<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Hager&#8217;s Endorsements From Democrats</title>
	<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/16/john-hagers-endorsements-from-democrats/</link>
	<description>Blog-Fu for Prince William, Manassas and Manassas Park politics.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: 10 feet tall and Bulletproof</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/16/john-hagers-endorsements-from-democrats/#comment-65074</link>
		<dc:creator>10 feet tall and Bulletproof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 02:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/16/john-hagers-endorsements-from-democrats/#comment-65074</guid>
		<description>I tend to put the Cranwell comment in proper context. One that goes beyond the sleazy partisan dimension that some live in... It is entirely possible for men to co-exist within the fabric that is politics...and disagree on subject matter....but still retain civil and social ties to their opponents that even resemble friendship on some levels. Jeez...lighten up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to put the Cranwell comment in proper context. One that goes beyond the sleazy partisan dimension that some live in&#8230; It is entirely possible for men to co-exist within the fabric that is politics&#8230;and disagree on subject matter&#8230;.but still retain civil and social ties to their opponents that even resemble friendship on some levels. Jeez&#8230;lighten up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loudoun Insider</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/16/john-hagers-endorsements-from-democrats/#comment-65028</link>
		<dc:creator>Loudoun Insider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 21:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/16/john-hagers-endorsements-from-democrats/#comment-65028</guid>
		<description>It is also quite possible that they did this because they want the opposite to be true.  Don't you think Warner and Cranwell would know this would piss off party activists?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is also quite possible that they did this because they want the opposite to be true.  Don&#8217;t you think Warner and Cranwell would know this would piss off party activists?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SWAC Girl</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/16/john-hagers-endorsements-from-democrats/#comment-65018</link>
		<dc:creator>SWAC Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 20:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/05/16/john-hagers-endorsements-from-democrats/#comment-65018</guid>
		<description>Greg asked, "Does anyone else come to the conclusion that Democrats are more concerned about Jeff Frederick running RPV, rather than John Hager?"

Interesting observation and one worth consideration, Greg. I posted and linked at my site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg asked, &#8220;Does anyone else come to the conclusion that Democrats are more concerned about Jeff Frederick running RPV, rather than John Hager?&#8221;</p>
<p>Interesting observation and one worth consideration, Greg. I posted and linked at my site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

