<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is PWCH Becoming Anti-Christian?</title>
	<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/</link>
	<description>Blog-Fu for Prince William, Manassas and Manassas Park politics.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 17:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Karla H</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88523</link>
		<dc:creator>Karla H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 02:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88523</guid>
		<description>"costs do not always follow supply and demand - just look at the oil prices of the past few years."  Oops... that sounds like a good argument FOR socialized health care (and government instituted price controls).

Capitalism works... up until corruption enters.  Socialism doesn't work... and it breeds corruption. 

Sounds like we must concentrate on eliminating corruption if we want to preserve our freedom (or what little of it we have left).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;costs do not always follow supply and demand - just look at the oil prices of the past few years.&#8221;  Oops&#8230; that sounds like a good argument FOR socialized health care (and government instituted price controls).</p>
<p>Capitalism works&#8230; up until corruption enters.  Socialism doesn&#8217;t work&#8230; and it breeds corruption. </p>
<p>Sounds like we must concentrate on eliminating corruption if we want to preserve our freedom (or what little of it we have left).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88452</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88452</guid>
		<description>Seems like a good time to take a deep breath. Based on what Greg himself acknowledges in the post is thin anecdotal evidence, Novant Health is being accused of being both anti-Christian and Marxist. Talk about overheated, crazy rhetoric! And then we have a grab bag of completely unrelated issues such as same sex relationships and illegal immigration thrown in for good measure.

As others have already pointed out, businesses have the right to control the use of their facilities. This includes their computers and internet connections. They have valid business and security reasons for doing this. It sometimes results in blocking of access that seems odd, but that hardly makes the business evil. Filtering content is hardly an exact science. I can provide my own anecdotal evidence of this.

The Northern Virginia hospital where my wife worked for nearly a quarter century had (like all hospitals) internet filtering software as well as filters to block certain content from hospital e-mail accounts. My daughter, who was working for a health related non-profit at the time, sent an e-mail from her work e-mail to my wife's hospital e-mail related to a medical issue using perfectly proper terms for various parts of the human anatomy. The e-mail was blocked. This e-mail was not the target of the filtering, but it was caught in the same net. 

At around the same time I was working for a company that had an extremely rigid internet policy. They blocked most everything. My daughter sent me an e-mail with a link to the Alzheimer's Association. The site was blocked by my employer. Seemed laughable to me, but it was their computer and their internet connection and they had the right to block anything they pleased. I suppose I could have followed the example of this post and started complaining that my employer was PRO-Alzheimer's and wanted people to suffer with the disease. But that would be crazy, wouldn't it?

Finally, I know a little bit about Novant Health. We have moved to North Carolina and my wife now works for them. My grandson was also born in one of their hospitals. They are a first class organization. When I read that Prince William had been purchased by Novant and told my wife her reaction was that it would be a great thing for Prince William. I suspect most of the employees will feel that way in time. It is natural for there to be anxiety over the changes that come with new ownership in any business. I strongly suspect that is what is behind this overheated silliness about being a bunch of anti-Christian Marxists.

As far as Blessed RN's statement that "PWC and Manassas are different from where they’re from" goes, I suspect you would be quite comfortable here. There seems to be a much wider presumption here that we all share the same Christian beliefs than I ever saw in Northern Virginia (including Prince William County). That goes for the area in general and for the conversations I have overheard or been part of inside Novant facilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like a good time to take a deep breath. Based on what Greg himself acknowledges in the post is thin anecdotal evidence, Novant Health is being accused of being both anti-Christian and Marxist. Talk about overheated, crazy rhetoric! And then we have a grab bag of completely unrelated issues such as same sex relationships and illegal immigration thrown in for good measure.</p>
<p>As others have already pointed out, businesses have the right to control the use of their facilities. This includes their computers and internet connections. They have valid business and security reasons for doing this. It sometimes results in blocking of access that seems odd, but that hardly makes the business evil. Filtering content is hardly an exact science. I can provide my own anecdotal evidence of this.</p>
<p>The Northern Virginia hospital where my wife worked for nearly a quarter century had (like all hospitals) internet filtering software as well as filters to block certain content from hospital e-mail accounts. My daughter, who was working for a health related non-profit at the time, sent an e-mail from her work e-mail to my wife&#8217;s hospital e-mail related to a medical issue using perfectly proper terms for various parts of the human anatomy. The e-mail was blocked. This e-mail was not the target of the filtering, but it was caught in the same net. </p>
<p>At around the same time I was working for a company that had an extremely rigid internet policy. They blocked most everything. My daughter sent me an e-mail with a link to the Alzheimer&#8217;s Association. The site was blocked by my employer. Seemed laughable to me, but it was their computer and their internet connection and they had the right to block anything they pleased. I suppose I could have followed the example of this post and started complaining that my employer was PRO-Alzheimer&#8217;s and wanted people to suffer with the disease. But that would be crazy, wouldn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Finally, I know a little bit about Novant Health. We have moved to North Carolina and my wife now works for them. My grandson was also born in one of their hospitals. They are a first class organization. When I read that Prince William had been purchased by Novant and told my wife her reaction was that it would be a great thing for Prince William. I suspect most of the employees will feel that way in time. It is natural for there to be anxiety over the changes that come with new ownership in any business. I strongly suspect that is what is behind this overheated silliness about being a bunch of anti-Christian Marxists.</p>
<p>As far as Blessed RN&#8217;s statement that &#8220;PWC and Manassas are different from where they’re from&#8221; goes, I suspect you would be quite comfortable here. There seems to be a much wider presumption here that we all share the same Christian beliefs than I ever saw in Northern Virginia (including Prince William County). That goes for the area in general and for the conversations I have overheard or been part of inside Novant facilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FactCheck</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88438</link>
		<dc:creator>FactCheck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 23:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88438</guid>
		<description>NoVa Scout is right.  What is the issue here?  Sounds like management has told employees they should not be sending out unsolicited religious messages using the company's resources -- common sense.  Also sounds like they are now offering a benefits package to same-sex partners -- increasingly common and supported even by many conservatives. In fact, if the compelling anecdotal evidence Greg is talking about is of the kind that Blessed RN has provided (which is all we have to go on), then it seems more likely that Blessed RN and some of his or her coworkers are the problem.  Without appropriate permission, a Security Director at a public hospital should not be emailing to the entire organization a faith-based article about God and Amercia, as opposed to a security message within his or her job responsibilities.  That's sort of professional conduct 101 in a public job in a country founded on religious liberty.  Despite Blessed RN's claim that everyone appreciated it and no one had issues with it, the opposite is probably the case -- some employees probably did contact management to complain about the use of hospital resources for such a purpose.  The reference to the benefits package and that we're not like other places, makes me think Blessed RN is opposed to the hospital offering benefits to same-sex partners for religious or other reasons.  I've got to say, from the little we have it sounds like Blessed RN is the one trying to inappropriately impose her religious beliefs on others at a public hospital and that management is doing the right thing.  I'll reserve judgment, though, if Blessed RN or anyone else, can provide contrary evidence.  Is the Hospital getting rid of its chapel?  Telling faith workers they cannot visit patients who want to see them?  Telling employees they cannot belong or practice a certain religion?  From what we know so far it does not appear anyone's religious liberty is being restricted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NoVa Scout is right.  What is the issue here?  Sounds like management has told employees they should not be sending out unsolicited religious messages using the company&#8217;s resources &#8212; common sense.  Also sounds like they are now offering a benefits package to same-sex partners &#8212; increasingly common and supported even by many conservatives. In fact, if the compelling anecdotal evidence Greg is talking about is of the kind that Blessed RN has provided (which is all we have to go on), then it seems more likely that Blessed RN and some of his or her coworkers are the problem.  Without appropriate permission, a Security Director at a public hospital should not be emailing to the entire organization a faith-based article about God and Amercia, as opposed to a security message within his or her job responsibilities.  That&#8217;s sort of professional conduct 101 in a public job in a country founded on religious liberty.  Despite Blessed RN&#8217;s claim that everyone appreciated it and no one had issues with it, the opposite is probably the case &#8212; some employees probably did contact management to complain about the use of hospital resources for such a purpose.  The reference to the benefits package and that we&#8217;re not like other places, makes me think Blessed RN is opposed to the hospital offering benefits to same-sex partners for religious or other reasons.  I&#8217;ve got to say, from the little we have it sounds like Blessed RN is the one trying to inappropriately impose her religious beliefs on others at a public hospital and that management is doing the right thing.  I&#8217;ll reserve judgment, though, if Blessed RN or anyone else, can provide contrary evidence.  Is the Hospital getting rid of its chapel?  Telling faith workers they cannot visit patients who want to see them?  Telling employees they cannot belong or practice a certain religion?  From what we know so far it does not appear anyone&#8217;s religious liberty is being restricted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I bleed Obama Blue</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88427</link>
		<dc:creator>I bleed Obama Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88427</guid>
		<description>Fed Said:

"If the additional customers generate higher-than-average claims, they make the costs go up.  That’s why your car insurance wants to drop you after you have too many DUIs and accidents."

It is also why your health insurance company wants to drop you when you get sick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fed Said:</p>
<p>&#8220;If the additional customers generate higher-than-average claims, they make the costs go up.  That’s why your car insurance wants to drop you after you have too many DUIs and accidents.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is also why your health insurance company wants to drop you when you get sick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoVA Scout</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88374</link>
		<dc:creator>NoVA Scout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88374</guid>
		<description>KDO and Blessed Nurse are still leaving us very much in the dark as to what actually happened.  Greg asks if the Hospital is anti-Christian.  I don't know why he asked that and no one has stepped forward to explain.  I suspect that the hospital is no more anti-Christian than it is anti-
buddhist or anti-Islam.  I suspect it's just a hospital.   Public hospitals have their place.  We'd be worse off without them.  However, I don't generally think of them as organizations whose purposes are to propagate the faith (insert whatever faith you choose).  There are hospitals that have overt links to different religions and denominations.  My sister was born at Christ Hospital.  My Grandmother died at Good Samaritan.  My father's life was saved at Jewish Hospital.  But PWCH is not a religious institution, as far as I know.  What's the problem? 20 comments have not cleared it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KDO and Blessed Nurse are still leaving us very much in the dark as to what actually happened.  Greg asks if the Hospital is anti-Christian.  I don&#8217;t know why he asked that and no one has stepped forward to explain.  I suspect that the hospital is no more anti-Christian than it is anti-<br />
buddhist or anti-Islam.  I suspect it&#8217;s just a hospital.   Public hospitals have their place.  We&#8217;d be worse off without them.  However, I don&#8217;t generally think of them as organizations whose purposes are to propagate the faith (insert whatever faith you choose).  There are hospitals that have overt links to different religions and denominations.  My sister was born at Christ Hospital.  My Grandmother died at Good Samaritan.  My father&#8217;s life was saved at Jewish Hospital.  But PWCH is not a religious institution, as far as I know.  What&#8217;s the problem? 20 comments have not cleared it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat.Herve</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88369</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat.Herve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88369</guid>
		<description>costs do not always follow supply and demand - just look at the oil prices of the past few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>costs do not always follow supply and demand - just look at the oil prices of the past few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: es_la_ley</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88364</link>
		<dc:creator>es_la_ley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 23:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88364</guid>
		<description>Citizen12 said on 22 Sep 2009 at 1:31 pm:

&lt;i&gt;From the hospitals own publication
[some of your post deleted for brevity]

Caucasian American
Many Caucasian-Americans see themselves as the dominate group in America, even as demographics are rapidly changing. Most &lt;b&gt;Caucasians of American decent&lt;/b&gt; do not identify themselves as Caucasian-Americans. They view themselves as “Americans” or “Christians” or “Texans” or “New Yorkers”&lt;/i&gt;

[Shouldn't they mean "Americans of Caucasian decent"?]

The Caucasian label needs to be summarily dropped.  It's way too general, and totally meaningless (unless you're actually from the area of Europe which bears that name).

From dictionary.com...

Cau⋅ca⋅sian
"of, pertaining to, or characteristic of one of the traditional racial divisions of humankind, marked by fair to dark skin, straight to tightly curled hair, and light to very dark eyes, and originally inhabiting Europe, parts of North Africa, western Asia, and India: no longer in technical use."

I love the "no longer in technical use" part.  They still use the label though. :-)

I'm not Caucasian, nor am I white.  I prefer pale-skin (which is that actual description of my skin), but that will give me troubles using it.  :-)

/end of my tirade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Citizen12 said on 22 Sep 2009 at 1:31 pm:</p>
<p><i>From the hospitals own publication<br />
[some of your post deleted for brevity]</p>
<p>Caucasian American<br />
Many Caucasian-Americans see themselves as the dominate group in America, even as demographics are rapidly changing. Most <b>Caucasians of American decent</b> do not identify themselves as Caucasian-Americans. They view themselves as “Americans” or “Christians” or “Texans” or “New Yorkers”</i></p>
<p>[Shouldn&#8217;t they mean &#8220;Americans of Caucasian decent&#8221;?]</p>
<p>The Caucasian label needs to be summarily dropped.  It&#8217;s way too general, and totally meaningless (unless you&#8217;re actually from the area of Europe which bears that name).</p>
<p>From dictionary.com&#8230;</p>
<p>Cau⋅ca⋅sian<br />
&#8220;of, pertaining to, or characteristic of one of the traditional racial divisions of humankind, marked by fair to dark skin, straight to tightly curled hair, and light to very dark eyes, and originally inhabiting Europe, parts of North Africa, western Asia, and India: no longer in technical use.&#8221;</p>
<p>I love the &#8220;no longer in technical use&#8221; part.  They still use the label though. <img src='http://www.bvbl.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not Caucasian, nor am I white.  I prefer pale-skin (which is that actual description of my skin), but that will give me troubles using it.  <img src='http://www.bvbl.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>/end of my tirade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FED UP</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88360</link>
		<dc:creator>FED UP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88360</guid>
		<description>Hey, we have two fed ups on here.  I'm all caps, but will change my name so that lower case fed up can keep it.
You are welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, we have two fed ups on here.  I&#8217;m all caps, but will change my name so that lower case fed up can keep it.<br />
You are welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karla H</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88359</link>
		<dc:creator>Karla H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88359</guid>
		<description>Question: Was the name "Allah" nixed as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question: Was the name &#8220;Allah&#8221; nixed as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karla H</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88358</link>
		<dc:creator>Karla H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88358</guid>
		<description>"Fed up, a larger population of customers tends to REDUCE costs."  - anonymous

Cost is based on supply and demand.  If the demand (larger population) goes up and the supply (doctors, in this case) stays the same then the cost rises (doctors see an opportunity, and raise their rates).  

Now the cost could decrease, but only if the supply went up more than the demand (perhaps due to investors seeing an opportunity, or the increased demand leading to new, deflationary technologies, etc.).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Fed up, a larger population of customers tends to REDUCE costs.&#8221;  - anonymous</p>
<p>Cost is based on supply and demand.  If the demand (larger population) goes up and the supply (doctors, in this case) stays the same then the cost rises (doctors see an opportunity, and raise their rates).  </p>
<p>Now the cost could decrease, but only if the supply went up more than the demand (perhaps due to investors seeing an opportunity, or the increased demand leading to new, deflationary technologies, etc.).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizen12</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88354</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizen12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88354</guid>
		<description>From the hospitals own publication 

Defining Diversity: A Glossary of Diversity Related Terms:

Prejudice:Implies a preconceived idea, judgment, or opinion, usually an unfavorable one marked by hatred, and is directed toward a racial religious, cultural, or ethnic group.
Judgments about others that reinforce superiority/inferiority belief systems: 
Exaggerate value/worth of a particular group while diminishing worth for other group(s). 
http://www.novanthealth.org/eap/daily_issues/diversity.jsp

Then they offer this:

This information is offered as a general guide to improve understanding and quality of care.


Caucasian American
Many Caucasian-Americans see themselves as the dominate group in America, even as demographics are rapidly changing. Most Caucasians of American decent do not identify themselves as Caucasian-Americans. They view themselves as "Americans" or "Christians" or "Texans" or "New Yorkers"


Now I have no idea how having their employees accept and understand this summation is going to enable them to put me on the road to a rapid recovery. Perhaps knowing this will enable them to help heal the "inner me".

The wonders of modern medicine never cease to amaze me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the hospitals own publication </p>
<p>Defining Diversity: A Glossary of Diversity Related Terms:</p>
<p>Prejudice:Implies a preconceived idea, judgment, or opinion, usually an unfavorable one marked by hatred, and is directed toward a racial religious, cultural, or ethnic group.<br />
Judgments about others that reinforce superiority/inferiority belief systems:<br />
Exaggerate value/worth of a particular group while diminishing worth for other group(s).<br />
<a href="http://www.novanthealth.org/eap/daily_issues/diversity.jsp" rel="nofollow">http://www.novanthealth.org/eap/daily_issues/diversity.jsp</a></p>
<p>Then they offer this:</p>
<p>This information is offered as a general guide to improve understanding and quality of care.</p>
<p>Caucasian American<br />
Many Caucasian-Americans see themselves as the dominate group in America, even as demographics are rapidly changing. Most Caucasians of American decent do not identify themselves as Caucasian-Americans. They view themselves as &#8220;Americans&#8221; or &#8220;Christians&#8221; or &#8220;Texans&#8221; or &#8220;New Yorkers&#8221;</p>
<p>Now I have no idea how having their employees accept and understand this summation is going to enable them to put me on the road to a rapid recovery. Perhaps knowing this will enable them to help heal the &#8220;inner me&#8221;.</p>
<p>The wonders of modern medicine never cease to amaze me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88352</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88352</guid>
		<description>I wonder if PWH has installed a filter to block any email that mentions "Obama".

Now that would be interesting to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if PWH has installed a filter to block any email that mentions &#8220;Obama&#8221;.</p>
<p>Now that would be interesting to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fed up</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88351</link>
		<dc:creator>fed up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88351</guid>
		<description>"Fed up, a larger population of customers tends to REDUCE costs."

Only if the amount paid out in claims to those additional customers is the same as or lower than the average amount paid out to the existing customers.

If the additional customers generate higher-than-average claims, they make the costs go up.

That's why your car insurance wants to drop you after you have too many DUIs and accidents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Fed up, a larger population of customers tends to REDUCE costs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Only if the amount paid out in claims to those additional customers is the same as or lower than the average amount paid out to the existing customers.</p>
<p>If the additional customers generate higher-than-average claims, they make the costs go up.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why your car insurance wants to drop you after you have too many DUIs and accidents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard the Duck</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88349</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard the Duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88349</guid>
		<description>#
Tillie said on 22 Sep 2009 at 9:12 am:
Flag comment

Quack, quack, Duck

We need HEALTH CARE WORKERS - period - Christian or not!


Go look at the topic again.  We are discussing Christian health care workers.  

Steer yourself away from emotion based reasoning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#<br />
Tillie said on 22 Sep 2009 at 9:12 am:<br />
Flag comment</p>
<p>Quack, quack, Duck</p>
<p>We need HEALTH CARE WORKERS - period - Christian or not!</p>
<p>Go look at the topic again.  We are discussing Christian health care workers.  </p>
<p>Steer yourself away from emotion based reasoning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88347</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88347</guid>
		<description>Fed up, a larger population of customers tends to REDUCE costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fed up, a larger population of customers tends to REDUCE costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fed up</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88343</link>
		<dc:creator>fed up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88343</guid>
		<description>"but rather extends benefits to same sex domestic relationships, an increasingly frequent practice in modern businesses, especially large ones that operate in multiple jurisdictions and communities, I would think that would not be a matter of great concern to the vast majority of employees"

If it results in increased insurance premiums, it might be a matter of concern to the vast majority of employees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;but rather extends benefits to same sex domestic relationships, an increasingly frequent practice in modern businesses, especially large ones that operate in multiple jurisdictions and communities, I would think that would not be a matter of great concern to the vast majority of employees&#8221;</p>
<p>If it results in increased insurance premiums, it might be a matter of concern to the vast majority of employees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tillie</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88341</link>
		<dc:creator>Tillie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88341</guid>
		<description>Quack, quack, Duck

We need HEALTH CARE WORKERS - period - Christian or not!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quack, quack, Duck</p>
<p>We need HEALTH CARE WORKERS - period - Christian or not!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard the Duck</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88340</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard the Duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88340</guid>
		<description>The WorldNetDaily site runs stories about just this sort of thing, and it would be useful if some of the affected employees contact them.

http://www.wnd.com/Contact%20WND

With  health care trending toward cost cutting and euthanasia, we need all the Christian health care employees we can get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The WorldNetDaily site runs stories about just this sort of thing, and it would be useful if some of the affected employees contact them.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wnd.com/Contact%20WND" rel="nofollow">http://www.wnd.com/Contact%20WND</a></p>
<p>With  health care trending toward cost cutting and euthanasia, we need all the Christian health care employees we can get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Contrarian</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88339</link>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88339</guid>
		<description>Greg, you are in the Information Technology business.  As you know, it is a business’ recognized and legal right to restrict the use of business resources (computers) to access non-business related websites and/or engage in non-business related activities (such as email).  It is also normally reason for termination to do so while "on the clock".  Religious discussions and websites certainly fall within this reasonable mandate.  While one might object, no legal foundations exist for any objection.  

If the folks do their jobs while they are on the clock, they won’t have any problems.  If they spend their work time engaged on non-work related issues (i.e., that which is not in their job description) they should be quickly terminated.  If they have moral issues about policy decisions made by their employer, they should quit.  Such is the free market in a right to work state...  and Conservative values.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, you are in the Information Technology business.  As you know, it is a business’ recognized and legal right to restrict the use of business resources (computers) to access non-business related websites and/or engage in non-business related activities (such as email).  It is also normally reason for termination to do so while &#8220;on the clock&#8221;.  Religious discussions and websites certainly fall within this reasonable mandate.  While one might object, no legal foundations exist for any objection.  </p>
<p>If the folks do their jobs while they are on the clock, they won’t have any problems.  If they spend their work time engaged on non-work related issues (i.e., that which is not in their job description) they should be quickly terminated.  If they have moral issues about policy decisions made by their employer, they should quit.  Such is the free market in a right to work state&#8230;  and Conservative values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hazegray</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88338</link>
		<dc:creator>Hazegray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2009/09/21/is-pwch-becoming-anti-christian/#comment-88338</guid>
		<description>Katie's Day Off -- 
    You wrote that "case in fact, immigrants no longer have their babies at PWH, they go to Reston."  Do yu mean legal immigrants (in which case they shoul dbe able to use PWH) or "illegal aliens," defined elsewhere in this blog (by federal statutes) as “alien[s] who [are] not lawfully present in the United States.” 
    We all need to be very clear and precise in our language, unless you are against all immigrants -- in which case 95% of us need to leave, including this writer, whose forbearers only arrived in the United States in 1847.
    Frankly, illegal aliens can have their children in the land of their parents, as far as I'm concerned.  Play by the rules -- welcome; break the rules -- get outta here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katie&#8217;s Day Off &#8212;<br />
    You wrote that &#8220;case in fact, immigrants no longer have their babies at PWH, they go to Reston.&#8221;  Do yu mean legal immigrants (in which case they shoul dbe able to use PWH) or &#8220;illegal aliens,&#8221; defined elsewhere in this blog (by federal statutes) as “alien[s] who [are] not lawfully present in the United States.”<br />
    We all need to be very clear and precise in our language, unless you are against all immigrants &#8212; in which case 95% of us need to leave, including this writer, whose forbearers only arrived in the United States in 1847.<br />
    Frankly, illegal aliens can have their children in the land of their parents, as far as I&#8217;m concerned.  Play by the rules &#8212; welcome; break the rules &#8212; get outta here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

