<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SB 462 Violates Law, Harms Witness Program</title>
	<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/</link>
	<description>Blog-Fu for Prince William, Manassas and Manassas Park politics.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 18:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Cynic</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-93021</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-93021</guid>
		<description>DPortM said on 9 Mar 2010 at 12:50 pm:
Excellent news - this bill was killed in Committee.

Interesting. Wonder how many of those who sponsored this Bill knew that it would be killed in Committee?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DPortM said on 9 Mar 2010 at 12:50 pm:<br />
Excellent news - this bill was killed in Committee.</p>
<p>Interesting. Wonder how many of those who sponsored this Bill knew that it would be killed in Committee?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoVA Scout</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-93018</link>
		<dc:creator>NoVA Scout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-93018</guid>
		<description>Groveton - thanks for that.  re health care, I think the 10th amendment argument is a reach, but, in any event, my question is why is the AG raising that?  I think he probably has just decided it's a way to raise his personal profile.  Until there is some legislation on the federal level and we know exactly what its final contents are, there's no point in even talking about it other than on the goofy cable channels that masquerade as "news" outlets these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Groveton - thanks for that.  re health care, I think the 10th amendment argument is a reach, but, in any event, my question is why is the AG raising that?  I think he probably has just decided it&#8217;s a way to raise his personal profile.  Until there is some legislation on the federal level and we know exactly what its final contents are, there&#8217;s no point in even talking about it other than on the goofy cable channels that masquerade as &#8220;news&#8221; outlets these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DPortM</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-93016</link>
		<dc:creator>DPortM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-93016</guid>
		<description>Excellent news - this bill was killed in Committee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent news - this bill was killed in Committee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Groveton</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92979</link>
		<dc:creator>Groveton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92979</guid>
		<description>NoVa Scout:

Half of what Cuccinelli is doing is a legitimate effort to check federal over-reach.  The Tenth Amendment is pretty clear:

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.".

The federal government has no power to force people into contracts with private concerns.  That power is not granted in the constitution.  Yet, some iterations of the health care bill would require that.  Cuccinelli is saying that only the states have that right since it is not specifically defined in the constitution and the Tenth Amendment gives "everything else" to the states.

His stance on global warming / climate change is a bit harder to fathom.  I think he's saying that he thinks the science is faulty.  He contends that his undergraduate engineering degree makes him well suited for that complaint.  That seems like a reach to me.  The EPA has been in existence since the Nixon Administration (yes, it was created by a Republican Administration).  I am not sure how Virginia will successfully challenge environmental legislation.

Finally, his publicity stunt in sending a letter to colleges and universities informing them that they lack the right to forbid discrimination based on sexual preference was just silly.  While he is technically correct it's very hard to see what he can do about it.

I think the fame of becoming AG has gone to Ken Cuccinelli's head.  That's too bad since some of his ideas about preserving the balance of power defined by the constitution are good ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NoVa Scout:</p>
<p>Half of what Cuccinelli is doing is a legitimate effort to check federal over-reach.  The Tenth Amendment is pretty clear:</p>
<p>&#8220;The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.&#8221;.</p>
<p>The federal government has no power to force people into contracts with private concerns.  That power is not granted in the constitution.  Yet, some iterations of the health care bill would require that.  Cuccinelli is saying that only the states have that right since it is not specifically defined in the constitution and the Tenth Amendment gives &#8220;everything else&#8221; to the states.</p>
<p>His stance on global warming / climate change is a bit harder to fathom.  I think he&#8217;s saying that he thinks the science is faulty.  He contends that his undergraduate engineering degree makes him well suited for that complaint.  That seems like a reach to me.  The EPA has been in existence since the Nixon Administration (yes, it was created by a Republican Administration).  I am not sure how Virginia will successfully challenge environmental legislation.</p>
<p>Finally, his publicity stunt in sending a letter to colleges and universities informing them that they lack the right to forbid discrimination based on sexual preference was just silly.  While he is technically correct it&#8217;s very hard to see what he can do about it.</p>
<p>I think the fame of becoming AG has gone to Ken Cuccinelli&#8217;s head.  That&#8217;s too bad since some of his ideas about preserving the balance of power defined by the constitution are good ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: local gop's hemorrhoid</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92978</link>
		<dc:creator>local gop's hemorrhoid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92978</guid>
		<description>Notwithstanding local gop's attacks on constitutionally protected liberties and the Christian faith, I'm sure he's just a fine fellow.  

He probably hangs out with Russ Potts and John Chichester while they bemoan the birth of Ronald Reagan while pushing copies of the Federalist Papers into a wood chipper.  Potts and Chichester are probably the only two "Republicans" who would consistently agree with him and still play "pitcher" to his pustule-laden butt.

Hey local gop, isn't there an American flag somewhere you should be setting fire to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notwithstanding local gop&#8217;s attacks on constitutionally protected liberties and the Christian faith, I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;s just a fine fellow.  </p>
<p>He probably hangs out with Russ Potts and John Chichester while they bemoan the birth of Ronald Reagan while pushing copies of the Federalist Papers into a wood chipper.  Potts and Chichester are probably the only two &#8220;Republicans&#8221; who would consistently agree with him and still play &#8220;pitcher&#8221; to his pustule-laden butt.</p>
<p>Hey local gop, isn&#8217;t there an American flag somewhere you should be setting fire to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92977</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92977</guid>
		<description>babe said on 6 Mar 2010 at 10:07 am: "More like a grammatically challenged Jiffy Lube drop out blogging from mommy’s basement."

That pretty much covers ALL left wing, whacked out Liberal NUT JOBS with a MENTAL DISORDER !!!

They want to BAN plastic bags but it's O.K. to FLUSH a BABY down the TOILET !!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>babe said on 6 Mar 2010 at 10:07 am: &#8220;More like a grammatically challenged Jiffy Lube drop out blogging from mommy’s basement.&#8221;</p>
<p>That pretty much covers ALL left wing, whacked out Liberal NUT JOBS with a MENTAL DISORDER !!!</p>
<p>They want to BAN plastic bags but it&#8217;s O.K. to FLUSH a BABY down the TOILET !!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: local gop</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92976</link>
		<dc:creator>local gop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 17:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92976</guid>
		<description>freedom,
at some point or another, arguing with ideological wack nuts gets really old.  no, i'll let you go back in your hole and cling to your guns and religion (oh wait unless that's 'offensive') and live out your lives as the 'real americans.'  while you're at it i'm sure you will find the time to pay homage to your leader papa cooch; i hear he's picking fights with gays now....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>freedom,<br />
at some point or another, arguing with ideological wack nuts gets really old.  no, i&#8217;ll let you go back in your hole and cling to your guns and religion (oh wait unless that&#8217;s &#8216;offensive&#8217;) and live out your lives as the &#8216;real americans.&#8217;  while you&#8217;re at it i&#8217;m sure you will find the time to pay homage to your leader papa cooch; i hear he&#8217;s picking fights with gays now&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92972</link>
		<dc:creator>Freedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92972</guid>
		<description>Wait a minute folks, if you keep slamming "local gop," I'm afraid he'll get angry and won't come back!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a minute folks, if you keep slamming &#8220;local gop,&#8221; I&#8217;m afraid he&#8217;ll get angry and won&#8217;t come back!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: babe</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92971</link>
		<dc:creator>babe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92971</guid>
		<description>Not sure that Local GOP is either local or GOP. More like a grammatically challenged  Jiffy Lube drop out blogging from mommy's basement. Or maybe be an ACORN drone getting paid to trash discussion threads. Probably not a bad way to worm your way through school. Beats working for a living.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure that Local GOP is either local or GOP. More like a grammatically challenged  Jiffy Lube drop out blogging from mommy&#8217;s basement. Or maybe be an ACORN drone getting paid to trash discussion threads. Probably not a bad way to worm your way through school. Beats working for a living.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DPortM</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92970</link>
		<dc:creator>DPortM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 14:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92970</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that local gop and Senator McCain have a lot in common. Not really Republicans, not at all conservative, and both should not consider themselves members of the GOP.

It is because of people like local gop, and Senator McCain having the GOP presidential nomination, that our country is in the situation it is today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that local gop and Senator McCain have a lot in common. Not really Republicans, not at all conservative, and both should not consider themselves members of the GOP.</p>
<p>It is because of people like local gop, and Senator McCain having the GOP presidential nomination, that our country is in the situation it is today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92967</link>
		<dc:creator>Freedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 13:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92967</guid>
		<description>Hmmmmmm, having read his entries, it seems to me that "local gop" needs to find a class in remedial English grammar while he's at GMU.  :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmmmm, having read his entries, it seems to me that &#8220;local gop&#8221; needs to find a class in remedial English grammar while he&#8217;s at GMU.  <img src='http://www.bvbl.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: local gop's hemorrhoid</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92949</link>
		<dc:creator>local gop's hemorrhoid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92949</guid>
		<description>Notwithstanding local gop's utter failure to advance a non-laughable argument concerning the law, he now resorts to attacking the messenger who has demolished his argument.  A tried and true methodology of the left.

Maybe we should stack up local gop's credentials against the attorney who wrote the opinion.  Let's see now, undergraduate art history vs. juris doctor ... how does one choose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notwithstanding local gop&#8217;s utter failure to advance a non-laughable argument concerning the law, he now resorts to attacking the messenger who has demolished his argument.  A tried and true methodology of the left.</p>
<p>Maybe we should stack up local gop&#8217;s credentials against the attorney who wrote the opinion.  Let&#8217;s see now, undergraduate art history vs. juris doctor &#8230; how does one choose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: local gop</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92947</link>
		<dc:creator>local gop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92947</guid>
		<description>what lawyer?  you can't seriously be referring to the political interest group that paid a lawyer to give them an opinion that they agreed with, are you??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what lawyer?  you can&#8217;t seriously be referring to the political interest group that paid a lawyer to give them an opinion that they agreed with, are you??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Advocator</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92939</link>
		<dc:creator>Advocator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92939</guid>
		<description>Corey Stewart is on WAMU now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corey Stewart is on WAMU now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Love the U.S.A.</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92937</link>
		<dc:creator>Love the U.S.A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92937</guid>
		<description>HB 737 will be heard on Monday! So all of you need to REALLY contact Colgan and tell him this E-Verify bill is needed in Virginia! 
Email*: district29@senate.virginia.gov
Phone: (804) 698-7529</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HB 737 will be heard on Monday! So all of you need to REALLY contact Colgan and tell him this E-Verify bill is needed in Virginia!<br />
Email*: <a href="mailto:district29@senate.virginia.gov">district29@senate.virginia.gov</a><br />
Phone: (804) 698-7529</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Love the U.S.A.</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92932</link>
		<dc:creator>Love the U.S.A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92932</guid>
		<description>local gop, 
Are you a Constitutional lawyer? Constitutional lawyers have looked at this bill and agree with Greg. Illegal aliens are afforded protection when victims of a crime in the form of an U visa. Look it up.

Never before has Virginia restricted a police officers ability to question a victim. This would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>local gop,<br />
Are you a Constitutional lawyer? Constitutional lawyers have looked at this bill and agree with Greg. Illegal aliens are afforded protection when victims of a crime in the form of an U visa. Look it up.</p>
<p>Never before has Virginia restricted a police officers ability to question a victim. This would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Advocator</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92931</link>
		<dc:creator>Advocator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92931</guid>
		<description>Meanwhile, back to HB 737, the E-Verify bill.  I go a response from Senator Wagner today to my inquiry about it.  Although I am not his constituent, he responded anyway.  Wish ole Chuckie was as courteous and responsive:

Dear Mr. ____:

Thank you for contacting my office regarding your support for House Bill 737, the “E-Verify” bill, which requires agencies of the Commonwealth and localities to enroll in the E-Verify Program by December 1, 2010, and to use the Program for each newly hired employee who is to perform work within the Commonwealth.  HB 737 passed the House 82-13 and was communicated to the Senate for consideration.  The bill has been assigned to the Senate Commerce and Labor Committee, on which I serve, and should be on the docket for the March 8, 2010 meeting.  This will be the last meeting of Commerce and Labor, as session is scheduled to adjourn on March 13th.

I agree entirely with your sentiments on this legislation.  I will vote for the bill in Commerce and Labor and, if it is reported out of committee, I will vote for the bill on the Senate floor.

 The cornerstone of good government is an informed electorate.  I am proud to have constituents who are engaged in the political process.  While we might not always agree, I can promise that I will always listen to you and examine both sides of every issue.  Constituent input is essential in a well-represented district.  As I go about my legislative duties, the people of the 7th District are my first and foremost concern.

Please feel free to contact me if you need assistance at any time.  When session adjourns on March 13th, I can be reached at the district office by calling 757-671-2250 or emailing district07@senate.virginia.gov.   If you wish to track an issue or specific bills of interest, please access the Virginia General Assembly website: http://legis.state.va.us.  And, look for session updates and other information on my website: www.wagnervasenate.com.

Again, thank you for your participation in our state government.


                                                         Sincerely yours,


Frank W. Wagner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile, back to HB 737, the E-Verify bill.  I go a response from Senator Wagner today to my inquiry about it.  Although I am not his constituent, he responded anyway.  Wish ole Chuckie was as courteous and responsive:</p>
<p>Dear Mr. ____:</p>
<p>Thank you for contacting my office regarding your support for House Bill 737, the “E-Verify” bill, which requires agencies of the Commonwealth and localities to enroll in the E-Verify Program by December 1, 2010, and to use the Program for each newly hired employee who is to perform work within the Commonwealth.  HB 737 passed the House 82-13 and was communicated to the Senate for consideration.  The bill has been assigned to the Senate Commerce and Labor Committee, on which I serve, and should be on the docket for the March 8, 2010 meeting.  This will be the last meeting of Commerce and Labor, as session is scheduled to adjourn on March 13th.</p>
<p>I agree entirely with your sentiments on this legislation.  I will vote for the bill in Commerce and Labor and, if it is reported out of committee, I will vote for the bill on the Senate floor.</p>
<p> The cornerstone of good government is an informed electorate.  I am proud to have constituents who are engaged in the political process.  While we might not always agree, I can promise that I will always listen to you and examine both sides of every issue.  Constituent input is essential in a well-represented district.  As I go about my legislative duties, the people of the 7th District are my first and foremost concern.</p>
<p>Please feel free to contact me if you need assistance at any time.  When session adjourns on March 13th, I can be reached at the district office by calling 757-671-2250 or emailing <a href="mailto:district07@senate.virginia.gov.">district07@senate.virginia.gov.</a>   If you wish to track an issue or specific bills of interest, please access the Virginia General Assembly website: <a href="http://legis.state.va.us." rel="nofollow">http://legis.state.va.us.</a>  And, look for session updates and other information on my website: <a href="http://www.wagnervasenate.com." rel="nofollow">www.wagnervasenate.com.</a></p>
<p>Again, thank you for your participation in our state government.</p>
<p>                                                         Sincerely yours,</p>
<p>Frank W. Wagner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoVA Scout</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92927</link>
		<dc:creator>NoVA Scout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92927</guid>
		<description>Groveton: why would a state attorney general "go with" either a health care fight or a global warming fight?  what do those issues have to do with his responsibilities?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Groveton: why would a state attorney general &#8220;go with&#8221; either a health care fight or a global warming fight?  what do those issues have to do with his responsibilities?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Local GOP's very small brain</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92915</link>
		<dc:creator>Local GOP's very small brain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 04:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92915</guid>
		<description>It depends on what the definition of "is" is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends on what the definition of &#8220;is&#8221; is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: local gop's hemorrhoid</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92913</link>
		<dc:creator>local gop's hemorrhoid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/03/04/sb-462-violates-law-harms-witness-program/#comment-92913</guid>
		<description>Notwithstanding his demonstrated issues with reading comprehension, local gop can still shuck and jive on another tangential argument of dubious merit as each subsequent argument of his crumbles to dust.  Now his argument is that prohibiting the collection of information is not prohibiting the collection of information.

Bill Clinton couldn't even pull off such dumbass baloney, and he was actually good at this.  Local gop is just a piker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notwithstanding his demonstrated issues with reading comprehension, local gop can still shuck and jive on another tangential argument of dubious merit as each subsequent argument of his crumbles to dust.  Now his argument is that prohibiting the collection of information is not prohibiting the collection of information.</p>
<p>Bill Clinton couldn&#8217;t even pull off such dumbass baloney, and he was actually good at this.  Local gop is just a piker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

