<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama, La Hood-winked, Caterpillar and Canoodling</title>
	<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/</link>
	<description>Blog-Fu for Prince William, Manassas and Manassas Park politics.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 05:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: AWCheney</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81963</link>
		<dc:creator>AWCheney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81963</guid>
		<description>Actually, you could call Obama a Washington outsider, given that he hadn't been in the Senate for even a full term...and THEN only showed up half the time to do his job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, you could call Obama a Washington outsider, given that he hadn&#8217;t been in the Senate for even a full term&#8230;and THEN only showed up half the time to do his job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fed up</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81903</link>
		<dc:creator>fed up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 01:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81903</guid>
		<description>Red, White and Blue said on 14 Feb 2009 at 9:53 pm: Flag comment 
Kool Aid alert!!!! “I Bleed Obama Blue”, do you really believe pork is now stimulus ? Holy poo-poo Batman, keep the kool aid coming! Wow! Let’s see, Oblahblah said that he was for CHANGE...."

Yeah, Noboma is so much for "change" that he hired half of Clinton's cabinet to work for him.....
So much for change and getting rid of "politics as usual" and hiring "outside of Washington"...

What a joke!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Red, White and Blue said on 14 Feb 2009 at 9:53 pm: Flag comment<br />
Kool Aid alert!!!! “I Bleed Obama Blue”, do you really believe pork is now stimulus ? Holy poo-poo Batman, keep the kool aid coming! Wow! Let’s see, Oblahblah said that he was for CHANGE&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, Noboma is so much for &#8220;change&#8221; that he hired half of Clinton&#8217;s cabinet to work for him&#8230;..<br />
So much for change and getting rid of &#8220;politics as usual&#8221; and hiring &#8220;outside of Washington&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>What a joke!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81811</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81811</guid>
		<description>Bleed Obama Blue said on 13 Feb 2009 at 4:02 pm: Flag comment 

Citi,

What you call pork, President Obama calls economic stimulus. He’s not lying or being deceitful: He just doesn’t see it your way.

Better get that blood transfusion, dork!  You are in dire need of one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bleed Obama Blue said on 13 Feb 2009 at 4:02 pm: Flag comment </p>
<p>Citi,</p>
<p>What you call pork, President Obama calls economic stimulus. He’s not lying or being deceitful: He just doesn’t see it your way.</p>
<p>Better get that blood transfusion, dork!  You are in dire need of one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: citizenofmanassas</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81773</link>
		<dc:creator>citizenofmanassas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81773</guid>
		<description>Anon,

I agree we should not just be concerned with teenagers who text and drive.  As long as we pass out licenses like candy, we will have horrible drivers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon,</p>
<p>I agree we should not just be concerned with teenagers who text and drive.  As long as we pass out licenses like candy, we will have horrible drivers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81764</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81764</guid>
		<description>Pat.Herve said on 13 Feb 2009 at 11:39 am: Flag comment 

Both Pat and AW are correct in that voting for something because it is for the greater good DID fly the coop ages ago, and more’s the pity. Congressmen and Senators don’t really care about opinions outside their home district or state as those opinions will not get them reelected or defeat them. This is why there is all this pork - everyone wants to go home and tell the folks - “look what I got you, etc.”

The "porker in chief" is Sen. Byrd.  When he passes, the people of West Virginia are going to rename to state to ROBERT W. BYRD.  He will be the first one to have a state named after him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat.Herve said on 13 Feb 2009 at 11:39 am: Flag comment </p>
<p>Both Pat and AW are correct in that voting for something because it is for the greater good DID fly the coop ages ago, and more’s the pity. Congressmen and Senators don’t really care about opinions outside their home district or state as those opinions will not get them reelected or defeat them. This is why there is all this pork - everyone wants to go home and tell the folks - “look what I got you, etc.”</p>
<p>The &#8220;porker in chief&#8221; is Sen. Byrd.  When he passes, the people of West Virginia are going to rename to state to ROBERT W. BYRD.  He will be the first one to have a state named after him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81763</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81763</guid>
		<description>We gotta get this bill to my desk this weekend or the sky will fall.  Bill was signed, sealed and deliverd this weekend but Obamarama is on a junket to "CHI" and now says Tuesday will be soon enough as it now appears the sky will not fall after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We gotta get this bill to my desk this weekend or the sky will fall.  Bill was signed, sealed and deliverd this weekend but Obamarama is on a junket to &#8220;CHI&#8221; and now says Tuesday will be soon enough as it now appears the sky will not fall after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81761</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81761</guid>
		<description>Correction to 11:40 comment:
swatting flies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction to 11:40 comment:<br />
swatting flies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81760</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81760</guid>
		<description>citizenofmanassas said on 15 Feb 2009 at 11:36 pm: Flag comment
 
As for roads, we will never get out of the hole with roads. Will additional lanes make people use their turn signals more? Will additional lanes stop rubber necking? Will it make slow people move out of the far left lanes? Will it get people paying attention to what is next to them, so they are not pacing the car in the next lane thereby blocking both lanes so that other cars are not able to pass? Until the majority of drivers resume using common sense on the roads, we will never improve the roads.

It's tough trying to use the turn signal when one is texting.
It's tough trying to remain alert while driving and using the cell phone.
Our state legislatures think ONLY the teenagers need to be restricted using cell phones and texting while driving and will NOT ban the use of a cell phone while driving for EVERYONE.  Therein the problem lies.  I have almost been side-swiped a number of time because of an idiot with a cell phone stuck to his/her ear and the other arm waving like he/she was swatting flied creaped into my lane.  Every day is a challenge while driving!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>citizenofmanassas said on 15 Feb 2009 at 11:36 pm: Flag comment</p>
<p>As for roads, we will never get out of the hole with roads. Will additional lanes make people use their turn signals more? Will additional lanes stop rubber necking? Will it make slow people move out of the far left lanes? Will it get people paying attention to what is next to them, so they are not pacing the car in the next lane thereby blocking both lanes so that other cars are not able to pass? Until the majority of drivers resume using common sense on the roads, we will never improve the roads.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s tough trying to use the turn signal when one is texting.<br />
It&#8217;s tough trying to remain alert while driving and using the cell phone.<br />
Our state legislatures think ONLY the teenagers need to be restricted using cell phones and texting while driving and will NOT ban the use of a cell phone while driving for EVERYONE.  Therein the problem lies.  I have almost been side-swiped a number of time because of an idiot with a cell phone stuck to his/her ear and the other arm waving like he/she was swatting flied creaped into my lane.  Every day is a challenge while driving!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: citizenofmanassas</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81751</link>
		<dc:creator>citizenofmanassas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 04:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81751</guid>
		<description>There is already enough money being spent on schools.    The reason there is so much waste is because the unions know they have to just scream and whine louder to get more money.  If you know you can always get more money, where is the ugency to save money and to think about ways to save?  

As for roads, we will never get out of the hole with roads.  Will additional lanes make people use their turn signals more?  Will additional lanes stop rubber necking?  Will it make slow people move out of the far left lanes?  Will it get people paying attention to what is next to them, so they are not pacing the car in the next lane thereby blocking both lanes so that other cars are not able to pass?    Until the majority of drivers resume using common sense on the roads, we will never improve the roads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is already enough money being spent on schools.    The reason there is so much waste is because the unions know they have to just scream and whine louder to get more money.  If you know you can always get more money, where is the ugency to save money and to think about ways to save?  </p>
<p>As for roads, we will never get out of the hole with roads.  Will additional lanes make people use their turn signals more?  Will additional lanes stop rubber necking?  Will it make slow people move out of the far left lanes?  Will it get people paying attention to what is next to them, so they are not pacing the car in the next lane thereby blocking both lanes so that other cars are not able to pass?    Until the majority of drivers resume using common sense on the roads, we will never improve the roads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81745</link>
		<dc:creator>freedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81745</guid>
		<description>I'm with you, Prester....and T-Diddly, as for you, I wouldn't mind paying another $500 or even $1000 more for good schools and good roads either.  However, two points to consider before increasing our contribution (tax) to government:  1)  Let's be sure that what we're paying already is spent on the right things, not wealth redistribution for those who haven't had the courage to make good/sound personal decisions and 2) throwing more money at programs, e.g., schools, does not necessarily improve the education of our children.  OK?  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you, Prester&#8230;.and T-Diddly, as for you, I wouldn&#8217;t mind paying another $500 or even $1000 more for good schools and good roads either.  However, two points to consider before increasing our contribution (tax) to government:  1)  Let&#8217;s be sure that what we&#8217;re paying already is spent on the right things, not wealth redistribution for those who haven&#8217;t had the courage to make good/sound personal decisions and 2) throwing more money at programs, e.g., schools, does not necessarily improve the education of our children.  OK?  <img src='http://www.bvbl.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prester John</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81732</link>
		<dc:creator>Prester John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81732</guid>
		<description>T-Diddy,

Despite your accusations that I am just spouting what the "whack jobs" tell me to (I am quite capable of thinking for myself thank you and don't just spout what other people say) we actually aren't that far apart.  Govenment does serve a purpose and I have no problem paying taxes for those roads, schools, and quality people in government you mentioned.  I also believe that government, especially the federal government is sticking its nose in places it does not belong and is impoverishing our country by sucking us dry financially.  Let the feds take care of things like national defense and foreign policy and let the states figure out education, welfare, non-interstate roads etc.

And yes, I bet the two of us could sit down and figure out a reasonable budget given reasonable and limited revenues.

And yes, I totally agree with you about how "normal" people running for office get looked down on and how we need to elect people to office who actually represent the people and not just their political parties and contributors.

Regards.

But I still think it is better to give tax cuts to the people who earn the money rather instead of doling out federal dollars to political friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T-Diddy,</p>
<p>Despite your accusations that I am just spouting what the &#8220;whack jobs&#8221; tell me to (I am quite capable of thinking for myself thank you and don&#8217;t just spout what other people say) we actually aren&#8217;t that far apart.  Govenment does serve a purpose and I have no problem paying taxes for those roads, schools, and quality people in government you mentioned.  I also believe that government, especially the federal government is sticking its nose in places it does not belong and is impoverishing our country by sucking us dry financially.  Let the feds take care of things like national defense and foreign policy and let the states figure out education, welfare, non-interstate roads etc.</p>
<p>And yes, I bet the two of us could sit down and figure out a reasonable budget given reasonable and limited revenues.</p>
<p>And yes, I totally agree with you about how &#8220;normal&#8221; people running for office get looked down on and how we need to elect people to office who actually represent the people and not just their political parties and contributors.</p>
<p>Regards.</p>
<p>But I still think it is better to give tax cuts to the people who earn the money rather instead of doling out federal dollars to political friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red, White and Blue</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81725</link>
		<dc:creator>Red, White and Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 02:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81725</guid>
		<description>Kool Aid alert!!!! "I Bleed Obama Blue", do you really believe pork is now stimulus ? Holy poo-poo Batman, keep the kool aid coming! Wow! Let's see, Oblahblah said that he was for CHANGE, not the same old (George Bush) Washington politics as before, NO PORK, NO LOBBYIST, yessiree, just CHANGE you can believe in. I guess you still do. 

Your points are ludricous; your logic flawed. Kool aid can do that sometimes. This is an open blog but your mind is closed to the same old song being played again. Oblahblah is no different than any of the rest of the politicians but he LIED and that is an undisputed fact on he pork and lobbyist to start and he does mix his words and math as it pleases him.

He got past Hillary and McCain by offering HOPE, now he only talks of DISPARE, incites fear and as he offers, no, demands that we just hand over another trillion to him, with some PORK, and he will settle everything - but don't expect it all to work in the first 4 years, he will need more time - like 8 years.

Mr. Hope is Mr. Doom and Gloom. In truth, unlike some kool aid drimkers can grasp, I don't know if anyone could stop this recession but recessions are cyclic and do occur no matter who is in the White House. The key is not spending the Bush trillion, the Obama trillion and offer little hope except "I may not get all this done in the first term. I gonna need more time." (Paraphrasing he not to distant comments on the crappy, stinking, rotten, failing, doomed, awful, bad, OMG economy he "inherited") That also is not true. He ahs been in the  Senate for 4 years and offered little if anytihing on improving the economy ( except surrender in the middle east, close gitmo and give all illegals something called "a path to citizenship.Wow, such novel ideas and ideals.

Kool aid. Keep drinking and listen to Mr. Oblahblah. Keep ringing his bell of hope as he sells fear and doom. His words, not mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kool Aid alert!!!! &#8220;I Bleed Obama Blue&#8221;, do you really believe pork is now stimulus ? Holy poo-poo Batman, keep the kool aid coming! Wow! Let&#8217;s see, Oblahblah said that he was for CHANGE, not the same old (George Bush) Washington politics as before, NO PORK, NO LOBBYIST, yessiree, just CHANGE you can believe in. I guess you still do. </p>
<p>Your points are ludricous; your logic flawed. Kool aid can do that sometimes. This is an open blog but your mind is closed to the same old song being played again. Oblahblah is no different than any of the rest of the politicians but he LIED and that is an undisputed fact on he pork and lobbyist to start and he does mix his words and math as it pleases him.</p>
<p>He got past Hillary and McCain by offering HOPE, now he only talks of DISPARE, incites fear and as he offers, no, demands that we just hand over another trillion to him, with some PORK, and he will settle everything - but don&#8217;t expect it all to work in the first 4 years, he will need more time - like 8 years.</p>
<p>Mr. Hope is Mr. Doom and Gloom. In truth, unlike some kool aid drimkers can grasp, I don&#8217;t know if anyone could stop this recession but recessions are cyclic and do occur no matter who is in the White House. The key is not spending the Bush trillion, the Obama trillion and offer little hope except &#8220;I may not get all this done in the first term. I gonna need more time.&#8221; (Paraphrasing he not to distant comments on the crappy, stinking, rotten, failing, doomed, awful, bad, OMG economy he &#8220;inherited&#8221;) That also is not true. He ahs been in the  Senate for 4 years and offered little if anytihing on improving the economy ( except surrender in the middle east, close gitmo and give all illegals something called &#8220;a path to citizenship.Wow, such novel ideas and ideals.</p>
<p>Kool aid. Keep drinking and listen to Mr. Oblahblah. Keep ringing his bell of hope as he sells fear and doom. His words, not mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg L</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81724</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 01:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81724</guid>
		<description>I'd say Jeff Frederick is doing a fine job if he's driving liberals like "T-Diddy" to distraction.  They might prefer to have a Russ Potts look-alike as the RPV Chair instead of someone who will actually fight liberalism, but that doesn't serve the Republican Party at all.  The "let's raise taxes and solve all problems with greater government spending" crowd hates Jeff Frederick.

Good.  Let's hope he keeps it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say Jeff Frederick is doing a fine job if he&#8217;s driving liberals like &#8220;T-Diddy&#8221; to distraction.  They might prefer to have a Russ Potts look-alike as the RPV Chair instead of someone who will actually fight liberalism, but that doesn&#8217;t serve the Republican Party at all.  The &#8220;let&#8217;s raise taxes and solve all problems with greater government spending&#8221; crowd hates Jeff Frederick.</p>
<p>Good.  Let&#8217;s hope he keeps it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T-Diddy</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81721</link>
		<dc:creator>T-Diddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81721</guid>
		<description>Prester,

Tax cuts don't work like you think they do.  They buy adjustable rate mortgages they can't afford in 5 years.  I'm not advocating giving a UK type of deduction each payday, but there is a "cost of doing business" in the country.  The difference between you and me is I am willing to part with an extra $500 a year if it means my kids get better books, we get better roads, etc.

Now, you are going to quote me the mantra of, "Yeah, but they never send that money.  They give it to illegal pregnant moms for abortions so their lesbian mates don't have to adopt them at the marriage ceremony"...blah, blah, blah.  Come on, do they really?  Give me hard numbers from credible sources that I can check. Prove me wrong.  Show me its a large portion of the pie.  Know what?  You can't.  You are just spouting a line the whack jobs gave you.

It costs money for good things.  I want good schools, good roads, efficient government just like you.  There is no more money to cut, unless you are willing to boot the mental patients out on the street and continue to pay dog-s%$t for teachers.  If you think there is, then you're just admitting how ineffective Republicans are since they controlled the US House for most of Clinton's time and half of Bush's.  Republicans control the General Assembly. You telling me they can't get things done as the majority?  You need to think about that!  It takes money to pay quality government employees to execute the contracts and write the specifications that are coherent.  It takes money for CAREER government employees that will watch home loan trends and jump in and regulate the greed out.  Worried Big brother will appear? How's your house's market value doing? Mine sucks!  I wish the SEC or whoever watches that stuff had done something.  Wouldn't it have been better for someone to stop those dummies that bought a mortgage they couldn't afford rather than watch the recession gobble up our retirement accounts?

Its our own fault.  Mine as much as yours.  We elect dorks like Pelosi and Jeff Frederick.  We keep getting these whack jobs from the fringes.  If a "normal" person runs for office, we all look at them like they are some kind of idiot.  PJ, you and I could sit down with the PWC budget and in a day have something that works.  Know why?  We aren't beholding to the folks that fund our campaigns.  We are not enslaved to the idealogues.  We aren't dreaming of the next step up the political ladder (re: Frederick).  We are here for the long haul.  We have to deal with reality and we have to live with the consequences of our decisions .  Politicians do not.  It will get better when we start choosing our government representatives that actually represent US and not some ethereal pie in the sky (conservative AND liberal).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prester,</p>
<p>Tax cuts don&#8217;t work like you think they do.  They buy adjustable rate mortgages they can&#8217;t afford in 5 years.  I&#8217;m not advocating giving a UK type of deduction each payday, but there is a &#8220;cost of doing business&#8221; in the country.  The difference between you and me is I am willing to part with an extra $500 a year if it means my kids get better books, we get better roads, etc.</p>
<p>Now, you are going to quote me the mantra of, &#8220;Yeah, but they never send that money.  They give it to illegal pregnant moms for abortions so their lesbian mates don&#8217;t have to adopt them at the marriage ceremony&#8221;&#8230;blah, blah, blah.  Come on, do they really?  Give me hard numbers from credible sources that I can check. Prove me wrong.  Show me its a large portion of the pie.  Know what?  You can&#8217;t.  You are just spouting a line the whack jobs gave you.</p>
<p>It costs money for good things.  I want good schools, good roads, efficient government just like you.  There is no more money to cut, unless you are willing to boot the mental patients out on the street and continue to pay dog-s%$t for teachers.  If you think there is, then you&#8217;re just admitting how ineffective Republicans are since they controlled the US House for most of Clinton&#8217;s time and half of Bush&#8217;s.  Republicans control the General Assembly. You telling me they can&#8217;t get things done as the majority?  You need to think about that!  It takes money to pay quality government employees to execute the contracts and write the specifications that are coherent.  It takes money for CAREER government employees that will watch home loan trends and jump in and regulate the greed out.  Worried Big brother will appear? How&#8217;s your house&#8217;s market value doing? Mine sucks!  I wish the SEC or whoever watches that stuff had done something.  Wouldn&#8217;t it have been better for someone to stop those dummies that bought a mortgage they couldn&#8217;t afford rather than watch the recession gobble up our retirement accounts?</p>
<p>Its our own fault.  Mine as much as yours.  We elect dorks like Pelosi and Jeff Frederick.  We keep getting these whack jobs from the fringes.  If a &#8220;normal&#8221; person runs for office, we all look at them like they are some kind of idiot.  PJ, you and I could sit down with the PWC budget and in a day have something that works.  Know why?  We aren&#8217;t beholding to the folks that fund our campaigns.  We are not enslaved to the idealogues.  We aren&#8217;t dreaming of the next step up the political ladder (re: Frederick).  We are here for the long haul.  We have to deal with reality and we have to live with the consequences of our decisions .  Politicians do not.  It will get better when we start choosing our government representatives that actually represent US and not some ethereal pie in the sky (conservative AND liberal).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: citizenofmanassas</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81720</link>
		<dc:creator>citizenofmanassas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 22:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81720</guid>
		<description>What hog wash.  Obama knows very well what pork is.  I guess we are back to the Clinton days of it depends on what your think "is" means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What hog wash.  Obama knows very well what pork is.  I guess we are back to the Clinton days of it depends on what your think &#8220;is&#8221; means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81717</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81717</guid>
		<description>I Bleed Obama Blue said on 13 Feb 2009 at 4:02 pm: Flag comment 

Citi,

What you call pork, President Obama calls economic stimulus. He’s not lying or being deceitful: He just doesn’t see it your way.

About time you got a goddam transfusion, you jerk!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Bleed Obama Blue said on 13 Feb 2009 at 4:02 pm: Flag comment </p>
<p>Citi,</p>
<p>What you call pork, President Obama calls economic stimulus. He’s not lying or being deceitful: He just doesn’t see it your way.</p>
<p>About time you got a goddam transfusion, you jerk!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prester John</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81715</link>
		<dc:creator>Prester John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81715</guid>
		<description>Oh, I am perfectly willing to admit the Bush the GOP run Congress did plenty to screw things up just as the Dems are screwing things up even worse now.

And with regard to tax cuts, they do work.  The economy between 2003 and 2007 was doing just fine until all the people who had no business buying houses found out they couldn't afford the payments any more, and away we go.......

So why do the anti-tax cutters think politicians (at what ever level) know better how money should be spent than the people who actually earn the money?  


What is so horrible about letting people keep the money they earn?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I am perfectly willing to admit the Bush the GOP run Congress did plenty to screw things up just as the Dems are screwing things up even worse now.</p>
<p>And with regard to tax cuts, they do work.  The economy between 2003 and 2007 was doing just fine until all the people who had no business buying houses found out they couldn&#8217;t afford the payments any more, and away we go&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>So why do the anti-tax cutters think politicians (at what ever level) know better how money should be spent than the people who actually earn the money?  </p>
<p>What is so horrible about letting people keep the money they earn?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T-Diddy</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81712</link>
		<dc:creator>T-Diddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81712</guid>
		<description>Prester John said:
"Uh, if I recall it correctly, it was the Dem controlled Congress who was practically hysterical in their demands that “something” be done back in Sept and Oct."

That means Mr. Bush's administration was without effect, right?  They just caved to Pelosi, right? No backbone?

Then PJ says:
"Want to stimulate the economy? TAX CUTS, TAX CUTS, TAX CUTS"

Didn't seem to work with Mr. Bush, did it?  He passed the tax cut early in his administration.  What happened?  Also, wasn't his administration populating the SEC?  

Can't have it both ways PJ.  You're boy was watching the shop when the economy augered in.  He's to blame as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prester John said:<br />
&#8220;Uh, if I recall it correctly, it was the Dem controlled Congress who was practically hysterical in their demands that “something” be done back in Sept and Oct.&#8221;</p>
<p>That means Mr. Bush&#8217;s administration was without effect, right?  They just caved to Pelosi, right? No backbone?</p>
<p>Then PJ says:<br />
&#8220;Want to stimulate the economy? TAX CUTS, TAX CUTS, TAX CUTS&#8221;</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t seem to work with Mr. Bush, did it?  He passed the tax cut early in his administration.  What happened?  Also, wasn&#8217;t his administration populating the SEC?  </p>
<p>Can&#8217;t have it both ways PJ.  You&#8217;re boy was watching the shop when the economy augered in.  He&#8217;s to blame as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mighty Putty</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81708</link>
		<dc:creator>Mighty Putty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81708</guid>
		<description>Pat.Herve said on 13 Feb 2009 at 7:42 pm: Flag comment 

"No, I think they can all take blame. So far, I hear no suggestions on this blog as to how to stimulate the economy."

Here's a suggestion:  leave it alone.  There are signs that things are beginning to stabilize.   This bill contains pork that Congress would not have the audacity to try to pass in any other appropriations bill.  Take off your dem colored glasses and try to be honest.  After all, you and your children willl be paying for all of this too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat.Herve said on 13 Feb 2009 at 7:42 pm: Flag comment </p>
<p>&#8220;No, I think they can all take blame. So far, I hear no suggestions on this blog as to how to stimulate the economy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a suggestion:  leave it alone.  There are signs that things are beginning to stabilize.   This bill contains pork that Congress would not have the audacity to try to pass in any other appropriations bill.  Take off your dem colored glasses and try to be honest.  After all, you and your children willl be paying for all of this too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: citizenofmanassas</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81702</link>
		<dc:creator>citizenofmanassas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 05:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/02/13/obama-la-hood-winked-caterpillar-and-canoodling/#comment-81702</guid>
		<description>Pat,

The housing bail out plan and bad loan program plan that obama wants  could cost up to 9 trillion dollars.  That makes the Iraq war look pretty darn cheap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat,</p>
<p>The housing bail out plan and bad loan program plan that obama wants  could cost up to 9 trillion dollars.  That makes the Iraq war look pretty darn cheap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

