras at all.  Instead, Deane and Principi want illegal aliens to continue to live in in PWC and commit their crimes without impediment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Riley siad:</p>
<p>&#8220;The four supervisors who voted to fund the cameras were Stewart, Stirrup, Caddigan and Covington. That tells you who was the most serious about the strictest enforcement.&#8221;</p>
<p>With all due respect, the vote to fund cameras had nothing to do with strict enforcement.</p>
<p>As I have stated before in another thread, Chief Deane&#8217;s request for cameras was just a red herring.  He never wanted them, and he is not worried about protection from discrimination or harrasment suits.  Otherwise he would have been asking for cameras for years to protect white officers who stop blacks or male officers who stop women&#8211;also situations that make officers vulnerable to driscimination and arrassment suits. If Deane wanted cameras, he would have looked to Homeland Security for funds once the BOCS voted not to fund them.  He has never done any of those things.</p>
<p>Deane only asked for cameras in order to double the cost of the resolution, in hopes of making it expensive enough to be defeated.</p>
<p>Stewart, Stirrup, Caddingan and Covington voted for the cameras this time around to force Deane and Principi&#8217;s hand, and show the taxpayers that these clowns do not want law enforcement cameras at all.  Instead, Deane and Principi want illegal aliens to continue to live in in PWC and commit their crimes without impediment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Had Enough</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63709</link>
		<dc:creator>Had Enough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 12:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63709</guid>
		<description>Funny! More like the "Axis of Weasel"!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny! More like the &#8220;Axis of Weasel&#8221;!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63706</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 12:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63706</guid>
		<description>cdubbs said on 1 May 2008 at 9:41 pm: 
And remember compadres, in the words of our immortal Chief Deano ” We are only interested in those illegal aliens who are breaking the law”.

And like the DOJ attorney for New Jersey said the other day, "being in this country illegally is not a crime."   DUH!   This guy is a Justice Department attorney????????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cdubbs said on 1 May 2008 at 9:41 pm:<br />
And remember compadres, in the words of our immortal Chief Deano ” We are only interested in those illegal aliens who are breaking the law”.</p>
<p>And like the DOJ attorney for New Jersey said the other day, &#8220;being in this country illegally is not a crime.&#8221;   DUH!   This guy is a Justice Department attorney????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Ridge</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63688</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Ridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 11:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63688</guid>
		<description>Correction:  "you're going to get"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction:  &#8220;you&#8217;re going to get&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Ridge</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63687</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Ridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 11:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63687</guid>
		<description>Dolph 12:20 a.m.:

Absolutely, that's politics.  

Maureen, Wally, Corey and John S. are a known quantity, when you talk to them, you know what your are going to get because they have an agenda; a constituent driven agenda by the way.  So, love 'em or not, they are following through on what they were sent to office to do by their Districts and in Corey's case, the majority in the County.

Mike, Marty, Frank and John J. (even after 20+ years) are trying to be relevant.  They want to be important too so they continue to try and dismantle everything that is put together at the will of the voters for no other reason than to try and prove they too are important and have a voice (even if it counters what their constituents want).  These four have formed the "Axis of Snivel" and their actions will end up hurting us all in the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dolph 12:20 a.m.:</p>
<p>Absolutely, that&#8217;s politics.  </p>
<p>Maureen, Wally, Corey and John S. are a known quantity, when you talk to them, you know what your are going to get because they have an agenda; a constituent driven agenda by the way.  So, love &#8216;em or not, they are following through on what they were sent to office to do by their Districts and in Corey&#8217;s case, the majority in the County.</p>
<p>Mike, Marty, Frank and John J. (even after 20+ years) are trying to be relevant.  They want to be important too so they continue to try and dismantle everything that is put together at the will of the voters for no other reason than to try and prove they too are important and have a voice (even if it counters what their constituents want).  These four have formed the &#8220;Axis of Snivel&#8221; and their actions will end up hurting us all in the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Good Time Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63679</link>
		<dc:creator>Good Time Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 04:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63679</guid>
		<description>starryflights,
You would think the pro-illegal immigration supporters would understand your examination of Deane's statement and the objective breakdown of his words which you displayed at 9:47 p.m. 

But a powerful public servant like Deane should not be making a statement which is such a contradiction in terms. But Prince William's top L.E.O. is very talented in manipulating local politicians &#38; the local media. Just as the Potomac News has routinely made a public apology to the police department after Deane has voiced his dissatisfaction with an opinion article which shows the department in a less than favorable light; the BOCS has backed down on another position they supported after Charlie Deane voiced opposition. 

Say what you want about Deane. He has managed to manipulate the BOCS &#38; the local media AGAIN. If anything he is a strategic thinker, and influencial local politician. That doesn't make you safer than you were 20 years ago, but most of you are dealing with being witness to everyday crimes involving illegals while he builds his position as "a man of the people."

He has survived many years in his current job building a position of power. Removing him at this point will only occur if elected officials begin to be replaced, and it becomes tied to the continued employment of Charlie Deane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>starryflights,<br />
You would think the pro-illegal immigration supporters would understand your examination of Deane&#8217;s statement and the objective breakdown of his words which you displayed at 9:47 p.m. </p>
<p>But a powerful public servant like Deane should not be making a statement which is such a contradiction in terms. But Prince William&#8217;s top L.E.O. is very talented in manipulating local politicians &amp; the local media. Just as the Potomac News has routinely made a public apology to the police department after Deane has voiced his dissatisfaction with an opinion article which shows the department in a less than favorable light; the BOCS has backed down on another position they supported after Charlie Deane voiced opposition. </p>
<p>Say what you want about Deane. He has managed to manipulate the BOCS &amp; the local media AGAIN. If anything he is a strategic thinker, and influencial local politician. That doesn&#8217;t make you safer than you were 20 years ago, but most of you are dealing with being witness to everyday crimes involving illegals while he builds his position as &#8220;a man of the people.&#8221;</p>
<p>He has survived many years in his current job building a position of power. Removing him at this point will only occur if elected officials begin to be replaced, and it becomes tied to the continued employment of Charlie Deane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dolph</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63678</link>
		<dc:creator>Dolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 04:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63678</guid>
		<description>Anon, and what were the other rats doing?  watching?  or perhaps cutting their own deals and peddling influence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon, and what were the other rats doing?  watching?  or perhaps cutting their own deals and peddling influence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63676</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 04:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63676</guid>
		<description>We have to remember the chief of police does not work for us, answer to us or is accountable to us. We didn't give him a badge and we can't take it away, only the the Board of Supervisors can. And since the board is not up for election for another three years, and Charlie Deane is their golden boy, the board and Charlie Deane will let us huff and puff all we want and Deane will still be our chief for thoes three years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have to remember the chief of police does not work for us, answer to us or is accountable to us. We didn&#8217;t give him a badge and we can&#8217;t take it away, only the the Board of Supervisors can. And since the board is not up for election for another three years, and Charlie Deane is their golden boy, the board and Charlie Deane will let us huff and puff all we want and Deane will still be our chief for thoes three years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dolph</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63675</link>
		<dc:creator>Dolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 04:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63675</guid>
		<description>I am trying to figure out why so many people here are looking at last night's vote as a defeat.  Do you not have most of your rule of law resolution?  Do you not have your criminal alien unit still in tact, regardless of cost?  Do you not have the 287g program at the ADC?  

Must you win 100%?  You know that isn't possible because there simply isn't the money without driving both residential and commercial taxes up even higher.  People are already hurting.  

You can  all be happy you got this much achieved or you can moan and groan because you didn't get every little thing you wanted.

The glass is half empty or is the glass half full.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am trying to figure out why so many people here are looking at last night&#8217;s vote as a defeat.  Do you not have most of your rule of law resolution?  Do you not have your criminal alien unit still in tact, regardless of cost?  Do you not have the 287g program at the ADC?  </p>
<p>Must you win 100%?  You know that isn&#8217;t possible because there simply isn&#8217;t the money without driving both residential and commercial taxes up even higher.  People are already hurting.  </p>
<p>You can  all be happy you got this much achieved or you can moan and groan because you didn&#8217;t get every little thing you wanted.</p>
<p>The glass is half empty or is the glass half full.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63674</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 04:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63674</guid>
		<description>The vote on the cameras was to be expected from Jenkins and Principi.

Marty and Mike are another story.

Mike and Marty spent their time scurrying around like rats during the recess, facilitating this agreement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The vote on the cameras was to be expected from Jenkins and Principi.</p>
<p>Marty and Mike are another story.</p>
<p>Mike and Marty spent their time scurrying around like rats during the recess, facilitating this agreement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dolph</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63673</link>
		<dc:creator>Dolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 04:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63673</guid>
		<description>All 8 of the supervisors voted for the current resolution.  Why is anyone holding one more accountable than the other if you don't like the end result?

How many folks would have been furious if 'their hard earned tax dollars' went to buy cameras?  

It was obvious that Mrs. Caddigan voted for the cameras to help the schools.  That's politics.  

I see no consistency here with the rage here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All 8 of the supervisors voted for the current resolution.  Why is anyone holding one more accountable than the other if you don&#8217;t like the end result?</p>
<p>How many folks would have been furious if &#8216;their hard earned tax dollars&#8217; went to buy cameras?  </p>
<p>It was obvious that Mrs. Caddigan voted for the cameras to help the schools.  That&#8217;s politics.  </p>
<p>I see no consistency here with the rage here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starryflights</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63667</link>
		<dc:creator>starryflights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 03:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63667</guid>
		<description>Never mind.  I found the link and I voted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind.  I found the link and I voted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63662</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 03:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/01/more-calls-to-remove-good-time-charlie/#comment-63662</guid>
		<description>There actually aren't that many people "frothing at the mouth" about Deane.  If you read the thread, you'd know that.

Of course, I am wondering why he has already stopped enforcement on the previous resolution, since the new one won't take effect until next week - if at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There actually aren&#8217;t that many people &#8220;frothing at the mouth&#8221; about Deane.  If you read the thread, you&#8217;d know that.</p>
<p>Of course, I am wondering why he has already stopped enforcement on the previous resolution, since the new one won&#8217;t take effect until next week - if at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

