Driving liberals, dhimmis and illegal alien apologists absolutely insane since 2005...

Yeah, Go With That You Moonbats

By Greg L | 6 November 2010 | DPVA, Virginia Politics | 17 Comments

If you want to peer into the twisted psyche of today’s moonbat reeling in reaction to the midterm elections, grab plenty of duct tape and head on over to “Blue Virginia.” There you can find out how they believe their political future relies upon fostering a Communist revolution to sweep away free markets, replace them with a command-and-control economy, and “re-educate” the proletarian masses to love political philosophies handed down by Democrat Party “elites.” About the only substantial difference between today’s manifesto and the one penned long ago by Karl Marx is that this one is penned in English.

Here in all its glory is the action plan by Teddy Goodson that lays waste to any notion that there’s a whit of difference between the Marxism-Leninism and “Progressives:”

Democrats must enunciate an alternate political-economic theory to replace the pernicious Free Market Theory so beloved of Republicans. It sanctified personal greed and the unregulated mystic “free market.” It brought us a new form of ruthless colonialism, and inevitably the Wall Street meltdown, economic collapse, and environmental degradation. Although worshiped as “capitalism,” today’s finance-dominated international corporotism is capitalism on steroids, and it deserves another name and a better description. Economic theory has moved beyond the Keynesian ideas of the mid-twentieth century, and it is time now to get rid of Friedmanism as well. Free market capitalism still has value, but lacks a mechanism for including social costs and environmental costs in its pricing mechanisms, it clearly cannot cope with computer-driven stock markets to direct capital flows—- in fact it fails on a global and macro level not merely to describe the market but to allocate investment well on its own. Democrats do have the basics of a political-economic philosophy describing the purpose of government. One short-hand description is the slogan “We’re in this together.” If you cannot agree, you should not be considered a Democrat.

When efforts to bring about social or political change fail initially, the most effective answer is to “take it to the people.” Arnold Toynbee, in his monumental Study of History, pointed out that it is the elites who bring along the vast majority of people, educating them to accept improvements. When intellectuals in Tsarist Russia failed repeatedly in attempts to Europeanize (read “modernize”) Russia they gave up on bringing change through the aristocratic elites, and “went to the people.” One reason the Republicans have been successful is their relentless training of the public in their version of free market capitalism. Therefore, progressives will have to stop talking endlessly to each other, and personally educate Americans on Democratic values and philosophy, especially in contrast to the Republican worship of impersonal, corporate greed and the wealthy haves versus the have-nots. Union organizers and social workers understand this well, and the techniques are already well understood. Lakoff has already provided lessons in re-framing issues and the dialog necessary to re-program minds into seeing and understanding things from a progressive point of view. Such re-programming is not easy; it requires constant repetition from the highest level on down by every progressive in every community.

Really, just soak in this hard-core Communist goodness.  It has everything.  Destroy capitalism.  Impose a command economy run by political elites to replace it.  Re-educate the populace to accept the end of their liberty, for the collective good.  There’s even a reference in there about how the Communist Revolution in Russia was somehow a good thing.  Folks, this roadmap endorsed by the biggest “progressive” mouthpiece in the Commonwealth is the future they envision for America. It is Soviet-style Communism, plain and simple, and in pretty stark and refreshingly unambiguous terms.

The next two years ought to be really interesting.  In a debate between those who wish to restore the founding principles of our republic and those who want to replace it with a Communist utopia, given just how strongly the current administration is showing us what the reality of that utopia might actually look like, I figure the exchange will end pretty darned quickly.

Let’s hope this is the actual game plan of the “progressive” movement.  I really doubt their attempts going forward to “re-program minds” with Communist ideology is going to be any more successful than their efforts to do so in the sixties and seventies.  The ultimate result of that effort led to this, which is a fitting final word to this stunning nonsense.

The opinions expressed here are solely the views of the author, and not representative of the position of any organization, political party, doughnut shop, knitting guild, or waste recycling facility, but may be correctly attributed to the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy. If anything in the above article has offended you, please click here to receive an immediate apology.

BVBL is not a charity and your support is not tax-deductible.

You can follow the discussion through the Comments feed. You can also pingback or trackback from your own site.


  1. Disgusted said on 7 Nov 2010 at 8:35 am:
    Flag comment

    Don’t get your panties in such a bind, Greg. Most of use in the middle ain’t buyin their crap just like ain’t butin all that tea party crap. Common sense will prevail.

    I DO like the Reagan video!

  2. Uncle Caveman said on 7 Nov 2010 at 10:57 am:
    Flag comment


    As a fairly hardcore Democrat, I can assure you that most of us don’t even remotely agree with those sentiments. Capitalism needs some modest checks and balances, but it’s still far and away the best thing going.

  3. legal2 said on 7 Nov 2010 at 1:01 pm:
    Flag comment

    Russia has successfully spread her error of Communism throughout many continents. The battle in the USA has been ongoing for at least a century. See Bella Dodd’s story at http://www.scribd.com/doc/8634527/Bella-Dodd-School-of-Darkness
    Miss Dodd testified at the McCarthy hearings (which were of course villified by those “innocent” Reds). She admits her complicity within the teachers’ unions, but offers plenty of additional and interesting inside information. You can discover how the foothold began in this country. A good read for explaining how we got where we are. (I just wish that the present-day Amerikan Marxxists would leave us alone and go to a country of their choosing where they can enjoy the governments that they so admire. At least now, while we are still free to come and go.)

  4. legal2 said on 7 Nov 2010 at 1:10 pm:
    Flag comment

    And thanks, Greg, for the video - a breath of fresh air, and something that should be shown regularly to the uneducated, indoctrinated masses that have gone through our public schools learning revisionist history, denigrating our country, ignoring its founding principles, and living diversity rather than unity.

  5. USA said on 7 Nov 2010 at 3:24 pm:
    Flag comment

    Problem with the left is that while they rant bout not being socialists - they elect, support and defend hard core socialists.

    Every time.

  6. Uncle Caveman said on 7 Nov 2010 at 5:39 pm:
    Flag comment

    Yeah, yeah… and all muslims are terrorists, all republicans are racists, etc..

  7. USA said on 7 Nov 2010 at 8:11 pm:
    Flag comment

    “Dig It. First they killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with them, they even shoved a fork into a victim’s stomach! Wild!”
    -Weather Underground leader and wife of Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn

    Good friend and political associate of Barack Hussein Obama.

    ’splain that one.

  8. Anonymous said on 7 Nov 2010 at 11:15 pm:
    Flag comment

    Obama is learn’t to have asked Mukherjee about the entry of communists in India into the parliamentary system in India.


    Whata Putz.

    “Earlier this week, I posted about the Republican takeover of the House, and the role of Constitutionalism and the Tea Party in the win. I also made some important points about where to go when the Republican Party ultimately drops the ball.

    OreoThunder left a comment that took nine paragraphs to say what it took the likes of Hannity and Limbaugh multiple volumes to say. Were Harry Kalas alive today, he would have had to call it just like he would have a Michael Jack Schmidt home run … OUTAA HEERREE!!!!! Here it is in its entirety for all to savor:

    We conservatives have rallied against what we see as President Barack Obama’s “wealth redistribution” policies. For us, Obama’s infamous meeting with Joe the Plumber, during which the future president said he wanted to “spread the wealth around,” was a defining moment.

    Nearly two years into Obama’s presidency, the debate about government’s role in redistributing wealth continues to be a central one in American politics. Too often, however, conservatives allow this debate to center around the issue of “fairness.” Liberals believe it would be “fair” if the “wealthy” were taxed more in order to support government programs intended to benefit the less fortunate. Conservatives counter that no “fairness” can exist in a society where income is forcibly taken from those who have earned it, regardless of the intent.

    Such a debate will never be settled. Words such as “fair” and “wealthy” defy definition, and any argument that presupposes a shared meaning is doomed from the start. The real challenge for liberals, then, is not in convincing conservatives of the true definition of “fair” or how much income makes one “wealthy.” The real challenge facing liberals is a much more basic one. In order to present a truly sound argument for redistributing wealth, liberals must focus not on distribution at all. Instead, they must solve for wealth creation.

    Any government with a sufficiently armed police force has the ability to redistribute wealth. There’s nothing complicated about forcing an individual to give up some or even all of his or her wealth at the threat of incarceration. That’s easy. The dilemma, however, lies in doing so while at the same time maintaining an environment in which those who create wealth are motivated to continue doing so.

    If wealth simply appeared out of nowhere, the liberal view of “fair” distribution would certainly have merit, especially from a purely social perspective. Who could argue that a free and abundant resource should be equally shared by all? Wealth, however, does not simply appear. It is the result of ingenuity, effort and risk-taking. If we fail to make it worthwhile — or make it unnecessarily burdensome — for individuals and organizations to apply ingenuity, put forth effort and take risks, there no longer exists an incentive to create wealth.

    Because a policy of redistribution destroys the motivation to create wealth, such a policy cannot be sustained. There is a terminal point to a policy of wealth redistribution — the inevitable point where wealth creation simply ceases, or at least decreases to a level that cannot support the standard of living enjoyed at the policy’s inception.

    Liberals must solve for wealth creation. Any policy that seeks to redistribute wealth but at the same time decreases the incentive for its creation will ultimately collapse on itself. For liberal policies to work, there must exist at the same time an increasing tax burden on wealth and an increasing incentive to create wealth. This paradox is not overcome by some vague concept of “fairness.” Basic economics cannot be permanently ignored.

    This liberal dilemma is an example of something we see more and more in today’s political environment: a clash between social ideology and economic reality. We can even go back to the 2008 economic downturn to see this dynamic at work. A social ideology (everyone should own a home) led to government-mandated lending practices that ultimately ran headlong into economic reality (not everyone can repay a home loan). The result was economic disaster.

    It is an interesting irony that the very capitalism decried by liberals is responsible for the wealth they want to redistribute under their banner of “fairness.” Until, however, they can adequately solve for creation — rather than simply call for redistribution — their arguments amount to nothing more than hollow, irrational ranting. Perhaps this is what Winston Churchill meant when he said, “If you’re 20 and not liberal you have no heart, but if you’re 40 and not conservative, you have no brain.”


  9. Anonymous said on 7 Nov 2010 at 11:25 pm:
    Flag comment

    Michael Moore Threatens the Dems


    MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell Admits He’s a Socialist


  10. NoGreed said on 9 Nov 2010 at 12:41 am:
    Flag comment

    What the heck has Obama done so far?: http://whattheheckhasobamadonesofar.com/

  11. Freedom said on 9 Nov 2010 at 6:03 am:
    Flag comment

    …and don’t forget, NoGreed, Obama and his minions did it whether the American people wanted it or not…and they were warned repeatedly. Of course, Obama got his “thank you,” — the lowest approval rating in modern history, a loss of 60+ seats in the House of Representatives, 6 seats in the Senate and numerous state legislators and Governors.

    That’s a good thing NoGreed, we simply can’t afford more of Obama’s greed.

  12. Anonymous said on 9 Nov 2010 at 6:18 am:
    Flag comment

    MSNBC Host Dylan Ratigan and Lefty Guest Ted Rall Agree: Violent Revolution by The Left Might be Necessary…


  13. legal2 said on 9 Nov 2010 at 6:35 am:
    Flag comment

    I also heard that Pelosi made history by having the shortest tenure as SOH! Here’s a little post-election fun (after the short ad: http://dailycaller.com/2010/11/04/glenn-beck-holds-gloat-fest-2010-video/

  14. Anonymous said on 9 Nov 2010 at 6:19 pm:
    Flag comment

    Obama: “I’m So Glad To Meet an Indian Communist, I’m Told You’re Part of The Political Mainstream Here”…


  15. Anonymous said on 10 Nov 2010 at 5:35 am:
    Flag comment

    Ahhh, yes. Communism …

    It’s just like the other “religion of peace”.

    … submit, convert or die.

    And as Elvis Costello once implored in song … “what’s so funny ’bout peace, love and understanding….”

  16. Anonymous said on 10 Nov 2010 at 6:02 am:
    Flag comment

    Think of this the next time some leftist starts lecturing you about the need for tolerance, diversity and inclusion…


    Somali Gangs in Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota Busted in Teen Sex Trafficking Ring.


  17. Black Saint said on 12 Nov 2010 at 4:45 pm:
    Flag comment

    Obama and the loony left wing of the Open borders, Multiculturalism wing of the Democrat party must be the only species on the face of the earth that cannot or will not learn from experience, even Animals learn from experience!

    The Socialist countries in Europe , Britain, France, Germany, Greece etc. have finally recognized Socialism and the Welfare State with unlimited immigration of uneducated, prolific breeding third world parasites flooding in to get on the public dole, does not work and are cutting back government, including numbers, wages, & benefits in order to survive as a Nation and returning to capitalism.

    While here in the USA Obama and the Democrats are hell bent on taking the USA to a welfare socialist paradise in spite of proof all over the world and in the failed Blue States here that it does not work.

    Illinois, Calif, New York, New Jersey, all Blue States that have been controlled by Democrat Majorities for years and long enough to try there taxing, spending and vote buying of public union members by giving wages and benefits that is bankrupting the government while pandering to illegal Aliens, are now seeing the results, all are bordering on bankruptcy.

    Now Obama is following the same blueprint on a vastly bigger scale for the rest of American using 100,s of billion of the simulate money to reward Democrat supporters and to keep the under worked and overpaid public unions in jobs and buy Workfare & Welfare votes!

    The same multi-trillion dollar con job Obama is attempting, by open borders and giving Amnesty to the invading horde of Criminals & Uneducated Prolific breeding third world parasites & with chain immigration all the ones still left in Mexico to buy 10,s of millions of welfare votes for the Democrat party with money borrowed from China while bankrupting this Nation.

    With the future & further goal of turning the USA into a Spanish speaking Third World Slum modeled on Mexico but controlled Lock, Stock & Barrel by the Socialist/Democrat party Dictatorship of the United Sates of Mexico!

    Capitalism is the unequal sharing of wealth, Socialism is the equal sharing of misery, with the exception of the elitist ruling class they still live like royalty on the misery of the rest, which is Obama’s and the Democrats plan for Them & Us.

Comments are closed.

Views: 2150