<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeff Frederick Removed</title>
	<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/</link>
	<description>Blog-Fu for Prince William, Manassas and Manassas Park politics.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Benton</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83394</link>
		<dc:creator>Benton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 01:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83394</guid>
		<description>57-18.  I don't  think too many people like him.  They might agree with him, but it doesn't look they like him.  Boils down to just that - how you do what you do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>57-18.  I don&#8217;t  think too many people like him.  They might agree with him, but it doesn&#8217;t look they like him.  Boils down to just that - how you do what you do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWCheney</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83388</link>
		<dc:creator>AWCheney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 22:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83388</guid>
		<description>Just a tip, Groveton...put your website address on your sign-in.  That way people can click on your "name" on your comments and go to your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a tip, Groveton&#8230;put your website address on your sign-in.  That way people can click on your &#8220;name&#8221; on your comments and go to your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Groveton</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83387</link>
		<dc:creator>Groveton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 22:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83387</guid>
		<description>AWC:

Thanks for the comments on my blog site.  Once you start a blog site you realize how much work people like Greg L put into sites like this.  Whether you agree with Greg or not - he's providing a valuable free service that encourages debate on a critical issue.  Now, if I could manage to write and publish one post for every 50 on this site I'd be doing a lot better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AWC:</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments on my blog site.  Once you start a blog site you realize how much work people like Greg L put into sites like this.  Whether you agree with Greg or not - he&#8217;s providing a valuable free service that encourages debate on a critical issue.  Now, if I could manage to write and publish one post for every 50 on this site I&#8217;d be doing a lot better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWCheney</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83384</link>
		<dc:creator>AWCheney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83384</guid>
		<description>By the way BPCAY, what I said was, "I didn’t realize that you were actually a Socialist," suggesting, of course, that I was surprised by the comment I was referencing.  By your commentary on previous threads, I had thought you were more astute than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way BPCAY, what I said was, &#8220;I didn’t realize that you were actually a Socialist,&#8221; suggesting, of course, that I was surprised by the comment I was referencing.  By your commentary on previous threads, I had thought you were more astute than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BothPartiesColludeAgainstUs</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83383</link>
		<dc:creator>BothPartiesColludeAgainstUs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83383</guid>
		<description>I take your point.  The optimal point for us all involves some government regulation though.

My head's not in the sand.  We need a new political party, short of that we'll be run by crooks and liars.  Obama doesn't make me shudder so much - but Pelosi and Reid do.

Obama has yet to prove himself to be a wild-eyed socialist.  I'm hoping he won't.  I hoping he'll be a moderate, like Clinton.  I do believe that Clinton's budgets and tax policy and general governance were a big factor in how great the 90's were for America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take your point.  The optimal point for us all involves some government regulation though.</p>
<p>My head&#8217;s not in the sand.  We need a new political party, short of that we&#8217;ll be run by crooks and liars.  Obama doesn&#8217;t make me shudder so much - but Pelosi and Reid do.</p>
<p>Obama has yet to prove himself to be a wild-eyed socialist.  I&#8217;m hoping he won&#8217;t.  I hoping he&#8217;ll be a moderate, like Clinton.  I do believe that Clinton&#8217;s budgets and tax policy and general governance were a big factor in how great the 90&#8217;s were for America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWCheney</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83382</link>
		<dc:creator>AWCheney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83382</guid>
		<description>"But neither do I believe in unchecked capitalism - history shows that government regulation and intervention are necessary to keep it going"

That presupposes that we have an Executive Branch that actually believes in enforcing the laws that they have been directed to enforce by the Legislative Branch...such as the Sherman Antitrust Act.  Just as they have chosen to disregard our immigration laws for at least the past decade, if not longer, the Executive has taken it upon itself to pursue an agenda through lack of enforcement which has made the Legislative irrelevant, except insofar as the pursuit of the agenda of the Chief Executive.  Coincidence that the last President had a solid Party block in the Legislature as does the current?  I think not.

Don't think for a moment that imbuing our Executive Branch with MORE power is going to solve any problems for the average citizen.  Don't bury your head in the sand...take a REAL look at what's going on.  Then get back to me when you've realized that you've supported government control of every element of our lives...our health, our wealth, our freedom, our very existence!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But neither do I believe in unchecked capitalism - history shows that government regulation and intervention are necessary to keep it going&#8221;</p>
<p>That presupposes that we have an Executive Branch that actually believes in enforcing the laws that they have been directed to enforce by the Legislative Branch&#8230;such as the Sherman Antitrust Act.  Just as they have chosen to disregard our immigration laws for at least the past decade, if not longer, the Executive has taken it upon itself to pursue an agenda through lack of enforcement which has made the Legislative irrelevant, except insofar as the pursuit of the agenda of the Chief Executive.  Coincidence that the last President had a solid Party block in the Legislature as does the current?  I think not.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t think for a moment that imbuing our Executive Branch with MORE power is going to solve any problems for the average citizen.  Don&#8217;t bury your head in the sand&#8230;take a REAL look at what&#8217;s going on.  Then get back to me when you&#8217;ve realized that you&#8217;ve supported government control of every element of our lives&#8230;our health, our wealth, our freedom, our very existence!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BothPartiesColludeAgainstYou</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83381</link>
		<dc:creator>BothPartiesColludeAgainstYou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83381</guid>
		<description>Whereas both parties have dedicated themselves to unchecked global capitalism, and here are the glorious results.  The engine is crashing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whereas both parties have dedicated themselves to unchecked global capitalism, and here are the glorious results.  The engine is crashing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BothPartiesColludeAgainstYou</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83380</link>
		<dc:creator>BothPartiesColludeAgainstYou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83380</guid>
		<description>I don't believe in Socialism

But neither do I believe in unchecked capitalism - history shows that government regulation and intervention are necessary to keep it going

America at its best is a combination of the two</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe in Socialism</p>
<p>But neither do I believe in unchecked capitalism - history shows that government regulation and intervention are necessary to keep it going</p>
<p>America at its best is a combination of the two</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BothPartiesColludeAgainstYou</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83379</link>
		<dc:creator>BothPartiesColludeAgainstYou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83379</guid>
		<description>And here's a perfect example of the kind of good thing that can happen - companies that use taxpayer money protecting American jobs rather than helping to build China's and India's economies.  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/06/AR2009040601189.html?hpid=sec-business</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here&#8217;s a perfect example of the kind of good thing that can happen - companies that use taxpayer money protecting American jobs rather than helping to build China&#8217;s and India&#8217;s economies.  <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/06/AR2009040601189.html?hpid=sec-business" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/06/AR2009040601189.html?hpid=sec-business</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83375</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83375</guid>
		<description>"He just didn’t have what it takes to keep this party on track."

How about the last 4 chairmen? 

As long as RPV continues chewing up and spitting out chairmen, well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He just didn’t have what it takes to keep this party on track.&#8221;</p>
<p>How about the last 4 chairmen? </p>
<p>As long as RPV continues chewing up and spitting out chairmen, well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWCheney</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83373</link>
		<dc:creator>AWCheney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83373</guid>
		<description>I didn't realize that you were actually a Socialist, BPCAY.  If you really study what is happening, it's really only the next step in the control of the private sector by the Executive Branch.  First you begin to restrict the liberty of the individual; then you begin to subvert the other branches of government, and manipulate them into abrogating their powers (the threat of marshal law is very effective); next you ruin the economy and create panic; the next step is nationalizing industry...and here we are.  Unfortunately, we are on the fast track to the end game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t realize that you were actually a Socialist, BPCAY.  If you really study what is happening, it&#8217;s really only the next step in the control of the private sector by the Executive Branch.  First you begin to restrict the liberty of the individual; then you begin to subvert the other branches of government, and manipulate them into abrogating their powers (the threat of marshal law is very effective); next you ruin the economy and create panic; the next step is nationalizing industry&#8230;and here we are.  Unfortunately, we are on the fast track to the end game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BothPartiesColludeAgainstYou</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83371</link>
		<dc:creator>BothPartiesColludeAgainstYou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83371</guid>
		<description>"As I told someone recently BPCAU, Bush started the slalom run, and Obama is finishing the country off. So, in effect, you did vote for Bush."

I never said that I voted for Obama.  However, I would say he is charting a different course than Bush was.  Rather than a blank check to the ruling class, he is insisting on some level of new regulation and governance on the bailed out companies.  I do approve of this, for the current situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As I told someone recently BPCAU, Bush started the slalom run, and Obama is finishing the country off. So, in effect, you did vote for Bush.&#8221;</p>
<p>I never said that I voted for Obama.  However, I would say he is charting a different course than Bush was.  Rather than a blank check to the ruling class, he is insisting on some level of new regulation and governance on the bailed out companies.  I do approve of this, for the current situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83368</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83368</guid>
		<description>Wow...I actually read all of the comments here and can say without a doubt that the Republican Party in Virginia is, indeed, in serious trouble.  I cannot believe the pettiness, childishness, and mob mentality that I see.  Are there, or are there not, some basic principles of being a Republican?  If so, then if any person toes the lines of those basic principles, they are indeed a Republican.  I know that Jeff Frederick is a fine Republican.  He just didn't have what it takes to keep this party on track.  That's no shame.  He is a fine conservative.  

This party needs someone who can do the job and hopefully will make the right decisions going forward.   Judge our leaders based on facts, not emotions and a sense of geographical pride. 

Yeah, we may need to go door to door, but why did we ever stop going door to door in the first place?  What do the majority of the centrist public really know about us?  We know each other quite well, but I daresay that the majority of the voting public really don't know us at all as of late.  We do a whole lot of finger pointing at the democraps, but what are we holding up to the public?  I daresay it's mostly finger pointing and a paranoid sounding platform.  The message is not wrong, but the delivery of it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;I actually read all of the comments here and can say without a doubt that the Republican Party in Virginia is, indeed, in serious trouble.  I cannot believe the pettiness, childishness, and mob mentality that I see.  Are there, or are there not, some basic principles of being a Republican?  If so, then if any person toes the lines of those basic principles, they are indeed a Republican.  I know that Jeff Frederick is a fine Republican.  He just didn&#8217;t have what it takes to keep this party on track.  That&#8217;s no shame.  He is a fine conservative.  </p>
<p>This party needs someone who can do the job and hopefully will make the right decisions going forward.   Judge our leaders based on facts, not emotions and a sense of geographical pride. </p>
<p>Yeah, we may need to go door to door, but why did we ever stop going door to door in the first place?  What do the majority of the centrist public really know about us?  We know each other quite well, but I daresay that the majority of the voting public really don&#8217;t know us at all as of late.  We do a whole lot of finger pointing at the democraps, but what are we holding up to the public?  I daresay it&#8217;s mostly finger pointing and a paranoid sounding platform.  The message is not wrong, but the delivery of it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWCheney</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83359</link>
		<dc:creator>AWCheney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83359</guid>
		<description>Excellent analysis, Groveton...and I also checked out your site.  It is balanced, which is very difficult to accomplish...that's something to which I can speak.  I tried blogging, the hard way.  I put an enormous amount of research into my posts, but was unable to continue due to illness.  I'm hoping that I'll be able to pick it up again.  I truly wish you luck with it...we need some balance out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent analysis, Groveton&#8230;and I also checked out your site.  It is balanced, which is very difficult to accomplish&#8230;that&#8217;s something to which I can speak.  I tried blogging, the hard way.  I put an enormous amount of research into my posts, but was unable to continue due to illness.  I&#8217;m hoping that I&#8217;ll be able to pick it up again.  I truly wish you luck with it&#8230;we need some balance out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Groveton</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83358</link>
		<dc:creator>Groveton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83358</guid>
		<description>Nova Scout:

Glad you liked the site.  I have to tip my hat to Greg L - it's hard work keeping a blog site going.  Anyway, this should be a very interesting race.  McDonnell is going be a real tough candidate to beat.  He lives in Tidewater, he's part of the Richmond establishment and he grew up in Northern Virginia.  He's Republican so he'll do well in the western part of the state.  He'll lose in the urban areas in southern Virginia - places like Petersburg and the City of Richmond have become "no go" zones for Republican candidates.  He sweep the western counties although there aren't that many votes there.  He'll take Tidewater with ease.  Which brings us back to two key areas - Northern Virginia and suburban Richmond.  If the Dems have either Moran or McAulliffe - I think they will struggle against McDonnell.  He's going to get enough votes in NoVA to win (even though he'll lose NoVA to either of them).  Deeds has a better chance.  He'll get votes in NoVA just by being a Democrat (and a genuinely good guy).  He'll do well in suburban Richmond and will wim nore votes than people thing in the western counties (He's from Bath County).

Of course, all of this will change if McAulliffe runs up a campaign war chest that is 2X - 3X the nearest competitor.  His relentless "I will create jobs" might play better than expected outside NoVA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nova Scout:</p>
<p>Glad you liked the site.  I have to tip my hat to Greg L - it&#8217;s hard work keeping a blog site going.  Anyway, this should be a very interesting race.  McDonnell is going be a real tough candidate to beat.  He lives in Tidewater, he&#8217;s part of the Richmond establishment and he grew up in Northern Virginia.  He&#8217;s Republican so he&#8217;ll do well in the western part of the state.  He&#8217;ll lose in the urban areas in southern Virginia - places like Petersburg and the City of Richmond have become &#8220;no go&#8221; zones for Republican candidates.  He sweep the western counties although there aren&#8217;t that many votes there.  He&#8217;ll take Tidewater with ease.  Which brings us back to two key areas - Northern Virginia and suburban Richmond.  If the Dems have either Moran or McAulliffe - I think they will struggle against McDonnell.  He&#8217;s going to get enough votes in NoVA to win (even though he&#8217;ll lose NoVA to either of them).  Deeds has a better chance.  He&#8217;ll get votes in NoVA just by being a Democrat (and a genuinely good guy).  He&#8217;ll do well in suburban Richmond and will wim nore votes than people thing in the western counties (He&#8217;s from Bath County).</p>
<p>Of course, all of this will change if McAulliffe runs up a campaign war chest that is 2X - 3X the nearest competitor.  His relentless &#8220;I will create jobs&#8221; might play better than expected outside NoVA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWCheney</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83352</link>
		<dc:creator>AWCheney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83352</guid>
		<description>Let me give you a better analogy.  Bush set up the play, and Obama is making the touchdown.  That should satisfy the jocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me give you a better analogy.  Bush set up the play, and Obama is making the touchdown.  That should satisfy the jocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWCheney</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83351</link>
		<dc:creator>AWCheney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83351</guid>
		<description>"...or, one could argue, moving towards paying for what we spend, and trying in some responsible fashion to clean up the cluster-**** that was made for him."

As I told someone recently BPCAU, Bush started the slalom run, and Obama is finishing the country off.  So, in effect, you did vote for Bush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;or, one could argue, moving towards paying for what we spend, and trying in some responsible fashion to clean up the cluster-**** that was made for him.&#8221;</p>
<p>As I told someone recently BPCAU, Bush started the slalom run, and Obama is finishing the country off.  So, in effect, you did vote for Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoVA Scout</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83350</link>
		<dc:creator>NoVA Scout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83350</guid>
		<description>Groveton - I linked.  Liked the site. Thought you summed it up well.  What's an objective guy like you doing hanging out here?   My take on this has been that Deeds is their best candidate, but I'm sort of hoping that the Dems will boot it away by running one of the other two.  I also can see a scenario developing where we get a boost if the external economy is still in the tank come autumn and there is large-scale dissatisfaction among voters with the tax and economic policies of the Obama/Dem Congress regime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Groveton - I linked.  Liked the site. Thought you summed it up well.  What&#8217;s an objective guy like you doing hanging out here?   My take on this has been that Deeds is their best candidate, but I&#8217;m sort of hoping that the Dems will boot it away by running one of the other two.  I also can see a scenario developing where we get a boost if the external economy is still in the tank come autumn and there is large-scale dissatisfaction among voters with the tax and economic policies of the Obama/Dem Congress regime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Groveton</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83349</link>
		<dc:creator>Groveton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 03:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83349</guid>
		<description>AWC - My votes are mixed.  For example, I voted for Frank Wolf.

But enough of the past.

Here is my first analysis of the upcoming governor's race (11/09):

http://grovetonsvirginia.wordpress.com/

I am trying to keep it even-handed.  Let me know if I succeeded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AWC - My votes are mixed.  For example, I voted for Frank Wolf.</p>
<p>But enough of the past.</p>
<p>Here is my first analysis of the upcoming governor&#8217;s race (11/09):</p>
<p><a href="http://grovetonsvirginia.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://grovetonsvirginia.wordpress.com/</a></p>
<p>I am trying to keep it even-handed.  Let me know if I succeeded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BothPartiesColludeAgainstUs</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83346</link>
		<dc:creator>BothPartiesColludeAgainstUs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 01:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/04/jeff-frederick-removed/#comment-83346</guid>
		<description>"helped put Obama in charge of the raping of the American taxpayer and their progeny"

or, one could argue, moving towards paying for what we spend, and trying in some responsible fashion to clean up the cluster-**** that was made for him.

Everyone who voted for Bush should just have the ***damn sense to just never vote again.  Just withhold your opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;helped put Obama in charge of the raping of the American taxpayer and their progeny&#8221;</p>
<p>or, one could argue, moving towards paying for what we spend, and trying in some responsible fashion to clean up the cluster-**** that was made for him.</p>
<p>Everyone who voted for Bush should just have the ***damn sense to just never vote again.  Just withhold your opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

