OUTRAGE! Mexican UN Official To Come And Lecture PWC
By Greg L | 4 June 2008 | Illegal Aliens, Prince William County | 69 Comments
This is beyond outrageous. The United Nations, which coddles tyrannical and repressive regimes all over the world that treat their own citizens worse than we treat our convicted criminals, is sending a radical open-borders advocate from Mexico to Prince William County and lecture us on “human rights” at the behest of a local organization that is affiliated with the Zapatista Army of National Liberation. This is going to set off a conflagration in Prince William County beyond imagination.
Dear Chairman Stewart,
The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Migrants, the Honorable Jorge Bustamante, PhD, will visit Prince William County next week to investigate reports of human rights violations of migrants. At our request, he would be honored to meet with members of the Board of County Supervisors and elicit your perspective on the current crisis.
Dr. Bustamante will visit our community next Tuesday and Wednesday, June 10 and 11. He will be meeting with various groups and individuals throughout the two day period. We have set aside time on Wednesday, June 10(sic), 2008 at 9:00 for him to meet with you and other BOCS members. The McCoart Bldg. seems like the logical location if that is acceptable to you. Please let me know if you will be able to attend this meeting.
Sincerely,
Nancy Lyall
Legal Coordinator
Mexicanos Sin Fronteras
It is worth noting that Jorge Bustamante is a Mexican national, whose government allows their national police force to rape, rob and maim immigrants in Mexico. Bustamante has spoken frequently about his belief that Mexico has the right to dictate immigration policy to the United States. He quite dramatically misses the point that the United States is governed by a Constitution that we actually adhere to, and that at the founding of our nation it was made explicitly clear that our government seeks only the consent of the governed, not the approval of foreign nations. This idea that the United States must seek permission from Mexico in order to secure our nation from the millions of their nationals that they encourage to break our laws is enraging.
Bustamante also has a novel way to further his reconquista goals with the creation of a dual Mexican-American citizenship that would ensure that Mexican nationals who immigrate to the United States can permanently retain their Mexican citizenship. When immigrants are sworn in as citizens in the United States, they renounce their allegiance to any foreign powers or potentates, but Bustamante actively wants to subvert the oath of citizenship in the United States.
For what I propose, it would be enough that the Congress of the Union, reform the Constitution, declaring that the Mexican Nationality becomes nontransferable for all its legal effects to be exercised in the Mexican territory. This way if a Mexican by birth acquires U.S. citizenship, that fact would allow him to vote in the United States, without losing his Mexican nationality. However, he could exercise the latter only in Mexican territory, but he could not exercise his U.S. citizenship, and seek the U.S. government protection while being inside Mexican territory, unless he renounced his rights as a Mexican citizen in Mexico. But he could expressly renounce in Mexico to his U.S. citizenship, as a requisite to exercise his rights of Mexican citizenship, to which his Mexican nationality by birth gives him that right, which is nontransferable.
Isn’t this a novel way to completely undermine American sovereignty? Nationality is rendered meaningless, and Mexican citizens start voting in our elections.
My Constitutional Reform proposal is valid because of what I see coming due to Wilson campaign, as well as the future of the relations between Mexico and the U.S. in that future will be inevitable and irreversible participation of Mexicans - by origin or by birth - who live permanently in that country, in the politics of both countries. Therefore accepting that premise, anyone who wants to defend the interests of Mexico in whichever country they reside, augment their political power in order to make it within that country’s rules.
We already know what conclusion this Mexican national will arrive at after his cursory fig-leaf of an “investigation” into the lawful policies in place in Prince William County. Were a U.S. National doing this same thing in Mexico, he would be thrown in jail for interfering in the political process in Mexico. Bustamante is nevertheless injecting himself into our national political debate, and has started a boycott by persons of Mexican descent on companies that donate to Republican candidates because they advocate immigration policies that he thinks are “immoral”. I guess his understanding of federal campaign finance laws is a little weak, since corporate donations to federal candidates is prohibited by law. I wonder how he got the impression this was a legal practice.
Mexico’s foremost expert on immigration is calling on Mexicans to do whatever they can to stop Republicans from winning the White House next year, including a boycott of companies that donate to Republican candidates.
Jorge Bustamante, the United Nations’ Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants and a sociology professor at the University of Notre Dame, this week called Republican Party policies on immigration “immoral.” Writing in the Mexico City daily Reforma, Bustamante said the Republican candidates share a in immigration stance that “lacks even the most minimum recognition of the demand for the Mexican migrant labor.”
This is entirely outrageous. The United Nations has no business telling Prince William County what the heck it can do. We don’t answer to the United Nations. The involvement of Bustamante makes this even worse, since a radical Mexican national like this guy has absolutely no standing whatsoever to render judgement on what we do in Prince William County.
The opinions expressed here are solely the views of the author, and not representative of the position of any organization, political party, doughnut shop, knitting guild, or waste recycling facility, but may be correctly attributed to the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy. If anything in the above article has offended you, please click here to receive an immediate apology.
You can follow the discussion through the Comments feed. You can also pingback or trackback from your own site.
69 Comments
Views: 1854
Loading ...
It’s ridiculous stuff, for sure. The other side seems way out of touch with reality.
Time for a demonstration?
The supervisors should tell him in a resolution BITE ME!
I hope NumbersUSA and Outraged Patriots carry this on their websites. We need Glenn Beck, Hannity, Lou Dobbs, O’Reilly, Rush and Malkin to pick this up and run with it. I have steam coming out of my ears!
We need to get Congressman Wolf involved as well as our Senators. Can we go to this meeting? I’m ready for a demonstration.
Stay tuned… There will be an opportunity for citizens to get involved. I understand that these meetings will be public.
Why wouldn’t Stewart just decline the meeting with Mr. Ballabusteros?
Does this mean American citizens who want to live in Mexico will also be entitled to dual-citizenship and all the rights afforded Mexican citizens in Mexico?
I would not be at all adverse to being able to buy (in my own name) a piece of land on the beach, or in the “exclusive hills,” and build a nice little retirement home, while enjoying all the benefits Mexico offers its “dual” citizens.
Perhaps someone would ask Sr Bustamante to incorporate this into his recommended changes for the “Union” constitution. Afterall, isn’t this what Bush and our Congress had planned all along?
Mexico bought into it completely. After Bush and Fox did the “hand shake,” 10% of Mexico’s working poor poured into the US to depress wages and make American businesses very happy, while breaking the backs of American tax payers to cover the costs of their benefits and services.
Americans didn’t think it was such a good idea. But, when we asked Congress to do something, they played us like a fiddle because most of them are in total agreement of this most profitable and quite pleased with this successful government-business partnership they have created and allowed to grow.
This is Bush’s dream of a North American Union. Obviously he and Congress did a good job pushing it through because ICE still into “catch and release” (unlike Mexico where you’re thrown in jail). And, when was the last time we read of any executive or foreman of a business jailed, or a business “painfully” fined, after found guilty of hiring illegal aliens and failing to follow up on SSA and IRS no-match notices?
With Obama and McCain as the primary party candidates for the leadership role in our country, I wouldn’t expect too much during the next four years either. … Unless we are able to vote in a “do something” Congress …. or at least one that will give Americans “equal rights” and “citizenship” in Mexico.
Since Mr. Ballabusteros is investigating reports of human rights violations of migrants, I think Prince William officials have a responsibility to humanity to provide whatever information they have about human rights abuses of migrants in Mexico. Perhaps he can do something about what is going on in his homeland from the safety and protection that America has always offered.
Mike
El Jeffe Bustaballes might be better served “investigating” human rights violations in his home country, where he’s more likely to find them. Those of us with firing neurons know that this “investigation” will likely consist of listening to stories of the far left. No fact-finding, just one side of the story. “Responsibility to humanity?” On your way to a Tibet demonstration?
FAIR. USA. Save Manassas. Save Maryland and other reform groups should send reps also/ show a united front.
American Legion News Release
What’s New
Veterans Launch National Education Effort on Illegal Immigration
INDIANAPOLIS, IN, April 28, 2008 - Crime, terrorism and dependency on scarce government dollars are some of the major reasons why the nation’s largest veterans organization is concerned about illegal immigration. So concerned, in fact, that The American Legion today began a nationwide outreach to alert Americans to the dangers posed by illegal aliens and the government’s reluctance to seriously address the issue.
Through a radio spot campaign, news releases from posts across the country, letters to newspaper editors and a concerted outreach to America’s leading media pundits, at both the national and local levels, The American Legion will offer a free booklet about illegal immigration that not only discusses the far reaching problems it is causing but also provides a cogent strategy to address the issue.
“American Legion members have served in the U.S. Armed Forces throughout the world so that Americans can feel safe at home,” said Marty Conatser, national commander. “We have seen Third World countries. We have seen poverty, political instability, disease and war. Today we see the threat that open borders present to our homeland.
“With more than 14,000 posts and 2.7 million members, I am asking Legionnaires everywhere to start the national dialogue that needs to happen now,” Conatser said. “As a nation at war with operatives sworn to kill Americans, our government must shut down our open borders and take decisive action to address a crippling national problem.”
The booklet, “A Strategy to Address Illegal Immigration in the United States,” is available for download at www.legion.org/bulletins. A free hard copy can be requested by sending an email to acy@legion.org. Conatser has asked Legionnaires to obtain a media kit, visit radio stations and offer the public service spot package of six 60-second radio spots that addresses various problems with illegal immigration and offers the booklet free to listeners.
“The American Legion is very much in support of legal immigration,” Conatser added. “Indeed the ancestors of countless Legionnaires immigrated here from around the world. However, we are a nation of laws and since we all swore to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States when we donned our uniforms, we believe strongly that the security and sovereignty of our nation must be our highest priority through stringent enforcement of our immigration laws.”
- 30 -
Media contacts: Ramona E. Joyce, (202) 263-2982, Cell (202) 445-1161; Joe March, (317) 630-1253, Cell, (317) 748-1926; or John Raughter (317) 630-1350, Cell (317)441-8847.
Hopefully you will all call your Supervisor and the Chairman and tell them you do not want them, or any other PWC official to meet this guy.
Will Ballabusteros luncheon with MS. CHAVEZ?
I kinda like the way that Stewart was GIVEN a time to meet with Bustamante rather than first being informed that Bustmante would enjoy the honor of meeting with him and then being ASKED for a time that was convenient for Stewart.
Not a good rate to impress the natives.
Sorry, I meant to say not a good way to impress the natives. (I haven’t finished my morning coffee yet).
I called W. Covington’s office and he is aware of this. I told his staff person that BOCS should tell Lyall and Bustmante that they can go pound sand and that if they have a problem, they can call Condi Rice.
Also, Tom Davis’ office was not aware of it, but they are now.
Someone should fill Dr. Bustamante in on the heineouis civil right violations committed by and on his own people south of the border.
Guess the remittance checks are slowing and his pockets are thinning out.
This dog and pony show is BS to the n’th degree.
“The McCoart Bldg. seems like the logical location if that is acceptable to you.”
We should not provide our taxpayer funded government buildings for this tripe.
You guys.
This is perfect. The vast majority of Americans think the UN is a crock. A “special rapporteur”? Is that some sort of hybridized rapper - reporter?
The only real question is whether Corey Stewart has the stones to take this clown on. Stewart ought to put Bustabozo on trial. It should be filmed. The media should be invited.
Then ….
Mark Warner ought to be forced to take a side. Gilmore too. Do they side with Stewart who thinks the UN has no business in local US politics and that Mexico has no standing to complain about anybody’s civil rights or…
Do they side with the UN?
Mark Warner should be invited to the discussion.
The UN is poison for US politicians. Anybody who blasts the UN is a hero to 80% of Americans.
This is a rare opportunity for politicians running for office in November to score some real points with voters.
Where is Chuck Colgan?
I will be very disappointed if any of the Board agrees to meet with this guy. He has no standing. Meeting Jorge will play into the hands of MSF and Lyall. Wake up, supervisors, there’s no need to grovel!
Monticup -
If I were a conservative candidate running for office this November I’d go to the meeting and try to make sure that my opponent went too. I’d hire a video crew. From then on my web site and campaign commercials would have me arguing with a UN rapper-reporter while my opponent agrees with the guy.
You couldn’t buy political advertising like that.
Fimian telling Bustamove to go to he** while Connolley and Feder agree with the guy. The election would be over that day. It doesn’t even matter what voters think of the immigration debate - the UN is poison. This is the kind of thing the Republicans should take to town. But they won’t. They are just not bright enough. Instead, they’s lose across the board in November as the Democrats all paint them as Bush protoges.
I can live with Obama but not Mark Warner.
We gotta get Warner to the Bustalamp meeting.
One does not have to renounce citizenship of a foreign coutry to become a US Citizen. The US Does recognize dual citizenship.
http://www.travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_1753.html
so what we are saying is that if there are accusations of abuse, the UN should not investigate them. Like they did in Bosnia, Serbia, Darfur, etc. Lets see what the opinion of the UN is after they investigate, then you have something to complain about.
The opinion Americans have regarding the UN has been established for decades. I am not even arguing on the merits of the UN here. I am proposing a bit of political strategy. The Dems will paint all Republicans as Bush lovers. That’s political strategy. The Republicans should react. If they can tie Democrat candidates to some Notre Dame professor / UN investigator / rapper - reporter, they should do that.
And the UN didn’t do anything in Bosnia. Hillary did. She (and Simbad) ran through a hail of bullets in a hot LZ to fight the genocidal maniacs. Or was that Serbia? It’s hard to keep track of her lies.
As for Darfur - yes, good point - that was a job well done. The utter uselessness of the UN was confirmed in Darfur. Best to send Bustatable to PWC. That’s where the real problems lie.
Vigilant1 said on 5 Jun 2008 at 10:14 am:
Where is Chuck Colgan?
On his front porch, drinking a nice glass of ice cold lemonade.
Since this is clearly an international event involving policy matters important to the UN, WHO is representing the United States? Is anyone from the State Department going to be present for this international witch hunt, or has Corey been promoted to POTIS on matters of state?
Corey should refer Jorge Bustamante to the State Department to discuss the “human rights” position of the United States.
Groveton said on 5 Jun 2008 at 9:58 am:
Mark Warner should be invited to the discussion.
There will be NO discussion. A foregone conclusion has already been made. Just look at the results of the so called PWC human rights commission, Ms, Chavez investigation et al. PWC is the bad guy for wanting the law to be enforced re ILLEGAL ALIENS. These dimwitted, needle brained appologists for the ILLEGALS only have the media (and that is changing) to try and keep the cause going. They have already lost in court and the court of public opinion.
Seems like every third world Banditos, Criminal, and uneducated peons think they have the right to cross the border and squat wherever they want, breed like fruit flies and expect American Citizens to pay their medical bills, educate their spawn, and provide jobs and welfare while they Kill, Rape and Rob American citizens by the 10,s of thousands!
Does any of the open Borders crowd know the different s between Illegal Immigration & Legal Immigration? Also if it is ok to be invaded from the South then it should be ok to be invaded from any Nation or race in the world. There are 100,s of millions probably billions from Africa, India, China, etc. that would like the same right as Latinos to Invade this Nation, have the tax payers pay their Medical bills, Educate their Children in their own language while they break numerous laws and Rape, Rob, Kill thousands of Citizens every year.
Lets adopt Mexico Immigration Laws!
MEXICO,S Immigration LAWS!
Mind you, this is the law of the land in Mexico, the third-world nation that has encouraged millions of it’s citizens to invade America.
It is also the same country that threatened to take the U.S. to the UN for building a fence on American soil!
Mexico’s Immigration Law:
Let’s Try It Here at Home
Reference:
http://www.citizensforaconstitutionalrepublic.com/waller5-8-06.html#top
By J. Michael Waller
Mexico has a radical idea for a rational immigration policy that most Americans would love. However, Mexican officials haven’t been sharing that idea with us as they press for our Congress to adopt the McCain-Kennedy immigration reform bill.
That’s too bad, because Mexico, which annually deports more illegal aliens than the United States does, has much to teach us about how it handles the immigration issue. Under Mexican law, it is a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico.
At a time when the Supreme Court and many politicians seek to bring American law in line with foreign legal norms, it’s noteworthy that nobody has argued that the U.S. look at how Mexico deals with immigration and what it might teach us about how best to solve
our illegal immigration problem. Mexico has a single, streamlined law that ensures that foreign visitors and immigrants are:
* in the country legally;
* have the means to sustain themselves economically;
* not destined to be burdens on society;
* of economic and social benefit to society;
* of good character and have no criminal records; and
* contributors to the general well-being of the nation.
The law also ensures that:
* immigration authorities have a record of each foreign visitor;
* foreign visitors do not violate their visa status;
* foreign visitors are banned from interfering in the country’s internal politics;
* foreign visitors who enter under false pretenses are imprisoned or deported;
* foreign visitors violating the terms of their entry are imprisoned or deported;
* those who aid in illegal immigration will be sent to prison.
Who could disagree with such a law? It makes perfect sense. The Mexican constitution strictly defines the rights of citizens — and the denial of many fundamental rights to non-citizens, illegal and illegal. Under the constitution, the Ley General de Población, or
General Law on Population, spells out specifically the country’s immigration policy.
It is an interesting law — and one that should cause us all to ask, Why is our great southern neighbor pushing us to water down our own immigration laws and policies, when its own immigration restrictions are the toughest on the continent? If a felony is a
crime punishable by more than one year in prison, then Mexican law makes it a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico.
If the United States adopted such statutes, Mexico no doubt would denounce it as a manifestation of American racism and bigotry.
We looked at the immigration provisions of the Mexican constitution. [1] Now let’s look at Mexico’s main immigration law.
Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:
* Foreigners are admitted into Mexico “according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress.” (Article 32)
* Immigration officials must “ensure” that “immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance” and for their dependents. (Article 34)
* Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets “the equilibrium of the national demographics,” when foreigners are deemed detrimental to “economic or national interests,” when they do not behave like good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and when “they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy.” (Article 37)
* The Secretary of Governance may “suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest.” (Article 38)
Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country:
* Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article 73)
* A National Population Registry keeps track of “every single individual who comprises the population of the country,” and verifies each individual’s identity. (Articles 85 and 86)
* A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91).
Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned:
* Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article 116)
* Foreigners who sign government documents “with a signature that is false or different from that which he normally uses” are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article 116)
Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned as felons:
* Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117)
* Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118)
* Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to up to six years in prison (Articles 119, 120 and 121). Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico — such as working without a permit — can also be imprisoned.
Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says,
* “A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country illegally.” (Article 123)
* Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from Mexico instead of being imprisoned. (Article 125)
* Foreigners who “attempt against national sovereignty or security” will be deported. (Article 126)
Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered criminals under the law:
* A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the foreigner live in the country is subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127)
* Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into Mexico will be fined. (Article 132)
All of the above runs contrary to what Mexican leaders are demanding of the United States. The stark contrast between Mexico’s immigration practices versus its American immigration preachings is telling. It gives a clear picture of the Mexican government’s agenda: to have a one-way immigration relationship with the United States.
Let’s call Mexico’s bluff on its unwarranted interference in U.S. immigration policy. Let’s propose, just to make a point, that the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) member nations standardize their immigration laws by using Mexico’s own law as a model.
Bl, you have issues, and your posts are boring as heck. While I am anti illegal immigration, I find the comment “breeding like fruit flies” to be pretty hateful. This type of rhetoric is not what we stand for here, and you need to knock it off.
“so what we are saying is that if there are accusations of abuse, the UN should not investigate them. Like they did in Bosnia, Serbia, Darfur, etc.”
Pat.Herve, you’re comparing how illegal aliens are treated in THIS country with how even citizens were/are treated in Bosnia, Serbia, and Darfur??? Are you mad (and I don’t mean angry)? Do you think maybe the taxpayers just haven’t provided enough services for these illegals and that equates with ethnic cleansing, murder, rape, and the multitude of other sins perpetrated on the people of those countries? We provide education, health care and they take jobs, welfare benefits, housing all the while stealing our very identities with hardly a slap on the fingers for it…and you’re comparing THAT with ethnic cleansing? You need some perspective!!
It seems to me that real human rights abuses are going on in other places in the world. Why isn’t the UN investigating South Africa or Zimbabwe? When was the last time you saw a Mexican soldier on a UN Peacekeeping mission?
I wonder if these brilliant Presidential candidates of ours have realized how much more they would weaken the position of the United States in the world than even George W. has managed to accomplish if they push amnesty upon the American people? The United Nations will see this as a victory of intimidation over the former world power that has tried to keep the UN from destroying the sovereignty of the nations of the world, on OUR dime for the most part. It would be a coup for them, just as the European Union was and the North American Union will be once this pro-illegal crowd gets full power in the White House as well as the Congress. The United Nations is NOT the “Federation” of Star Trek legend, just so all you Trekkies out there realize that. It has a history of incompetence, corruption, and malfeasance far beyond what you might imagine. It was, and probably still is, spy central for every nation of the world that wants a piece of this country. It HATES the United States.
New Zealand keeps looking better and better.
HerndonBob: You’re right. Is Nancy Lyall a registered foreign agent? Under what authority is she bringing in UN officials into PWC. Who is paying for this travesty? State Dept should be alerted–another wannabee diplomatic on the loose.
Several good stories in the WashPo today, nothing about the impending visit.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/04/AR2008060403757.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/04/AR2008060404019.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/04/AR2008060401766.html
I’m glad that Greg L is highlighting folks like the U.N. and Mr. Bustamente, rather than American businesses, who are the real proponents and beneficiaries of open borders. By doing so, he keeps the pressure off American businesses. That’s good. We need “useful idiots”; otherwise, the voters might turn on businesses, and that would be very bad.
According to this story Stewart said he is willing to meet with Bustamante.
http://www.examiner.com/a-1425548~U_N__official_to_visit_Prince_William_to_study_illegal_immigration_policy.html
Well, this story made the National Review Online. Worth taking a look at “Sovereignty Watch ” entry.
http://corner.nationalreview.com/
Tell them things are changing across this country
Back to rule of law!!!!
Sanford signs illegal immigration bill
COLUMBIA, S.C. — Gov. Mark Sanford signed legislation Wednesday that threatens to temporarily shut down businesses and fine them up to $1,000 per worker if they employ illegal immigrants. Sanford, surrounded by about 20 legislators, said the measure reasserts the rule of law in South Carolina - cracking down on the “wink-and-nod” employment of illegal immigrants. He and legislators said they hope the ideas spread and force Congress to act. “The message is loud and clear: Stop the silent invasion of this state,” said Senate President Pro Tem Glenn McConnell, R-Charleston. Legislators boasted the measure is the most strict and effective anti-illegal-immigrant bill in the country.
You should all be glad to know that according to Bustmante (per the links in the NRO item to Spanish language newspaper articles in Mexico) the movement to enforce our immigration laws will increase xenophobia and persecution ala the Nazis in WWII.
Just thought you’d like to know.
Hopefully Lindsey Graham has seen his better days.
Buddy Witherspoon is the man to vote for in South Carolina.
I’m not from there but anybody have family in South Carolina tell them to vote buddy 2008. He is against illegal immigration. He has been on terry anderson show
www.terry@theterryandersonshow.com
His show is sunday nights at 9 pm pacific time
He does this for free. He depends on donations He has been on the forefront of this battle for I believe 7 or 8 years.
His show is available on the internet. South Central Los Angeles has been our ground zero on this issue. Take time to listen. He even has archives up and running. If nothing he will keep your patriot blood flowing with the outstanding guests he has on. This is a national problem and a state problem.It is everybody’s problem.
Give him a listen. I am sure you will like him as much as I do.
Che’ and Vigilante1:
Whats your concern with Chuck Colgan, I dont get it…
Lets not get carried away here, I don’t see any evidence that this guy is representing the UN on his visit. He is probably representing himself, otherwise why would he have Nancy Lyall send a letter requesting a meeting.
OMG maybe it was HIS posse that was in Manassas Park the other night..All 300 of them!! Maybe they are SPIES since only 1 person seen them..shhhh
Sorry had to go there, The entertainment provided from this site just absolutely baffles me to the point I resort to a smart A**… but seriously, I agree alot of people get to carried away in their comments…
Kinda concerning though…
From the Lyall letter:
“to investigate reports of human rights violations of migrants.”
What are the nature of these reports and whom is compiling them? That would be my first question.
Just Cause said on 5 Jun 2008 at 3:00 pm:
Che’ and Vigilante1:
Whats your concern with Chuck Colgan, I dont get it…
Believe at last look he (Colgan) was/is the most senior representative of PWC.
What a bunch of BS! Special Rapporteur???
These apologists are out of their minds. I love the listing of Mexican immigration laws above - maybe the “Special Rapporteur” should start there where he has more experience.
Just Cause said on 5 Jun 2008 at 3:00 pm:
Che’ and Vigilante1:
Whats your concern with Chuck Colgan, I dont get it…
I was just giving an update. I drove past his house and saw him on his front porch drinking lemonade and wearing a searsucker suit and straw hat. Looked like he was strumming on the ole’ banjo too. Not a care in the world!
There are goals and deadlines in place for the country that does not include a national dialogue nor does it include going through congressional review. Some call it the NAU others call it North American Community. Call it what you like, it’s coming!!! Jerome Corsi, has done extensive research on this subject and wrote his findings in the book THE LATE GREAT USA: The Merger with Mexico and Canada. And it is time to name businesses who are pushing for this merger.
Duck Colgan is the senior senator and represents the citizens of this area. I’m sorry, ignores the citizens of this area for the most part. I believe the concern or issue here is that Duck is great for non-appearances on issues of importance to his constituents. I would suspect that he should have involvement as our highest area political offfical in office. As for Warner, he can’t afford any tarnish and Gilmore can’t find Manassas. This issue is too hot for the weak minded and the weak kneed. We will never see Duck, Mark or Jim pony up on this issue. That is one reason Jim will not win, no guts. Republicans figure to “go for the middle” and most democrats “go for the door”. That is why Prince William County has more balls than the federal government while the President and most other politicians ignore the oaths they all took.
Maybe Al Gore was right - an inconvenient truth.
Go get ‘em Corey and the rest of the BoS! We don’t push so easily here. The law is the law even if Richmond and Washington ignore it. After intros, read him the immigration laws of Mexico and tell him that you have some serious human rights concerns for “migrants”. If he refuses to answer, politely show him the door and say, Adios, the U.N. is 389 miles Northeast.
This is just another example of what we get with World Government. As if we don’t have enough problems dealing with our own government now we have another layer of super government to contend with. The United States of America does not need to belong to the U.N. We did mighty fine for ourselves for quite a long time and I would be willing to bet that we would all be more prosperous and more free without the U.N. on our backs and in our wallets.
Now despite what you may soon read, you must remember they just want to work hard at the things you don’t want to do. Your president told you this so it must be true. They will be good once they get on THIS side of the border. Once they get amnesty. Once they get __________( enter latest demands here)
Sure…sure they will.
The report on “non-natural” deaths, however, indicates that between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2007, a total of 667 American citizens died in Mexico. During the same period, 35 Americans died in Canada. Only two of the Americans killed in Canada were reported to have been murdered.
http://www.crosswalk.com/news/11576135/
April 14, 2008
This Travel Alert updates information for U.S. citizens on security situations in Mexico that may affect their activities while in that country. This supersedes the Travel Alert for Mexico dated October 24, 2007, and expires on October 15, 2008.
Violence Along The U.S.-Mexico Border
http://www.travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/pa/pa_3028.html
US Warns Tourists of ‘Small-Unit Combat’ at Mexico Border
By Penny Starr
CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer
May 16, 2008
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=/Nation/archive/200805/NAT20080516a.html
Red, White and Blue said on 5 Jun 2008 at 10:17 pm:
OUTSTANDING!
to Che’ and Vigilante1:
and??? So?? again whats your point???
Che’ and Vigilante1: you know anyone can talk the talk but I want to know exactly what are you doing to make this great society a better place? What do you do everyday to contribute??
“ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country” - John F Kennedy
Just Cause said on 6 Jun 2008 at 8:47 am:
Just Cause -
And you - what have YOU done to make this society a better place? What do YOU do everyday to contribute. Come on - we’re all waiting…..
LMAO..I’m not the one blogging about what some one is doing on their front porch in the privacy of their own home, I am not the one “whinning” about my local Government. I want to get the point across that if you want to talk the talk, then get off you A** and walk the walk !!!!
“ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country” - John F Kennedy
oops and let me add, that I might not agree with what Greg is doing but he atleasts talks the talk while he walks the walk and as much research as I have done on this subject with both “sides”, I only have seen Greg stand up for what he believes in and take the heat for what everyone else here only talks about….
Just Cause said on 6 Jun 2008 at 8:47 am:
Red, White and Blue said on 5 Jun 2008 at 10:17 pm:
RWB summed it up beautifully!
And bye the bye, it’s VIGILAN1!
Just Cause said on 6 Jun 2008 at 8:47 am:
Che’ and Vigilante1: you know anyone can talk the talk but I want to know exactly what are you doing to make this great society a better place? What do you do everyday to contribute??
I’m doing a helluva lot more than Senor Colgan, who by the way is drawing a PAYCHECK to “make this great society a better place”. All I know is that he was playing the heck out of that banjo the other night.
I’m still trying to sell my local airline for millions of dollars. But,alas, no one is interested in owning Air Revolutione.
Stalker Che’..aka:
hmmm ” Doin’ helluva lot more” so thats your contribution to society!
LMAO…. another words you do nothing..
Guess I made my point…..
Vigilant1 said
LMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Your name is posting as Vigilant1! I cut and paste everyones name when I address them in a blog..Makes for NO ERRORS on MY PART hahahahahaha
Just Cause said on 6 Jun 2008 at 12:26 pm:
How old are you? Five?
I’m over 18 and under 50…How is that relevant?
Just Cause said on 6 Jun 2008 at 12:26 pm:
Vigilant1 said
LMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Your name is posting as Vigilant1! I cut and paste everyones name when I address them in a blog..Makes for NO ERRORS on MY PART hahahahahaha
Just Cause said on 6 Jun 2008 at 8:47 am:
Che’ and Vigilante1: you know anyone can talk the talk but I want to know exactly what are you doing to make this great society a better place? What do you do everyday to contribute??
I guess there is problem with this site with cut and paste then. Your comment at 8:47 am is above.
Just Cause said on 5 Jun 2008 at 3:00 pm:
Che’ and Vigilante1:
Just Cause said on 6 Jun 2008 at 8:43 am:
to Che’ and Vigilante1:
Better get hold of Greg and have him fix this problem with cut and paste.
Vigilant1 or Vigilante1 or Che’ or Manassasresident (which ever personality your going by in the moment)
Still not answering my question..hmmmmm
Now:
How about you do smack yourself in the forehead and tell them ALL to shut up!
Sorry, I couldn’t hear you. Senator Colgan’s banjo music is drowning out your comments. Yeah, he sure is doing some good for us. Really earning his paycheck….
Che’ said on 6 Jun 2008 at 3:42 pm:
Sorry, I couldn’t hear you. Senator Colgan’s banjo music is drowning out your comments.
Is he playing Shenandoah, my Shenandoah?