<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seems Like A Valid Question To Me</title>
	<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/17/seems-like-a-valid-question-to-me/</link>
	<description>Blog-Fu for Prince William, Manassas and Manassas Park politics.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 17:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Max Power</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/17/seems-like-a-valid-question-to-me/#comment-88258</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/17/seems-like-a-valid-question-to-me/#comment-88258</guid>
		<description>Just noticed this thread. Nichols has been an advocate on the illegal immigration debate, Im going to give him the benefit of the doubt on this one. He still has my vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just noticed this thread. Nichols has been an advocate on the illegal immigration debate, Im going to give him the benefit of the doubt on this one. He still has my vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg L</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/17/seems-like-a-valid-question-to-me/#comment-88191</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/17/seems-like-a-valid-question-to-me/#comment-88191</guid>
		<description>Also of note it's unclear whether someone convicted ot "taking indecent liberties" would be eligible for a waiver, since that's not necessarily considered a violent crime.  I recall a few illegal aliens accused of child rape who plead down to "indecent liberties" charges, so this can't be all that uncommon.

It would have been very unfortunate if this had passed and allowed school boards to allow persons access to schools who had been convicted on taking indecent liberties with a child after pleading down from child molestation or rape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also of note it&#8217;s unclear whether someone convicted ot &#8220;taking indecent liberties&#8221; would be eligible for a waiver, since that&#8217;s not necessarily considered a violent crime.  I recall a few illegal aliens accused of child rape who plead down to &#8220;indecent liberties&#8221; charges, so this can&#8217;t be all that uncommon.</p>
<p>It would have been very unfortunate if this had passed and allowed school boards to allow persons access to schools who had been convicted on taking indecent liberties with a child after pleading down from child molestation or rape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotTimothyGeithner</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/17/seems-like-a-valid-question-to-me/#comment-88190</link>
		<dc:creator>NotTimothyGeithner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/17/seems-like-a-valid-question-to-me/#comment-88190</guid>
		<description>What exactly is the reasoning behind this? I'm all for forgiveness but not allowing sexual predators into schools seems like a no-brainer. I suppose the employer could have multiple projects and shouldn't be denied if he had a sexual predator at another project, but I have no idea why the waiver should ever allow a sexual predator into a school. This is a valid question that raises question about judgement or attention to one's job. 

Not only did the Dems' then-future AG nominee vote against it, Moran, who I believe was endorsed by Nichols, voted against it. They made it easy on the party backbenchers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What exactly is the reasoning behind this? I&#8217;m all for forgiveness but not allowing sexual predators into schools seems like a no-brainer. I suppose the employer could have multiple projects and shouldn&#8217;t be denied if he had a sexual predator at another project, but I have no idea why the waiver should ever allow a sexual predator into a school. This is a valid question that raises question about judgement or attention to one&#8217;s job. </p>
<p>Not only did the Dems&#8217; then-future AG nominee vote against it, Moran, who I believe was endorsed by Nichols, voted against it. They made it easy on the party backbenchers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lake Ridge Resident</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/17/seems-like-a-valid-question-to-me/#comment-88189</link>
		<dc:creator>Lake Ridge Resident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/17/seems-like-a-valid-question-to-me/#comment-88189</guid>
		<description>Hmmmmm, I didn't even know about HB 1481, but this whole deal tends to make one wonder but what there just may be some particular sensitivity here concerning the issue of sexual predators.  Did I miss something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmmm, I didn&#8217;t even know about HB 1481, but this whole deal tends to make one wonder but what there just may be some particular sensitivity here concerning the issue of sexual predators.  Did I miss something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

