# Krutis said on 7 Jun 2008 at 11:33 am:

j -

Micro chips might work. However, I strongly object to your expression “… like dogs”. After all, they are human beings, aren’t they?

I didn’t take this as derogatory, I took it as an example. My dog has a microchip in him.

I too find this is alarming that this individual was bold enough to return to our home after we deported him. Now, the problem is that he is not alone, there are many just like him who think they own our streets and the souls that walk them. They have no regard for us or our rights.
I think it is only a matter of time before someone shoots one of these illegal aliens (in self defense) and then we will be faced with being accused of all kinds of ‘human’ rights violations.

True story:
I stepped out of my car a few days ago (7pm) to peer into the front window of a store a few doors down from Rack & Roll Billiards. Thank God I was warned by a reflection in a window that a very shoddy looking latino was coming up behind me acting in an agressive posture. I believe if I had not turned to face this “human” I would have been attacked from the rear with no warning. My wife watched from our car in suspended horror. This is not paranoia. I have military and police training, as well as sixty years of life experience that tells me I was in danger. Had the attack take place and had I been fortunate enough to react in a timely manner, you AND I would have read it all in the MJM.

Trust me when I say that there are many more where this “human” came from. Watch each others backs.

j said: “…microchip them when they are deported … like dogs. - “What did I misread?

Micro chips might work. However, I strongly object to your expression “… like dogs”. After all, they are human beings, aren’t they?

There she goes again! Read what he said and not what you want to read into it. He said microchip them as they do no do for dogs to be able to identify them if they are lost, before they deport them. geeeeez!

To err is human.

I found it alarming that he was charged by the PWCPD and then deported, only to return to PWC.

So, clearly, he felt comfortable and safe here. How did he manage to “blend” into our community here? Those are questions I would like to see answered — how this criminal was able to live easily amongst the community without fear of detection or reprisal.

That is the downside to tacitly approving of a huge underground, undocumented population ….it allows the criminal element a safe place to lurk.

This is very disturbing and only serves to reinforce the strategy of the Resolution and a return to law and order.

What on eaarth did you put in your coffee this morning? Schrooms, acid, or ….?

Idi Amin Dada
Adolf Hiltler
Elizabeth Bathory
Atilla the Hun
Vlad of Wallachia
Pol Pot
Josef Stalin
Baby Doc Duvalier

Being human doesn’t get you any special treatment ’round here.

Micro chips might work. However, I strongly object to your expression “… like dogs”. After all, they are human beings, aren’t they?

Along with the obvious problem of simple prison overcrowding, we also have a problem that what were “asylums” years ago are now prisons. An overwhelming majority of the folks who were once committed to asylums are now pushed into the prison system. Wrong tool for the job if you ask me. Yes, mean old me is advocating for some sort of mental health reform in the US. I doubt very seriously that having the mentally ill in prisons is cost efficient, or in any way fosters safety for citizens.

I also don’t think deportation is cost effective either. I’d rather see illegals self-deport by taking away all incentives to be here (mostly by going after businesses that hire them and removing services). We dump them over in Mexico, they’re back the next day (if not the same day). That just doesn’t work. Just think if we had illegals gone and had the mentally ill out of our prisons and in places where they get the treatment they need! We might actually save money!

If people are dumped at the border or even deposited into the center of the home country and go free there, most of those who are physically able and strongwilled enough will try to make it back, I believe, and they’ll go without punishment.

It seems to me, for deportation to work, there has to be cooperation between the US judiciary system and that of the other country and somehow I have a feeling that that is not simple. As said, I don’t know what the best solution is.

It’s a real problem what to do with illegal aliens who break the law but haven’t committed a violent crime. Our judicial system hasn’t found a good way to deal with that. I, myself, certainly have no idea.

We already lock up poor people. The most inhumane thing we do is give poor people food and shelter. And while they enjoy that food and shelter and don’t have to keep themselves busy working. They tend to become complacent and dependent on the government. (example: New Orleans) When you depend on government for everything ( ie.. food, minimum wage, no smoking section, correct light bulb in your house, what toilet you can have, what kind of car you can drive, how much of your paycheck you get to keep etc…) it creates a sense of hopelessness, and thats not good. I think we need to rely less on the government, stop locking up poor people (only the truly rich can afford to not be subjects of the state)

We need the government to enforce the law and if that law includes deportation, so be it. I also think the 14th amendment to the constitution should be changed if a illegal immigrant has a baby here. They both should be deported to their home country. By deporting only the parent we are breaking up families and we don’t want to be responsible for that.

The constitution says our government is to provide for the common defense, promote general welfare (notice it says general) insure domestic tranquility, establish justice, secure the blessing of liberty. None of our politicians are doing this right now. (haven’t for a long time) If they did our nation wouldn’t be in this mess. Our government wouldn’t be financially broke our borders wouldn’t be insecure. And if there was tranquility we wouldn’t have gang members “gang banging” in the streets. And if there was justice Ramos and Compean would be out of prison and the ms-13 gang member would be in prison. If they promoted general welfare they wouldn’t tax us like they do, and as for liberty I guess we should just be thankful that we still have the right to speak freely as long as we aren’t infringing on Mccain-Fiengold.