Comments on: John McCain Can BITE ME!

By: freedom

freedom — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:07:47 +0000

No Greg, that’s a vote for Obama whichever way you wanna slice it.

Illegal immigration aside, we can not tolerate Obama for a number of other reasons and if you “bail out,” you’re not helping in the fight against the socialists.

By: Greg L

Greg L — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 03:36:26 +0000

It’s not necessary to actually vote for Obama, which I doubt many would have the stomach to do. Any otherwise reliable Republican voter who simply doesn’t cast a ballot in the presidential race, or writes in a better candidate at least sends an important message.

Call it the “I’d rather be fishing than vote for McCain” approach.

By: James Young

James Young — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 03:03:04 +0000

Sorry, “And Justice For All,” “BoyTrewth”: don’t buy it. Whatever McCain’s deficiencies — and he has them — no “Conservative” of any stripe could, in his right mind, vote for Obama.

By: KO

KO — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:42:13 +0000

Benedict Arnold was a hero to his country at one time as well.

By: AWCheney

AWCheney — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:34:45 +0000

That’s OK freedom…I, and probably everybody else, get that question all the time. My response was as much for others as for you.

By: freedom

freedom — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:29:40 +0000

Sorry if I offended you, AWC….wasn’t my intent…and yes, I certainly realize whose business your vote is. I didn’t mean my question as you took it.

By: AWCheney

AWCheney — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:58:47 +0000

Yeah freedom, aren’t their immigration laws great…and SO logical!

By: AWCheney

AWCheney — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:57:19 +0000

Bottom line is, my vote is MY business. I’m not out there actively campaigning for ANYONE against John McCain, which means that I AM living up to my “Republican Oath,” although minimally in his case. It’s very inappropriate for ANYONE to ask ANYONE else how they are voting. It’s just none of their business…that’s the reason we have “secret” ballots.

By: freedom

freedom — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:53:17 +0000

Ah yes, AWC, me too, but guess what…they won’t allow us to stay….

By: AWCheney

AWCheney — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:51:29 +0000

I said before freedom, in a choice between the two, I vote to move to New Zealand. Does that answer your question?

By: freedom

freedom — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:21:05 +0000

…and so, AWC….does that mean that because of Obama’s “strong stand against illegal aliens, and his promise to secure our border” (cough, cough…) you, like Greg, are going to support him rather than John McCain?

By: AWCheney

AWCheney — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:01:39 +0000

“Couldn’t agree with you more, BL, and it must be stopped. However, they (the invaders from the south) have one saving grace — they’re not intent on killing us.”

Maybe not…but their leadership is intent upon rounding us all up and shipping us back to Europe and, after that, I expect they’d want to do the same with the blacks by shipping them back to Africa. If that’s not a formula for civil war, I don’t know what is.

By: freedom

freedom — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:14:13 +0000

Couldn’t agree with you more, BL, and it must be stopped. However, they (the invaders from the south) have one saving grace — they’re not intent on killing us.

Would you prefer to put up a fight against those who want what you have or those who simply want you dead and then, take what they want?

Quite a choice, huh?

By: Ducky

Ducky — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:50:13 +0000

Dragged Kicking and Screaming, Tancredo Will Pull Lever for McCain
June 10, 2008 6:53 PM

Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., has reluctantly come to the conclusion that he will have to vote for Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., whose immigration reform bill Tancredo blasted as amnesty.

“Sometimes I say to myself, ‘Can I really do this?’” Tancredo said of voting for McCain, according to the Rocky Mountain News. “And then you listen to Obama or Hillary and say, ‘Yeah, I have to.’”

At a debate last October Tancredo sounded less sure of such an idea.

Tancredo told the News he couldn’t vote for Libertarian presidential candidate Bob Barr, who has similar views as he does on immigration, because Barr has “a blind spot on radical Islam.”

- jpt

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/06/dragged-kicking.html

By: Bl

Bl — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:09:53 +0000

Immigration policies are destroying Nations, The USA will become an Spanish speaking Cesspool of Crime, Corruption, Poverty and Misery as the Millions of Hispanics create the same type society here that they created in Latin American. It is Ironic that people create the same type of environment in their new nations that they flee from in their old nations. Communities all across the USA are increasing getting less like the Character and Culture of the people that played by the rules, fought the wars, payed the taxes, and build this Nation as a beacon of freedom for the world but like the Corrupt, Crime ridden countries the invaders build in their home countries!

By: Rick Bentley

Rick Bentley — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 04:30:55 +0000

McCain’s solution is Amnesty

And ironically it will almsot surely be the death of the Republican party, it will ensure a huge Democratic voting bloc for generations

By: dennis c

dennis c — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 03:12:09 +0000

There is but one way to do it right!

Eisenhower did it in 1954.

Operation Wetback!

No, I did not use the word, I reported it.

Wikipedia, type in the same thing and you will see how it should be done.

By: NoVA Scout

NoVA Scout — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 02:14:08 +0000

I sure as hell don’t see what all the fuss is about. McCain knows that the federal government has to tackle the immigration issue and is one of the very few who can’t be accused of being AWOL on this. Most of what everyone complains of here is the result of inaction at the federal level. McCain has been willing to take the heat for trying to find a federal solution. That puts him way ahead of virtually anyone else. There’s no backtracking, inconsistency or hypocrisy in the posted statements. We must secure the borders and we must have comprehensive federal immigration reform. You’re far more likely to get that from McCain than from the Democrats. “two-faced, pandering, lying son of a bitch” is not the stuff that informed policy in the national interest is made from, especially when the guy has been as consistent as anyone in the public eye on this issue, probably to his detriment, but almost in the national interest. I have no idea what “Republican principles” or “conservative” interests you’re talking about in your 0134 comment/ A lot of us conservative Republicans think we are the party of economic growth and sensible international trade policies. Getting some sort of sane federal policy that balances security and minimally impeded cross-border movement of goods, services and labor is a quintessentially Republican/Conservative hallmark. The minute the Republican Party goes Tancredo on us, the Party will die as a force for conservative principles of economic growth and individual rights.

By: freedom

freedom — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:32:38 +0000

BoyTrewth said 6:10 pm, “But then they turn around and say deport all undocumented immigrants no matter what the cost to our economy. What else is this anti-immigrant movement if not a call for a countrywide massively expensive program for government controlled social engineering?”

First of all, Boy…the “deport” is correct except you left out a word…and that’s “self,” as in “self-deport,” and if they get the idea that things are better from which they came, that’s exactly what they’ll do…at their expense/effort, not ours.

Secondly, you propose that it’s a “…program for government controlled social engineering,” hardly. Do you realize that our country has laws to protect its society? Protection of our society from those who kinda like “wander in” is hardly “social engineering”!! Come on, you can do better than that!

By: freedom

freedom — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:26:13 +0000

And Justice for All, don’t even TRY that BS on us…you’re no more conservative than Osama Obama…:(