i think it is a fine thing that a person of color has the oppurtunity to run for president and have a chance to win (which *gulps* he probably will) the office.

it’s also a fine thing for people to be stupid, and that’s exactly what they are voting for obama. no one seems able to see through the “smoke and mirrors” around him. it’s almost like he’s the political anti-christ or the pied piper of hamlin leading us (them) down a road to socialism and economic ruin. with his choice words and slick demeanor. thank god i and most if not all the people here can see through his sorcery.

if we all pray to whatever gods and goddesses we hold dear, this s.o.b. won’t win….

North Africans are in France due to:

A situation created as a matter of industrial policy by the state.

Deliberate political decisions made by ethnic French political leaders AND the efforts of political bodies from the former French colonies to lobby France to allow their citizens access to work in France.

A failure of the French political classes to consider the long-term social ramifications.

When the low-skilled industry jobs dried up, the “guest workers” and, by the by, the term guest worker is not used in France, resisted repatriation programs, prefering to stay on the dole in France than return home.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/3241685/Illegal-migrant-to-be-charged-with-student-rape.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/3246036/Riot-police-clear-Calais-migrant-camps.html

The French neither assimilated to the societies of Algeria, Morocco, West Africa or it’s other colonies - nor were they accepted - they were booted out.

And there were no protest cries of Diversity being a strength or Multiculturalism being a blessing …

http://forums.techguy.org/civilized-debate/350816-unreported-race-riot-france.html

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47236

The adherents of this “other campaign” are in numerous other countries, including the United States. Based on their past behavior, these organizations post a national security threat and bear close watching lest the “other campaign” start engaging in acts of violence in the United States.

While certainly there were illegal aliens who participated, there is no indication that they were anything but a small fraction of the rioters. The article you flag even indicates that given the tiny number mentioned who were being deported. These riots involved thousands of people.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4422422.stm

There is no indication that a majority of foreclosures in the United States are of homes purchased by illegal aliens. If you think that is true in PWC, present evidence. Proof means more than Spanish surnames on foreclosure announcements since clearly having a Spanish surname does not make someone an illegal immigrant.

Lesson #1 … handing out citizenship does not guarantee assimilation. Similar riots occured in Denmark, ….

http://www.canadafreepress.com/2005/cover110405.htm

http://fjordman.blogspot.com/2005/07/norwegian-government-covering-up.html

These “French youth” have been acting up since the 1980’s.

http://www.city-journal.org/html/12_4_the_barbarians.html

So what you have here are riots conducted, in the majority, by French citizens. The debate is over their assimilation or acceptance in French society, but they generally weren’t illegal aliens as the video and Greg implies.

“Speaking without notes, she traded her favored fireside voice for a more fiery one, calling out to people to vote early, if not often.”

So the Washington Post is actually endorsing massive voter fraud to get Obama elected. This is probably the most refreshingly honest statement that paper has ever made.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/24/AR2008102403721.html

“Judicial Watch’s nationwide campaign to abolish illegal alien sanctuary policies got a huge boost this week thanks to a California appellate court.

On October 22, the First District Court of Appeal for the State of California ruled in our taxpayer lawsuit that the San Francisco Police Department must comply with a state law requiring police officers to notify federal authorities when they arrest a person for various narcotics offenses whom they suspect to be an alien, legal or illegal [Fonseca v. Fong, Case No. A120206].

With its ruling, the appellate court shot down a lower court ruling that the law in question, Section 11369 of the California Health and Safety Code, was an impermissible invasion of the federal government’s “absolute authority” to regulate immigration. Rejecting this argument, the appellate court remanded the case back to the trial court to make sure the SFPD’s policies comply with Section 11369.

Here’s an excerpt from the ruling, which can be read in full by clicking here http://www.judicialwatch.org/documents/2008/fonseca-v-fong-appeal-decision.pdf:

“…Section 11369 does not require any state or local law enforcement agency to independently determine whether an arrestee is a citizen of the United States, let alone whether he or she is present in the United States lawfully or unlawfully. Nor does the statute create or authorize the creation of independent criteria by which to classify individuals based on immigration status… All of those determinations, as well as the duty to tell an arrestee who may be in this country unlawfully to either obtain legal status or leave, are left entirely to federal immigration authorities…the statute is therefore not an impermissible state regulation of immigration.”

http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=194983&comments=1

Far more fascinating than the Palin wardrobe budget - the millions in illegal international campaign contributions to Obama - not to mention the huge voter fraud surrounding his campaign -

Some dim bulb in my office has amused himself all week by running around yelling “Caribou Barbi”.