Comments on: Mexicans Without Borders Lies Again

By: bill

bill — Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:01:03 +0000

With all of the identity theft done by the illegal communtiy, ie. stolen or fake Social Security Numbers, how is it possible the U.S. Government cannot track them down through the Social Security Administration. It would be very simple for ICE to subpoena the records of SSN’s not issued by the Social Security Administration, or the ones that have two, three, four, who knows how many incomes paying into the account from multiple states, and cities it would be impossible to commute between. There really are easy ways to track illegals and I see no reason to hold them long term in U.S. prisons unless they commit crimes other than illegal entry to the U.S. Simply ship them back to Wherever they came from. As for the arguments of seperating legal children from illegal parents, since the dawn of man the children have had to suffer the consequences of their parents actions and decisions. Does the child born into poverty choose to be born into poverty? When your family moved because of a new job did you stay behind? I never stayed behind. Past influxes of immigrant populations came in numbers which were able to be assimilated into society and chose to assimilate tehmselves into society. The current problem with the immigrant population is the large number who do not chose to assimilate themselves into our society. Which leaves the sad fact that if I want to go to a fast food restaraunt, wal mart, etc.. I now have to speak spanish inorder to get food or pay for the items I am trying to buy. This countries language is english, not espanyol. As for constitutional rights, when did crimanals get more constitutional rights than law abiding citizens? What right does somebody who is here illegally to hide behind the constitution? If you are here illegally then you are a criminal and should be treated as such. If the issue is racial profiling, then every time I commit a crime check my residency status. Wait, forget that I said that, I do not commit crimes! Check my status when I walk down the street, whn I go to the DMV, when I get my car inspected, when I speed. You can check my status every day I do not care! If you check everybodies status there is no racial profiling involved. The deficite, How many billions of dollars do we spend on welfare, insurance, housing, etc. for illegals. Why is it my responsibility to pay for them to live when they cannot get a job in the down economy. There are enough americans I already have to pay for. Marches on the Capitol, For gods sake if you are going to march on the capitol of my country do it in english. 95% or more of the people in the white house and capitol building do not speak spanish and therefore do not understand you, and do not do it waving any other flag than an American Flag. I am not going to listen or care what you have to say if you are waiving a foriegn flag, But I will check your residency!

By: chicko

chicko — Sun, 30 May 2010 22:12:06 +0000

what’s up with teachers turning into freaks lately…isnt moonhowler a former teacher too? damn…wouldnt want to be in any of their classes. I’m all for teaching as a profession, some of the greatest people in the world..but fools like that put the profession down.

By: Cynic

Cynic — Sun, 30 May 2010 19:59:35 +0000

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=159677

I’m all for scraping the mild Arizona immigration law and replacing it with Mexico’s immigration laws.

Am sure Nancy and her illegal minions would be in full support of taking this action.

By: GimmeABreaaaaak!

GimmeABreaaaaak! — Sun, 30 May 2010 18:18:11 +0000

“Maybe we are getting through to Webb, but Warner needs to know we are not happy with him.”

Webb is up for re-election in 2012, when Obama is as well. His voting record on immigration issues is D. Warner, up in 2014 - a long 4.5 years away - has F-, meaning that he basically has 0 good votes. He shares this distinction with Jim Moran.

http://www.numbersusa.com/content/my/tools/grades/list/0/RECENT/VA/A/Grade/Active

By: You Know Me

You Know Me — Sun, 30 May 2010 17:30:08 +0000

Chicken Little is correct. Nancy “All Lies” Layall is no attorney, even though she plays one on TV. She’s what Sailors call a “sea lawyer” and Soldiers and Marines call a “Barracks Attorney”. In reality, she is nothing more than a marxist fraud who prey upon her constituancy. She’s no better than Al Not-so-Sharpton. She is a commie. Worse, she is a traitor to her nation. She deserves a traitor’s fate.

By: chicken little

chicken little — Sun, 30 May 2010 02:49:27 +0000

Nancy is a former social studies teacher - I taught with her at Potomac High School many years ago

By: Dave in PWC

Dave in PWC — Sat, 29 May 2010 22:57:35 +0000

Just checked the voting records of our Virginia Senators on the three amendments offered up on the emergency war funding bill discussed on Thursday that had to do with securing the southern border. Webb voted for adding funds to the bill to help secure the border on all three amendments and Warner voted no on all three. Two additional amendments were offered but Harry Reid would not let them come up for a vote. Maybe we are getting through to Webb, but Warner needs to know we are not happy with him.

By: Cynic

Cynic — Sat, 29 May 2010 22:15:30 +0000

Is the “legal Coordinator” a citizen?

Would guess she is not. As an illegal in the USA she has far more rights and benefits than a citizen. She should go to Mexico where the immigration laws are somewhat stricter. There she would at least have some challenges.

By: chicko

chicko — Sat, 29 May 2010 22:07:55 +0000

as long as she wears any mask I’m fine with it, they should have issued her one from birth with that nasty mug of hers…

By: chicko

chicko — Sat, 29 May 2010 22:06:58 +0000

she’s not an practicing attorney as far as I know.

she’s one of those people with pseudo-legal knowledge that use subterfuge and smoke and mirrors to try to dazzle people with their legal brilliance…so that they THINK they are lawyers (but really are not).

but I’ll give her one thing…she is pretty stupid though, that I’m sure of.

By: Greg L

Greg L — Sat, 29 May 2010 20:29:03 +0000

She is the legal coordinator for Mexicans Without Borders. I do not know for sure whether she is an attorney or not. She certainly seems to present herself as one, but her behavior seems rather inconsistent with that discipline.

By: Cynic

Cynic — Sat, 29 May 2010 16:50:17 +0000

Nancy, is she not an Immigration Attorney?

Why would she wear a ski mask?

By: chicko

chicko — Sat, 29 May 2010 13:56:30 +0000

Old Ricky was probably deported, what should have happened long ago. Now if we can get Nancy deported we are getting somewhere, she’s around somewhere dancing around with her ski mask..

By: Wolverine

Wolverine — Sat, 29 May 2010 05:01:30 +0000

Danilyn, the intent was to show that more than half of the Hispanic community appears to approve of the way in which the police are enforcing the current resolution. That 51% came from two categories, as did all the other percentages: “Very Satisfied” and “Somewhat Satisfied.” Most certainly one has to take into account the attitudes of the remaining 49% of that community; but the majority number would seem to indicate that over half are not particularly focused on evidence of racial profiling in the application of the law. One ought to be able to read some significance into the fact that you got a satisfied response of some sort from over half of the community almost exclusively involved in the basic issue from Day One. That seems to me to be a promising positive for PWC with regard to the current resolution. But, if there is some solid evidence of cases of racial profiling, I would like to see it. Moreover, given the way surveys of this kind usually go, you have to calculate that a good portion of the negative responses may have come from those who want no resolution whatsoever and consider the existence of anything like it as unacceptable. It does not necessarily mean that they have witnessed or experienced racial profiling themselves, except if they think any police stop for DUI or traffic violations or lesser “crimes” is the eqiuivalent of racial profiling.

By: Rgdfry

Rgdfry — Sat, 29 May 2010 03:28:31 +0000

Peter,

Perhaps that segment perceives there is profiling, OR they would like others to believe there is??? Where is the evidence?

By: Peter Danlyn

Peter Danlyn — Sat, 29 May 2010 00:05:42 +0000

Sorry if my post seemed a bit obtuse. The statistical post seemed to say, “If 51 percent of hispanics think the law is being implemented fairly then the opinion of the 49 percent who feel otherwise is discredited, thus proving that it is being impemented fairly” The other way one could read it is “the significant deviation in responses between hispanic and all other respondents suggests that there is indeed some racial profiling going on. That perception could affect the quality of life of almost half the hispanic residents of PWC.”

Surely that wasn’t the intent of the post, was it?

By: You Know Me

You Know Me — Fri, 28 May 2010 23:30:21 +0000

“51 percent is the majority threshold where those who disagree or feel they have legitimate conerns should just give it a rest?”

Peter, your comment is illogical, and yet, pointless.

By: legal2

legal2 — Fri, 28 May 2010 22:45:15 +0000

The ignorant, what-can-you-do-for-me crowd continues to elect ignorant, what-can-you-do-for-me candidates and we end up with a downward spiral of third-world social/economic conditions from whence they escaped (if immigrants), or which they admire (socialist/marxist, limousine liberals). I think we owe a lot of this mindset to the dumbed-down, revisionist-history, public education for the last couple of generations.

By: Peter Danlyn

Peter Danlyn — Fri, 28 May 2010 22:31:24 +0000

So,
51 percent is the majority threshold where those who disagree or feel they have legitimate conerns should just give it a rest? Seems like Mr. Obama beat that threshold in the last election. By your reasoning, those who object should just get out of the way and let him do his thing.

By: Dave in PWC

Dave in PWC — Fri, 28 May 2010 21:58:29 +0000

Where is Ricky? I concur with Oh No! Greg, we need to support Arizona and show how the rule of law helped our county for awhile, not sure it’s working anymore as I’m seeing a lot more day laborers at Coverstone Raceway as well as 7-11.