<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rule Of Law Resolution Update Tomorrow</title>
	<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/06/02/rule-of-law-resolution-update-tomorrow/</link>
	<description>Blog-Fu for Prince William, Manassas and Manassas Park politics.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Advocator</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/06/02/rule-of-law-resolution-update-tomorrow/#comment-66769</link>
		<dc:creator>Advocator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/06/02/rule-of-law-resolution-update-tomorrow/#comment-66769</guid>
		<description>USMCWife:

The loiterers are not being picked up because they are not really at the 7-11.  They congregate at a vacant commercial building's property next to it.  The police must have a complaint from the owner (or someone with a legal interest in the property) prior to enforcing any trespassing law.  

The police could, if they really wanted to, enforce certain traffic regulations when vehicles stop on the public right of way to converse with and pick up the loiterers.  This would be the appropriate way for the community to deal with this nonsense.

A group of citizens could also file a nuisance suit against the owner to force the owner to abate the nuisance.  I would not support such an action because it's an implicit approval of the police department's abdication of responsibility and the County Government's (read Executive's) failure to provide for public safety.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>USMCWife:</p>
<p>The loiterers are not being picked up because they are not really at the 7-11.  They congregate at a vacant commercial building&#8217;s property next to it.  The police must have a complaint from the owner (or someone with a legal interest in the property) prior to enforcing any trespassing law.  </p>
<p>The police could, if they really wanted to, enforce certain traffic regulations when vehicles stop on the public right of way to converse with and pick up the loiterers.  This would be the appropriate way for the community to deal with this nonsense.</p>
<p>A group of citizens could also file a nuisance suit against the owner to force the owner to abate the nuisance.  I would not support such an action because it&#8217;s an implicit approval of the police department&#8217;s abdication of responsibility and the County Government&#8217;s (read Executive&#8217;s) failure to provide for public safety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USMCWife</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/06/02/rule-of-law-resolution-update-tomorrow/#comment-66748</link>
		<dc:creator>USMCWife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 03:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/06/02/rule-of-law-resolution-update-tomorrow/#comment-66748</guid>
		<description>I wish we were there to help, but you are all doing a great job of stayin g on top of this.  

I am pretty upset that the loiterers at the 7-11's etc are not being picked up as the public nuisances that they are.

I guess one step at a time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish we were there to help, but you are all doing a great job of stayin g on top of this.  </p>
<p>I am pretty upset that the loiterers at the 7-11&#8217;s etc are not being picked up as the public nuisances that they are.</p>
<p>I guess one step at a time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryanna</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/06/02/rule-of-law-resolution-update-tomorrow/#comment-66722</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 23:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/06/02/rule-of-law-resolution-update-tomorrow/#comment-66722</guid>
		<description>At the State Convention, a very distinguished man from McLean VA went out of his way to meet Chairman Stewart. I watched and listened as he offered high praises to the Chairman for the great work he has done to correct the illegal alien problem in PW.  Corey humbley apologized for sending our illegal's to Fairfax, and the man was equally gracious in his acknowledgement of that fact.

One day, Chairman Stewart will be Governor, because the people of PW and across the state recognize the progress that has been made here. 

It is very obvious that those who are still trying to spoil it, are part of the problem, and not part of the solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the State Convention, a very distinguished man from McLean VA went out of his way to meet Chairman Stewart. I watched and listened as he offered high praises to the Chairman for the great work he has done to correct the illegal alien problem in PW.  Corey humbley apologized for sending our illegal&#8217;s to Fairfax, and the man was equally gracious in his acknowledgement of that fact.</p>
<p>One day, Chairman Stewart will be Governor, because the people of PW and across the state recognize the progress that has been made here. </p>
<p>It is very obvious that those who are still trying to spoil it, are part of the problem, and not part of the solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ceejay</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/06/02/rule-of-law-resolution-update-tomorrow/#comment-66718</link>
		<dc:creator>ceejay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 23:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/06/02/rule-of-law-resolution-update-tomorrow/#comment-66718</guid>
		<description>A Reader said on 2 Jun 2008 at 7:24 pm: 
Could someone again supply the phone numbers and email addresses of the BOS, just in case they need a little reminding about the will of the citizens of PWC.

-------------------------------

A Reader, i've always found Supervisor Stirrup and Chairman Stewart to be pretty responsive to e-mail.  have never e-mail May, even though he is my supervisor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Reader said on 2 Jun 2008 at 7:24 pm:<br />
Could someone again supply the phone numbers and email addresses of the BOS, just in case they need a little reminding about the will of the citizens of PWC.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>A Reader, i&#8217;ve always found Supervisor Stirrup and Chairman Stewart to be pretty responsive to e-mail.  have never e-mail May, even though he is my supervisor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maureen Wood</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/06/02/rule-of-law-resolution-update-tomorrow/#comment-66717</link>
		<dc:creator>Maureen Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 23:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/06/02/rule-of-law-resolution-update-tomorrow/#comment-66717</guid>
		<description>Corey A. Stewart- Office Phone: 703-792-4640
cstewart@pwcgov.org

Wally Covington- Office Phone: (703) 792-6190
wcovington@pwcgov.org 

Martin E. Nohe- Office Phone: 703-792-4620
mnohe@pwcgov.org

Maureen S. Caddigan- Office Phone: 703-792-4645
mcaddigan@pwcgov.org 

John T. Stirrup, Jr.- Office Phone: (703) 792-6195
gainesville@pwcgov.org

John D. Jenkins- Office Phone: 703-792-4668
jjenkins@pwcgov.org

Michael C. May- Office Phone: 703-792-4643
mcmay@pwcgov.org

Frank J. Principi- Office Phone: 703-792-4646
FPrincipi@pwcgov.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corey A. Stewart- Office Phone: 703-792-4640<br />
<a href="mailto:cstewart@pwcgov.org">cstewart@pwcgov.org</a></p>
<p>Wally Covington- Office Phone: (703) 792-6190<br />
<a href="mailto:wcovington@pwcgov.org">wcovington@pwcgov.org</a> </p>
<p>Martin E. Nohe- Office Phone: 703-792-4620<br />
<a href="mailto:mnohe@pwcgov.org">mnohe@pwcgov.org</a></p>
<p>Maureen S. Caddigan- Office Phone: 703-792-4645<br />
<a href="mailto:mcaddigan@pwcgov.org">mcaddigan@pwcgov.org</a> </p>
<p>John T. Stirrup, Jr.- Office Phone: (703) 792-6195<br />
<a href="mailto:gainesville@pwcgov.org">gainesville@pwcgov.org</a></p>
<p>John D. Jenkins- Office Phone: 703-792-4668<br />
<a href="mailto:jjenkins@pwcgov.org">jjenkins@pwcgov.org</a></p>
<p>Michael C. May- Office Phone: 703-792-4643<br />
<a href="mailto:mcmay@pwcgov.org">mcmay@pwcgov.org</a></p>
<p>Frank J. Principi- Office Phone: 703-792-4646<br />
<a href="mailto:FPrincipi@pwcgov.org">FPrincipi@pwcgov.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/06/02/rule-of-law-resolution-update-tomorrow/#comment-66716</link>
		<dc:creator>A Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 23:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/06/02/rule-of-law-resolution-update-tomorrow/#comment-66716</guid>
		<description>Could someone again supply the phone numbers and email addresses of the BOS, just in case they need a little reminding about the will of the citizens of PWC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could someone again supply the phone numbers and email addresses of the BOS, just in case they need a little reminding about the will of the citizens of PWC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dude</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/06/02/rule-of-law-resolution-update-tomorrow/#comment-66715</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 23:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/06/02/rule-of-law-resolution-update-tomorrow/#comment-66715</guid>
		<description>Looks like Deane finally got the message from the voice of the citizens of PWC, as reflected by the BOCS:

"In a Friday morning impromptu meeting with members of the press, Deane clarified further: Under this new policy, officers check immigration status at the stage of “physical custodial arrest,” when the handcuffs are used, he said."

"In the meantime, police will continue to press for immigration status of suspects “based on circumstances,” Deane said, adding that those circumstances did not necessarily need to include arrests. 
“We still retain the ability to check immigration status prior to arrest,” he said."

http://www.insidenova.com/isn/news/local/article/prince_william_police_chief_supervisors_to_discuss_immigration_policy/16428/


Looks like a satisfactory interpretation to me, and I was a skeptic that it would be enforce before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Deane finally got the message from the voice of the citizens of PWC, as reflected by the BOCS:</p>
<p>&#8220;In a Friday morning impromptu meeting with members of the press, Deane clarified further: Under this new policy, officers check immigration status at the stage of “physical custodial arrest,” when the handcuffs are used, he said.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;In the meantime, police will continue to press for immigration status of suspects “based on circumstances,” Deane said, adding that those circumstances did not necessarily need to include arrests.<br />
“We still retain the ability to check immigration status prior to arrest,” he said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.insidenova.com/isn/news/local/article/prince_william_police_chief_supervisors_to_discuss_immigration_policy/16428/" rel="nofollow">http://www.insidenova.com/isn/news/local/article/prince_william_police_chief_supervisors_to_discuss_immigration_policy/16428/</a></p>
<p>Looks like a satisfactory interpretation to me, and I was a skeptic that it would be enforce before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

