Comments on: McCain To Visit NOVA On Wednesday http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/ Blog-Fu for Prince William, Manassas and Manassas Park politics. Thu, 24 May 2012 04:59:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3 By: Anonymous http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73958 Anonymous Sat, 13 Sep 2008 14:35:17 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73958 I am voting against Obama/Biden because they will push us a few more steps closer to socialism. Defeating that ticket is my top priority! The addition of Sarah Palin to the McCain ticket gives me more confidence and solidifies my support for them. She's obviously not going to be content to just sit around and collect dust as VP. McCain knows that for sure. Honestly, I'm a chick, and I didn't see the Obama lipstick line as sexist. Sarah is good looking. So what? Good for her. (And Todd is a total cutie. Good for her again.) Still, I'm happy that Obama continued to open his mouth and inserted his foot not once, but twice (he did it again on late night). That and Joe Biden asking a guy in a wheelchair to stand up. Did you see that one? Hysterically funny. Biden. What a buffoon. Some things never change. Like Joe Biden. And his patented buffoonery. I am voting against Obama/Biden because they will push us a few more steps closer to socialism. Defeating that ticket is my top priority!

The addition of Sarah Palin to the McCain ticket gives me more confidence and solidifies my support for them. She’s obviously not going to be content to just sit around and collect dust as VP. McCain knows that for sure.

Honestly, I’m a chick, and I didn’t see the Obama lipstick line as sexist. Sarah is good looking. So what? Good for her. (And Todd is a total cutie. Good for her again.) Still, I’m happy that Obama continued to open his mouth and inserted his foot not once, but twice (he did it again on late night).

That and Joe Biden asking a guy in a wheelchair to stand up. Did you see that one? Hysterically funny. Biden. What a buffoon. Some things never change. Like Joe Biden. And his patented buffoonery.

]]> By: CitizenofManassas http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73772 CitizenofManassas Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:22:20 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73772 Lake Ridge, Exactly when did Hillary say she was like a pit bull but with lipstick? NEVER. One of the more memorable lines from Sarah's speech was the lip stick line. The fact the crowd laughed before Obama finished also tells maybe he was talking about her. Either the crowd he was speaking to was stupid, or they expect such talk. Either way, it does not look good. The bottom line is that Obama claims words matter, he is ivy league educated and he stumbled through that part of his stump speech. He should not better. Lake Ridge,

Exactly when did Hillary say she was like a pit bull but with lipstick? NEVER. One of the more memorable lines from Sarah’s speech was the lip stick line. The fact the crowd laughed before Obama finished also tells maybe he was talking about her. Either the crowd he was speaking to was stupid, or they expect such talk. Either way, it does not look good.

The bottom line is that Obama claims words matter, he is ivy league educated and he stumbled through that part of his stump speech. He should not better.

]]> By: Emma http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73771 Emma Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:23:59 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73771 Incredibly bad timing on Obama's part. He said today he wants to get past these "nonissues." I hope he decides to finally hold his own campaiign to that standard as well. Incredibly bad timing on Obama’s part. He said today he wants to get past these “nonissues.” I hope he decides to finally hold his own campaiign to that standard as well.

]]> By: Lake Ridge http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73766 Lake Ridge Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:21:42 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73766 Yet another example, my friends, of unbridled Republican hypocrisy and arrogance: From the Washington Post: McCain himself used the exact same phrase to describe Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's health care plan just last year. "I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig," McCain said in October of 2007, describing Clinton's universal health care plan when she was running in the Democratic primary. He also, in February 2007, used the phrase to describe conflict over a resolution on the Iraq War. "It gets down to whether you support what is being done in this new strategy or you don't," McCain said at the time. "You can put lipstick on a pig, [but] it's still a pig, in my view." Yet another example, my friends, of unbridled Republican hypocrisy and arrogance:

From the Washington Post:
McCain himself used the exact same phrase to describe Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s health care plan just last year. “I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig,” McCain said in October of 2007, describing Clinton’s universal health care plan when she was running in the Democratic primary. He also, in February 2007, used the phrase to describe conflict over a resolution on the Iraq War. “It gets down to whether you support what is being done in this new strategy or you don’t,” McCain said at the time. “You can put lipstick on a pig, [but] it’s still a pig, in my view.”

]]> By: Emma http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73764 Emma Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:04:12 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73764 Obama's got a really interesting sense of timing: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/09/obama-lipstick-on-a-pig-v_n_125253.html Of course he wasn't REALLY talking about Palin... Obama’s got a really interesting sense of timing:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/09/obama-lipstick-on-a-pig-v_n_125253.html

Of course he wasn’t REALLY talking about Palin…

]]> By: rebelreggie http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73752 rebelreggie Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:21:23 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73752 Ron Paul Statement to the National Press Club September 10th, 2008 by Don Rasmussen The American Majority The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can throw the rascals out at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. Carroll Quigley Author of Tragedy & Hope The coverage of the presidential election is designed to be a grand distraction. This is not new, but this year, its more so than ever. Pretending that a true difference exists between the two major candidates is a charade of great proportion. Many who help to perpetuate this myth are frequently unaware of what they are doing and believe that significant differences actually do exist. Indeed, on small points there is the appearance of a difference. The real issues, however, are buried in a barrage of miscellaneous nonsense and endless pontifications by robotic pundits hired to perpetuate the myth of a campaign of substance. The truth is that our two-party system offers no real choice. The real goal of the campaign is to distract people from considering the real issues. Influential forces, the media, the government, the privileged corporations and moneyed interests see to it that both partys candidates are acceptable, regardless of the outcome, since they will still be in charge. Its been that way for a long time. George Wallace was not the first to recognize that theres not a dimes worth of difference between the two parties. There is, though, a difference between the two major candidates and the candidates on third-party tickets and those running as independents. The two parties and their candidates have no real disagreements on foreign policy, monetary policy, privacy issues, or the welfare state. They both are willing to abuse the Rule of Law and ignore constitutional restraint on Executive Powers. Neither major party champions free markets and private-property ownership. Those candidates who represent actual change or disagreement with the status quo are held in check by the two major parties in power, making it very difficult to compete in the pretend democratic process. This is done by making it difficult for third-party candidates to get on the ballots, enter into the debates, raise money, avoid being marginalized, or get fair or actual coverage. A rare celebrity or a wealthy individual can, to a degree, overcome these difficulties. The system we have today allows a President to be elected by as little as 32% of the American people, with half of those merely voting for the lesser of two evils. Therefore, as little as 16% actually vote for a president. No wonder when things go wrong, anger explodes. A recent poll shows that 60% of the American people are not happy with the two major candidates this year. This system is driven by the conviction that only a major party candidate can win. Voters become convinced that any other vote is a wasted vote. Its time for that conclusion to be challenged and to recognize that the only way not to waste ones vote is to reject the two establishment candidates and join the majority, once called silent, and allow the voices of the people to be heard. We cannot expect withdrawal of troops from Iraq or the Middle East with either of the two major candidates. Expect continued involvement in Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Georgia. Neither hints of a non-interventionist foreign policy. Do not expect to hear the rejection of the policy of supporting the American world empire. There will be no emphasis in protecting privacy and civil liberties and the constant surveillance of the American people. Do not expect any serious attempt to curtail the rapidly expanding national debt. And certainly, there will be no hint of addressing the Federal Reserve System and its cozy relationship with big banks and international corporations and the politicians. There is only one way that these issues can get the attention they deserve: the silent majority must become the vocal majority. This message can be sent to our leaders by not participating in the Great Distractionthe quadrennial campaign and election of an American President without a choice. Just think of how much of an edge a Vice President has in this process, and he or she is picked by a single personthe partys nominee. This was never intended by the Constitution. Since a principled non-voter sends a message, we must count them and recognize the message they are sending as well. The non-voters need to hold their own election by starting a League of Non-voters and explain their principled reasons for opting out of this charade of the presidential elective process. They just might get a bigger membership than anyone would guess. Write-in votes should not be discouraged, but the electoral officials must be held accountable and make sure the votes are counted. But one must not be naive and believe that under todays circumstances one has a chance of accomplishing much by a write-in campaign. The strongest message can be sent by rejecting the two-party system, which in reality is a one-party system with no possible chance for the changes to occur which are necessary to solve our economic and foreign policy problems. This can be accomplished by voting for one of the non-establishment principled candidatesBaldwin, Barr, McKinney, Nader, and possibly others. (listed alphabetically) Yes, these individuals do have strong philosophic disagreements on various issues, but they all stand for challenging the status quothose special interest who control our federal government. And because of this, on the big issues of war, civil liberties, deficits, and the Federal Reserve they have much in common. People will waste their vote in voting for the lesser of two evils. That cant be stopped overnight, but for us to have an impact we must maximize the total votes of those rejecting the two major candidates. For me, though, my advicefor what its worthis to vote! Reject the two candidates who demand perpetuation of the status quo and pick one of the alternatives that you have the greatest affinity to, based on the other issues. A huge vote for those running on principle will be a lot more valuable by sending a message that weve had enough and want real change than wasting ones vote on a supposed lesser of two evils. I THINK I'LL RAISE THAT HERE.........."LEAGUE OF NON-VOTERS", THAT'S WHAT WE NEED!!! Ron Paul Statement to the National Press Club
September 10th, 2008 by Don Rasmussen
The American Majority
The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can throw the rascals out at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.
Carroll Quigley Author of Tragedy & Hope
The coverage of the presidential election is designed to be a grand distraction. This is not new, but this year, its more so than ever.
Pretending that a true difference exists between the two major candidates is a charade of great proportion. Many who help to perpetuate this myth are frequently unaware of what they are doing and believe that significant differences actually do exist. Indeed, on small points there is the appearance of a difference. The real issues, however, are buried in a barrage of miscellaneous nonsense and endless pontifications by robotic pundits hired to perpetuate the myth of a campaign of substance.
The truth is that our two-party system offers no real choice. The real goal of the campaign is to distract people from considering the real issues.
Influential forces, the media, the government, the privileged corporations and moneyed interests see to it that both partys candidates are acceptable, regardless of the outcome, since they will still be in charge. Its been that way for a long time. George Wallace was not the first to recognize that theres not a dimes worth of difference between the two parties. There is, though, a difference between the two major candidates and the candidates on third-party tickets and those running as independents.
The two parties and their candidates have no real disagreements on foreign policy, monetary policy, privacy issues, or the welfare state. They both are willing to abuse the Rule of Law and ignore constitutional restraint on Executive Powers. Neither major party champions free markets and private-property ownership.
Those candidates who represent actual change or disagreement with the status quo are held in check by the two major parties in power, making it very difficult to compete in the pretend democratic process. This is done by making it difficult for third-party candidates to get on the ballots, enter into the debates, raise money, avoid being marginalized, or get fair or actual coverage. A rare celebrity or a wealthy individual can, to a degree, overcome these difficulties.
The system we have today allows a President to be elected by as little as 32% of the American people, with half of those merely voting for the lesser of two evils. Therefore, as little as 16% actually vote for a president. No wonder when things go wrong, anger explodes. A recent poll shows that 60% of the American people are not happy with the two major candidates this year.
This system is driven by the conviction that only a major party candidate can win. Voters become convinced that any other vote is a wasted vote. Its time for that conclusion to be challenged and to recognize that the only way not to waste ones vote is to reject the two establishment candidates and join the majority, once called silent, and allow the voices of the people to be heard.
We cannot expect withdrawal of troops from Iraq or the Middle East with either of the two major candidates. Expect continued involvement in Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Georgia. Neither hints of a non-interventionist foreign policy. Do not expect to hear the rejection of the policy of supporting the American world empire. There will be no emphasis in protecting privacy and civil liberties and the constant surveillance of the American people. Do not expect any serious attempt to curtail the rapidly expanding national debt. And certainly, there will be no hint of addressing the Federal Reserve System and its cozy relationship with big banks and international corporations and the politicians.
There is only one way that these issues can get the attention they deserve: the silent majority must become the vocal majority.
This message can be sent to our leaders by not participating in the Great Distractionthe quadrennial campaign and election of an American President without a choice. Just think of how much of an edge a Vice President has in this process, and he or she is picked by a single personthe partys nominee. This was never intended by the Constitution.
Since a principled non-voter sends a message, we must count them and recognize the message they are sending as well. The non-voters need to hold their own election by starting a League of Non-voters and explain their principled reasons for opting out of this charade of the presidential elective process. They just might get a bigger membership than anyone would guess.
Write-in votes should not be discouraged, but the electoral officials must be held accountable and make sure the votes are counted. But one must not be naive and believe that under todays circumstances one has a chance of accomplishing much by a write-in campaign.
The strongest message can be sent by rejecting the two-party system, which in reality is a one-party system with no possible chance for the changes to occur which are necessary to solve our economic and foreign policy problems. This can be accomplished by voting for one of the non-establishment principled candidatesBaldwin, Barr, McKinney, Nader, and possibly others. (listed alphabetically)
Yes, these individuals do have strong philosophic disagreements on various issues, but they all stand for challenging the status quothose special interest who control our federal government. And because of this, on the big issues of war, civil liberties, deficits, and the Federal Reserve they have much in common. People will waste their vote in voting for the lesser of two evils. That cant be stopped overnight, but for us to have an impact we must maximize the total votes of those rejecting the two major candidates.
For me, though, my advicefor what its worthis to vote! Reject the two candidates who demand perpetuation of the status quo and pick one of the alternatives that you have the greatest affinity to, based on the other issues.
A huge vote for those running on principle will be a lot more valuable by sending a message that weve had enough and want real change than wasting ones vote on a supposed lesser of two evils.

I THINK I’LL RAISE THAT HERE……….”LEAGUE OF NON-VOTERS”, THAT’S WHAT WE NEED!!!

]]> By: Black Saint http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73705 Black Saint Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:05:36 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73705 Lets face the facts, both Juan McAmnesty and Barrack S. Obama love this country and its citizens so much that both cannot wait to give Amnesty to 20 to 30 millions Invading, American hating, Illegal Aliens that kill more Americans every year than Terrorists have in the last 20 years! With chain immigration millions of their American hating relatives and their relatives in an never ending chain will also get Citizenship which will in time turn the USA into an Spanish speaking third world cesspool, modeled on Mexico! Both candidates ignore our Constitution against Invasion, the Rule of Law and their Oath of Office! The invaders have loyally to other Nations, refuse to assimilate & have proven in hundreds of years in their Nations that their primary ability is to breed, produce, foster, and create an third world society of Crime, Corruption, Poverty, Cruelly and Misery. If anyone doubts that point of view just look at the Border cities they are as different as night and day. The land is the same the only thing different is the culture of the people living on the land. Lets face the facts, both Juan McAmnesty and Barrack S. Obama love this country and its citizens so much that both cannot wait to give Amnesty to 20 to 30 millions Invading, American hating, Illegal Aliens that kill more Americans every year than Terrorists have in the last 20 years! With chain immigration millions of their American hating relatives and their relatives in an never ending chain will also get Citizenship which will in time turn the USA into an Spanish speaking third world cesspool, modeled on Mexico!

Both candidates ignore our Constitution against Invasion, the Rule of Law and their Oath of Office! The invaders have loyally to other Nations, refuse to assimilate & have proven in hundreds of years in their Nations that their primary ability is to breed, produce, foster, and create an third world society of Crime, Corruption, Poverty, Cruelly and Misery. If anyone doubts that point of view just look at the Border cities they are as different as night and day. The land is the same the only thing different is the culture of the people living on the land.

]]> By: Mightyputty http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73694 Mightyputty Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:51:57 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73694 Naughtius Maximus said on 9 Sep 2008 at 3:47 pm: "Churches … hmmm … well they have a right to do what they want with their church, it’s private property even if tax exempt. It probably diminishes their ostensible spiritual purposes to get involved. I think ALL churches should be subject to taxes anyway, they are all PHONY institutions run by charlatans who pretend they actually CAN TALK TO GOD or at a minimum can interpret GOD’S DIRECTION. But you know, many of these churches need all the income they can keep their hands on, to settle molestation lawsuits and so forth (byproducts of the holy crusade to spread God’s word on Earth)." Waah, waah, waah. I hate God cause daddy was mean. He made me go to church, and we couldn't dance. Cause I gotta cut loose, footloose.... Naughtius Maximus said on 9 Sep 2008 at 3:47 pm:
“Churches … hmmm … well they have a right to do what they want with their church, it’s private property even if tax exempt. It probably diminishes their ostensible spiritual purposes to get involved.

I think ALL churches should be subject to taxes anyway, they are all PHONY institutions run by charlatans who pretend they actually CAN TALK TO GOD or at a minimum can interpret GOD’S DIRECTION.

But you know, many of these churches need all the income they can keep their hands on, to settle molestation lawsuits and so forth (byproducts of the holy crusade to spread God’s word on Earth).”

Waah, waah, waah. I hate God cause daddy was mean. He made me go to church, and we couldn’t dance. Cause I gotta cut loose, footloose….

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73692 Anonymous Wed, 10 Sep 2008 03:53:10 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73692 choctaws said on 9 Sep 2008 at 4:44 pm: The lipstick wearing pit bull is a nice addition to the ticket. Better watch your "jewels." That's what they go for first! choctaws said on 9 Sep 2008 at 4:44 pm:
The lipstick wearing pit bull is a nice addition to the ticket.

Better watch your “jewels.” That’s what they go for first!

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73690 Anonymous Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:16:09 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73690 Call on this issue tomorrow please. Its the last day before it gets out of committee and then we'd have to fight it harder http://www.numbersusa.com/content/nusablog/beckr/september-7-2008/us-house-leaders-plan-vote-big-foreign-w.html Call on this issue tomorrow please. Its the last day before it gets out of committee and then we’d have to fight it harder

http://www.numbersusa.com/content/nusablog/beckr/september-7-2008/us-house-leaders-plan-vote-big-foreign-w.html

]]> By: legal2 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73684 legal2 Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:06:34 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73684 NOTICE: Received recorded message tonight saying that the McCain/Palin Rally was so overwhelmingly responded to, that they are moving it to the adjacent Van Dyke Park, gates open at 8 am, rally at 10 am, tickets available at the gate. For further info call 703.650.5872, or visit va.johnmccain.org NOTICE: Received recorded message tonight saying that the McCain/Palin Rally was so overwhelmingly responded to, that they are moving it to the adjacent Van Dyke Park, gates open at 8 am, rally at 10 am, tickets available at the gate. For further info call 703.650.5872, or visit va.johnmccain.org

]]> By: Emma http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73682 Emma Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:32:28 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73682 Is that really you, Rick? Is that really you, Rick?

]]> By: TDB http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73680 TDB Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:14:40 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73680 Big Dog...Shouldn't you be home licking your ba!!s or something as worthy? Big Dog…Shouldn’t you be home licking your ba!!s or something as worthy?

]]> By: manassascityresident http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73679 manassascityresident Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:13:02 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73679 Emma said on 8 Sep 2008 at 7:23 pm: "I felt like I wandered into the wrong blog after reading through your posts here, Rick. Have you been drinking anti koolaid?" I believe he has .... he's sounding VERY bitter and a tad hateful these days. Does sound like he's been drinking the anti koolaid. Too bad. I used to read his posts. Emma said on 8 Sep 2008 at 7:23 pm:
“I felt like I wandered into the wrong blog after reading through your posts here, Rick. Have you been drinking anti koolaid?”

I believe he has …. he’s sounding VERY bitter and a tad hateful these days. Does sound like he’s been drinking the anti koolaid. Too bad. I used to read his posts.

]]> By: Johnson http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73677 Johnson Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:03:47 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73677 You're killing me, Smalls! You’re killing me, Smalls!

]]> By: Big Dog http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73676 Big Dog Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:48:10 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73676 Si, Muy Rojo! Viva McAmnesty! Si, Muy Rojo! Viva McAmnesty!

]]> By: Mando http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73675 Mando Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:46:27 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73675 "God told me he’s going to make it rain frogs tomorrow during this event." That's funny... Obama told me the same thing. Coincidence?!?! “God told me he’s going to make it rain frogs tomorrow during this event.”

That’s funny… Obama told me the same thing. Coincidence?!?!

]]> By: choctaws http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73674 choctaws Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:44:56 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73674 everybody should be happy with this outcome. Mccain and Palin have a huge outdoor rally in perfect weather(Sunny 70) they dont violate the school policy, even Obama supporters get to go to this( I promise to be respectful, and not do anything bad like shout out at mccain, even if my teeth do grind) It should be a nice event. The lipstick wearing pit bull is a nice addition to the ticket. everybody should be happy with this outcome.

Mccain and Palin have a huge outdoor rally in perfect weather(Sunny 70)
they dont violate the school policy, even Obama supporters get to go to this( I promise to be respectful, and not do anything bad like shout out at mccain, even if my teeth do grind)

It should be a nice event. The lipstick wearing pit bull is a nice addition to the ticket.

]]> By: Naughtius Maximus http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73673 Naughtius Maximus Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:40:53 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73673 God told me he's going to make it rain frogs tomorrow during this event. God told me he’s going to make it rain frogs tomorrow during this event.

]]> By: 999 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73672 999 Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:40:13 +0000 http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/09/07/mccain-to-visit-nova-on-wednesday/#comment-73672 Big Dog said on 9 Sep 2008 at 1:26 pm: Question for McCain- Your health plan calls for taxing employer provided health insurance. Of course, that would also apply to McCain as his health insurance is provided through the Federal Government. It probably would not hurt HIM very much to pay a tax on his health insurance plan as he is one who owns seven homes and is married to a millionaress and will draw a 6 figure retirement from the Federal Government. Big Dog said on 9 Sep 2008 at 1:26 pm:
Question for McCain-

Your health plan calls for taxing employer provided
health insurance.

Of course, that would also apply to McCain as his health insurance is provided through the Federal Government. It probably would not hurt HIM very much to pay a tax on his health insurance plan as he is one who owns seven homes and is married to a millionaress and will draw a 6 figure retirement from the Federal Government.

]]>