<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruttenberg Appeals</title>
	<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/07/24/ruttenberg-appeals/</link>
	<description>Blog-Fu for Prince William, Manassas and Manassas Park politics.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Leeper</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/07/24/ruttenberg-appeals/#comment-86616</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Leeper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/07/24/ruttenberg-appeals/#comment-86616</guid>
		<description>The image is very low resolution. I believe it has been scaled down. The original image should be much sharper--Greg, you may want to see if you can get the original and post it. It should have at least 450 lines of vertical resolution(assuming the use of a standard TV camera). This image has only 190 lines of vertical resolution. Also the horizontal resolution is much lower--this image only has 300p but the original should have 720p (again, assuming the use of a standard TV camera) In other words, this image is less than a quarter of the size of the original. Any gun should be easier to see on the original.

"This is the kind of stuff you see in th movies."

This is also the kind of stuff that makes you wonder what else is going on here that isn't being talked about, at least not in public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The image is very low resolution. I believe it has been scaled down. The original image should be much sharper&#8211;Greg, you may want to see if you can get the original and post it. It should have at least 450 lines of vertical resolution(assuming the use of a standard TV camera). This image has only 190 lines of vertical resolution. Also the horizontal resolution is much lower&#8211;this image only has 300p but the original should have 720p (again, assuming the use of a standard TV camera) In other words, this image is less than a quarter of the size of the original. Any gun should be easier to see on the original.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is the kind of stuff you see in th movies.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is also the kind of stuff that makes you wonder what else is going on here that isn&#8217;t being talked about, at least not in public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/07/24/ruttenberg-appeals/#comment-86615</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/07/24/ruttenberg-appeals/#comment-86615</guid>
		<description>Who is the judge/where was this latest decision made?

This craziness makes me wonder if the judge has some kind of connection that we're unaware of.

Since my resolution isn't top notch, is it possible that the black thing that looks like a gun is really a hand with a glove on it?  Other than that, I can't imagine what it could be besides a gun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is the judge/where was this latest decision made?</p>
<p>This craziness makes me wonder if the judge has some kind of connection that we&#8217;re unaware of.</p>
<p>Since my resolution isn&#8217;t top notch, is it possible that the black thing that looks like a gun is really a hand with a glove on it?  Other than that, I can&#8217;t imagine what it could be besides a gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me-n-u</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/07/24/ruttenberg-appeals/#comment-86611</link>
		<dc:creator>me-n-u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/07/24/ruttenberg-appeals/#comment-86611</guid>
		<description>I have talked to Dave and what he has to tell is just amazing. I too find it hard to believe that a police department would use the tactics they did to get Dave to leave.

This is the kind of stuff you see in th movies.

Hang in there Dave!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have talked to Dave and what he has to tell is just amazing. I too find it hard to believe that a police department would use the tactics they did to get Dave to leave.</p>
<p>This is the kind of stuff you see in th movies.</p>
<p>Hang in there Dave!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FormerCOMemployee</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/07/24/ruttenberg-appeals/#comment-86574</link>
		<dc:creator>FormerCOMemployee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/07/24/ruttenberg-appeals/#comment-86574</guid>
		<description>I have to say that I am usually 100% behind the police.  But this whole saga has me really thinking something crooked is happening here.  The PD using the ABC agents administrative inspection powers to conduct a raid is outrageous and thsi was clearly a raid.  It is on the same line as the PD following a zoning inspector into a house for the purpose of finding drugs without a search warrant.  This was clearly way beyond an administrative inspection by the ABC agents.  I went along on several ABC agents inspection during my time in Manassas and never saw one conducted in this fashion.  I have to agree with GL on this one, something is wrong here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say that I am usually 100% behind the police.  But this whole saga has me really thinking something crooked is happening here.  The PD using the ABC agents administrative inspection powers to conduct a raid is outrageous and thsi was clearly a raid.  It is on the same line as the PD following a zoning inspector into a house for the purpose of finding drugs without a search warrant.  This was clearly way beyond an administrative inspection by the ABC agents.  I went along on several ABC agents inspection during my time in Manassas and never saw one conducted in this fashion.  I have to agree with GL on this one, something is wrong here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loudoun Insider</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/07/24/ruttenberg-appeals/#comment-86566</link>
		<dc:creator>Loudoun Insider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/07/24/ruttenberg-appeals/#comment-86566</guid>
		<description>Why aren't more people outraged about this???  And where the f are the feds???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why aren&#8217;t more people outraged about this???  And where the f are the feds???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/07/24/ruttenberg-appeals/#comment-86559</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 02:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/07/24/ruttenberg-appeals/#comment-86559</guid>
		<description>How in the heck can a judge say there were no guns when there were?  That guy is smokin something, and it aint legal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How in the heck can a judge say there were no guns when there were?  That guy is smokin something, and it aint legal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

