Driving liberals, dhimmis and illegal alien apologists absolutely insane since 2005...

Chalk One Up For The Good Guys

By Greg L | 21 October 2008 | Crime, Prince William County | 6 Comments

Now THAT’S what I’m talking about!

The victims, a man and a woman who were in the house at the time of the intrusion, called police and reported a burglary in progress.

The three gunmen forced the man and the woman to the third level of the town house where the shooting occurred, Hernandez said.

Police did not release details of the how the shooting unfolded.

The gunmen, including the one who was shot in the head, jumped from the third floor window to escape.

If someone breaks into your house in a home invasion robbery, calling the police is a waste of precious seconds.  Trying to hide is phenomenally dangerous.  There’s nowhere to run.  If you submit, there is no end to the risks you and your family face at the hands of the brazen attackers who certainly are predisposed to violence.  There is only one responsible action — responsible to yourself, to anyone else in your house, and to your neighbors who may otherwise become the next victims of this violence.  You must kill the attackers, and the best way to do that is with a loaded firearm in the hands of someone who knows how to use it.

I’m a little surprised that the dirtbags survived their attack, but they certainly got the message, and others who might have chosen to do the same thing will think twice now that they’ve got this wonderful mental image of someone with a head wound unassing themselves from a third story window as they flee in fear from the most powerful force on the face of this planet: an outraged and thoroughly pissed off American citizen with a gun.  That’s a powerfully deterring picture.

Dumfries, you did us proud this week, but next time, use your 12 gauge.  I recommend #4 buckshot.  It tends to save us the cost of prosecuting criminals, especially when you aim for the head.



The opinions expressed here are solely the views of the author, and not representative of the position of any organization, political party, doughnut shop, knitting guild, or waste recycling facility, but may be correctly attributed to the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy. If anything in the above article has offended you, please click here to receive an immediate apology.

BVBL is not a charity and your support is not tax-deductible.

You can follow the discussion through the Comments feed. You can also pingback or trackback from your own site.

6 Comments

  1. Anonymous said on 21 Oct 2008 at 11:55 pm:
    Flag comment

    Semper Fi!

  2. Pat.Herve said on 22 Oct 2008 at 6:31 am:
    Flag comment

    Just make sure you correctly identify the intruder first!

    http://www.nbc6.net/news/13411043/detail.html

  3. Old Soldier said on 22 Oct 2008 at 7:43 am:
    Flag comment

    An armed society is a civil society.

  4. K.O'toole said on 22 Oct 2008 at 9:17 am:
    Flag comment

    pat.h, the officer’s daughter was shot in the leg (non-life threatening). He knew how to use his gun; hopefully his daughter will take responsibility and not need to sneak in anywhere.

  5. Anchor Baby said on 22 Oct 2008 at 3:52 pm:
    Flag comment

    Speaking of home defense. I’m thinking about emailing this to Del. Frederick’s and some other candidates that are fairly pro-2A.

    If anyone would like to help wordsmith this or help me with thoughts (pro or con) I’d appreciate it. Major parts to note are that: the citizen is assumed as having used approrpiate force to preserve life, that the intruder intends harm by breaking into a domicile, that a police officer MUST identify himself to a homeowner and that a homeowner is immune from civil prosecution.

    Home protection; use of deadly force; presumption of fear of death or great bodily harm.–

    (1) A person is presumed to have held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another when using defensive force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to another if:

    (a) The person against whom the defensive force was used was in the process of unlawfully and forcefully entering, or had unlawfully and forcibly entered, a dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle, or if that person had removed or was attempting to remove another against that person’s will from the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle; and

    (b) The person who uses defensive force knew or had reason to believe that an unlawful and forcible entry or unlawful and forcible act was occurring or had occurred.

    (2) The presumption set forth in subsection (1) does not apply if:

    (a) The person against whom the defensive force is used has the right to be in or is a lawful resident of the dwelling, residence, or vehicle, such as an owner, lessee, or titleholder, and there is not an injunction for protection from domestic violence or a written pretrial supervision order of no contact against that person; or

    (b) The person or persons sought to be removed is a child or grandchild, or is otherwise in the lawful custody or under the lawful guardianship of, the person against whom the defensive force is used; or

    (c) The person who uses defensive force is engaged in an unlawful activity or is using the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle to further an unlawful activity; or

    (d) The person against whom the defensive force is used is a law enforcement officer, who enters or attempts to enter a dwelling, residence, or vehicle in the performance of his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance with any applicable law.

    (3) A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.

    (4) A person who unlawfully and by force enters or attempts to enter a person’s dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle is presumed to be doing so with the intent to commit an unlawful act involving force or violence.

    (5) As used in this section, the term:

    (a) “Dwelling” means a building or conveyance of any kind, including any attached porch, whether the building or conveyance is temporary or permanent, mobile or immobile, which has a roof over it, including a tent, and is designed to be occupied by people lodging therein at night.

    (b) “Residence” means a dwelling in which a person resides either temporarily or permanently or is visiting as an invited guest.

    (c) “Vehicle” means a conveyance of any kind, whether or not motorized, which is designed to transport people or property.

    (6) Any person using defensive force consistant with this act may not be held liable in any civil action brought as a result of the threat or use of such force.

  6. Old Soldier said on 22 Oct 2008 at 4:57 pm:
    Flag comment

    What Anchor Baby said on 22 Oct 2008 at 3:52 pm:

    Why not contact the NRA Institute for Legislative Action for help?

    http://www.nraila.org/

Comments are closed.


Views: 1581