<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bob Marshall On Fox News</title>
	<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/</link>
	<description>Blog-Fu for Prince William, Manassas and Manassas Park politics.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 18:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: local gop</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92365</link>
		<dc:creator>local gop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92365</guid>
		<description>1) where did I say that we should copy or emulate NY or CA????  Think before typing next time, Greg.

2)  NY and CA were offered as examples of states that exercise home rule, other such states are.....EVERY STATE EXCEPT MS, AL, ID, VT, VA, AND IN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) where did I say that we should copy or emulate NY or CA????  Think before typing next time, Greg.</p>
<p>2)  NY and CA were offered as examples of states that exercise home rule, other such states are&#8230;..EVERY STATE EXCEPT MS, AL, ID, VT, VA, AND IN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg L</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92335</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 03:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92335</guid>
		<description>Clairese, it's good to see you've given up beating up on Jews.  Now I guess you've moved on to pounding on Christians.  I always appreciate it when leftist religious bigots drop by and try to act morally superior to everyone else.  It's endlessly amusing.

&lt;blockquote&gt;"All they are doing is repeating the same drivel from the tired propagandists in the main stream, Jew-run, mind control factories."   &lt;a href="http://notlarrysabato.typepad.com/doh/2007/07/shad-plank.html?cid=76709048#comment-6a00d83451b13369e200e009975bda8833 " rel="nofollow"&gt;Clareese Lippincott on NLS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clairese, it&#8217;s good to see you&#8217;ve given up beating up on Jews.  Now I guess you&#8217;ve moved on to pounding on Christians.  I always appreciate it when leftist religious bigots drop by and try to act morally superior to everyone else.  It&#8217;s endlessly amusing.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;All they are doing is repeating the same drivel from the tired propagandists in the main stream, Jew-run, mind control factories.&#8221;   <a href="http://notlarrysabato.typepad.com/doh/2007/07/shad-plank.html?cid=76709048#comment-6a00d83451b13369e200e009975bda8833 " rel="nofollow">Clareese Lippincott on NLS</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clairese Lippincott</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92331</link>
		<dc:creator>Clairese Lippincott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92331</guid>
		<description>Having had the advantage of coming late to this and reading an already leangthy thread, a few points require clarification:

1. For Greg: When you are walking along with a crowd and someone yells, "Hey stupid!"  Do you automatically turn around, presuming that you were being called stupid?

As I read the earlier post by J T Balance, it was clear, at least to me, that he was saying that if Bob Marshall could turn his skills toward real problems, instead of those created by the extreme religious fanatics (like the late Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, the latter of which blames Haitians for bringing their earthquake on themselves) then Virginia would be much better off. If Greg considers himself in the same company of Robertson, whose behavior earns him the title, Leader of the Religious Reich, then, if the shoe fits, Greg, then wear it, boy.

2. The other, much more funny aspect of the thread, is the employment of a rhetorical device designed to avoid actually addressing the point(s) or issues, and instead redirects with an absurd statement. This was used in the old Animal House movie when the Animal House fraternity reps protested to Dean Wormer, that any criticism of them was a condemnation of the whole fraternity system...and indeed the entire United States of America. Greg dodges any constructive discussion and offers the absurdity that, Religious Reich, sounds similar to the Nazi Third Reich, so therefore the post was not about focusing the talents of  legislators like Bob Marshall on energy, jobs etc. but were supposedly an attack on Greg's veteran relatives; or claiming to have called Greg a Nazi; none of which actually happened.  Nice try, if you are an Eighth grader.

It is awfully funny that Greg pulls this absurd argument tactic rather often and few people bother to call him on such clumsy rhetorical maneuvers.


In general, I am encouraged to learn that there are some Democrats who are considering supporting the exploratory wells and approving Uranium mining. It remains to be seen how many will stand tall and be counted, but lets use sound arguments and persuastion to win them over to the cause of fighting for new energy jobs, as well taking steps towards energy independence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having had the advantage of coming late to this and reading an already leangthy thread, a few points require clarification:</p>
<p>1. For Greg: When you are walking along with a crowd and someone yells, &#8220;Hey stupid!&#8221;  Do you automatically turn around, presuming that you were being called stupid?</p>
<p>As I read the earlier post by J T Balance, it was clear, at least to me, that he was saying that if Bob Marshall could turn his skills toward real problems, instead of those created by the extreme religious fanatics (like the late Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, the latter of which blames Haitians for bringing their earthquake on themselves) then Virginia would be much better off. If Greg considers himself in the same company of Robertson, whose behavior earns him the title, Leader of the Religious Reich, then, if the shoe fits, Greg, then wear it, boy.</p>
<p>2. The other, much more funny aspect of the thread, is the employment of a rhetorical device designed to avoid actually addressing the point(s) or issues, and instead redirects with an absurd statement. This was used in the old Animal House movie when the Animal House fraternity reps protested to Dean Wormer, that any criticism of them was a condemnation of the whole fraternity system&#8230;and indeed the entire United States of America. Greg dodges any constructive discussion and offers the absurdity that, Religious Reich, sounds similar to the Nazi Third Reich, so therefore the post was not about focusing the talents of  legislators like Bob Marshall on energy, jobs etc. but were supposedly an attack on Greg&#8217;s veteran relatives; or claiming to have called Greg a Nazi; none of which actually happened.  Nice try, if you are an Eighth grader.</p>
<p>It is awfully funny that Greg pulls this absurd argument tactic rather often and few people bother to call him on such clumsy rhetorical maneuvers.</p>
<p>In general, I am encouraged to learn that there are some Democrats who are considering supporting the exploratory wells and approving Uranium mining. It remains to be seen how many will stand tall and be counted, but lets use sound arguments and persuastion to win them over to the cause of fighting for new energy jobs, as well taking steps towards energy independence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolverine</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92325</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolverine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92325</guid>
		<description>"...social engineering issues that have, in the recent past, emerged from the religious Reich."

That's good for a big laugh.  Imagine a Democrat accusing someone else of "socal engineering"!  Is it 1 April already?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;social engineering issues that have, in the recent past, emerged from the religious Reich.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s good for a big laugh.  Imagine a Democrat accusing someone else of &#8220;socal engineering&#8221;!  Is it 1 April already?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg L</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92322</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92322</guid>
		<description>Follow California and New York as examples?  Are you freakin' kidding me???

Why does it not surprise me that you think we need to emulate the laws of two neo-socialist states with tremendous budget deficits, high taxes, nanny government, moribund economies, and bloated state governments?  If you think New York is such a fine place, I invite you to live there for a while.  I grew up in New York State.  That place sucks in so many ways, and government is the root of everything wrong there.

I am proud to be a Virginian now, and the benefits of being here are absolutely tremendous.  You're welcome to personally experiment with New York style government, but just don't involve me in any of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Follow California and New York as examples?  Are you freakin&#8217; kidding me???</p>
<p>Why does it not surprise me that you think we need to emulate the laws of two neo-socialist states with tremendous budget deficits, high taxes, nanny government, moribund economies, and bloated state governments?  If you think New York is such a fine place, I invite you to live there for a while.  I grew up in New York State.  That place sucks in so many ways, and government is the root of everything wrong there.</p>
<p>I am proud to be a Virginian now, and the benefits of being here are absolutely tremendous.  You&#8217;re welcome to personally experiment with New York style government, but just don&#8217;t involve me in any of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: local gop</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92320</link>
		<dc:creator>local gop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92320</guid>
		<description>Now that I remember, there was a relatively serious article in the Post a while ago advocating for NOVA leaving Virginia.....i'll post the link if I can find it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that I remember, there was a relatively serious article in the Post a while ago advocating for NOVA leaving Virginia&#8230;..i&#8217;ll post the link if I can find it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: local gop</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92319</link>
		<dc:creator>local gop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92319</guid>
		<description>Groveton:
Some states are home rule states, New York and California for example.  There is also a touch of geopolitics that plays into the power struggle in Virginia.  Nova vs. Rova (Rest of Virginia).  It's funny actually because as underfunded and unappreciated as we are, take out Nova (my personal bias is that nova is Fairfax, Arlington, Alexandria, Prince William, and Loudoun; sorry fburg aint nova) and all that is left is virtually identical to Arkansas.  
****
This dynamic is also seen in New York, Illinois, and Nevada.  
****
I am all for Nova seceding from Virginia, Tom Davis for Governor of NOVA!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Groveton:<br />
Some states are home rule states, New York and California for example.  There is also a touch of geopolitics that plays into the power struggle in Virginia.  Nova vs. Rova (Rest of Virginia).  It&#8217;s funny actually because as underfunded and unappreciated as we are, take out Nova (my personal bias is that nova is Fairfax, Arlington, Alexandria, Prince William, and Loudoun; sorry fburg aint nova) and all that is left is virtually identical to Arkansas.<br />
****<br />
This dynamic is also seen in New York, Illinois, and Nevada.<br />
****<br />
I am all for Nova seceding from Virginia, Tom Davis for Governor of NOVA!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Groveton</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92306</link>
		<dc:creator>Groveton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92306</guid>
		<description>local gop:

It seems that the hatred of Richmond and the GA goes beyond NoVa -

http://virginiatomorrow.com/2010/02/16/the-locals-v-the-capitals/#comments

It's time to dilute Dillon's Rule in Virginia and give all localities more home rule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>local gop:</p>
<p>It seems that the hatred of Richmond and the GA goes beyond NoVa -</p>
<p><a href="http://virginiatomorrow.com/2010/02/16/the-locals-v-the-capitals/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://virginiatomorrow.com/2010/02/16/the-locals-v-the-capitals/#comments</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s time to dilute Dillon&#8217;s Rule in Virginia and give all localities more home rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: local gop</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92301</link>
		<dc:creator>local gop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92301</guid>
		<description>Groveton,
I utterly hate Richmond.  I hate the GA, and the entire concept of the Dillon Rule.  I'm sorry, but what the hell do farmers (southern delegates) know about mass transit, clogged interstates, high density development, the Washington COG, and all the issues NOVA faces?  Nothing, thats the answer, nothing.  Yet we have to get their approval for anything we do, its absurd.  The local governments should be the ones handling 90% of what goes on in NOVA, not the GA.  
******
It's SO SO SO HYPOCRITICAL of delegates like Bob Marshall to go on TV and whine about the big bad federal government when he is just as guilty of big government tyranny coming from Richmond.  And they wont give up an ounce of power, they are just as bad as national dems as far as I'm concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Groveton,<br />
I utterly hate Richmond.  I hate the GA, and the entire concept of the Dillon Rule.  I&#8217;m sorry, but what the hell do farmers (southern delegates) know about mass transit, clogged interstates, high density development, the Washington COG, and all the issues NOVA faces?  Nothing, thats the answer, nothing.  Yet we have to get their approval for anything we do, its absurd.  The local governments should be the ones handling 90% of what goes on in NOVA, not the GA.<br />
******<br />
It&#8217;s SO SO SO HYPOCRITICAL of delegates like Bob Marshall to go on TV and whine about the big bad federal government when he is just as guilty of big government tyranny coming from Richmond.  And they wont give up an ounce of power, they are just as bad as national dems as far as I&#8217;m concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Groveton</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92277</link>
		<dc:creator>Groveton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92277</guid>
		<description>local gop:

I'd like to see the whole governance structure de-centralize more.  I certainly want the federal government to run the Navy but I wonder about their undue influence over things like intra-state highways.  I want Richmond to run the state police but I wonder about their influence over local roads.

The General Assembly's love of Dillon's Rule creates some odd behavior.  The delegate representing my district was (until November) Margi Vanderhye.  Ms. Vanderhye won the seat in 11/07 by emphasizing her experience in Northern Virginia.  She was clear about her long standing in the the Northern Virginia community.  Yet, somehow, she ended up on the Agriculture Committee.  Shouldn't agrigcultural decisions be left to areas of the state where farming actually occurs?  Then, there's this guy named Clay Athey from Front Royal.  He's popping off about how to design local roads in high density suburban neighborhoods.  It's like watching a bunch of 8th graders in the Model UN.  

When you centralize everything (as Virginia has) you get the Politburo (i.e. Richmond) trying to decide everything for everyone.  Right now there is a bill in the General Assembly to address the school funding debate between the City of Charlottesville and the County of Alberarle.  Shouldn't the wizards in Richmond let local government solve local problems?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>local gop:</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see the whole governance structure de-centralize more.  I certainly want the federal government to run the Navy but I wonder about their undue influence over things like intra-state highways.  I want Richmond to run the state police but I wonder about their influence over local roads.</p>
<p>The General Assembly&#8217;s love of Dillon&#8217;s Rule creates some odd behavior.  The delegate representing my district was (until November) Margi Vanderhye.  Ms. Vanderhye won the seat in 11/07 by emphasizing her experience in Northern Virginia.  She was clear about her long standing in the the Northern Virginia community.  Yet, somehow, she ended up on the Agriculture Committee.  Shouldn&#8217;t agrigcultural decisions be left to areas of the state where farming actually occurs?  Then, there&#8217;s this guy named Clay Athey from Front Royal.  He&#8217;s popping off about how to design local roads in high density suburban neighborhoods.  It&#8217;s like watching a bunch of 8th graders in the Model UN.  </p>
<p>When you centralize everything (as Virginia has) you get the Politburo (i.e. Richmond) trying to decide everything for everyone.  Right now there is a bill in the General Assembly to address the school funding debate between the City of Charlottesville and the County of Alberarle.  Shouldn&#8217;t the wizards in Richmond let local government solve local problems?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: local gop</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92271</link>
		<dc:creator>local gop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92271</guid>
		<description>Groveton,
You hit on an excellent point that is all too often overlooked, the centralized power in Richmond that screws over local governments (IE NOVA).  Its absurd that the Fairfax County Board has to go to richmond to ammend their dog leash laws and similar petty issues that are far more appropriate to be handled at the local level.  I am a huge fan of home rule and believe that the local government should always be the chief unit of government.  The general assembly refuses to give up an ounce of power over the local governments yet they complain about what the federal government does to the states.  tit for tat as far as im concerned.  
*****
I would give anything for a NOVA delegate (dont really care what party) to point this out next time Mr. Marshall (or anyone for that matter) whines about federal power over states.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Groveton,<br />
You hit on an excellent point that is all too often overlooked, the centralized power in Richmond that screws over local governments (IE NOVA).  Its absurd that the Fairfax County Board has to go to richmond to ammend their dog leash laws and similar petty issues that are far more appropriate to be handled at the local level.  I am a huge fan of home rule and believe that the local government should always be the chief unit of government.  The general assembly refuses to give up an ounce of power over the local governments yet they complain about what the federal government does to the states.  tit for tat as far as im concerned.<br />
*****<br />
I would give anything for a NOVA delegate (dont really care what party) to point this out next time Mr. Marshall (or anyone for that matter) whines about federal power over states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Groveton</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92263</link>
		<dc:creator>Groveton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92263</guid>
		<description>Just Sayin'

I am more optimistic than you.  The Commonwealth of Virginia is on its 8th constitution.  The last wholesale revision was ratified in 1970.  While I certainly have problems with the amount of power centralized in Richmond, the 1970 constitution was a huge step forward by the Commonwealth.

My understanding of the mechanics of calling a constitutional convention are as follows:

1. 2/3 of the state legislatures must vote to call the convention.
2. The state legislatures would appoint delegates from their states to represent them at the constitutional convention.  I am not sure if there is a standard approach to making these appointments.  I doubt it.  However, I'd guess that most state legislatures would vote among themselves rather than demanding a popular vote.
3. The delegates would hold their convention and debate the new constitution.  I do not believe there is a mandated way to write the new constitution.  However, the delegates would either come up with changes to the current constitution or they would not.  Let's assume they do.
4. Three fourths of the state legislatures (or state constitutional conventions) must ratify the new constitution.

As you can see, it really doesn't matter whether the average citizen understands the Bill of Rights or not.  The constitutional convention will no more be populated by average citizens than the original constitutional convention was populated by ordinary (or average) citizens.

There are clearly risks to allowing our state legislatures (or, more accurately, their designees) to change the US Constitution.  However, I see the bigger risk being the continuance of federal over-reach.  It is obvious to me that the federal government will continue to ignore the letter and the spirit of the US Constitution in their zeal to centralize all power in their own hands.

The lesser of two evils may be clearly amending the US Constitution to put the federal government back into the governance space intended by the founding fathers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just Sayin&#8217;</p>
<p>I am more optimistic than you.  The Commonwealth of Virginia is on its 8th constitution.  The last wholesale revision was ratified in 1970.  While I certainly have problems with the amount of power centralized in Richmond, the 1970 constitution was a huge step forward by the Commonwealth.</p>
<p>My understanding of the mechanics of calling a constitutional convention are as follows:</p>
<p>1. 2/3 of the state legislatures must vote to call the convention.<br />
2. The state legislatures would appoint delegates from their states to represent them at the constitutional convention.  I am not sure if there is a standard approach to making these appointments.  I doubt it.  However, I&#8217;d guess that most state legislatures would vote among themselves rather than demanding a popular vote.<br />
3. The delegates would hold their convention and debate the new constitution.  I do not believe there is a mandated way to write the new constitution.  However, the delegates would either come up with changes to the current constitution or they would not.  Let&#8217;s assume they do.<br />
4. Three fourths of the state legislatures (or state constitutional conventions) must ratify the new constitution.</p>
<p>As you can see, it really doesn&#8217;t matter whether the average citizen understands the Bill of Rights or not.  The constitutional convention will no more be populated by average citizens than the original constitutional convention was populated by ordinary (or average) citizens.</p>
<p>There are clearly risks to allowing our state legislatures (or, more accurately, their designees) to change the US Constitution.  However, I see the bigger risk being the continuance of federal over-reach.  It is obvious to me that the federal government will continue to ignore the letter and the spirit of the US Constitution in their zeal to centralize all power in their own hands.</p>
<p>The lesser of two evils may be clearly amending the US Constitution to put the federal government back into the governance space intended by the founding fathers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizen12</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92257</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizen12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92257</guid>
		<description>J. Tyler Ballance said on 15 Feb 2010 at 10:39 pm:
 3...............replace high tech businesses who have recently left (like Quimonda)

****************************************************************
In your push for state and federal action in attracting and keeping jobs in Virginia you mention the loss of Qimonda, a German company who recently let go  1,500 after struggling financially for a number of years. 

 Yet, you feel the loss of an air craft carrier from the Hampton Roads area to Florida, with the relocation of thousands of Navel personnel and their families, the loss of thousands of support related jobs, and the cost in millions in federal tax dollars, should not be viewed as a big deal?

http://www2.timesdispatch.com/rtd/news/local/article/QIMOGAT03_20090203-103402/196780/


http://hrblogs.typepad.com/the_shad_plank/2010/02/virginia-state-lawmaker-blast-aircraft-carrier-move-to-florida.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J. Tyler Ballance said on 15 Feb 2010 at 10:39 pm:<br />
 3&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;replace high tech businesses who have recently left (like Quimonda)</p>
<p>****************************************************************<br />
In your push for state and federal action in attracting and keeping jobs in Virginia you mention the loss of Qimonda, a German company who recently let go  1,500 after struggling financially for a number of years. </p>
<p> Yet, you feel the loss of an air craft carrier from the Hampton Roads area to Florida, with the relocation of thousands of Navel personnel and their families, the loss of thousands of support related jobs, and the cost in millions in federal tax dollars, should not be viewed as a big deal?</p>
<p><a href="http://www2.timesdispatch.com/rtd/news/local/article/QIMOGAT03_20090203-103402/196780/" rel="nofollow">http://www2.timesdispatch.com/rtd/news/local/article/QIMOGAT03_20090203-103402/196780/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://hrblogs.typepad.com/the_shad_plank/2010/02/virginia-state-lawmaker-blast-aircraft-carrier-move-to-florida.html" rel="nofollow">http://hrblogs.typepad.com/the_shad_plank/2010/02/virginia-state-lawmaker-blast-aircraft-carrier-move-to-florida.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Sayin'</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92256</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Sayin'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92256</guid>
		<description>Groveton, be careful what you wish for. On any number of occasions pollsters have asked Americans if they would favor the repeal of the Bill of Rights (without calling it that, of course). A majority expressed that they favored eliminating our basic liberties. I don't know if the majorities in those polls are simply poorly educated or if they are dumb as hell, but in any event it is a remarkable result. 

If you were to succeed in calling a Constitutional Convention I think you could kiss the First Amendment goodbye. It seems a great many Americans don't understand the critical role free speech plays in ensuring liberty. Their desire to muzzle those they disagree with seems to be so great that it blinds them to the fact that they themselves might wind up in a jail cell for saying something that offends those in power. And considering the large number of Americans who seem hell bent on making some form of Christianity the state religion of the United States I think the protection to worship as one's conscience dictates would be in grave peril at such a convention. The First Amendment wouldn't likely survive your convention.

Considering how many Americans flippantly refer to our protection against unreasonable searches and seizures as "technicalities to protect criminals", I don't imagine the Fourth Amendment stands much chance of surviving your constitutional convention either. How many times have you heard someone say something like, "If you don't have anything to hide you shouldn't care if the police come in and search your house."? The Founding Fathers must spin in their graves whenever a statement of such consummate stupidity that betrays such a total lack of understanding of America and its Constitution is uttered. Kiss the Fourth Amendment goodbye at your convention.

If you were to get your wish of a Constitutional Convention you would not be able to limit it to the few issues you might wish to address. Pandora's box would be open. We are talking total re-write. By people who think repealing the Bill of Rights and having the government dictate and enforce one set of religious  beliefs are just swell ideas whose time has come.

No thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Groveton, be careful what you wish for. On any number of occasions pollsters have asked Americans if they would favor the repeal of the Bill of Rights (without calling it that, of course). A majority expressed that they favored eliminating our basic liberties. I don&#8217;t know if the majorities in those polls are simply poorly educated or if they are dumb as hell, but in any event it is a remarkable result. </p>
<p>If you were to succeed in calling a Constitutional Convention I think you could kiss the First Amendment goodbye. It seems a great many Americans don&#8217;t understand the critical role free speech plays in ensuring liberty. Their desire to muzzle those they disagree with seems to be so great that it blinds them to the fact that they themselves might wind up in a jail cell for saying something that offends those in power. And considering the large number of Americans who seem hell bent on making some form of Christianity the state religion of the United States I think the protection to worship as one&#8217;s conscience dictates would be in grave peril at such a convention. The First Amendment wouldn&#8217;t likely survive your convention.</p>
<p>Considering how many Americans flippantly refer to our protection against unreasonable searches and seizures as &#8220;technicalities to protect criminals&#8221;, I don&#8217;t imagine the Fourth Amendment stands much chance of surviving your constitutional convention either. How many times have you heard someone say something like, &#8220;If you don&#8217;t have anything to hide you shouldn&#8217;t care if the police come in and search your house.&#8221;? The Founding Fathers must spin in their graves whenever a statement of such consummate stupidity that betrays such a total lack of understanding of America and its Constitution is uttered. Kiss the Fourth Amendment goodbye at your convention.</p>
<p>If you were to get your wish of a Constitutional Convention you would not be able to limit it to the few issues you might wish to address. Pandora&#8217;s box would be open. We are talking total re-write. By people who think repealing the Bill of Rights and having the government dictate and enforce one set of religious  beliefs are just swell ideas whose time has come.</p>
<p>No thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Groveton</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92254</link>
		<dc:creator>Groveton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92254</guid>
		<description>It's a pity Mr. Ballance can't contain his emotions.  His points about the sale of public assets to private corporations and oil exploration are very legitimate issues in Virginia.  They deserve to be discussed across party and ideological divides.  Even more, the constitutional balance between the federal government and the states looks to be one of the biggest political issues in America over the next 5 - 10 years.  I personally believe that the federal government has been over-reaching for the last 50 years.  It's about time to put that over-reach to the test.  Frankly, I don't care if that over-reach is tested by a Godless atheist, a born again Christian or a devout Buddhist.  I just want the test to happen.  I think most Americans would agree with me that he federal government has become too powerful.  I think most Americans would agree that the federal government has usurped rights properly delegated to the states.  The Commerce Clause hallucination was only the start.  If the federal government will not submit to the US Constitution and its practical limits I believe there is some chance that the American people will take the matter into their own hands.  I write not of revolution but of a new constitutional convention.  The US Constitution clearly allows for two avenues to amend The Constitution.  The first is an amendment put forth by Congress.  The second is a decision taken by the state legislatures to meet and form a new constitution.  The second avenue requires no permission or authorization from any person or organization in the federal government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a pity Mr. Ballance can&#8217;t contain his emotions.  His points about the sale of public assets to private corporations and oil exploration are very legitimate issues in Virginia.  They deserve to be discussed across party and ideological divides.  Even more, the constitutional balance between the federal government and the states looks to be one of the biggest political issues in America over the next 5 - 10 years.  I personally believe that the federal government has been over-reaching for the last 50 years.  It&#8217;s about time to put that over-reach to the test.  Frankly, I don&#8217;t care if that over-reach is tested by a Godless atheist, a born again Christian or a devout Buddhist.  I just want the test to happen.  I think most Americans would agree with me that he federal government has become too powerful.  I think most Americans would agree that the federal government has usurped rights properly delegated to the states.  The Commerce Clause hallucination was only the start.  If the federal government will not submit to the US Constitution and its practical limits I believe there is some chance that the American people will take the matter into their own hands.  I write not of revolution but of a new constitutional convention.  The US Constitution clearly allows for two avenues to amend The Constitution.  The first is an amendment put forth by Congress.  The second is a decision taken by the state legislatures to meet and form a new constitution.  The second avenue requires no permission or authorization from any person or organization in the federal government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92249</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92249</guid>
		<description>J. Tyler Ballance said on 15 Feb 2010 at 10:39 pm: "Kevin managed to use his cut and paste function...yet had nothing constructive to add."

I "cut and paste" so there is NO DOUBT in anyone's mind about what I am saying and to WHOM I am saying it !!!

To you I SAY AGAIN, as I have said before, you're very, VERY seriously MENTALLY DISTURBED !!!!

J. Tyler Ballance said on 15 Feb 2010 at 10:39 pm: "Feel free to chime-in with your own constructive ideas..."

Here's a, "constructive idea !!!"

You NEED help !!!  

I HOPE you get it before you end up like the University of Alabama professor and so many others who have been down your SAME 
path !!!!

You have the SAME twisted mind and a VERY distorted (mental) image of yourself !!!

It seems you're the ONLY one on this blog who doesn't know that you're way, WAY OUTTA BALANCE !!!!!

GET HELP !!!

SOON !!!!

BEFORE you become the next one to make the Six O'clock News !!!!!

THAT'S about as constructive as anyone can get with you !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J. Tyler Ballance said on 15 Feb 2010 at 10:39 pm: &#8220;Kevin managed to use his cut and paste function&#8230;yet had nothing constructive to add.&#8221;</p>
<p>I &#8220;cut and paste&#8221; so there is NO DOUBT in anyone&#8217;s mind about what I am saying and to WHOM I am saying it !!!</p>
<p>To you I SAY AGAIN, as I have said before, you&#8217;re very, VERY seriously MENTALLY DISTURBED !!!!</p>
<p>J. Tyler Ballance said on 15 Feb 2010 at 10:39 pm: &#8220;Feel free to chime-in with your own constructive ideas&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a, &#8220;constructive idea !!!&#8221;</p>
<p>You NEED help !!!  </p>
<p>I HOPE you get it before you end up like the University of Alabama professor and so many others who have been down your SAME<br />
path !!!!</p>
<p>You have the SAME twisted mind and a VERY distorted (mental) image of yourself !!!</p>
<p>It seems you&#8217;re the ONLY one on this blog who doesn&#8217;t know that you&#8217;re way, WAY OUTTA BALANCE !!!!!</p>
<p>GET HELP !!!</p>
<p>SOON !!!!</p>
<p>BEFORE you become the next one to make the Six O&#8217;clock News !!!!!</p>
<p>THAT&#8217;S about as constructive as anyone can get with you !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92248</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92248</guid>
		<description>The unique thing about the Judeo-Christian tradition is that these faiths regard each individual as loved by God. This belief underpins all that is good about Western Civilization... the belief in the value of the individual. 

Naturally, this belief system is very threatening to Progressives, who believe that all rights are property of the state and collective. This is why Progressives despise Christianity and Judaism beyond other faiths.

 Obama revealed his disdain for middle America’s faith and values at a closed-door San Francisco fundraiser:

“You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest... it’s not surprising they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” 


Liberals are masters of the technique known as projection, by which they accuse their enemies of their own worst faults The new world order 3rd Way is the 4th Reich.

 http://www.worldviewtimes.com/article.php/articleid-5597/Brannon-Howse


http://theothermccain.com/2010/02/12/evolution-anthropogenic-global-warming-and-other-non-falsifiable-theories/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The unique thing about the Judeo-Christian tradition is that these faiths regard each individual as loved by God. This belief underpins all that is good about Western Civilization&#8230; the belief in the value of the individual. </p>
<p>Naturally, this belief system is very threatening to Progressives, who believe that all rights are property of the state and collective. This is why Progressives despise Christianity and Judaism beyond other faiths.</p>
<p> Obama revealed his disdain for middle America’s faith and values at a closed-door San Francisco fundraiser:</p>
<p>“You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest&#8230; it’s not surprising they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” </p>
<p>Liberals are masters of the technique known as projection, by which they accuse their enemies of their own worst faults The new world order 3rd Way is the 4th Reich.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.worldviewtimes.com/article.php/articleid-5597/Brannon-Howse" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldviewtimes.com/article.php/articleid-5597/Brannon-Howse</a></p>
<p><a href="http://theothermccain.com/2010/02/12/evolution-anthropogenic-global-warming-and-other-non-falsifiable-theories/" rel="nofollow">http://theothermccain.com/2010/02/12/evolution-anthropogenic-global-warming-and-other-non-falsifiable-theories/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gnarly</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92245</link>
		<dc:creator>Gnarly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92245</guid>
		<description>.....and while you were helping with Bob's campaign you never figured out he was a Delegate, not a Senator as you said in your first post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;..and while you were helping with Bob&#8217;s campaign you never figured out he was a Delegate, not a Senator as you said in your first post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gnarly</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92244</link>
		<dc:creator>Gnarly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92244</guid>
		<description>"J. Tyler Ballance said on 15 Feb 2010 at 5:07 pm: Flag comment 

Gnarly: I helped with Bob’s campaign against Jim Gilmore…"


You worked on a campaign of someone you have no ideological compatibility and  from your comments for whom you harbor a certain amount of contempt....now you say you are employed by Democrats?  Not that you had any before your comments, but in my opinion, you have NO credibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;J. Tyler Ballance said on 15 Feb 2010 at 5:07 pm: Flag comment </p>
<p>Gnarly: I helped with Bob’s campaign against Jim Gilmore…&#8221;</p>
<p>You worked on a campaign of someone you have no ideological compatibility and  from your comments for whom you harbor a certain amount of contempt&#8230;.now you say you are employed by Democrats?  Not that you had any before your comments, but in my opinion, you have NO credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg L</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92238</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/02/14/bob-marshall-on-fox-news/#comment-92238</guid>
		<description>Perhaps, when you seem to go out of your way to deeply offend others, it should come as little surprise that they're not very interested in engaging in a conversation with you.

"Religious Reich?"  "Teabaggers?"  And then you come out with an appeal for reasoned discussion?

I've no interest at all in discussing anything with someone who starts a conversation by calling me a Nazi.  Members of my family died fighting Hitler.  People I will never know but for the stories my grandmother tells me about the warm and exuberant brother who went off to war and never came home, and whose ultimate fate remained unknown for years until Norway informed the United States that they recovered his dog tags in the wreckage of a P-51 Mustang.  I could have known this man, I could have enjoyed playing with my only great uncle as a kid, but he gave his life for our country and I never got to meet him.  My family, as have many others, paid a personal price to oppose Hitler's plans and keep our country safe.

And you call me, and others who carry deep religious convictions and have lost family members, who are informed about their faith from the Bible "the religious reich."  Appalling.  Truly appalling.

Go crawl back into that slimy filthy hole you came from, and do me the favor of not trying to engage me in a conversation dictated by your own terms of "decency" again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps, when you seem to go out of your way to deeply offend others, it should come as little surprise that they&#8217;re not very interested in engaging in a conversation with you.</p>
<p>&#8220;Religious Reich?&#8221;  &#8220;Teabaggers?&#8221;  And then you come out with an appeal for reasoned discussion?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve no interest at all in discussing anything with someone who starts a conversation by calling me a Nazi.  Members of my family died fighting Hitler.  People I will never know but for the stories my grandmother tells me about the warm and exuberant brother who went off to war and never came home, and whose ultimate fate remained unknown for years until Norway informed the United States that they recovered his dog tags in the wreckage of a P-51 Mustang.  I could have known this man, I could have enjoyed playing with my only great uncle as a kid, but he gave his life for our country and I never got to meet him.  My family, as have many others, paid a personal price to oppose Hitler&#8217;s plans and keep our country safe.</p>
<p>And you call me, and others who carry deep religious convictions and have lost family members, who are informed about their faith from the Bible &#8220;the religious reich.&#8221;  Appalling.  Truly appalling.</p>
<p>Go crawl back into that slimy filthy hole you came from, and do me the favor of not trying to engage me in a conversation dictated by your own terms of &#8220;decency&#8221; again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

