I bet nothing happened to Nichols because there was no proof he did anything in the first place.

Only if it is, or was, his NEW wife because, and I have this on VERY good authority, he CHEATED on his wife for SEVEN years with his (or A) secretary.

lp said, “He is slime!”

Now, with THAT, you hit the nail RIGHT on the HEAD !!!

How SOON people forget!

Back during the ‘06 election, when it was the Potomac News they, having had GUTS and SENSE labeled Nickles, “SLIMY!”

Funk & Wagnall:
SLIME: n. 1. Any soft, sticky, or DIRTY substance. 3. A mucous exudation from the bodies of certain animals, as fishes and snails…(a SLUG is more like it, leaving a TRAIL of slime)

SLIMY: 3. [As it applies to Paul F (for FU**STER) Nickles] SLIMELIKE, FOUL!

Believe me, I’m sure YOU can work for people you don’t respect but ME, never!

For you to say Nickles is an, “…extremely honorable man.” only brings YOUR decision making ability into question. The world is FULL of (two legged) SHEEP!

You’re the kind of employee who says, “Don’t worry, we’ll get the people out just as soon as the RAIN stops. Ain’t we doin’ a HECK of job?”

Or, even more likely, “Don’t worry about those guys who just want to learn how to STEER airplanes, I’m sure they’re a bunch of EXTREMELY honorable men.”

Paul is an extremely honorable man. Attacking him on the basis of being la awyer is unfair.

Doesn’t Corey Stewart negotiate international trade deals (guns) that some may find offensive?

Get my point?

Nickles owning a house about two miles from his office does NOT necessarily mean HE lives there. WHO knows WHO lives there? This is not the first time his “residency” has been called into question. I’ve heard it suggested that he doesn’t even LIVE in the 51st?

One thing I DO know is, if his WIFE got the house in his DIVORCE (although, obviously it would have been kept in his name in order to PAD his balance sheet), then he does NOT live there.

Anyone know why the PROFESSIONAL LIAR would list his OFFICE as his “RESIDENCE?”

Wouldn’t have anything to do with his QUESTIONABLE character, would it?

BAD judgement Anderson.

We need common sense in Richmond. Nichols gets my vote.

None of this is applical to Paul Nichols, and I can prove it to anyone that wants to know about his Judicial tampering within his role as an honest attorney or a man of conviction and integrity. He in no way deserves to serve as a Delegate in the House of Representatives. If anyone can assist me in exposing his criminal act that he perpetrated upon me, I would greatly appreciate it. This is a story that will make headline news and blow him right out of the race, not mention the other attorny’s and the Judge that was involved in this Criminal Act. He may have gotten away with his charges being dropped, but I assure you he won’t be able to escape this story, because I can back up everything with a paper trail. Paul Nichols you may run but you cannot hide because the truth will always find you out. If there are any reporters that would like to know about this you can reply to this post. I am going to post my email address or my real name because welive in a world that is full of crooks and I am tired of being a victum by our governmnet. Prayerfully someone with a concious will help me to expose this crook.

I’m almost ALWAYS pro law enforcement, but I’m a former resident of the Outer Banks where I managed bars and nightclubs. My last 2 years living there I worked in two different establishments in Duck, NC (the jurisdiction just to the north of Southern Shores. In that capacity, I came to know MANY law enforcement officers in each of the towns along the beach.

Without elaborating too much, most of the other police from other jurisdictions used to joke about how incompetent and out-of-control Southern Shores policemen could get…and I have 2 good friends who used to serve on that force who left for that very reason.

I would bet ANY amount of money that Paul Nichols was arrested for no reason at all and the fact that there was no conviction is because someone with good sense determined that no violation took place. I’m sorry that the Anderson campaign used this “arrest report” and implied there was guilt when the justice system determined that there wasn’t a violation of law. When this type of thing is done, we are no better than the Constituion hating left-wingers who, among other things, don’t believe in INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.

“Conviction is not the issue; none of us were there to know exactly what happened, but it’s certainly a matter of poor conduct and poor judgment of a defense attorney who under normal circumstances should have known better.”

Now that makes a lot of sense.