<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dumbest Legal Question Of The Year</title>
	<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/</link>
	<description>Blog-Fu for Prince William, Manassas and Manassas Park politics.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: chicko</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76530</link>
		<dc:creator>chicko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76530</guid>
		<description>I would agree..

it's not an "illegal immigrant" issue entirely, everyone does it. doesnt make it right though. Illegals frequently make up names and SSN's, they dont care whether they are correct or not and they dont care if they causes anyone a problem (or not). They dont have to deal with the repercussions at all, the person who's identity they stole did however.

For nova - get your credit report merged with an illegal aliens and see how hard it is to get it fixed. With someone who is "legal" it's not as bad to fix, you can usually find these folks. What do you do when the illegal splits town with your credit report in the balance? Basically you have about 6 months of pain and suffering writing nasty letters to the credit bureaus until things get cleared up. If you are lucky you dont have a problem getting your tax return back. These are true impacts, for illegals taking your SSN I think it's even worse, it's not like you can sue a "Jose Gonzalez", wonder how many of them there are in Mexico?

Oh...I'll just file a lawsuit against an "un-named individual" that will work for sure :)

Nova - get a taste of reality and realize the costs are real and the pain is real from the suffering these illegals inflict on our nation. Come out of your ivory tower and see what it's really like in trenches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree..</p>
<p>it&#8217;s not an &#8220;illegal immigrant&#8221; issue entirely, everyone does it. doesnt make it right though. Illegals frequently make up names and SSN&#8217;s, they dont care whether they are correct or not and they dont care if they causes anyone a problem (or not). They dont have to deal with the repercussions at all, the person who&#8217;s identity they stole did however.</p>
<p>For nova - get your credit report merged with an illegal aliens and see how hard it is to get it fixed. With someone who is &#8220;legal&#8221; it&#8217;s not as bad to fix, you can usually find these folks. What do you do when the illegal splits town with your credit report in the balance? Basically you have about 6 months of pain and suffering writing nasty letters to the credit bureaus until things get cleared up. If you are lucky you dont have a problem getting your tax return back. These are true impacts, for illegals taking your SSN I think it&#8217;s even worse, it&#8217;s not like you can sue a &#8220;Jose Gonzalez&#8221;, wonder how many of them there are in Mexico?</p>
<p>Oh&#8230;I&#8217;ll just file a lawsuit against an &#8220;un-named individual&#8221; that will work for sure <img src='http://www.bvbl.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Nova - get a taste of reality and realize the costs are real and the pain is real from the suffering these illegals inflict on our nation. Come out of your ivory tower and see what it&#8217;s really like in trenches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoVA Scout</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76518</link>
		<dc:creator>NoVA Scout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76518</guid>
		<description>AWC:  I apologoize.  I apparently am having trouble expressing myself clearly on this.  I DO believe that identity theft leads to those things.  That's exactly how these rings or con artists operate.  Sorry.  I thought I said that.  I must be having a senior lapse here.  But I'm also saying that this type of crime is not an illegal immigrant phenomenon, it's a modern societal crime largely perpetrated by citizens against citizens (although a wrinkle on this is that it is now happening with some frequency internationally - e.g., where a person in Germany pinches data on a person in the US or Switzerland and goes to town on the other guy's nest egg).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AWC:  I apologoize.  I apparently am having trouble expressing myself clearly on this.  I DO believe that identity theft leads to those things.  That&#8217;s exactly how these rings or con artists operate.  Sorry.  I thought I said that.  I must be having a senior lapse here.  But I&#8217;m also saying that this type of crime is not an illegal immigrant phenomenon, it&#8217;s a modern societal crime largely perpetrated by citizens against citizens (although a wrinkle on this is that it is now happening with some frequency internationally - e.g., where a person in Germany pinches data on a person in the US or Switzerland and goes to town on the other guy&#8217;s nest egg).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWCheney</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76508</link>
		<dc:creator>AWCheney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76508</guid>
		<description>And if you believe for one moment that the theft of identification does not lead to "credit theft, false credit cards, or trashing of credit ratings," then you have either been blinded by the Bush/McCain amnesty rhetoric and haven't looked into this yourself...or you've suddenly gotten very naive, which I really find hard to believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if you believe for one moment that the theft of identification does not lead to &#8220;credit theft, false credit cards, or trashing of credit ratings,&#8221; then you have either been blinded by the Bush/McCain amnesty rhetoric and haven&#8217;t looked into this yourself&#8230;or you&#8217;ve suddenly gotten very naive, which I really find hard to believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWCheney</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76507</link>
		<dc:creator>AWCheney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76507</guid>
		<description>Actually, NoVA, that's where we disagree.  If you read my piece, and checked out all the videos therein (which are only REPRESENTATIVE examples of thousands upon thousands of similar cases), according to my research the most common recipients of stolen identification happens to be "undocumented" aliens and, more often than not, it is other illegal aliens who sold/provided it to them.  As far as I'm concerned, it's just another way for them to steal from those people who are in this country legitimately.  The fact is, they KNOW they are breaking the law, but they just somehow believe that they are entitled to do anything, by whatever means, to take what they can out of this country.  Even if they didn't realize that what they were doing is illegal, since when was ignorance of the law any excuse?  Oh yeah...now!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, NoVA, that&#8217;s where we disagree.  If you read my piece, and checked out all the videos therein (which are only REPRESENTATIVE examples of thousands upon thousands of similar cases), according to my research the most common recipients of stolen identification happens to be &#8220;undocumented&#8221; aliens and, more often than not, it is other illegal aliens who sold/provided it to them.  As far as I&#8217;m concerned, it&#8217;s just another way for them to steal from those people who are in this country legitimately.  The fact is, they KNOW they are breaking the law, but they just somehow believe that they are entitled to do anything, by whatever means, to take what they can out of this country.  Even if they didn&#8217;t realize that what they were doing is illegal, since when was ignorance of the law any excuse?  Oh yeah&#8230;now!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoVA Scout</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76506</link>
		<dc:creator>NoVA Scout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76506</guid>
		<description>Sorry to have been unclear AWC.  Identity theft is a punishable crime under federal law and, no cout, under most states' laws.  It's a particularly damaging activity in modern times, where much depends on the security of electronic transactions and where repair of the damage can take months or years.  There was recently a fairly high profile example of this sort of thing where a young jet-set couple engaged in serial identity theft to support their high-flying lifestyle.  Thankfully, they finally were caught and are awaiting trial.

The perpetrators are largely US citizens and I have no problem with them cooling off in prison for a good long while.  If illegals engage in the same sort of activity, I have no problem with them sharing a cell with the US Citizens who do the same thing.  But the type of crime that you and Chicko are talking about is very rarely committed by illegal aliens.  When aliens falsify an identity, they are generally trying to get enough proof of legal residence to get a job. 

That's why Greg's original post dealt with something quite different than credit theft, false credit cards, or trashing of credit ratings.  I was addressing Greg's story about the Supreme Court taking up the case of an illegal immigrant who had (apparently randomly) duplicated an identity number that belonged to an actual person.  The question is whether that action violates federal law.  I continue to think it a good, not a bad, development that the Supreme Court decided to reconcile different approaches to this type of crime in the various Circuit Courts of Appeal around the country.  Can I assume that (but for Greg) we have unanimity on that point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to have been unclear AWC.  Identity theft is a punishable crime under federal law and, no cout, under most states&#8217; laws.  It&#8217;s a particularly damaging activity in modern times, where much depends on the security of electronic transactions and where repair of the damage can take months or years.  There was recently a fairly high profile example of this sort of thing where a young jet-set couple engaged in serial identity theft to support their high-flying lifestyle.  Thankfully, they finally were caught and are awaiting trial.</p>
<p>The perpetrators are largely US citizens and I have no problem with them cooling off in prison for a good long while.  If illegals engage in the same sort of activity, I have no problem with them sharing a cell with the US Citizens who do the same thing.  But the type of crime that you and Chicko are talking about is very rarely committed by illegal aliens.  When aliens falsify an identity, they are generally trying to get enough proof of legal residence to get a job. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s why Greg&#8217;s original post dealt with something quite different than credit theft, false credit cards, or trashing of credit ratings.  I was addressing Greg&#8217;s story about the Supreme Court taking up the case of an illegal immigrant who had (apparently randomly) duplicated an identity number that belonged to an actual person.  The question is whether that action violates federal law.  I continue to think it a good, not a bad, development that the Supreme Court decided to reconcile different approaches to this type of crime in the various Circuit Courts of Appeal around the country.  Can I assume that (but for Greg) we have unanimity on that point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWCheney</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76500</link>
		<dc:creator>AWCheney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76500</guid>
		<description>I should have also added, however, that it doesn't mean that I'm not going to give him a hard time every now and then.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have also added, however, that it doesn&#8217;t mean that I&#8217;m not going to give him a hard time every now and then.  <img src='http://www.bvbl.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWCheney</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76499</link>
		<dc:creator>AWCheney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76499</guid>
		<description>Actually chicko, I happen to know that NoVA is a rather prominent attorney for whom I have a great deal of respect.  I asked those questions seriously because I'm hoping that he can offer a legal perspective on the issue, in the way of a solution.  I, too, have felt that he and I do not see eye to eye on the issue of illegal aliens, but I allow that his legal expertise is far beyond mine and I am aware that our government HAS fallen on the side of the illegals more often than not, particularly during this Administration.  That aside, I am also inclined to agree to disagree with those whose opinion I respect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually chicko, I happen to know that NoVA is a rather prominent attorney for whom I have a great deal of respect.  I asked those questions seriously because I&#8217;m hoping that he can offer a legal perspective on the issue, in the way of a solution.  I, too, have felt that he and I do not see eye to eye on the issue of illegal aliens, but I allow that his legal expertise is far beyond mine and I am aware that our government HAS fallen on the side of the illegals more often than not, particularly during this Administration.  That aside, I am also inclined to agree to disagree with those whose opinion I respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chicko</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76495</link>
		<dc:creator>chicko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76495</guid>
		<description>awc,

identity theft is a horrendous crime. I know as I myself have been a victim of it. The illegals and everyone else who does it knows exactly what they are doing and what harm they are causing. There is no doubt about this. They know the chances of them being caught and prosecuted are slim. For the case of illegals, it's just a quick walk across the border and all is forgiven (in their minds). Nova seems like a huge advocate for the illegals and it's sad. I hope his/her credit report get's merged with an illegal aliens or an illegal alien uses his/her SSN and we'll see if he/she changes tune. Nova is just another apologist who thinks because she cracks a few hornbooks she's johnny cochran.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awc,</p>
<p>identity theft is a horrendous crime. I know as I myself have been a victim of it. The illegals and everyone else who does it knows exactly what they are doing and what harm they are causing. There is no doubt about this. They know the chances of them being caught and prosecuted are slim. For the case of illegals, it&#8217;s just a quick walk across the border and all is forgiven (in their minds). Nova seems like a huge advocate for the illegals and it&#8217;s sad. I hope his/her credit report get&#8217;s merged with an illegal aliens or an illegal alien uses his/her SSN and we&#8217;ll see if he/she changes tune. Nova is just another apologist who thinks because she cracks a few hornbooks she&#8217;s johnny cochran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWCheney</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76490</link>
		<dc:creator>AWCheney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76490</guid>
		<description>NoVA, unfortunately what I  am able to glean from your comments is that you do not believe that identity theft is sanctionable.  That the millions of dollars, not to mention the pain and heartache to honest Americans, perpetrated by these people is ignored by the law and they cannot be held accountable.  My question to you is, if that is case, what CAN be done about it, or do you believe that it is not significant enough to be addressed?  My second question is, did you follow that link I provided you and see just a little bit of what the common (and sometimes not so common) folk must deal with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NoVA, unfortunately what I  am able to glean from your comments is that you do not believe that identity theft is sanctionable.  That the millions of dollars, not to mention the pain and heartache to honest Americans, perpetrated by these people is ignored by the law and they cannot be held accountable.  My question to you is, if that is case, what CAN be done about it, or do you believe that it is not significant enough to be addressed?  My second question is, did you follow that link I provided you and see just a little bit of what the common (and sometimes not so common) folk must deal with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoVA Scout</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76473</link>
		<dc:creator>NoVA Scout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76473</guid>
		<description>awc:  receipt of stolen property is not an issue in the case.  I assume that that is a crime in most states (again, there would have to be knowledge - if an acquaintance asks if he can park his Bentley in my driveway while he's out of the country and I assent, believing that it belongs to him, there's no way I can be convicted for receipt of stolen goods if it's a stolen vehicle).  But it's not part of this fact pattern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awc:  receipt of stolen property is not an issue in the case.  I assume that that is a crime in most states (again, there would have to be knowledge - if an acquaintance asks if he can park his Bentley in my driveway while he&#8217;s out of the country and I assent, believing that it belongs to him, there&#8217;s no way I can be convicted for receipt of stolen goods if it&#8217;s a stolen vehicle).  But it&#8217;s not part of this fact pattern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chicko</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76472</link>
		<dc:creator>chicko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76472</guid>
		<description>and Nova,

with regard to your post above while thoughtful it's not theft or larceny (since nothing was carried away) but false pretenses if it's being used (and it's actually a real number) standard first year criminal law stuff. if it's not a real number, it's really not anything. Really nothing different than copying someones credit card number over the shoulder. wow, I actually remembered that lecture from my first year! but back to the subject, Unless it's an official document of some sort and you are lying on it. Probably the worst that happens is the employee gets fired</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and Nova,</p>
<p>with regard to your post above while thoughtful it&#8217;s not theft or larceny (since nothing was carried away) but false pretenses if it&#8217;s being used (and it&#8217;s actually a real number) standard first year criminal law stuff. if it&#8217;s not a real number, it&#8217;s really not anything. Really nothing different than copying someones credit card number over the shoulder. wow, I actually remembered that lecture from my first year! but back to the subject, Unless it&#8217;s an official document of some sort and you are lying on it. Probably the worst that happens is the employee gets fired</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chicko</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76471</link>
		<dc:creator>chicko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76471</guid>
		<description>if the illegal alien gained benefits of any kind while using a fake SSN then that's illegal.

if they used a SSN belonging to someone else, that's definitely illegal. ask someone (such as myself) who it actually happened too

my "illegal alien" has been deported thank the lord.

If the SSN was applied to a federal document then that's a crime. regardless, if the illegal was not here it would not happen.

just another reason to deport these people and remove the issue entirely.

illegals are not stupid, they have multiple people (such as nancy lyall and MWB and such) to help them navigate the waters to avoid issues. with people such as these advocating for them, we'll see more and more of identity theft and other problems. As long as these scumbags have someone to lean on (support groups) then they'll continue to be a problem. Take away their support structures and they'll be self-deporting. I blame the people that advocate for them more so than the illegal themselves. the advocates pave the way for the illegal acts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if the illegal alien gained benefits of any kind while using a fake SSN then that&#8217;s illegal.</p>
<p>if they used a SSN belonging to someone else, that&#8217;s definitely illegal. ask someone (such as myself) who it actually happened too</p>
<p>my &#8220;illegal alien&#8221; has been deported thank the lord.</p>
<p>If the SSN was applied to a federal document then that&#8217;s a crime. regardless, if the illegal was not here it would not happen.</p>
<p>just another reason to deport these people and remove the issue entirely.</p>
<p>illegals are not stupid, they have multiple people (such as nancy lyall and MWB and such) to help them navigate the waters to avoid issues. with people such as these advocating for them, we&#8217;ll see more and more of identity theft and other problems. As long as these scumbags have someone to lean on (support groups) then they&#8217;ll continue to be a problem. Take away their support structures and they&#8217;ll be self-deporting. I blame the people that advocate for them more so than the illegal themselves. the advocates pave the way for the illegal acts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWCheney</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76470</link>
		<dc:creator>AWCheney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76470</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but what about those illegal aliens who are guilty of receipt of stolen property?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but what about those illegal aliens who are guilty of receipt of stolen property?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoVA Scout</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76469</link>
		<dc:creator>NoVA Scout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76469</guid>
		<description>AWC:  totally agree, but the issue is whether the use of a fake ID that is not stolen (intent to deprive from a lawful owner) is identity theft.  Most identity theft in this country (the kind where they clean out your accounts, wreck your credit  etc.) is Yankee Doodle Dandy on Yankee Doodle Dandy crime. 

And, contrary to the original post and some early comments, this issue seems like precisely the kind of thing the Supreme Court should clarify.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AWC:  totally agree, but the issue is whether the use of a fake ID that is not stolen (intent to deprive from a lawful owner) is identity theft.  Most identity theft in this country (the kind where they clean out your accounts, wreck your credit  etc.) is Yankee Doodle Dandy on Yankee Doodle Dandy crime. </p>
<p>And, contrary to the original post and some early comments, this issue seems like precisely the kind of thing the Supreme Court should clarify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CONVA</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76465</link>
		<dc:creator>CONVA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76465</guid>
		<description>Round 'em up and ship'em out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Round &#8216;em up and ship&#8217;em out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FormerCOMemployee</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76462</link>
		<dc:creator>FormerCOMemployee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76462</guid>
		<description>NoVa Scout did a very good job of explaining this but if I read this case correctly the question is simply based on the matter if an illegal alien used a ss# that did not belong to anyone did they commit theft?  And if the number did belong to someone, do the police have to prove they (the illegal alien) know it belonged to someone and they were stealing someone elses identity?  If I read it correctly this is the issue in question.  The article I read quoted the ilegal aliens attorney saying that the federal governemnt was "piling on" when they could simply deport the illegal alien.  With the theft charge, they face two years in federal prison.  The attorney is attempting to remove the threat of two years in federal prison.  I sure hope the court rules on the side of the governement or it will have severe consequences  on us all if our identity is ever stolen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NoVa Scout did a very good job of explaining this but if I read this case correctly the question is simply based on the matter if an illegal alien used a ss# that did not belong to anyone did they commit theft?  And if the number did belong to someone, do the police have to prove they (the illegal alien) know it belonged to someone and they were stealing someone elses identity?  If I read it correctly this is the issue in question.  The article I read quoted the ilegal aliens attorney saying that the federal governemnt was &#8220;piling on&#8221; when they could simply deport the illegal alien.  With the theft charge, they face two years in federal prison.  The attorney is attempting to remove the threat of two years in federal prison.  I sure hope the court rules on the side of the governement or it will have severe consequences  on us all if our identity is ever stolen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vigilant1</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76460</link>
		<dc:creator>Vigilant1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76460</guid>
		<description>BothPartiesColludeAgainstYouAndMarketToYourFears said on 22 Oct 2008 at 11:54 am: Flag comment 
Hernandez’ money should be seized. On the basis of having been earned illegally.

And I believe this court is conservative enough not to invent a right to fake identity, thank God.

Remember the Senate's comprehensive immigration law they tried to stuff down our throats last year?   One of the items in that bill favoring the illegal invaders was the fact that anyone who used a phoney SSN would not be prosecuted for it and in fact, would be allowed to recover any monies paid into SS using said phoney number.  How's that for a government!   Check it out if you have any doubt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BothPartiesColludeAgainstYouAndMarketToYourFears said on 22 Oct 2008 at 11:54 am: Flag comment<br />
Hernandez’ money should be seized. On the basis of having been earned illegally.</p>
<p>And I believe this court is conservative enough not to invent a right to fake identity, thank God.</p>
<p>Remember the Senate&#8217;s comprehensive immigration law they tried to stuff down our throats last year?   One of the items in that bill favoring the illegal invaders was the fact that anyone who used a phoney SSN would not be prosecuted for it and in fact, would be allowed to recover any monies paid into SS using said phoney number.  How&#8217;s that for a government!   Check it out if you have any doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anchor Baby</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76459</link>
		<dc:creator>Anchor Baby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76459</guid>
		<description>Nova Scout,

I agree with you.  If the state has merits they'll be able to argue them in front of the SCOTUS.  Personally, I would've rather seen the law changed to target true identity thieves vice fake documentation makers or to have the original charge dropped and charge them for using fake documentation (which the defendant had originally claimed he had done).

So, I agree that this question should move on up but blame the prosecutors for not charging him under a more proper criminal violation law.

And, I think it's a valid question to be asked to the SCOTUS.  I think it'll still get squashed but it's a valid question to have asked to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nova Scout,</p>
<p>I agree with you.  If the state has merits they&#8217;ll be able to argue them in front of the SCOTUS.  Personally, I would&#8217;ve rather seen the law changed to target true identity thieves vice fake documentation makers or to have the original charge dropped and charge them for using fake documentation (which the defendant had originally claimed he had done).</p>
<p>So, I agree that this question should move on up but blame the prosecutors for not charging him under a more proper criminal violation law.</p>
<p>And, I think it&#8217;s a valid question to be asked to the SCOTUS.  I think it&#8217;ll still get squashed but it&#8217;s a valid question to have asked to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWCheney</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76447</link>
		<dc:creator>AWCheney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76447</guid>
		<description>NoVA Scout said on 22 Oct 2008 at 12:03 am:

NoVA, if you really believe that identity theft by illegal aliens does not affect real people, check this out and get back to me:

http://scheney.wordpress.com/2008/07/09/identity-theft/

This represents only a VERY small sampling of the damage they are doing every day, even when they are choosing random numbers.  I firmly believe that identity theft should fall under the category of grand theft, and be commensurately punished...at the least!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NoVA Scout said on 22 Oct 2008 at 12:03 am:</p>
<p>NoVA, if you really believe that identity theft by illegal aliens does not affect real people, check this out and get back to me:</p>
<p><a href="http://scheney.wordpress.com/2008/07/09/identity-theft/" rel="nofollow">http://scheney.wordpress.com/2008/07/09/identity-theft/</a></p>
<p>This represents only a VERY small sampling of the damage they are doing every day, even when they are choosing random numbers.  I firmly believe that identity theft should fall under the category of grand theft, and be commensurately punished&#8230;at the least!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BothPartiesColludeAgainstYouAndMarketToYourFears</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76442</link>
		<dc:creator>BothPartiesColludeAgainstYouAndMarketToYourFears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/10/21/dumbest-legal-question-of-the-year/#comment-76442</guid>
		<description>I'm having a nightmare ... in which Ginsburg authors a 5-4 majority opinion stating that Latinos who don't speak English cannot be reasonably expected to follow rules or societal norms ... and mandates a granting of US identity to everyone with a false ID on the grounds of equal treatment for all ...

But hopefully this is just a dream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m having a nightmare &#8230; in which Ginsburg authors a 5-4 majority opinion stating that Latinos who don&#8217;t speak English cannot be reasonably expected to follow rules or societal norms &#8230; and mandates a granting of US identity to everyone with a false ID on the grounds of equal treatment for all &#8230;</p>
<p>But hopefully this is just a dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

