Driving liberals, dhimmis and illegal alien apologists absolutely insane since 2005...

Ralph Northam: Kill Babies So They Don’t Suffer Anxiety

By Greg L | 16 October 2013 | Virginia Politics | 19 Comments

Here you have it, voters of Virginia.  The Ralph Northam supporters say that 4 in 10 unplanned pregnancies end in abortions, but that’s “okay” because those dead children are spared from the possibility of suffering anxiety or remorse.  You apparently can save people from all sorts of problems in life if you simply exterminate them before they have the opportunity to experience life at all.

When you have a campaign funded by NARAL and Planned Parenthood, celebrating the death of innocent human beings isn’t just a footnote for a political campaign, it’s the focus of that campaign to the exclusion of nearly all else.  Killing babies is big business, and those donors expect a big return on that investment.

Does anyone other than me find it curious that a pediatrician casts his lot with people who think that if someone “responsible” enough to kill their unborn baby is likely not responsible enough to love their own child?  Is this what Northam thinks himself, or is it all about the abortion industry’s direct contributions and fundraising activity on his behalf?  You’d think that someone who personally encounters parent’s love for their own children on such a regular basis would recoil at such horrid and preposterous notions.

Every time I have seen Ralph Northam speak,  abortion is the first subject he brings up.  Nearly every time I see a campaign advertisement from Northam, it concerns protecting the abortion industry.  For someone who loudly complains about divisive social issues in the campaign at every opportunity, he sure has an unusual penchant for making those issues his central focus.  Abortion.  All the time, anyplace, for any reason or no reason at all.  This isn’t a political campaign, it’s a walking, talking, Planned Parenthood advertisement in an endless loop.

Virginia does have a choice, though.  There’s a far better one than the endless abortion shill of Ralph Northam.



The opinions expressed here are solely the views of the author, and not representative of the position of any organization, political party, doughnut shop, knitting guild, or waste recycling facility, but may be correctly attributed to the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy. If anything in the above article has offended you, please click here to receive an immediate apology.

BVBL is not a charity and your support is not tax-deductible.

You can follow the discussion through the Comments feed. You can also pingback or trackback from your own site.

19 Comments

  1. Loudoun Lady said on 16 Oct 2013 at 5:55 pm:
    Flag comment

    Ralph is obsessed with abortion, it’s creepy to listen to him. Put in context that he is a pediatrician and it is downright disturbing.

  2. Done with 'em said on 16 Oct 2013 at 6:13 pm:
    Flag comment

    Ralph is pathetic. “McAwful” is, well, awful and Herring is inauthentic, but Northam is debased. Truly so…

  3. Cynic said on 16 Oct 2013 at 7:45 pm:
    Flag comment

    Terry McAuliffe will win the election. Will be Virginia’s next Governor. Many of his out of State supporters will be become in state supporters.

    And, Virginia will become a Right to Work State.
    It will soon “enjoy” more restrictive gun control laws - similar to California’s and Colorado’s.

    And, there will be no significant political differences between it and Maryland.

    And these changes will be considered Progress!

  4. Cynic said on 17 Oct 2013 at 8:20 am:
    Flag comment

    “And, Virginia will become a Right to Work State.”

    Correction: And, Virginia will become a Non-Right to Work State.

  5. Reasonable and Rational said on 17 Oct 2013 at 8:47 am:
    Flag comment

    How does one invest in the “Abortion Industry”?

  6. Greg L said on 17 Oct 2013 at 9:27 am:
    Flag comment

    Planned Parenthood has about one billion dollars in assets and earned $500 million in profits over the past decade.

  7. Greg sucks said on 17 Oct 2013 at 3:37 pm:
    Flag comment

    Maybe if you scum sucking republicans actually gave a shiat about kids after they were born, it wouldn’t be a problem. But since you evil, cruel, unchristian scumbags like denying help to the poor, you can go suck it, you shiatheads. Too bad your party is dying and nobody cares what you primitive whack jobs think.

  8. Cynic said on 17 Oct 2013 at 4:22 pm:
    Flag comment

    @Greg sucks

    Not a republican, But,

    unless they are my kids, why should I care about kids or be paying to support them?
    isn’t caring and supporting them the responsibility of parents?

  9. Done with 'em said on 17 Oct 2013 at 5:45 pm:
    Flag comment

    @Greg sucks,

    Why all the anger, little man…did your EBT card not work this week? Ahhh poor baby…try some warm milk and cookies–maybe a little nap…you’ll feel better….

  10. Skepp said on 17 Oct 2013 at 6:04 pm:
    Flag comment

    Cynic

    All children are our children. Why? Because they are the future of our country. And your children will have to deal with the uncared for children, if everybody felt like you. Is that what you want?

    Many children, through no fault of their own, have been born into dysfunctional families
    or no family at all.
    Should you not care about their lives? They deserve our support, at least during their
    early years when they are helpless pawns in life.

  11. Greg sucks said on 17 Oct 2013 at 9:38 pm:
    Flag comment

    Shiat, I’m an atheist, and it never ceases to amaze me how much more moral I am than self professed Christians. You people with your “got mine screw you” attitudes are enemies of every principle upon which this country was founded. You’re the American Taliban. You selfish bastards need to go somewhere and quietly color in a corner while the adults set about fixing things. Your fascination with fetuses, but your total lack of interest in actual people is disgusting.

  12. Greg L said on 17 Oct 2013 at 11:13 pm:
    Flag comment

    You sir are an unparalleled expert at digging yourself into a hole and represent your candidate of choice superbly. Northam celebrates slaughtering innocent babies and you chime right in to top it off with vitriol and insults directed at anyone who thinks this might not be a good idea.

    I really think you ought to pursue a career in political communications for “progressive” causes and candidates. You have a fascinating methodology that seems to involve making everyone despise you and your position and I would be fascinated to see how that turns out.

    Thanks for sharing. You made my day.

  13. Done with 'em said on 18 Oct 2013 at 5:57 am:
    Flag comment

    Clearly he (@Greg sucks) needs a nap…poor little boy, so cranky…really I do think some warm milk and a cookie will make him feel better, then maybe he can play nicely with other…but, probably not…

  14. Rasmus said on 18 Oct 2013 at 2:51 pm:
    Flag comment

    Problem is, the sumbitch votes.

  15. Wolverine said on 19 Oct 2013 at 1:12 am:
    Flag comment

    Sounds like that “atheist” escaped from custody somewhere.

  16. Done with 'em said on 19 Oct 2013 at 8:01 am:
    Flag comment

    He’s a punk…probably would cry to his mommy the first time somebody punched him in the nose…

  17. James Young said on 22 Oct 2013 at 9:36 pm:
    Flag comment

    I don’t care if you’re pro-abortion: that is the most deeply offensive advertisement for a political candidate that I’ve ever seen. If it were more widely viewed, E.W. Jackson would win in a landslide.

  18. charles said on 23 Oct 2013 at 5:35 pm:
    Flag comment

    I actually think that some of these democrats are upset that they are NOT allowed to kill babies after they are born, since the arguments used to defend abortion would apply equally well to a 2-year-old whose mother is tired of them.

    As to the anonymous person who thinks republicans are the problem — there are organizations ready to arrange adoptions for the unwanted children, and clinics ready to help the mothers to complete the pregnancy, and liberals like to target these clinics for not killing the babies.

    You could argue that special-needs kids have a hard time getting adopted, but since most of the abortions are of normal kids, that argument is largely moot.

  19. D. Bowman said on 29 Nov 2013 at 2:24 pm:
    Flag comment

    “Greg Sucks” seems to be suffering from severe anxiety judging by the context of his posts. Sounds like a perfect candidate for abortion if one uses Democrat reasoning.

Leave a Reply



Views: 1338