<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Rule Of Law Act Unveiled</title>
	<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/</link>
	<description>Blog-Fu for Prince William, Manassas and Manassas Park politics.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96122</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96122</guid>
		<description>Why dosn't Corry bring back Stirrups original rule of law resolution?  You know, the one they gutted just a few weeks after passing the original /good version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why dosn&#8217;t Corry bring back Stirrups original rule of law resolution?  You know, the one they gutted just a few weeks after passing the original /good version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just the Facts</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96110</link>
		<dc:creator>Just the Facts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 13:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96110</guid>
		<description>Greg - you and I are on the same page on a great many issues but I'm going to have to differ with you here.  It's not just Democrats pushing for inclusion of employer sanctions.  Many of us (Republicans) who want the problem of illegal immigration dealt with effectively see enforcing employment laws and employer sanctions as the best way to go.  If there were no jobs for the illegals they would not come here.  We would not even need to consider ID checks, and no sanctuary cities would exist.

The Richmond business lobby is indeed very powerful - no argument there.  However, is Corey just going to punt and shoot for some symbolic victory?  You are also correct about the "one object rule."  Why not start with the "one object" that would have the most impact in making Virginia an illegal-unfriendly state, namely employer sanctions, then move on to the other items.

Arizona did not back down back to and quiver in front of business interests.  SB 1070 includes solid provisions to crack down on illegal employment, and the judge did not rule an injunction against any of those sections of the bill.  None of those measures are included in Corey's proposed legislation for Virginia.

To me, Corey's Virginia Rule of Law campaign is nothing but posturing for upcoming elections and I can't sign on to something that I know has no chance of solving the illegal alien problem in any meaningful way.  Now, if Corey would show some true resolve and backbone, and take on the business interests, including developers, who are the true cause of the illegal immigration problem, I'd be with him one hundred percent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg - you and I are on the same page on a great many issues but I&#8217;m going to have to differ with you here.  It&#8217;s not just Democrats pushing for inclusion of employer sanctions.  Many of us (Republicans) who want the problem of illegal immigration dealt with effectively see enforcing employment laws and employer sanctions as the best way to go.  If there were no jobs for the illegals they would not come here.  We would not even need to consider ID checks, and no sanctuary cities would exist.</p>
<p>The Richmond business lobby is indeed very powerful - no argument there.  However, is Corey just going to punt and shoot for some symbolic victory?  You are also correct about the &#8220;one object rule.&#8221;  Why not start with the &#8220;one object&#8221; that would have the most impact in making Virginia an illegal-unfriendly state, namely employer sanctions, then move on to the other items.</p>
<p>Arizona did not back down back to and quiver in front of business interests.  SB 1070 includes solid provisions to crack down on illegal employment, and the judge did not rule an injunction against any of those sections of the bill.  None of those measures are included in Corey&#8217;s proposed legislation for Virginia.</p>
<p>To me, Corey&#8217;s Virginia Rule of Law campaign is nothing but posturing for upcoming elections and I can&#8217;t sign on to something that I know has no chance of solving the illegal alien problem in any meaningful way.  Now, if Corey would show some true resolve and backbone, and take on the business interests, including developers, who are the true cause of the illegal immigration problem, I&#8217;d be with him one hundred percent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: park'd</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96104</link>
		<dc:creator>park'd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96104</guid>
		<description>Wake me when there is a provision in this new act that has to do with firing Deane's a$$ for insubordination and dereliction of duty. Until then *yawn*.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wake me when there is a provision in this new act that has to do with firing Deane&#8217;s a$$ for insubordination and dereliction of duty. Until then *yawn*.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg L</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96098</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96098</guid>
		<description>Several rather legitimate reasons for this: one is the "one object rule" that is already being stretched already here.  Two, the legislation is crafted so as not to be directly targeted by the powerful Richmond business lobby.  You eat the elephant one bit at a time, and with this stuff you have to be careful about how you do it and strategic about what bites you take first.

I know the Dems are expressing concerns that employer sanctions aren't in this bill, and for that I have a simple solution: Any Democrat who wants to introduce an employer sanctions bill is free to contact me for assistance in getting one of these drafted.  I'll do everything I can to help them.  Last year Dick Sasllaw worked really hard to put a stop to a bill that did just this introduced by Dave Albo, and if they've suddenly seen the light and want to do something here, I'll do whatever I can to help.

Absent some sort of indication from Saslaw that he wants a bill like this, or at least won't move heaven and earth to gut it as he did last year, I don't take very seriously complaints by Dems that "more important" priorities are being missed.  Their record, at least so far, has been distressingly clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several rather legitimate reasons for this: one is the &#8220;one object rule&#8221; that is already being stretched already here.  Two, the legislation is crafted so as not to be directly targeted by the powerful Richmond business lobby.  You eat the elephant one bit at a time, and with this stuff you have to be careful about how you do it and strategic about what bites you take first.</p>
<p>I know the Dems are expressing concerns that employer sanctions aren&#8217;t in this bill, and for that I have a simple solution: Any Democrat who wants to introduce an employer sanctions bill is free to contact me for assistance in getting one of these drafted.  I&#8217;ll do everything I can to help them.  Last year Dick Sasllaw worked really hard to put a stop to a bill that did just this introduced by Dave Albo, and if they&#8217;ve suddenly seen the light and want to do something here, I&#8217;ll do whatever I can to help.</p>
<p>Absent some sort of indication from Saslaw that he wants a bill like this, or at least won&#8217;t move heaven and earth to gut it as he did last year, I don&#8217;t take very seriously complaints by Dems that &#8220;more important&#8221; priorities are being missed.  Their record, at least so far, has been distressingly clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just the Facts</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96092</link>
		<dc:creator>Just the Facts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 13:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96092</guid>
		<description>Groveton is absolutely right.  

Nothing in Corey’s Virginia Rule of Law proposal even causes an annoyance for employers of illegal aliens (except maybe the part about driving them around).  The Arizona law is explicit and effective on employment of illegal aliens.  However, none of those provisions are in Corey’s proposed legislation.

I’m afraid people are listening too much to Corey’s rhetoric and too little to what he is actually doing and proposing.  We need action on illegal immigration and that means cracking down on employers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Groveton is absolutely right.  </p>
<p>Nothing in Corey’s Virginia Rule of Law proposal even causes an annoyance for employers of illegal aliens (except maybe the part about driving them around).  The Arizona law is explicit and effective on employment of illegal aliens.  However, none of those provisions are in Corey’s proposed legislation.</p>
<p>I’m afraid people are listening too much to Corey’s rhetoric and too little to what he is actually doing and proposing.  We need action on illegal immigration and that means cracking down on employers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Groveton</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96088</link>
		<dc:creator>Groveton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96088</guid>
		<description>Is there any provision in the law to prosecute those who hire illegal aliens?  To me, that seems necessary to really solve the problem.  It is also the only rational defense used by liberals.  They claim that conservatives will target the generally poor and often defenseless illegals while ignoring the politically connected employers.  That gap must be eliminated.  If you like illegals enough to hire them you should also like them enough to spend some time in jail with them.

As for Saslaw - if stupidity could be bottled the label would read "Saslaw".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any provision in the law to prosecute those who hire illegal aliens?  To me, that seems necessary to really solve the problem.  It is also the only rational defense used by liberals.  They claim that conservatives will target the generally poor and often defenseless illegals while ignoring the politically connected employers.  That gap must be eliminated.  If you like illegals enough to hire them you should also like them enough to spend some time in jail with them.</p>
<p>As for Saslaw - if stupidity could be bottled the label would read &#8220;Saslaw&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S Gonzales</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96085</link>
		<dc:creator>S Gonzales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96085</guid>
		<description>Go Corey. Let's roll!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Corey. Let&#8217;s roll!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: june bug</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96084</link>
		<dc:creator>june bug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 03:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96084</guid>
		<description>What ever made you think citizens don't pay attention to our local politics?
This is why there are so many people agree with Corey and he will proceed.This is what we needed,to stand up and be counted. The Supervisors did that when voting for the Resolution a few years ago!

I would have hoped that Lingamfelter would have come across more positive in the news article, but I know Corey and our Supervisors are wanting all of the Delgates help in getting some strong Laws on the Books in Virginia. After all we have Laws on the Federal Level and for over 20 years,the Feds have not upheld them. They did start to rounding them up, but there are Millions out there,so the Feds need to get busy.

The large batch they hauled in recently, did you see the ICE people come down Rt. One and one place they stopped was the corner of Rt. One and P.Wm. Parkway.Don't know if they took anyone from there.The other place was P.Wm. Plaza and Todos!
I guess Todo has choosen his side. Too bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What ever made you think citizens don&#8217;t pay attention to our local politics?<br />
This is why there are so many people agree with Corey and he will proceed.This is what we needed,to stand up and be counted. The Supervisors did that when voting for the Resolution a few years ago!</p>
<p>I would have hoped that Lingamfelter would have come across more positive in the news article, but I know Corey and our Supervisors are wanting all of the Delgates help in getting some strong Laws on the Books in Virginia. After all we have Laws on the Federal Level and for over 20 years,the Feds have not upheld them. They did start to rounding them up, but there are Millions out there,so the Feds need to get busy.</p>
<p>The large batch they hauled in recently, did you see the ICE people come down Rt. One and one place they stopped was the corner of Rt. One and P.Wm. Parkway.Don&#8217;t know if they took anyone from there.The other place was P.Wm. Plaza and Todos!<br />
I guess Todo has choosen his side. Too bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whatever</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96080</link>
		<dc:creator>Whatever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 23:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96080</guid>
		<description>Interestingly, Greg, while I do consider myself to be a moderate Democrat, the name for that email address has absolutely nothing to do with politics whatsoever and was actually inspired by a practical joke at the office some years back.  
And while I certainly don't agree with many of John's policy decisions, I do applaus his sincerity and willingness to let Corey steal the limelight on this.  My objections to Corey have little to do with policy because, quite frankly, I have no idea what he stands for other than, well, Corey.  It's unfortunate that most folks pay less attention to local politics than, say, American Idol.  If that weren't the case, Corey's antics would have already been his downfall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, Greg, while I do consider myself to be a moderate Democrat, the name for that email address has absolutely nothing to do with politics whatsoever and was actually inspired by a practical joke at the office some years back.<br />
And while I certainly don&#8217;t agree with many of John&#8217;s policy decisions, I do applaus his sincerity and willingness to let Corey steal the limelight on this.  My objections to Corey have little to do with policy because, quite frankly, I have no idea what he stands for other than, well, Corey.  It&#8217;s unfortunate that most folks pay less attention to local politics than, say, American Idol.  If that weren&#8217;t the case, Corey&#8217;s antics would have already been his downfall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg L</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96078</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96078</guid>
		<description>I've spoken to both Delegates Lingamfelter and Miller, and no, they're not pissed off.  They're pleased that perhaps finally there's some momentum to finally dealing with this issue that the stonewalling Senate might not find so easy to destroy, once again.  They're both adamant that if this issue is to be dealt with at the state level, either the Senate needs to really hear from constituents beyond what they've ever seen before, or the senate has to be replaced.

As for Supervisor Stirrup, he's just happy we made some progress.  Some politicians are all about taking credit, then there are those who just want to get things done.  Stirrup is definitely in the latter group.

So for you Whatever (aka ElephantKiller - now there's a moniker that denotes reasoning and fairness), how about you enjoy watching your Democrat colleagues try to define publicly defensible stands on the issue.  I'd really like to see Dick Saslaw stand up and clearly explain his take on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve spoken to both Delegates Lingamfelter and Miller, and no, they&#8217;re not pissed off.  They&#8217;re pleased that perhaps finally there&#8217;s some momentum to finally dealing with this issue that the stonewalling Senate might not find so easy to destroy, once again.  They&#8217;re both adamant that if this issue is to be dealt with at the state level, either the Senate needs to really hear from constituents beyond what they&#8217;ve ever seen before, or the senate has to be replaced.</p>
<p>As for Supervisor Stirrup, he&#8217;s just happy we made some progress.  Some politicians are all about taking credit, then there are those who just want to get things done.  Stirrup is definitely in the latter group.</p>
<p>So for you Whatever (aka ElephantKiller - now there&#8217;s a moniker that denotes reasoning and fairness), how about you enjoy watching your Democrat colleagues try to define publicly defensible stands on the issue.  I&#8217;d really like to see Dick Saslaw stand up and clearly explain his take on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whatever</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96077</link>
		<dc:creator>Whatever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96077</guid>
		<description>I have to admit, this is absolutely fascinating to watch.  Particularly for those of us who are a little less lemming-like and willing to both pay close attention and read a bit between the lines.

First, it's blantantly obvious from the article that both Scott and Jackson are royally pissed off.  Why?  Because they're our representatives in the HOD, and Corey bypassed them in yet another feeble attempt to bring attention to himself.  And make no mistake, this isn't going to go anywhere at the state level.  Both Delegates practically said as much.  Scott is already poking holes in it, and Jackson shares the fact that he's been working on this in Richmond for several years.  Corey's going to make it happen?  Please.

Speaking of upset politicians, I have to wonder how John Stirrup's taking all of this.  I mean, this was his baby.  He did all of the leg work and heavy lifting on the resolution in PWC.  Corey simply saw which way the wind was blowing, hitched his wagon to a new issue and then made it his own right out from under John's nose.  Ouch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit, this is absolutely fascinating to watch.  Particularly for those of us who are a little less lemming-like and willing to both pay close attention and read a bit between the lines.</p>
<p>First, it&#8217;s blantantly obvious from the article that both Scott and Jackson are royally pissed off.  Why?  Because they&#8217;re our representatives in the HOD, and Corey bypassed them in yet another feeble attempt to bring attention to himself.  And make no mistake, this isn&#8217;t going to go anywhere at the state level.  Both Delegates practically said as much.  Scott is already poking holes in it, and Jackson shares the fact that he&#8217;s been working on this in Richmond for several years.  Corey&#8217;s going to make it happen?  Please.</p>
<p>Speaking of upset politicians, I have to wonder how John Stirrup&#8217;s taking all of this.  I mean, this was his baby.  He did all of the leg work and heavy lifting on the resolution in PWC.  Corey simply saw which way the wind was blowing, hitched his wagon to a new issue and then made it his own right out from under John&#8217;s nose.  Ouch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynic</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96075</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96075</guid>
		<description>june bug and Lovettsville Lady,

"If we don’t there will not be a Country left for our Grandchildren and all future generations."

That is the objective of liberals - destroy the country. 

The 4 time DWI illegal will not be deported. The Open Border crowd will get his deportation order canceled one way or another and then when he is released from prison they will  throw a party for him. It's a good bet that the Chief will be hosting the party. Compassion, you know! Besides, it is our racist society that drove that poor illegal to drink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>june bug and Lovettsville Lady,</p>
<p>&#8220;If we don’t there will not be a Country left for our Grandchildren and all future generations.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is the objective of liberals - destroy the country. </p>
<p>The 4 time DWI illegal will not be deported. The Open Border crowd will get his deportation order canceled one way or another and then when he is released from prison they will  throw a party for him. It&#8217;s a good bet that the Chief will be hosting the party. Compassion, you know! Besides, it is our racist society that drove that poor illegal to drink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lovettsville Lady</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96074</link>
		<dc:creator>Lovettsville Lady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96074</guid>
		<description>Articles like his one should help bolster Corey Stewart's proposal for law:

http://virginiavirtucon.wordpress.com/2010/07/30/an-illegal-immigrant-with-4-dwis/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Articles like his one should help bolster Corey Stewart&#8217;s proposal for law:</p>
<p><a href="http://virginiavirtucon.wordpress.com/2010/07/30/an-illegal-immigrant-with-4-dwis/" rel="nofollow">http://virginiavirtucon.wordpress.com/2010/07/30/an-illegal-immigrant-with-4-dwis/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: june bug</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96072</link>
		<dc:creator>june bug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96072</guid>
		<description>This is one of the greatest undertakings that an Elected Official has put himself forward to do for we the citizens. I applaud Corey Stewart for stepping up and being the kind of Leader we have needed in this County,Country and the United States. Every rule,proposal and Law is and should be for the protection of all of us. It doesn't matter if it's Local, State or Federal one is elected to represent the people and put forth the effort to protect us.
I for one hope that all the General Assembly will study hard what Corey and others have suggested and finally put Laws into place that will protect our Country. We are losing our Identity and we need to get back on track.

I was again very disappointed in our Chief of Police remarking in the News that he would not enforce or back racism.I can not believe that he feels the people want our Country protected and there are Laws on the Books,that says the illegals do not have the right to sneak across the border.And the Chief refers to it as racism!
This is not the Chief I have know all these years and had alot of respect for him a very long time. This is so sad, and I feel he has forgotten his Oath of Office in serving the citizens of our County and State. Yes Chief the citizens who are here legally and applied and waited their turn to become a citizen.

So as this elderly lady is seeing some hope for America to get back to protecting our Country and Our Citizens. I have the Greatest Hopes for Corey, the Board of Supervisors and our General Assembly to honor America and stand united in getting Laws that will enable us to send the Illegals back to where they came from and start over there to improve their Country.

If we don't there will not be a Country left for our Grandchildren and all future generations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the greatest undertakings that an Elected Official has put himself forward to do for we the citizens. I applaud Corey Stewart for stepping up and being the kind of Leader we have needed in this County,Country and the United States. Every rule,proposal and Law is and should be for the protection of all of us. It doesn&#8217;t matter if it&#8217;s Local, State or Federal one is elected to represent the people and put forth the effort to protect us.<br />
I for one hope that all the General Assembly will study hard what Corey and others have suggested and finally put Laws into place that will protect our Country. We are losing our Identity and we need to get back on track.</p>
<p>I was again very disappointed in our Chief of Police remarking in the News that he would not enforce or back racism.I can not believe that he feels the people want our Country protected and there are Laws on the Books,that says the illegals do not have the right to sneak across the border.And the Chief refers to it as racism!<br />
This is not the Chief I have know all these years and had alot of respect for him a very long time. This is so sad, and I feel he has forgotten his Oath of Office in serving the citizens of our County and State. Yes Chief the citizens who are here legally and applied and waited their turn to become a citizen.</p>
<p>So as this elderly lady is seeing some hope for America to get back to protecting our Country and Our Citizens. I have the Greatest Hopes for Corey, the Board of Supervisors and our General Assembly to honor America and stand united in getting Laws that will enable us to send the Illegals back to where they came from and start over there to improve their Country.</p>
<p>If we don&#8217;t there will not be a Country left for our Grandchildren and all future generations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter E. Kurtz</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96069</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter E. Kurtz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96069</guid>
		<description>Just before I turned 10 years old, I made up a list of possible birthday gifts.   Topping the list was a horse.  I showed my parents the list.  For various reasons, they could not get me a horse.  

Over 40 years later, I've got my horse(s).  But it took a lot of hard work.  No one ever gave one to me.  

Corey has shown us his wish list.  Maybe with a lot of hard work, he can get some of it.  But I doubt anyone is going to give it to him just for writing it down and showing it to us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just before I turned 10 years old, I made up a list of possible birthday gifts.   Topping the list was a horse.  I showed my parents the list.  For various reasons, they could not get me a horse.  </p>
<p>Over 40 years later, I&#8217;ve got my horse(s).  But it took a lot of hard work.  No one ever gave one to me.  </p>
<p>Corey has shown us his wish list.  Maybe with a lot of hard work, he can get some of it.  But I doubt anyone is going to give it to him just for writing it down and showing it to us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96068</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96068</guid>
		<description>Stewart has drafted nothing.  IRLI did it.  And it absolutely cannot survive intact due to the 'one object rule' on legislation in the General Assembly.  Bob Marshall regulary goes on the warpath (and usually succeeds) when someone tries to violate the one object rule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stewart has drafted nothing.  IRLI did it.  And it absolutely cannot survive intact due to the &#8216;one object rule&#8217; on legislation in the General Assembly.  Bob Marshall regulary goes on the warpath (and usually succeeds) when someone tries to violate the one object rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoVA Scout</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96065</link>
		<dc:creator>NoVA Scout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96065</guid>
		<description>Apparently, he doesn't read the papers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, he doesn&#8217;t read the papers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disgusted</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96062</link>
		<dc:creator>Disgusted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96062</guid>
		<description>Stewart has drafted a nice piece of legislation.  I hope it survives intact next session of the GA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stewart has drafted a nice piece of legislation.  I hope it survives intact next session of the GA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Patriot (Got E-Verify???)</title>
		<link>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96055</link>
		<dc:creator>The Patriot (Got E-Verify???)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2010/07/29/the-rule-of-law-act-unveiled/#comment-96055</guid>
		<description>http://www.numbersusa.com/content/news/july-29-2010/uscis-memo-details-administrations-plan-provide-mass-amnesty-through-executive-act
"A newly revealed memo, obtained by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) who is leading the fight against amnesty, shows Obama Administration officials offering a detailed plan that would offer actual or de facto amnesty to millions of illegal aliens without Congress ever taking a vote."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.numbersusa.com/content/news/july-29-2010/uscis-memo-details-administrations-plan-provide-mass-amnesty-through-executive-act" rel="nofollow">http://www.numbersusa.com/content/news/july-29-2010/uscis-memo-details-administrations-plan-provide-mass-amnesty-through-executive-act</a><br />
&#8220;A newly revealed memo, obtained by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) who is leading the fight against amnesty, shows Obama Administration officials offering a detailed plan that would offer actual or de facto amnesty to millions of illegal aliens without Congress ever taking a vote.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
