The MJM website now has a story that the Obama rally
will start at 9 PM Monday night at the PWC fairgrounds
and 40,000 people are expected.

(And apparently Hillary will be speaking Sunday
at the Fairfax campus of GMU - not at Manassas.)

Most recent MJM website suggest the Fairgrounds may
now be the location.

Don’t forget the screams in the background…. YO SE PUEDO!

Vote Chuck Baldwin for President!

I wanted to dress up as KG for halloween tonight, but I could not find a costume ugly enough. I then tried the halloween store for a costume suitable to dress up like alanna, but they were fresh out of “trailer park trash” costumes and I couldnt find a fat suit big enough to fully simulate Elena. Damn, I’m bummed for sure.

what a bunch of freaks!! it’s that NGL person again stirring up trouble. I wonder how many immigrants he/she has run off lately

Oh, well, one can always dream….

(oops, I just committed thoughtcrime)

Chicko, go over and look. They want the FBI and the Secret Service tipped off about HSM, just in case. For what, criminal free speech?

What a bunch of nuts.

Par for the course over there. Joseph Goebbels would be proud of them.

What he is going to do about Immigration law and “illegal” immigrants.

He needs to address WHY immigration law was created:
Immigration law was created to limit the political and social damage caused by “out of control population growth” due to diasporas (people fleeing war, famine, bad government, etc) Diasporas are good for the people involved in them but generally bad for the countries absorbing them if you look at the post diasporic environments historically. In most post diasporic events, people who settled in regions of their new host country generally do not adopt the traits of the culture they are residing in, especially for several generations and if those ethnic, gender, religious, and racial traits remain solidified as diverse, segregated, conflicting and arrogant political entities, then the regions they settle in become ethnic, or religious warzones with the surrounding community, often for several generations and hundreds of years (in some cases, like the Christian and Muslim Diasporas, thousands of years of un-relenting conflict. In RARE cases, such as the European diasporas into the US, their are enough common characteristic between the new and the old cultures, and the changes brought about by those cultural differences slow enough and small enough, that rapid and destructive change does not happen in a diasporic absorbing society, it has the time through “controlled growth” and “legal immigration law” to slowly absorb the change over several generations without the violence and conflict usually associated with rapid diasporic events typical of massive cultural migrations over short periods of time into areas of vast cultural and social differences.

He needs to address what he is going to do to prevent “uncontrolled” population growth in the US, that will affect both future economy, glbal warming and consumable natural resources:
The base issue is “controlled growth” that prevents conflict and war. In most other parts of the world, growth is neither slow, nor controllable, as a result of “illegal” immigration, war or desire for “choice land and mineral resources”, In these regions historically conflict is endemic, people refuse to change, cultures collide, people live in fear of one another, and political parties representing each “diversity groups” ethnic, gender, racial and religious “attributes”, fight for supreme political power at the cost of peace, prosperity, ethics, law and freedom from criminal political oppression.

To prevent “out of control” population growth and out of control DIASPORAS with severe negative consequences, Immigration law is established and enforced by all countries to attempt to prevent war and conflict between groups of people who refuse to identify and merge into a common peaceful culture. Some diasporic groups of people are worse than others in relating only “to their own kind”. It is these groups that create future wars and conflict as they gain political power.

He needs to address how he feels about the need or not for Immigration law reform:
Immigration reform is needed when the current immigration laws do not prevent “uncontrolled growth”. Immigration reform is not needed when the current immigration law provides a mechansim for people to legally enter a country at the population levels and growth rate the country can absorb peacefully and with stability. Immigration reform is also not needed when it is the diasporic people who want increased “quotas” for their own personal gain, when allowing “illegal” people to become “legal” will cause even more out of control growth, instability and potential for future ethnic, racial, gender and religious conflict.

When “illegal” people can and do hurt a nation, they should not be re-warded for their illegality, especially when that reward promotes even more “illegal” behavior and even more “diasporic destruction” and future potential for war and conflict.

It is my point of view that we do not need immigration “reform” just to make family members of “illegal” people happy, when the consequence of doing do is to invite even greater destruction and conflict in your future society, by rewarding “unlawful and “criminal” behavior.

He needs to offer some solutions that will prevent future “illegal” immigration:
I see we only have three possible solutions to prevent future conflict and ethnic, gender, racial and religious wars similar to those already underway in other countries with the same or worse problems the US is currently experiencing.

1. Treat everyone the same (under law), identify and promote common “attributes” and similarities between diverse ethnic, gender, racial and religious groups, with the goal to as quickly as possible merge cultures, languages and “attributes” to a common national culture enabling peace, prosperity and social stability between ALL “individuals” in a society.
2. Prevent political and social “diversity and divergence”, which is self- destructive, destabilizing, and militant in its political purpose to overthrow or dominate a nation’s political infrastructure, especially if the mechanism of overthrow is aristocratic, autocratic, socialistic, communistic or criminalistic. Democracy is the only historically proven governmental system that can peacefully create unified national cultures out of diasporic nations (the greeks were the first to understand and discover this simple truth, while they were at war with their diasporic neighbors).
3. Prevent “illegal” people from gaining amnesty and future “illegal” people from entering that will encourage furthur “uncontrolled growth” by rewarding “unlawful and criminal” behavior with the very thing the unlawful and “criminal behavior” is motivated to gain. This behavior cycle which rewards “lawless” behavior will continue until the punishment is sufficient or consequential damages fearful enough to stop it for good.

He needs to address the concerns of military officers and soldiers in this nation that fight for our freedoms and protection and see that the US political system is disintegrating into a third world political system of ignorant government and criminal political behavior:
As a soldier who fought for this nation, this is what I see and stand for. My arguments are against any of you who want to undermine our nation and create the conditions that will turn the US into a political and militant gang warfare environment the same as nations at war around the world. Our national government and political system is disintegrating because people with naive and angry minds are causing fraud, corruption and political formation of ethnic, gender, racial and religious political factions that will cause the nation to live in a society where we live fear of one another as do most of the other nations of the world.

If I and others like me who understand some basic causes of disintegration and conflict through personal experience of the global issues (as a result of fighting in those wars, and understanding the root cause of those wars), do not stand up for what we believe is right and wrong with this nation, and if we do not defend our nation at home as honorably as we defended our nation abroad, we will have failed each of you who are against the above solutions that are too un-informed or ignorant to know any better.

What a bunch of nuts.

why all this talk of him shredding the Constitution? Is that based on anything tangible? Seems to me Bush and the GOP are the ones who don’t seem to understand or respect checks and balances?

If this is concern about him appointing activist judges, well we’ll see. Maybe he’ll do something bipartisan and nominate Harriet Meiers.