<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ken Cuccinelli For Attorney General</title>
	<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/</link>
	<description>Blog-Fu for Prince William, Manassas and Manassas Park politics.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Greg L</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84545</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84545</guid>
		<description>Do you even know anything about E-Verify?  What makes you say it would raise costs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you even know anything about E-Verify?  What makes you say it would raise costs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84544</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 22:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84544</guid>
		<description>I stand corrected on the stats.  But you're wrong on the unemployment. 

The vast majority of unemployed Virginians refuse to do the jobs that illegal aliens do. Those jobs generally involve sweat and dirt.  

How many native Virginians do you see waiting at 7-11 for day jobs? 

Zero.

Big government has eliminated far more jobs than 300,000 illegals have taken. Forcing E-verify on Virginia's businesses will eliminate even more jobs because it will raise the cost of employment even more.

Illegals are bad. Creating government bureaucracies is worse.

How about shutting the door to LEGAL immigration?  Most of the illegals come to stay with naturalized relatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand corrected on the stats.  But you&#8217;re wrong on the unemployment. </p>
<p>The vast majority of unemployed Virginians refuse to do the jobs that illegal aliens do. Those jobs generally involve sweat and dirt.  </p>
<p>How many native Virginians do you see waiting at 7-11 for day jobs? </p>
<p>Zero.</p>
<p>Big government has eliminated far more jobs than 300,000 illegals have taken. Forcing E-verify on Virginia&#8217;s businesses will eliminate even more jobs because it will raise the cost of employment even more.</p>
<p>Illegals are bad. Creating government bureaucracies is worse.</p>
<p>How about shutting the door to LEGAL immigration?  Most of the illegals come to stay with naturalized relatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg L</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84526</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 03:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84526</guid>
		<description>The commonwealth institute, which is rather friendly to illegal aliens conservatively estimates the Virginia illegal alien population at 300,000.  The U.S. Census estimates the total VA population at 7,769,089, yielding an illegal alien population at 3.86%.  You're underestimating by at least half.

The current Virginia unemployment rate is 6.8%, so it we replaced illegal aliens illegally holding jobs with unemployed Virginians, we'd likely cut our unemployment rate in half.  For those legal Virginians that would benefit, the results would be tremendous.  For those of us living in the midst of illegal aliens and suffering the negative impacts they impose, it would be no less beneficial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The commonwealth institute, which is rather friendly to illegal aliens conservatively estimates the Virginia illegal alien population at 300,000.  The U.S. Census estimates the total VA population at 7,769,089, yielding an illegal alien population at 3.86%.  You&#8217;re underestimating by at least half.</p>
<p>The current Virginia unemployment rate is 6.8%, so it we replaced illegal aliens illegally holding jobs with unemployed Virginians, we&#8217;d likely cut our unemployment rate in half.  For those legal Virginians that would benefit, the results would be tremendous.  For those of us living in the midst of illegal aliens and suffering the negative impacts they impose, it would be no less beneficial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84524</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 02:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84524</guid>
		<description>This is a tough question. Conservatives, or at least, lovers of liberty, have two conflicting desires here.

1. We want limited government, less government bureaucracy, and less government intrusion into the lives of individuals and businesses.

2. We want to protect our country from illegal aliens.

Any solution to problem #2 that violates principle #1 is unacceptable.

If you look at the threat from big government versus the threat of illegal aliens, it looks to me like big government is much more dangerous.

I'm not keen on illegal aliens, but I'm definitely against being forced to pay for using some government database, whether it works or not.

John Brownlee has been the face of the federal government bureaucracy for the past ten years of his life.  He thinks in terms of more government to solve our problems.  This is obvious from his answer.

I can't say I'm terribly impressed with Cuccinelli's answer either.

In my part of Virginia the alien population is less than 2%, much less the illegal alien population. 

Any votes for sticking with the laws we already have on this subject?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a tough question. Conservatives, or at least, lovers of liberty, have two conflicting desires here.</p>
<p>1. We want limited government, less government bureaucracy, and less government intrusion into the lives of individuals and businesses.</p>
<p>2. We want to protect our country from illegal aliens.</p>
<p>Any solution to problem #2 that violates principle #1 is unacceptable.</p>
<p>If you look at the threat from big government versus the threat of illegal aliens, it looks to me like big government is much more dangerous.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not keen on illegal aliens, but I&#8217;m definitely against being forced to pay for using some government database, whether it works or not.</p>
<p>John Brownlee has been the face of the federal government bureaucracy for the past ten years of his life.  He thinks in terms of more government to solve our problems.  This is obvious from his answer.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m terribly impressed with Cuccinelli&#8217;s answer either.</p>
<p>In my part of Virginia the alien population is less than 2%, much less the illegal alien population. </p>
<p>Any votes for sticking with the laws we already have on this subject?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84298</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 11:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84298</guid>
		<description>Can we go to 7-Eleven, and hire a few illegals to protest for us, as we are too lazy to do it ourselves?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we go to 7-Eleven, and hire a few illegals to protest for us, as we are too lazy to do it ourselves?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84286</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 17:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84286</guid>
		<description>The Patriot (Got E-Verify?) said on 1 May 2009 at 9:46 pm: Flag comment 

ALERT…ALERT…ALERT
Start calling and emailing Warner and Webb about voting NO on Amnesty (pathway to citizenship) for illegal immigrants! Keep the pressure on folks!

Call Webb and Warner??  Hell, take to the steets just like the "amigos" do then we'll see some change.  The need to be confronted by the masses, not telephone calls!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Patriot (Got E-Verify?) said on 1 May 2009 at 9:46 pm: Flag comment </p>
<p>ALERT…ALERT…ALERT<br />
Start calling and emailing Warner and Webb about voting NO on Amnesty (pathway to citizenship) for illegal immigrants! Keep the pressure on folks!</p>
<p>Call Webb and Warner??  Hell, take to the steets just like the &#8220;amigos&#8221; do then we&#8217;ll see some change.  The need to be confronted by the masses, not telephone calls!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Patriot (Got E-Verify?)</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84275</link>
		<dc:creator>The Patriot (Got E-Verify?)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 02:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84275</guid>
		<description>ALERT...ALERT...ALERT
Start calling and emailing Warner and Webb about voting NO on Amnesty (pathway to citizenship) for illegal immigrants! Keep the pressure on folks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ALERT&#8230;ALERT&#8230;ALERT<br />
Start calling and emailing Warner and Webb about voting NO on Amnesty (pathway to citizenship) for illegal immigrants! Keep the pressure on folks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynic</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84274</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 01:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84274</guid>
		<description>A slight change of pace.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/05/01/severin_suspended_for_comments_about_mexican_immigrants/

"Jay Severin, the fiery right wing talk show host on Boston's WTKK-FM radio station, was suspended yesterday after calling Mexican immigrants "criminaliens," "primitives," "leeches," and exporters of "women with mustaches and VD," among other incendiary comments"

Isn't that interesting! Basically he was suspended for stating the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A slight change of pace.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/05/01/severin_suspended_for_comments_about_mexican_immigrants/" rel="nofollow">http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/05/01/severin_suspended_for_comments_about_mexican_immigrants/</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Jay Severin, the fiery right wing talk show host on Boston&#8217;s WTKK-FM radio station, was suspended yesterday after calling Mexican immigrants &#8220;criminaliens,&#8221; &#8220;primitives,&#8221; &#8220;leeches,&#8221; and exporters of &#8220;women with mustaches and VD,&#8221; among other incendiary comments&#8221;</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t that interesting! Basically he was suspended for stating the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84272</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 01:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84272</guid>
		<description>Not so fast here:  Cuccinelli OPPOSED e-Verify because the business community and the chamber, and NFIB all opposed e-Verify.  BTW, if Cucc is the nominee it virtually assures Shannon will be elected.  Cucc is a bad candidate with a ton of baggage and simply will not play</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so fast here:  Cuccinelli OPPOSED e-Verify because the business community and the chamber, and NFIB all opposed e-Verify.  BTW, if Cucc is the nominee it virtually assures Shannon will be elected.  Cucc is a bad candidate with a ton of baggage and simply will not play</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loudoun Insider</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84270</link>
		<dc:creator>Loudoun Insider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 00:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84270</guid>
		<description>Brownlee is a good conservative with the credentials to win the job in November.  Cuccinelli has too many problems, most are simply perception problems, but he won't be able to fix them.  He's already having trouble raising money as an AG candidate:

http://tooconservative.com/?p=3872</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brownlee is a good conservative with the credentials to win the job in November.  Cuccinelli has too many problems, most are simply perception problems, but he won&#8217;t be able to fix them.  He&#8217;s already having trouble raising money as an AG candidate:</p>
<p><a href="http://tooconservative.com/?p=3872" rel="nofollow">http://tooconservative.com/?p=3872</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brittancus</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84269</link>
		<dc:creator>Brittancus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 23:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84269</guid>
		<description>U.S. Reps. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz states she has a replacement for E-VERIFY?  But with all the lies our Politicians tell us, such as no more AMNESTIES, or completing the Border Fence, how can we--THE PEOPLE--tell fact from fiction?   Is this so-called replacement just an intentional hold-up while the negotiate secret committee's to push another path to citizenship, as which the 1986 was a catastrophe and and downright fraud.  The parasite businesses that hire illegal workers remain unscathed up to now, but E-Verify would put an end to that large profit run.  It's easy to work off the books, so that they pay nothing towards the upkeep of their illegal labor, while the US taxpayer subsidizes both.  So battle stations are being called in the next months and anti-illegal aliens advocates are ready for the fight. E-Verify should be a permanent instrument and not just for new workers to determine illegal labor in the workplace?

May 1st, is going to show the American taxpayer where their taxes are going?  Millions of people ready to demonstrate in the streets, for comprehensive Immigration reform and will probably get it under the Democratic-Socialist majority. If they become de facto legal the consequences will be very expensive for the population, because then we will be adding to the hundreds of billions of dollars already extracted from your paycheck in Federal mandates for benefits. Remember with another Amnesty it will be a commitment for billions of unseen dollars, being appropriated. Once legalized the newcomers can sponsor their whole family group adding to the chaos, and more money to support them. After this 2nd Amnesty the next waves of impoverished will keep coming--and never stopping.

Those who sponsor immigrants who are relatives sign an affidavit of financial support and must shoulder financial responsibility by law. But it is riddled with loopholes, so new arrivals and their U.S.-born children (anchor  Babies--intentional misinterpretation of emancipation for African Slaves after the Civil War) often become lifelong public burdens. A blockbuster example is the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). Economics writer Ed Rubenstein’s new report, “The Earned Income Tax Credit and Illegal Immigration: A Study in Fraud, Abuse, and Liberal Activism,” The author says immigrants collected about $12 billion from the EITC last year, the majority not paying a cent towards it. Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation found high school-dropouts-who headed households pay an average of $9,700 a year in taxes but collect an average of $32,138 a year in benefits. All this money in real dollars is procured from unaware taxpayers. Surf NUMBERSUSA for the truth not the propaganda you expect for the open border zealots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. Reps. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz states she has a replacement for E-VERIFY?  But with all the lies our Politicians tell us, such as no more AMNESTIES, or completing the Border Fence, how can we&#8211;THE PEOPLE&#8211;tell fact from fiction?   Is this so-called replacement just an intentional hold-up while the negotiate secret committee&#8217;s to push another path to citizenship, as which the 1986 was a catastrophe and and downright fraud.  The parasite businesses that hire illegal workers remain unscathed up to now, but E-Verify would put an end to that large profit run.  It&#8217;s easy to work off the books, so that they pay nothing towards the upkeep of their illegal labor, while the US taxpayer subsidizes both.  So battle stations are being called in the next months and anti-illegal aliens advocates are ready for the fight. E-Verify should be a permanent instrument and not just for new workers to determine illegal labor in the workplace?</p>
<p>May 1st, is going to show the American taxpayer where their taxes are going?  Millions of people ready to demonstrate in the streets, for comprehensive Immigration reform and will probably get it under the Democratic-Socialist majority. If they become de facto legal the consequences will be very expensive for the population, because then we will be adding to the hundreds of billions of dollars already extracted from your paycheck in Federal mandates for benefits. Remember with another Amnesty it will be a commitment for billions of unseen dollars, being appropriated. Once legalized the newcomers can sponsor their whole family group adding to the chaos, and more money to support them. After this 2nd Amnesty the next waves of impoverished will keep coming&#8211;and never stopping.</p>
<p>Those who sponsor immigrants who are relatives sign an affidavit of financial support and must shoulder financial responsibility by law. But it is riddled with loopholes, so new arrivals and their U.S.-born children (anchor  Babies&#8211;intentional misinterpretation of emancipation for African Slaves after the Civil War) often become lifelong public burdens. A blockbuster example is the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). Economics writer Ed Rubenstein’s new report, “The Earned Income Tax Credit and Illegal Immigration: A Study in Fraud, Abuse, and Liberal Activism,” The author says immigrants collected about $12 billion from the EITC last year, the majority not paying a cent towards it. Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation found high school-dropouts-who headed households pay an average of $9,700 a year in taxes but collect an average of $32,138 a year in benefits. All this money in real dollars is procured from unaware taxpayers. Surf NUMBERSUSA for the truth not the propaganda you expect for the open border zealots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84268</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 23:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84268</guid>
		<description>Cuccinelli sometimes reminds me of Winston Churchill: 
"There are a lot of lies about me going around, but some of them are true." 
this is the third time that Brownlee has pointed out something from Cuccinelli's record, and Cuccinelli's nuts respond with how hard Cuccinelli is on this issue--but the facts speak for themselves despite ALL THE CAPS USED BY CUCCINELLI'S SUPPORTERS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cuccinelli sometimes reminds me of Winston Churchill:<br />
&#8220;There are a lot of lies about me going around, but some of them are true.&#8221;<br />
this is the third time that Brownlee has pointed out something from Cuccinelli&#8217;s record, and Cuccinelli&#8217;s nuts respond with how hard Cuccinelli is on this issue&#8211;but the facts speak for themselves despite ALL THE CAPS USED BY CUCCINELLI&#8217;S SUPPORTERS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DPortM</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84263</link>
		<dc:creator>DPortM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 15:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84263</guid>
		<description>I spoke with a state government official who knows both Brownlee and Cuccinelli. I was told that both men are equally good candidates and that they are virtually the same on the relevant issues facing Virginia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spoke with a state government official who knows both Brownlee and Cuccinelli. I was told that both men are equally good candidates and that they are virtually the same on the relevant issues facing Virginia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Advocator</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84262</link>
		<dc:creator>Advocator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 15:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84262</guid>
		<description>OK.  Now there's a McDonnell ad.  That's better.  I thought maybe you had pulled a "Specter" on us, Greg. 

Instead of trashing either candidate and trying to decide whom to vote for by reading remarks on this (or any) blog, I've signed up for a couple of "meet and greets" and will talk to the candidates personally.  I suggest others do the same.  Brownlee's is next Wednesday and Ken's is Friday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK.  Now there&#8217;s a McDonnell ad.  That&#8217;s better.  I thought maybe you had pulled a &#8220;Specter&#8221; on us, Greg. </p>
<p>Instead of trashing either candidate and trying to decide whom to vote for by reading remarks on this (or any) blog, I&#8217;ve signed up for a couple of &#8220;meet and greets&#8221; and will talk to the candidates personally.  I suggest others do the same.  Brownlee&#8217;s is next Wednesday and Ken&#8217;s is Friday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Advocator</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84260</link>
		<dc:creator>Advocator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 14:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84260</guid>
		<description>I like this ad at the bottom of the page:  "Organize for Brian Moran
Help us to elect Virginia's next Democratic Governor."  What's up wid that, Greg?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this ad at the bottom of the page:  &#8220;Organize for Brian Moran<br />
Help us to elect Virginia&#8217;s next Democratic Governor.&#8221;  What&#8217;s up wid that, Greg?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Advocator</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84259</link>
		<dc:creator>Advocator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 14:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84259</guid>
		<description>Aren't debates like this recorded?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t debates like this recorded?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84257</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 12:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84257</guid>
		<description>Does this surprise anyone, that a politician will say anything to get elected?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this surprise anyone, that a politician will say anything to get elected?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoVA Scout</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84255</link>
		<dc:creator>NoVA Scout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 09:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84255</guid>
		<description>The Cuccinelli/Brownlee struggle appears to be one between an unelectable candidate and a candidate who is striving to become unelectable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cuccinelli/Brownlee struggle appears to be one between an unelectable candidate and a candidate who is striving to become unelectable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg L</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84253</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 02:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84253</guid>
		<description>Man, the level of desperation here is simply unreal.  Save The Old Dominion was formed just before the start of the 2007 session of the General Assembly.  We lobbied in 2007 and 2008.

I guess I hit some raw nerves in the Brownlee camp.  Good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, the level of desperation here is simply unreal.  Save The Old Dominion was formed just before the start of the 2007 session of the General Assembly.  We lobbied in 2007 and 2008.</p>
<p>I guess I hit some raw nerves in the Brownlee camp.  Good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84252</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 01:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/04/30/ken-cuccinelli-for-attorney-general/#comment-84252</guid>
		<description>Help Save Mannassas is only two years old, but you've been lobbying on behalf of STOD for several years!?!  Per this blog Save the Old Dominion was formed December of 2007. So, a year and half is several years. This is a crock of stinking doo-doo, and he knows it. Your words apply to you too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Help Save Mannassas is only two years old, but you&#8217;ve been lobbying on behalf of STOD for several years!?!  Per this blog Save the Old Dominion was formed December of 2007. So, a year and half is several years. This is a crock of stinking doo-doo, and he knows it. Your words apply to you too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

