Driving liberals, dhimmis and illegal alien apologists absolutely insane since 2005...

Obama-Care Makes America Sick

By Greg L | 24 July 2009 | National Politics | 11 Comments

Guest Post by Sanford D. Horn

“The American people are understandably queasy.” – Barack Hussein Obama, July 22, 2009

What is making the American people queasy is a Congress that does not pay attention to those who hired them in the first place. What is making the American people queasy is a Congress that does not do the job for which it was hired. What is making the American people queasy is the possibility of a healthcare program run by the Federal Government – after all, we all know how well the government has run the postal service, the department of motor vehicles and the public school system.

In a press conference that revealed nothing except Obama’s serious lack of a grasp on reality and a mostly sycophantic, fawning press, the state of capitalism, free choice and a first class medical system are on the critical list with doctors and nurses fleeing from the patient.

Actually the possibility of doctors and nurses leaving their chosen professions is approaching reality as their incomes will drop, and they will lose many of the freedoms they and their patients currently enjoy. Yet, Obama claimed his plan is supported by the American Medical Association and the American Nursing Association. However, the reality is that only 20 to 30 percent of AMA doctors support the plan and seven other medical societies have weighed in against the plan. Medical and nursing school will still cost an arm and a leg, but the days of top salaries will be a thing of the past. Obama all but admitted as much during his press lecture when he said that “we will cut medical costs.”

How will that happen? Via a drop in salaries? Cutting the cost of medical care? Cutting the cost of drugs? Obama mentioned having the support of the traditionally left of center AARP, which would make one think they could help cut the cost of medical care and drugs. However, those companies use profits to support candidates like Obama, so no chance of cutting the cost of medical care or drugs. Drug companies should not be begrudged their profits as they are the ones who conduct the research and development of the new drugs that are needed to fight diseases as well as the irresponsible behavior of Americans who live haphazard lives and expect government to take car of them womb to tomb and cradle to grave. Consider the amount of trial and error involved in R and D, thus the profit margin. This is a capitalist society and companies are entitled to reap the rewards produced by their risks and investments and make a profit.

Medical care in and of itself will wane simply because Obama is seeking to level the playing field to ensure that we all have worse care. He claims Americans pay $6,000 more per person than any other developed country – that is disingenuous as one cannot compare the United States to other countries with dissimilar populations and economies. Do we want health care a la Cuba, Sweden or even Great Britain, for example? Americans are not fleeing this country for health care overseas; just the opposite as thousands of foreigners are literally dying to get into the United States for medical treatment.

However, remember this is not really about health care, but instead health insurance. Obama noted there are allegedly 47 million people in the United States living sans health insurance, saying, “I want to cover everybody,” all but guaranteeing a rise in the cost of premiums to cover the uninsured. And it begs the questions, how many of the 47 million are in the United States illegally and how many simply choose not to be insured. Before Obama officially becomes the clone of Fidel Castro, he needs to be reminded that not having insurance is also a choice people in this country can make.

Obama asserted that people should be able to get affordable health care. Agreed; but it should not be thrust upon the American people; after all this is still a country of individual choice and personal responsibility. Additionally, demonstrating that this is about health insurance and not health care, Obama said he has a goal to “take [the] profit motive out” of the insurance companies adding that they are “making record-breaking profits.” That’s the American way – capitalism in action. The Obama desire to curtail that process is him tipping his own hand showing his cards leading this country down a path toward socialism.

Obama also demonstrated his “don’t do as I say, do as I do” attitude when he condemned the politics of health care, saying it should not be a political volleyball. Yet, in the very next sentence, he blamed two Republicans, not by name, for attempting to stymie his plan without mentioning the Blue Dog Democrats who may (hopefully) sink this dastardly bill – a bill he himself has yet to read. Fortunately, Obama does not get to vote on it. Unfortunately, the people for whom it is the responsibility to read such legislation prior to voting yea or nay have yet to do so either. This is their job. This is what they were sent to Washington to do and they are neglecting their sworn duties. If they are not willing to do their jobs the voters must do theirs and replace these indolent weasels.

Not only are the members of Congress not reading the legislation they are writing, but they are being implored by Obama to pass the bill into law prior to taking their August recess. This is one time I am endorsing the Congressional recess, and for two reasons – when they are idle, they can do no harm and when they return to their home districts they will get earfuls from their constituents to hopefully get them to see the light and crush this feeble legislation into dust.

After all, why the rush to passage before the recess? Oh, because of the fear of the people threatening to vote against their representatives en masse in 2010 and denying Obama a perpetual Democratic majority in Congress to do his bidding. So much for the Obama promise of transparency.

And if Obama-care is so great, why has not every member of Congress signed on for it as their own family plan? Perhaps because there is a provision on page 16 of the 1,018-page monstrosity making individual private medical insurance illegal. If Ted Kennedy needs medical attention, every effort will be made to keep him alive, while simultaneously, grandma will be subjected to being cast upon an ice float in the Arctic. Conversely, Obama bragged about the great policies he and Congress have. Why are the American people not entitled to that plan? Perhaps the stars were not as fully aligned as Obama claimed they were during his press conference.

Another ridiculous part of the plan requires all employers to cover all employees. This will only lead to increased unemployment as employers who can not afford such a stringent coverage policy will simply cut their work force. And to what extent will employees actually be covered? When did employer provided health insurance become a right and not a privilege? Instead of the government dictating the policy, there should be more competition amongst health care providers and everybody will benefit.

Contact your representatives, or the Capitol switchboard at 202-224-3121 to find your representative, demand that they first read the “health care for all Americans” bill, then vote against it, thus preserving what is currently the best health care in the world.

Sanford D. Horn is a writer and political consultant living in Alexandria, VA.

The opinions expressed here are solely the views of the author, and not representative of the position of any organization, political party, doughnut shop, knitting guild, or waste recycling facility, but may be correctly attributed to the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy. If anything in the above article has offended you, please click here to receive an immediate apology.

BVBL is not a charity and your support is not tax-deductible.

You can follow the discussion through the Comments feed. You can also pingback or trackback from your own site.


  1. Bridget said on 24 Jul 2009 at 1:28 pm:
    Flag comment


  2. TDB said on 24 Jul 2009 at 2:19 pm:
    Flag comment

    I liked one comment from some Congressmen or Senator: ‘We should spend as much time choosing health care as Obama took to select a puppy to live in the White House.’

  3. Bridget said on 24 Jul 2009 at 4:34 pm:
    Flag comment

    TDB… that comment came from one of the blue dog dems …. note CNN headline: GOP Rep. Compares Obama Picking a Puppy…


  4. Bob Wills said on 24 Jul 2009 at 5:29 pm:
    Flag comment

    Contact your representatives, or the Capitol switchboard at 202-224-3121 to find your representative, demand that they first read the “health care for all Americans” bill, then vote against it, thus preserving what is currently the best health care in the world.

    Sanford D. Horn is a writer and political consultant living in Alexandria

    If this is the best health care system in the world and needs no improvment then explain why a person in their 20’s who has worked and now has cancer that makes it impossible for them to work because they are so sick. They are now on SS disability and because that gives them “so much income” to live off of they do not qualify for medicade and can not get either medication or medical care paid for. The end result is they die as do many of the elderly who have to make a choice between eating and medication.

    What would be your solution to this real situation if it was one of your children or would you then as now not care?

    It is easy to criticize but hard to come up with solutions. Have a solution to what others are trying to fix and the tens of millions who have no health insurance is a real problem for this country.

  5. Bridget said on 25 Jul 2009 at 10:56 am:
    Flag comment

    We do have the best medical care in the world… but being the best is not the same as being perfect. I don’t know anyone who does not want health care reform. But what the dems are proposing is blindingly destructive.

    I have a 30 something relative who worked for years and now suffers a severe physical disability. She receives SS disability, medicaid and medicare to cover care not available under medicaid. She would love to work…but doing so would disqualify her for medical care. She is, in short, a ward of the state and the state demands that she gives up her freedom, choice and privacy.

    Fact is, once you qualify for SS disability you are eligible to access medicaid and/or medicare.





  6. Bridget said on 25 Jul 2009 at 11:27 am:
    Flag comment

    Forgot to add: A few reform solution suggestions:

    1) Lawsuits. You need to cap fees and damages in all 50 states. Obama has scoffed at the suggestion of tort reform for the simple reason that tort lawyers are big donors to the dems.

    2) Competition. Currently health insurance is not portable, transportable, or available in all 50 states.

    3) Government mandates that everyone must be treated at emergency rooms. I used to have a neighbor with four kids who regularly used the local hospital room for non-emergency health care. She had medicaid coverage but did not like making and waiting for appointments. Why does an aspirin or bandage cost $10 at the emergency room? Simple, because of the 10 people who went in before you and didn’t pay a dime.

  7. Sanford Horn said on 25 Jul 2009 at 11:52 am:
    Flag comment


    You raise some good points, but Bridget beat me to the punch on a response. She has offered up excellent points that I need not reiterate, but know that I had not planned on ignoring your questions. I am not a hit and run writer.


    Thanks for stepping up to the plate before I had a chance to get out of the dugout this morning!

  8. Bridget said on 25 Jul 2009 at 9:07 pm:
    Flag comment

    Sandford Horn,

    Thank you for hitting it out of the park with your article!

  9. Sanford Horn said on 25 Jul 2009 at 9:42 pm:
    Flag comment


    Thank you for your kind words. Pass the article around far and wide - people need to know what they’re in for.

  10. Bob Wills said on 27 Jul 2009 at 12:08 am:
    Flag comment

    What Bridget brought up is correct and there are so many things that need reform.

    The problem of law suits is brought up but what does the medical profession do to get the bad doctors out of the practice of medicine and nothing is done when a doctor moves to another state and gets a licence no matter that they had a problem inculding dieing patients in another state.

    Medicade is not guaranteed if you are on SS disability if you make more then that state sets as a maxium income.

    I still ask why can not every person in the country be allowed to buy the same health insurance policy that is offered to Congress and Federal Workers or to the State workers in the state in which you live?

    Night Line years ago did a segment on the cost of a heart attack at Georgetown Hospital. If you had insurance the charge was WAY less then then what was charged if you did not have insurance though the bill you saw did not show you what was actualy paid.

    Why does a clerk for the Insurance company have the right to stop your doctor from doing a surgery or procedure or prescribe what medication they belive will work the best for you and that is FACT today. I am not worried about the government getting involved in health care but I have had all kinds of problems with insurance company clerks playing doctor.

    At least something is trying to be done not the do nothing of the last 8 years.

    Where are the Pro Lifers who believe that people should live not die when so many people die in this country because of the lack of medical care or medication. Granted it is a slow slow dealth unlike abortion but it is still death.

  11. Pat,Herve said on 27 Jul 2009 at 11:50 am:
    Flag comment

    I worked for a California company that had a great medical plan - if you lived in California that is - all my doctors were out of network, and it cost me a bundle.

    I have allergies, and my Rx plan says that I must use over the counter medicine to treat it (my doctor says differently).

    Competition - in some states, a single insurer covers over 50% of people - how is that competition.

    The cost of insurance to companies is increasing at a rate greater than inflation - how do we contain that cost? (doing nothing is not an option).

    If I need surgery done, I need to get a pre-approval - can they deny me a surgery that my Doctor says I need? If not, then why a pre-approval? Is it just a way to deny my claim (a gimmick, gotcha).

Comments are closed.

Views: 1977